Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Burnout in Graduate Medical Education: Uncovering Resident Burnout Profiles Using Cluster Analysis.
Yaghmour, Nicholas A; Savage, Nastassia M; Rockey, Paul H; Santen, Sally A; DeCarlo, Kristen E; Hickam, Grace; Schwartzberg, Joanne G; Baldwin, DeWitt C; Perera, Robert A.
Afiliação
  • Yaghmour NA; Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education.
  • Savage NM; School of Health Professions Education, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Rockey PH; Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA.
  • Santen SA; Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL.
  • DeCarlo KE; Virginia Commonwealth School of Medicine, Richmond, VA.
  • Hickam G; University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH.
  • Schwartzberg JG; University of Illinois at Chicago Health System, Chicago, IL.
  • Baldwin DC; Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, VA.
  • Perera RA; Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education.
HCA Healthc J Med ; 5(3): 237-250, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39015585
ABSTRACT

Background:

Burnout is common among residents and negatively impacts patient care and professional development. Residents vary in terms of their experience of burnout. Our objective was to employ cluster analysis, a statistical method of separating participants into discrete groups based on response patterns, to uncover resident burnout profiles using the exhaustion and engagement sub-scales of the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI) in a cross-sectional, multispecialty survey of United States medical residents.

Methods:

The 2017 ACGME resident survey provided residents with an optional, anonymous addendum containing 3 engagement and 3 exhaustion items from the OBLI, a 2-item depression screen (PHQ-2), general queries about health and satisfaction, and whether respondents would still choose medicine as a career. Gaussian finite mixture models were fit to exhaustion and disengagement scores, with the resultant clusters compared across PHQ-2 depression screen results. Other variables were used to demonstrate evidence for the validity and utility of this approach.

Results:

From 14 088 responses, 4 clusters were identified as statistically and theoretically distinct Highly Engaged (25.8% of respondents), Engaged (55.2%), Disengaged (9.4%), and Highly Exhausted (9.5%). Only 2% of Highly Engaged respondents screened positive for depression, compared with 8% of Engaged respondents, 29% of Disengaged respondents, and 53% of Highly Exhausted respondents. Similar patterns emerged for the general query about health, satisfaction, and whether respondents would choose medicine as a career again.

Conclusion:

Clustering based on exhaustion and disengagement scores differentiated residents into 4 meaningful groups. Interventions that mitigate resident burnout should account for differences among clusters.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article