Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Resource and animal use implications of the proposed REACH information requirements for endocrine disruptor assessment.
Burden, Natalie; Brown, Rebecca J; Smith, Rhiannon; Brescia, Susy; Goodband, Tracey; Guerrero-Limón, Gustavo; Kent, Lauren; Marty, Sue; Pearson, Audrey; van der Mescht, Morné; Saunders, Leslie J; Sewell, Fiona; Wang, Neil; Wheeler, James R.
Afiliação
  • Burden N; NC3Rs, Gibbs Building, 215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE, UK. Electronic address: natalie.burden@nc3rs.org.uk.
  • Brown RJ; Wca, Brunel House, Volunteer Way, Faringdon, Oxfordshire, SN7 7YR, UK.
  • Smith R; Wca, Brunel House, Volunteer Way, Faringdon, Oxfordshire, SN7 7YR, UK.
  • Brescia S; Chemicals Regulation Division, Health and Safety Executive, Redgrave Court, Bootle, Merseyside, L20 7HS, UK.
  • Goodband T; Smithers ERS Limited, 108 Woodfield Drive, Harrogate, North Yorkshire, HG1 4LS, UK.
  • Guerrero-Limón G; Concawe, Brussels, 1160, Belgium. Electronic address: environment@concawe.eu.
  • Kent L; Corteva Agriscience, Regulatory Innovation Centre, 101E Park Drive, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, OX14 4RY, UK.
  • Marty S; The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, MI, USA.
  • Pearson A; Environment Agency, Red Kite House, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BD, UK.
  • van der Mescht M; Environment Agency, Red Kite House, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BD, UK.
  • Saunders LJ; Concawe, Brussels, 1160, Belgium. Electronic address: environment@concawe.eu.
  • Sewell F; NC3Rs, Gibbs Building, 215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE, UK.
  • Wang N; Syensqo, 52, Rue de La Haie Coq, 93300, Aubervilliers, France.
  • Wheeler JR; Corteva Agriscience, Zuid-Oostsingel 24D, 4611 BB, Bergen op Zoom, the Netherlands.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 151: 105671, 2024 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38968967
ABSTRACT
Revised information requirements for endocrine disruptor (ED) assessment of chemicals under the European Union's Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) Regulation have been proposed. Implementation will substantially increase demands for new data to inform ED assessment. This article evaluates the potential animal use and financial resource associated with two proposed ED policy options, and highlights areas where further clarification is warranted. This evaluation demonstrates that studies potentially conducted to meet the proposed requirements could use tens of millions of animals, and that the approach is unlikely to be feasible in practice. Given the challenges with implementing either policy option and the need to minimise the reliance on animal testing, further consideration and clarification is needed on several aspects prior to implementation of the requirements. This includes how testing will be prioritised in a proportionate approach; how to harness new approach methodologies to waive higher-tier animal testing; and need for provision of clear guidance particularly in applying weight-of-evidence approaches. There is now a clear opportunity for the European Commission to lead the way in developing a robust and transparent ED assessment process for industrial chemicals which fully implements replacement, refinement, and reduction of the use of animals (the 3Rs).
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Disruptores Endócrinos / União Europeia Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Disruptores Endócrinos / União Europeia Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article