Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Surveillance after surgery for pancreatic cancer: a global scoping review of guidelines and a nordic Survey of contemporary practice.
Ansari, Daniel; Søreide, Kjetil; Andersson, Bodil; Hansen, Carsten Palnæs; Seppänen, Hanna; Sparrelid, Ernesto; Labori, Knut Jørgen; Kirkegård, Jakob; Kauhanen, Saila; Månsson, Christopher; Nymo, Linn Såve; Nortunen, Minna; Björnsson, Bergthor; Kivivuori, Antti; Tingstedt, Bobby; Bratlie, Svein-Olav; Waardal, Kim; Laukkarinen, Johanna; Halimi, Asif; Lindberg, Hannes; Olin, Håkan; Andersson, Roland.
Afiliação
  • Ansari D; Department of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
  • Søreide K; Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
  • Andersson B; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
  • Hansen CP; Department of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
  • Seppänen H; Department of Surgery, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Denmark.
  • Sparrelid E; Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Meilahti Hospital, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Labori KJ; Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Kirkegård J; Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • Kauhanen S; Department of Surgery, HPB Section, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Månsson C; Division of Digestive Surgery and Urology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
  • Nymo LS; Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Nortunen M; Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
  • Björnsson B; Department of Surgery, Oulu University Hospital and Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
  • Kivivuori A; Department of Surgery in Linköping and Department of Biomedicine and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
  • Tingstedt B; Department of Surgery, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
  • Bratlie SO; Department of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
  • Waardal K; Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Laukkarinen J; Department of Acute and Digestive Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
  • Halimi A; Department of Gastroenterology and Alimentary Tract Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Finland.
  • Lindberg H; Department of Diagnostics and Intervention, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
  • Olin H; Department of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
  • Andersson R; Department of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Scand J Gastroenterol ; : 1-8, 2024 Jul 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38994854
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Most patients with pancreatic cancer who have undergone surgical resection eventually develop disease recurrence. |This study aimed to investigate whether there is evidence to support routine surveillance after pancreatic cancer surgery, with a secondary aim of analyzing the implementation of surveillance strategies in the Nordic countries. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A scoping review was conducted to identify clinical practice guidelines globally and research studies relating to surveillance after pancreatic cancer resection. This was followed by a survey among 20 pancreatic units from four Nordic countries to assess their current practice of follow-up for operated patients.

RESULTS:

Altogether 16 clinical practice guidelines and 17 research studies were included. The guidelines provided inconsistent recommendations regarding postoperative surveillance of pancreatic cancer. The clinical research data were mainly based on retrospective cohort studies with low level of evidence and lead-time bias was not addressed. Active surveillance was recommended in Sweden and Denmark, but not in Norway beyond the post-operative/adjuvant period. Finland had no national recommendations for surveillance. The Nordic survey revealed a wide variation in reported practice among the different units. About 75% (15 of 20 units) performed routine postoperative surveillance. Routine CA 19-9 testing was used by 80% and routine CT by 67% as part of surveillance. About 73% of centers continued follow-up until 5 years postoperatively.

CONCLUSION:

Evidence for routine long-term (i.e. 5 years) surveillance after pancreatic cancer surgery remains limited. Most pancreatic units in the Nordic countries conduct regular follow-up, but protocols vary.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article