Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Access to expensive therapies and diagnostics for kidney care in Switzerland.
Luyckx, Valerie A; de Zwart, Paul; Spartà, Giuseppina; Mueller, Thomas F.
Afiliação
  • Luyckx VA; Department of Public and Global Health, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • de Zwart P; Renal Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Spartà G; Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Cape Town, South Africa.
  • Mueller TF; Nephrology Department, University Childrens Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Kidney360 ; 2024 Jul 19.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39028572
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In Switzerland, nephrologists must frequently obtain pre-authorizations from health insurers for certain medications/tests for individual patients. These are time consuming and outcomes are inconsistent. Clinical experience suggest inequities in access to expensive medications, related to need for and processes involved with medication pre-authorization requests.

METHODS:

An anonymous survey was conducted between November 2021 and March 2022 regarding experiences in applying for pre-authorizations for medications and genetic testing required for kidney care conducted among nephrologists in Switzerland.

RESULTS:

Ninety-four responses were received. The most common medications reported to require pre-approvals were rituximab, sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and eculizumab. Rebuttals were reported to be most frequently required for rituximab, eculizumab and SGLT2i, also the most frequently denied medications. Most frequent genetic testing requests were for complement and Alports spectrum disorders. Requests for genetic testing were reported to be most frequently denied for cystic renal diseases, congenital syndromes and nephrotic syndrome.Most nephrologists found requests for further information from the health insurers were seldom reasonable; 72% reported it was rarely/never possible to engage with the insurance physicians, 69% were concerned insurance physicians did not have relevant expertise. Respondents reported receiving different responses from different insurers for similar requests more frequently than from the same insurer (58% vs 8%). One in three nephrologists reported that the pre-authorizations process frequently resulted in a clinically relevant delay in treatment. Four of five respondents reported that the pre-authorization process frequently made them feel that they could not do their best for the patient.

CONCLUSION:

From the perspective of nephrologists, the pre-authorizations process in Switzerland is cumbersome, not transparent and inequitable, may result in denial or delays of important treatment for patients and contributes to moral distress.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article