Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sentinel node mapping decreases the risk of failed detection of isolated positive para-aortic lymph node in endometrial cancer.
Menezes, Jacqueline Nunes; Tirapelli Gonçalves, Bruna; Faloppa, Carlos Chaves; Kumagai, Lillian Yuri; Badiglian-Filho, Levon; Bovolim, Graziele; Guimarães, Andrea Paiva Gadelha; De Brot, Louise; Baiocchi, Glauco.
Afiliação
  • Menezes JN; Department of Gynecologic Oncology, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Tirapelli Gonçalves B; Department of Gynecologic Oncology, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Faloppa CC; Department of Gynecologic Oncology, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Kumagai LY; Department of Gynecologic Oncology, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Badiglian-Filho L; Department of Gynecologic Oncology, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Bovolim G; Department of Anatomic Pathology, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Guimarães APG; Department of Medical Oncology, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • De Brot L; Department of Anatomic Pathology, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Baiocchi G; Department of Gynecologic Oncology, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil glauco.baiocchi@accamargo.org.br.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 2024 Aug 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39117377
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Isolated positive para-aortic lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer is an uncommon event, ranging from 1% to 3%.

OBJECTIVE:

Our aim was to evaluate the impact of sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping on the risk of isolated positive para-aortic lymph node metastasis.

METHODS:

We retrospectively evaluated a series of 426 patients who underwent SLN mapping with at least one SLN detected from January 2013 to December 2021 (SLN group) compared with a historical series of 209 cases who underwent a systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy between June 2007 and April 2015 (LND group). Isolated para-aortic lymph node metastasis recurrences were included in the SLN group analysis.

RESULTS:

In the SLN group, 168 cases (39.4%) had backup systematic lymphadenectomy, and 56 (13.1%) had positive lymph nodes compared with 34 (16.3%) in LND group (p=0.18). The SLN group had higher rates of minimally invasive surgeries (p<0.001) and presence of lymphovascular space invasion (p<0.001). Moreover, SLN group had fewer other uterine risk factors, such as high-grade tumors (p<0.001), and deep myometrial invasion (p<0.001). We found that SLN mapped outside the pelvis at pre-sacral, common iliac areas, and para-aortic regions in 2.8% (n=12), 11.5% (n=49), and 1.6% (n=7) of cases, respectively. Overall, 52 (12.2%) patients had positive SLNs, and 3 (5.7%) positive SLNs were found outside the pelvis-one in the pre-sacral region, one in the common iliac area, and one in the para-aortic region. An isolated para-aortic lymph node was found in only 2 (0.5%) cases in the SLN group compared with 7 (3.3%) cases in the LND group (p=0.004).

CONCLUSIONS:

SLN protocol accurately predicts lymph node status and may decrease the risk of failed identification of isolated para-aortic lymph node metastasis compared with systematic lymphadenectomy.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article