Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Intravenous alteplase versus tenecteplase in patients with acute posterior circulation strokes: A secondary analysis from the AcT randomized controlled trial.
Cimflova, Petra; Alhabli, Ibrahim; Bala, Fouzi; Horn, MacKenzie; Benali, Faysal; Buck, Brian H; Catanese, Luciana; Coutts, Prof Shelagh B; Khosravani, Houman; Appireddy, Ramana; Tkach, Aleksander; Dowlatshahi, Dar; Carpani, Federico; Field, Thalia; Hunter, Gary; Hill, Prof Michael D; Poppe, Alexandre Y; Ademola, Ayoola; Shamy, Michel; Sajobi, Tolulope T; Swartz, Richard H; Almekhlafi, Mohammed A; Menon, Prof Bijoy K; Singh, Nishita.
Afiliação
  • Cimflova P; Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada; Universitätsinstitut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Neuroradiologie, Universitätsspital Bern, Rosenbühlgasse 25, Bern 3010, Switzerland; Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada. Electronic a
  • Alhabli I; Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
  • Bala F; Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada; Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology Department, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France.
  • Horn M; Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
  • Benali F; Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
  • Buck BH; Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
  • Catanese L; Hamilton Health Sciences Centre and McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
  • Coutts PSB; Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada; Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada; Cumming School of Medicine and Department of Community Health Sciences; University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Calgary, Canad
  • Khosravani H; Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Appireddy R; Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
  • Tkach A; Kelowna General Hospital, Kelowna, BC, Canada.
  • Dowlatshahi D; Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa and the Ottawa Heart Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
  • Carpani F; Toronto Western Hospital and the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Field T; Vancouver Stroke Program and the Division of Neurology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Hunter G; University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
  • Hill PMD; Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada; Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada; Cumming School of Medicine and Department of Community Health Sciences; University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Calgary, Canad
  • Poppe AY; Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada.
  • Ademola A; Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
  • Shamy M; Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa and the Ottawa Heart Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
  • Sajobi TT; Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Swartz RH; Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Almekhlafi MA; Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada; Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada; Cumming School of Medicine and Department of Community Health Sciences; University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Calgary, Canad
  • Menon PBK; Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada; Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada; Cumming School of Medicine and Department of Community Health Sciences; University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Calgary, Canad
  • Singh N; Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada; Department of Internal Medicine-Neurology Division, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 33(11): 107985, 2024 Aug 31.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39222700
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

There are limited data available demonstrating the safety and efficacy of intravenous tenecteplase versus alteplase in patients with acute ischemic stroke in the posterior circulation. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

This is a post-hoc analysis of the Alteplase compared to Tenecteplase (AcT) pragmatic, phase 3, registry-linked randomized controlled trial. Patients with any posterior circulation vessel occlusion on baseline imaging were included. Study outcomes included 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-1, mRS 0-2, ordinal mRS, death within 90 days, 24 h symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (sICH) and successful reperfusion/recanalization. Mixed effects regression adjusting for age, sex and stroke severity was used to analyze differences in outcomes between patients administered tenecteplase vs. alteplase. Further, sensitivity analysis was conducted for basilar artery occlusion (BAO) alone.

RESULTS:

Of 1577 patients, 136 (8.6 %, 77alteplase, 59tenecteplase) had posterior circulation stroke. Baseline characteristics were similar[median age 71 (IQR 60-81) vs. 72 (IQR 65-82) years, 57.1 % vs. 67.8 % males, median baseline NIHSS 7 (IQR 4-12) vs. 7 (IQR 4-16) in alteplase vs. tenecteplase arms, respectively]. 28 patients (20.6 %, 16alteplase, 12tenecteplase arm) underwent EVT. The median 90-120 days mRS was 2 (IQR 1-4). There were no differences between alteplase and tenecteplase for 90-d mRS 0-1 (adjRR 0.93;95 %CI 0.63-1.36), 90-day mRS 0-2 (adjRR 0.95; 95 %CI 0.72-1.26), sICH (RR 0.65; 95 %CI 0.06-7.02) and mortality (RR 1.21; 95 %CI 0.61-2.38). Successful reperfusion eTICI 2b-3 and successful recanalization rAOL 2b-3 was achieved in 23/28 (82 %, 12alteplase, 11tenecteplase) and in 16/28 (57 %, 14alteplase, 12tenecteplase), respectively. Similar results were seen in 31 patients (22.8 %) with BAO.

CONCLUSION:

Intravenous tenecteplase has a similar effect on outcome as alteplase, without increased safety concerns in patients with acute posterior circulation strokes.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article