Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of four patient reported outcome measures in patients with ankle fracture: A study on patient preferences and psychometric properties.
Gundtoft, Per Hviid; Erichsen, Julie Ladeby; Terndrup, Mads; Walsøe, Lauritz; Pedersen, Lasse; Viberg, Bjarke; Ørts, Alice; Abrahamsen, Charlotte.
Afiliação
  • Gundtoft PH; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lillebaelt Hospital - Kolding, Denmark. Electronic address: pergun@rm.dk.
  • Erichsen JL; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Denmark.
  • Terndrup M; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hvidovre Hospital, Denmark.
  • Walsøe L; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
  • Pedersen L; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Denmark.
  • Viberg B; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lillebaelt Hospital - Kolding, Denmark.
  • Ørts A; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
  • Abrahamsen C; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lillebaelt Hospital - Kolding, Denmark; Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark.
Foot Ankle Surg ; 2024 Jul 14.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39013738
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The aim was to assess psychometric properties of Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ), the Self-reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS), the Olerud Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), and the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) in adults with ankle fractures.

METHODS:

Patients received all four questionnaires 6, 12, 14, 24, 52, and 104 weeks following an ankle fracture. According to COSMIN guidelines, statistical tests were performed to assess floor- and ceiling effects, structural validity, construct validity and reliability. Cognitive interview was performed with 9 patients.

RESULTS:

MOXFQ showed best model fit in Confirmatory Factor Analysis. When testing construct validity, all hypotheses were accepted except for OMAS and FJS. All questionnaires had an almost perfect test-retest reliability (Interclass Correlation Coefficient 0.81 to 0.91) and Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.76 to 0.95. MOXFQ was the best rated questionnaire.

CONCLUSION:

All questionnaires performed well and we recommend MOXFQ for future use in ankle fracture studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article