Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Unpacking WHO and CDC Bottle Bioassay Methods: A Comprehensive Literature Review and Protocol Analysis Revealing Key Outcome Predictors.
Praulins, Giorgio; Murphy-Fegan, Annabel; Gillespie, Jack; Mechan, Frank; Gleave, Katherine; Lees, Rosemary.
Afiliação
  • Praulins G; Innovation to Impact (I2I), Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.
  • Murphy-Fegan A; Innovation to Impact (I2I), Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.
  • Gillespie J; Innovation to Impact (I2I), Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.
  • Mechan F; Innovation to Impact (I2I), Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.
  • Gleave K; Innovation to Impact (I2I), Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.
  • Lees R; Innovation to Impact (I2I), Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.
Gates Open Res ; 8: 56, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39170853
ABSTRACT

Background:

Resistance monitoring is a key element in controlling vector-borne diseases. The World Health Organization (WHO) and Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have each developed bottle bioassay methods for determining insecticide susceptibility in mosquito vectors which are used globally.

Methods:

This study aimed to identify variations in bottle bioassay methodologies and assess the potential impact on the data that is generated. Our approach involved a systematic examination of existing literature and protocols from WHO and CDC, with a focus on the specifics of reported methodologies, variation between versions, and reported outcomes. Building on this, we experimentally evaluated the impact of several variables on bioassay results.

Results:

Our literature review exposed a significant inconsistency in the how bioassay methods are reported, hindering reliable interpretation of data and the ability to compare results between studies. The experimental research provided further insight by specifically identifying two key factors that influence the outcomes of bioassays mosquito dry weight and relative humidity (RH). This finding not only advances our comprehension of these assays but also underscores the importance of establishing precisely defined methodologies for resistance monitoring. The study also demonstrates the importance of controlling bioassay variables, noting the significant influence of wing length, as an indicator of mosquito size, on mortality rates in standardized bioassays.

Conclusions:

Generating data with improved protocol consistency and precision will not only deepen our understanding of resistance patterns but also better inform vector control measures. We call for continued research and collaboration to refine and build consensus on bioassay techniques, to help bolster the global effort against vector-borne diseases like malaria.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Organização Mundial da Saúde / Bioensaio / Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. / Mosquitos Vetores Limite: Animals / Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Organização Mundial da Saúde / Bioensaio / Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. / Mosquitos Vetores Limite: Animals / Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article