Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Most Cited Publications in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction-A Bibliometric Analysis.
Daneshi, Kian; Imantalab Kordmahaleh, Delaram; Rupra, Roshan S; Butler, Charles E; Khajuria, Ankur.
Afiliação
  • Daneshi K; From the School of Medicine and Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdon.
  • Imantalab Kordmahaleh D; School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom.
  • Rupra RS; Department of Surgery, James Paget University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Great Yarmouth, United Kingdom.
  • Butler CE; Houston, TX.
Ann Plast Surg ; 2024 Jul 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38984745
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) is a treatment option for structural defects of the abdominal wall. The most frequently cited publications related to AWR have not been quantitatively or qualitatively assessed. This bibliometric analysis characterizes and assesses the most frequently cited AWR publications, to identify trends, gaps, and guide future efforts for the international research community.

METHODS:

The 100 most cited publications in AWR were identified on Web of Science, across all available journal years (from May 1964 to December 2023). Study details, including the citation count, main content focus, and outcome measures, were extracted and tabulated from each publication. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine levels of evidence (LOE) of each study were also assessed.

RESULTS:

The 100 most cited publications in AWR were cited by a total of 9674 publications. Citations per publication ranged from 43 to 414 (mean 96.7 ± 52.48). Most publications were LOE 3 (n = 60), representative of the large number of retrospective cohort studies. The number of publications for LOE 5, 4, 3, 2, and 1 was 21, 2, 60, 2, and 12, respectively. The main content focus was surgical technique in 44 publications followed by outcomes in 38 publications. Patient-reported outcome measures were used in 3 publications, and no publications reported validated esthetic outcome measures.

CONCLUSIONS:

Overall, 3 was the LOE for most frequently cited AWR publications, with more publications below LOE 3 than above LOE 3. Validated outcome measures and patient-reported outcome measures were infrequently incorporated in the studies evaluated.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article