Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Identifying Elective Induction of Labor among a Diverse Pregnant Population from Electronic Health Records within a Large Integrated Health Care System.
Xie, Fagen; Fassett, Michael J; Im, Theresa M; Park, Daniella; Chiu, Vicki Y; Getahun, Darios.
Afiliação
  • Xie F; Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California.
  • Fassett MJ; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaiser Permanente West Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
  • Im TM; Department of Clinical Science, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, California.
  • Park D; Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California.
  • Chiu VY; Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California.
  • Getahun D; Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California.
Am J Perinatol ; 2024 Sep 19.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39209302
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Distinguishing between medically indicated induction of labor (iIOL) and elective induction of labor (eIOL) is a daunting process for researchers. We aimed to develop a Natural Language Processing (NLP) algorithm to identify eIOLs from electronic health records (EHRs) within a large integrated health care system. STUDY

DESIGN:

We used structured and unstructured data from Kaiser Permanente Southern California's EHRs of patients who were <35 years old and had singleton deliveries between 37 and 40 gestational weeks. Induction of labor (IOL) pregnancies were identified if there was evidence of an IOL diagnosis code, procedure code, or documentation in a delivery flowsheet or progress note. A comprehensive NLP algorithm was developed and refined through an iterative process of chart reviews and adjudications, where IOL-associated reasons (medically indicated vs. elective induction) were reviewed. The final algorithm was applied to discern the indications of IOLs performed during the study period.

RESULTS:

A total of 332,163 eligible pregnancies were identified between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2022. Of these eligible pregnancies, 68,541 (20.6%) were IOL, of which 6,824 (10.0%) were eIOL. Validation of the NLP process against 300 randomly selected pregnancies (100 eIOL, iIOL, and non-IOL cases each) yielded a positive predictive value of 83.0% and 88.0% for eIOL and iIOL, respectively. The rates of eIOL among the maternal age groups ranged between 9.6 and 10.3%, except for the <20 years group (12.2%). Non-Hispanic White individuals had the highest rate of eIOL (13.2%), while non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islanders had the lowest rate of eIOL (7.8%). The rate of eIOL increased from 1.0% in the 37-week gestational age (GA) group to 20.6% in the 40-week GA group.

CONCLUSION:

Findings suggest that the developed NLP algorithm effectively identifies eIOL. It can be utilized to support eIOL-related pharmacoepidemiological studies, fill in knowledge gaps, and provide content more relevant to researchers. KEY POINTS · An NLP algorithm was developed to identify indications of IOL.. · The study algorithm was successfully implemented within a large integrated health care system.. · The study algorithm can be utilized to support eIOL-related studies..

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article