Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Advancing stroke patient care: a network meta-analysis of dysphagia screening efficacy and personalization.
Jiang, Youli; Chi, Yue; Pan, Rongjia; Zhang, Dongqi; Huang, Suzhen; Ju, Hao; Li, Yanfeng.
Afiliação
  • Jiang Y; Department of Neurology, People's Hospital of Longhua, Shenzhen, China.
  • Chi Y; Department of Neurology, People's Hospital of Longhua, Shenzhen, China.
  • Pan R; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
  • Zhang D; Department of Neurology, People's Hospital of Longhua, Shenzhen, China.
  • Huang S; Department of Neurology, People's Hospital of Longhua, Shenzhen, China.
  • Ju H; Department of Endocrinology, People's Hospital of Longhua, Shenzhen, China.
  • Li Y; Department of Neurology, People's Hospital of Longhua, Shenzhen, China.
Front Neurol ; 15: 1380287, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39165268
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

The increasing incidence of stroke globally has led to dysphagia becoming one of the most common complications in stroke patients, with significant impacts on patient outcomes. Accurate early screening for dysphagia is crucial to avoid complications and improve patient quality of life.

Methods:

Included studies involved stroke-diagnosed patients assessed for dysphagia using bedside screening tools. Data was sourced from Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and CINAHL, including publications up to 10 December 2023. The study employed both fixed-effect and random-effects models to analyze sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and Negative Predictive Value (NPV), each with 95% confidence intervals. The random-effects model was particularly utilized due to observed heterogeneity in study data.

Results:

From 6,979 records, 21 studies met the inclusion criteria, involving 3,314 participants from 10 countries. The analysis included six assessment tools GUSS, MASA, V-VST, BSST, WST, and DNTA, compared against gold-standard methods VFSS and FEES. GUSS, MASA, and V-VST showed the highest reliability, with sensitivity and specificity rates of 92% and 85% for GUSS, 89% and 83% for MASA, respectively. Heterogeneity among studies was minimal, and publication bias was low, enhancing the credibility of the findings.

Conclusion:

Our network meta-analysis underscores the effectiveness of GUSS, MASA, and V-VST in dysphagia screening for stroke patients, with high sensitivity and specificity making them suitable for diverse clinical settings. BSST and WST, with lower diagnostic accuracy, require more selective use. Future research should integrate patient-specific outcomes and standardize methodologies to enhance dysphagia screening tools, ultimately improving patient care and reducing complications. Systematic review registration https//www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article