Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Predicting functional movement capacity in adults: the effect of range of motion and isometric strength.
Özkan, Mazhar; Canli, Umut; Alwhaibi, Reem; Ustaömer, Kübra; Karaçam, Aydin; Orhan, Bekir Erhan; Bohn, Lucimere; Sivrikaya, Kenan; Sönmeyenmakas, Aytekin; Gonzalez, Pablo Prieto.
Afiliação
  • Özkan M; Faculty of Medicine, Tekirdag Namik Kemal University, Tekirdag, Türkiye.
  • Canli U; Faculty of Sports Sciences, Tekirdag Namik Kemal University, Tekirdag, Türkiye. ucanli@nku.edu.tr.
  • Alwhaibi R; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh, 11671, Saudi Arabia.
  • Ustaömer K; Faculty of Medicine, Tekirdag Namik Kemal University, Tekirdag, Türkiye.
  • Karaçam A; Faculty of Sports Sciences, Istanbul Aydin University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
  • Orhan BE; Faculty of Sports Sciences, Bandirma Onyedi Eylül University, Bandirma, Türkiye.
  • Bohn L; Centro de Investigação em Desporto, Educação Física, Exercício e Saúde (CIDEFES), Lusófona University, Porto, Portugal.
  • Sivrikaya K; Faculty of Sports Sciences, Istanbul Aydin University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
  • Sönmeyenmakas A; Faculty of Sports Sciences, Istanbul Aydin University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
  • Gonzalez PP; Sport Sciences and Diagnostics Research Group, GSD-HPE Department, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil ; 16(1): 145, 2024 Jul 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38956714
ABSTRACT
The aim of the study was to determine the role of isometric strength and range of motion in predicting Functional Movement Screen (FMS) scores of adults. A total of 120 participants (age = 34.62 ± 11.82 years; height = 170.56 ± 9.63 cm; weight = 73.62 ± 15.39 kg) volunteered to participate in the study. Anthropometric measurements were performed, including height, body weight, muscle mass, and body fat. Following this, the ranges of motion of the shoulder, hip, knee, and ankle joints were measured sequentially. Isometric strength and FMS tests were then performed. Hip extension isometric strength explained 23% of the variation in FMStotal. The common effect of knee flexion, shoulder flexion, and dorsiflexion joint range of motion explained 34% of the change in FMStotal (F (3-116) = 20.375, p < 0.001). A significant relationship (R = 0.658, R2 = 0.413) was found between hip extension isometric strength, knee flexion, shoulder flexion, and dorsiflexion range of motion and FMStotal (F (4-115) = 21.952, p < 0.001). The common effect of all these variables explains 43% of the change in FMStotal. The results indicate that the FMS test scores, which are utilized to evaluate the risk of injury in sedentary adults, can be significantly predicted by the effect of hip extension isometric strength and parameters related to knee flexion, shoulder flexion, and dorsiflexion joint range of motion. At this time, it is advised that range of motion and isometric strength be taken into account when determining a person's functional movement capacity.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article