Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Optimizing the use of Ki-67 proliferative index as a prognostic biomarker in meningiomas using digital analysis.
Thirunavu, Vineeth; Drumm, Michael; McCord, Matthew; Steffens, Alicia; Youngblood, Mark W; Nandoliya, Khizar R; Smith, Heather; Walshon, Jordain; McCortney, Kathleen; Magill, Stephen T; Horbinski, Craig.
Afiliação
  • Thirunavu V; Departments of1Neurological Surgery and.
  • Drumm M; Departments of1Neurological Surgery and.
  • McCord M; 2Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Steffens A; Departments of1Neurological Surgery and.
  • Youngblood MW; Departments of1Neurological Surgery and.
  • Nandoliya KR; Departments of1Neurological Surgery and.
  • Smith H; 2Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Walshon J; Departments of1Neurological Surgery and.
  • McCortney K; Departments of1Neurological Surgery and.
  • Magill ST; Departments of1Neurological Surgery and.
  • Horbinski C; Departments of1Neurological Surgery and.
J Neurosurg ; : 1-11, 2024 Jul 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38968615
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Ki-67 immunohistochemistry is widely used as a prognostic marker in meningiomas, but visual estimations tend to be imprecise. Whether the average Ki-67 over an entire slide, a particular block, or areas of high staining (hotspots) is prognostic for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) is unknown. This study aimed to generate evidence-based recommendations for the optimal use of Ki-67 immunohistochemistry in the workup of meningiomas.

METHODS:

All tissue blocks from a retrospective cohort of 221 patients with primary meningioma (141 WHO grade 1, 64 WHO grade 2, 16 WHO grade 3) were immunostained for Ki-67 and scanned using automated digital analysis software. QuPath was used to quantify the average Ki-67 proliferation index per slide as well as the Ki-67 hotspot in a 2.2-mm2 area within each slide. The best block was defined subjectively by a neuropathologist as the most representative tissue block from each case. The pathology report Ki-67 was determined by visual estimation. Age, sex, WHO grade, extent of resection, tumor location, and quantitative Ki-67 labeling were tested to determine risk factors for RFS and OS.

RESULTS:

Multivariable analyses demonstrated that WHO grade 2 (HR 2.42, p = 0.018), subtotal resection (HR 8.16, p < 0.0001), near-total resection (HR 2.24, p = 0.041), QuPath Ki-67 averaged across all blocks (HR per % increase = 1.72, p = 0.030), and pathology report Ki-67 (HR per % increase = 1.05, p = 0.0026) were associated with shorter RFS. The average Ki-67 in the best block, maximum across all slides, and maximum hotspot in the best block were not associated with RFS. Only male sex was independently associated with shorter OS (HR 8.52, p = 0.0003). The pathology report Ki-67 was, on average, 6.5 times higher than the QuPath average.

CONCLUSIONS:

These data on Ki-67 in meningiomas indicate the following 1) visual estimation substantially overestimates Ki-67, 2) digital quantification of average Ki-67 across all tissue blocks provides more prognostic information than small hotspot regions or an entire single block, and 3) Ki-67 is not informative for OS. The results suggest that best practices for incorporating Ki-67 into meningioma prognostication include digital quantification of average Ki-67 over multiple blocks.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article