Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Investigation of Video Ocular Counter-Roll Findings According to Head and Body Tilt Positions in Healthy Subjects.
Kartal Özcan, Ahsen; Satici, Sema; Akbulut, Ahmet Alperen; Kiliç, Mert; Çankaya, Sare; Polat, Zahra.
Afiliação
  • Kartal Özcan A; Department of Audiology, Hamidiye Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Türkiye.
  • Satici S; Audiology and Language Disorders PhD Program, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Institute of Health Sciences, Marmara University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
  • Akbulut AA; Department of Audiology, Hamidiye Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Türkiye.
  • Kiliç M; Audiology and Language Disorders PhD Program, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Institute of Health Sciences, Marmara University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
  • Çankaya S; Department of Audiology, Hamidiye Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Türkiye.
  • Polat Z; Audiology and Language Disorders PhD Program, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Institute of Health Sciences, Marmara University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Ear Hear ; 2024 Aug 23.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39175112
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

A vestibulo-ocular reflex called the ocular counter-roll can be used to assess how well the otolith organs are functioning. The video ocular counter-roll (vOCR) test is a recent addition to the videonystagmography test battery that allows for video recording and quantitative ocular counter-roll analysis. The purpose of this study is to investigate potential discrepancies in vOCR measurements obtained from a 30° lateral head tilt in the roll plane versus measurements obtained from a 30° tilt of the head and body.

DESIGN:

Thirty otologically, and neurologically healthy subjects aged 18 to 30 (M = 23.32 years, SD = 2.66 years; 8 men, 22 women) participated in this study. Pure-tone audiometry, oculomotor tests, and vOCR evaluation were performed for all participants. The vOCR assessment was performed in 2 positions, 30° lateral head tilt, and 30° body tilt position. The degree of static vOCR eye position and vOCR asymmetry in both positions were calculated and compared.

RESULTS:

There was no statistically significant difference between the vOCR findings obtained in the right and left 30° lateral head tilt (p = 0.546) and body tilt (p = 0.114). vOCR asymmetry was determined as median (interquartile range) 0.08 (0.07) in lateral head tilt position and 0.09 (0.06) in body tilt position. The degree of static vOCR (8.75° [1.91]) detected during body tilt was statistically greater than the static vOCR (6.62 [1.69]) detected during head tilt (p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in terms of ocular counter-roll asymmetry detected between head tilt and body tilt (p = 0.918).

CONCLUSIONS:

Our study shows a significant difference in the vOCR responses during head tilt and body tilt, a finding that should be considered during clinical evaluation of vestibular function. There was no significant asymmetry between the responses with either head or body tilt.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article