Are Vestibuloocular Reflex Gain and Dynamic Visual Acuity Responsible of Oscillopsia After Complete Unilateral Vestibular Loss?

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Acute and complete unilateral vestibular deafferentation induces a significant change in ipsilateral vestibuloocular reflex gain, making the patient unable to stabilize gaze during active or passive head movements. This inability creates the illusion that the visual environment is moving, resulting in persistent visual discomfort during rapid angular or linear acceleration of the head. This is known as oscillopsia. Our objective was to understand if the spontaneous sensation of oscillopsias after complete unilateral vestibular deafferentation by vestibular neurotomy at 5 days (D5) and at 3 months (M3) is correlated with the loss of vestibuloocular reflex gain and dynamic visual acuity. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study was conducted in an otolaryngology tertiary care center (2019-2022) on patients with complete unilateral vestibular loss by vestibular neurotomy. They were divided into 2 groups according to the presence (group G1) or absence (group G2) of a spontaneous complaint of oscillopsia assessed at M3. Severity of oscillopsias evaluated by Oscillopsia Severity Questionnaire. Vestibuloocular reflex gain based on video head impulse test (vHIT) and the dynamic visual acuity were measured for each group at D5 and M3. Categorical variables were compared using χ2 test and quantitative variables using the nonparametric Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: All patients have a complete vestibular deafferentation at D5 and M3. At D5 (G1 = 8 patients, G2 = 5 patients), there is no significant difference for ipsilateral and contralateral vestibuloocular reflex gains and dynamic visual acuity losses. The Oscillopsia Severity Questionnaire was 2.68 ± 1.03 in G1 and 1.23 ± 1.03 in G2 (P < .05). At M3 (G1 = 9 patients, G2 = 6 patients), there is no significant difference between groups for epidemiologic and clinical data and for vestibuloocular reflex and dynamic visual acuity losses. The Oscillopsia Severity Questionnaire was 2.10 ± 0.63 in G1 and 1.24 ± 0.28 in G2 (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The spontaneous disabling sensation of oscillopsia after complete unilateral vestibular loss is well assessed by the Oscillopsia Severity Questionnaire but cannot be explained by objective vestibular tests assessing vestibuloocular reflex gain (vHIT) or dynamic visual acuity loss at D5 or M3. Further studies are needed to measure the sensation of oscillopsia under real-life conditions and to identify the factors responsible for its persistence. TRIAL REGISTRATION Retrospectively registered.