Optimizing maintenance therapy in acute myeloid leukemia: where do we stand in the year 2024?
Expert Rev Hematol
; 17(8): 515-525, 2024 Aug.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-39017205
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION:
Despite the prognosis of patients affected by acute myeloid leukemia (AML) improved in the last decade, most patients relapse. Maintenance therapy after a chemotherapy approach with or without allogeneic stem cell transplantation could be a way to control the undetectable residual burden of leukemic cells. Several studies are being carried out as maintenance therapy in AML. Some critical points need to be defined, how the physician can choose among the various drugs available. AREAS COVERED This review discusses the advances and controversies surrounding maintenance therapy for AML patients. EXPERT OPINION Patients withFLT3-positive AML should receive midostaurin or quizartinib in the first-linesetting. For a patient initially receiving midostaurin, consider switching to sorafenib in the post-transplant setting. Because of the improved safety profile and potency, many experts will lean toward using a second-generation FLT3 inhibitor such as quizartinib or gilteritinib. Finally, no data indicate whether maintenance therapy should be prolonged until progression or for a defined period.Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Leucemia Mieloide Aguda
/
Quimioterapia de Manutenção
Limite:
Humans
Idioma:
En
Ano de publicação:
2024
Tipo de documento:
Article