Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
What influences the implementation of clinical guidelines related to enteral nutrition in the intensive care unit: A mixed-methods systematic review.
Li, Jia Qi; Sun, Ting; Zuo, Jun Tao; Xu, Yao; Cai, Li Na; Zheng, Heng Yu; Ye, Xiang Hong.
Afiliação
  • Li JQ; Nanjing Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
  • Sun T; Graduate School, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, China.
  • Zuo JT; Nanjing Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
  • Xu Y; Graduate School, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, China.
  • Cai LN; Nanjing Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
  • Zheng HY; Nanjing Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
  • Ye XH; Nanjing Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
J Adv Nurs ; 2024 Aug 20.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39164061
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

To systematically evaluate and analyse literature concerning the factors influencing the implementation of clinical practice guidelines related to enteral nutrition in the adult intensive care unit.

BACKGROUND:

Guidelines serve as crucial tools for guiding clinical practice. However, a significant gap persists between current clinical practice and guidelines pertaining to enteral nutrition. It is essential to identify the reasons behind this disparity to foster clinical transformation.

METHODS:

A mixed-methods systematic review. DATA SOURCES A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane, PsycINFO and CNKI databases to identify impediments and facilitators to the implementation of ICU clinical practice guidelines related to enteral nutrition. The types of studies included quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods studies. The search spanned from January 2003 to January 2024 and was updated in May 2024. The quality assessment of the included literature was conducted using the Mixed-Methods Study Evaluation Tool (MMAT). Data analysis was performed using a data-based convergent integration approach. The protocol for this study was prospectively registered (PROSPERO2023, CRD42023483287).

RESULTS:

Twenty papers were finally included, and 65 findings were extracted, integrating a total of three categories, Category 1 healthcare provider factors, including three sub-themes knowledge of guideline-related knowledge and awareness of guideline application; social/professional roles and identity domains; beliefs, attitudes and self-efficacy; collaboration, Category 2 practice environments, including two sub-themes environmental factors and resource areas; systems and behavioural norms, Category 3 patient values and nutritional support preferences including two sub-themes patient disease status and value orientation.

CONCLUSION:

Healthcare professionals should analyse obstacles and facilitators to guideline implementation from multiple perspectives, strengthen healthcare collaboration, improve education and training systems, correct misperceptions and increase awareness of evidence-based practice.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article