Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Appropriateness and outcomes of hospitalized patients telemetry monitored for cardiac arrhythmias in accordance with the American Heart Association Practice Standards-A multicenter study.
Holm, Marianne Sætrang; Fålun, Nina; Pettersen, Trond Røed; Bendz, Bjørn; Nilsen, Roy Miodini; Langørgen, Jørund; Larsen, Alf Inge; Sørensen, Marianne Laastad; Sandau, Kristin E; Norekvål, Tone Merete.
Afiliação
  • Holm MS; Department of Health and Social Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Inndalsveien 28, 5063 Bergen, Norway.
  • Fålun N; Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Jonas Lies vei 65, 5021 Bergen, Norway.
  • Pettersen TR; Department of Health and Social Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Inndalsveien 28, 5063 Bergen, Norway; Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Jonas Lies vei 65, 5021 Bergen, Norway.
  • Bendz B; Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Sognsvannsveien 20, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Klaus Torgårds vei 3, 0372 Oslo, Norway.
  • Nilsen RM; Department of Health and Social Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Inndalsveien 28, 5063 Bergen, Norway.
  • Langørgen J; Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Jonas Lies vei 65, 5021 Bergen, Norway.
  • Larsen AI; Department of Cardiology, Stavanger University Hospital, Gerd Ragna Bloch Thorsens gate 8 Stavanger, Norway; Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Laboratory Building, Haukeland University Hospital, Jonas Lies vei 87, 5021, Bergen, Norway.
  • Sørensen ML; Department of Cardiology, Stavanger University Hospital, Gerd Ragna Bloch Thorsens gate 8 Stavanger, Norway.
  • Sandau KE; School of Nursing, University of Minnesota, 5-140 Weaver-Densford Hall, 308 Harvard Street SE Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
  • Norekvål TM; Department of Health and Social Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Inndalsveien 28, 5063 Bergen, Norway; Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Jonas Lies vei 65, 5021 Bergen, Norway; Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Laboratory Building
Heart Lung ; 68: 217-226, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39067328
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

To the best of our knowledge, no prospective research studies have compared clinical practice to the American Heart Association (AHA) updated practice standards for in-hospital telemetry monitoring.

OBJECTIVES:

Our aims were therefore (1) to investigate how patients were assigned to telemetry monitoring in accordance with the AHA's updated practice standards, (2) to determine the number and type of arrhythmic events, and (3) to describe subsequent changes in clinical management.

METHODS:

This prospective multicenter study included 1154 patients at three university hospitals in Norway. Data were collected 24/7 over a four-week period, with follow-up measurements from telemetry admission until hospital discharge.

RESULTS:

Of patients assigned to telemetry, 67 % (n = 767) met practice standards, corresponding to AHA Class I or II. Patients were predominantly men (65 %, n = 748), and the mean age was 65 years (SD ±16). The study included both patients with cardiac and non-cardiac diagnoses from various medical and surgical departments throughout the hospitals. Ninety-one percent of the patients in Class III were monitored based on indications that were reclassified from Class II to Class III (not indicated) in the updated practice standards (patients admitted with chest pain or post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) without complications). Overall, arrhythmic events occurred in 37 % (n = 424) of patients, and they occurred in all classes. Eighteen percent (n = 59) of arrhythmic events occurred in Class III. Of all arrhythmias, 3 % (n = 14) were life threatening, and all of them occurring within Class I. Telemetry monitoring led to changes in clinical management in 22 % (n = 257) of patients due to clinical alarms, of which 71 % (n = 182) were related to medication management.

CONCLUSIONS:

Most patients were appropriately monitored according to the AHA practice standards, meeting Class I and II. Arrhythmias occurred in all classes, but life-threatening arrhythmias only occurred in patients in Class I. However, a daily re-assessment of each patient's telemetry indication is warranted.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Arritmias Cardíacas / Telemetria Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte / Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Arritmias Cardíacas / Telemetria Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte / Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article