Chronomodulated versus fixed-infusion-rate delivery of ambulatory chemotherapy with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and folinic acid (leucovorin) in patients with colorectal cancer metastases: a randomized multi-institutional trial.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In a previous phase II trial, circadian (chronomodulated) delivery of fluorouracil (5-FU), folinic acid (FA; leucovorin), and oxaliplatin (1-OHP; a new platinum complex with no renal and minor hematologic toxic effects) produced an objective response rate of 58% in 93 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. PURPOSE: To determine whether chronomodulated drug delivery affects therapeutic activity, we again tested this regimen in another trial in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer, this time comparing chronomodulated with constant-rate drug delivery. METHODS: Seven European centers participated in this trial. Ninety-two patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were enrolled and assigned to a treatment schedule by central randomization. Treatment courses consisted of the daily administration of 5-FU (600 mg/m2 per day), FA (300 mg/m2 per day), and 1-OHP (20 mg/m2 per day) for 5 days and were repeated every 21 days (16-day intermission) in ambulatory patients with the use of a programmable in-time pump. Drug delivery was kept constant over a 5-day period in schedule A (47 patients). It was chronomodulated in schedule B (maximum delivery of 5-FU and FA infusions at 0400 hours and maximum delivery of 1-OHP at 1600 hours; 45 patients). A risk of partial chemical inactivation of 1-OHP by its 2-hour exposure to the basic pH of the 5-FU solution in the catheter was documented in schedule A. RESULTS: Severe stomatitis (grade 3 or 4, World Health Organization [WHO] grading system), the dose-limiting toxic effect of 5-FU, occurred in five times as many patients on schedule A than on schedule B (89% versus 18%; chi 2 = 46; P < .001). The cumulative dose-limiting toxicity of schedule B was peripheral sensitive neuropathy (WHO grade 2). This side effect was reversible following 1-OHP withdrawal. Higher doses of 5-FU were administered in schedule B (median 700 mg/m2 per day) compared with schedule A (median 500 mg/m2 per day) (P < .0001; Mann-Whitney U test). On schedule B, 24 of 45 patients (53%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 38%-68%) exhibited an objective response compared with 15 of 47 patients (32%; 95% CI = 18%-46%) on schedule A (chi 2 = 4.3; P = .038). The median progression-free survival was, respectively, 11 and 8 months (P = .19; logrank). The median survival was 19 months (95% CI = 14.8-23.2) on schedule B and 14.9 months (95% CI = 12.1-17.8) on schedule A (P = .03; logrank). CONCLUSION: This ambulatory treatment modality was both more effective and less toxic if drug delivery was chronomodulated rather than constant over time. IMPLICATION The respective roles of 1-OHP dose and schedule and circadian peak time of drug delivery are being investigated with regard to the high activity of this three-drug, chronomodulated chemotherapeutic regimen.