The use of isotypic control antibodies in the analysis of CD3+ and CD3+, CD4+ lymphocyte subsets by flow cytometry. Are they really necessary?

OBJECTIVE: Isotypic control reagents are defined as irrelevant antibodies of the same immunoglobulin class as the relevant reagent antibody in a flow cytometry panel. The use of the isotypic control antibody has been advocated as a necessary quality control measure in analysis of flow cytometry. The purpose of this study was to determine the necessity of an isotypic control antibody in the analysis of CD3+ and CD3+, CD4+ lymphocyte subsets. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective study of 46 consecutive patient samples received for lymphocyte subset analysis to determine the need for the isotypic control. For each sample, a sham buffer (autocontrol) and isotypic control reagent were stained for three-color immunofluorescence, processed, and identically analyzed with Attractors software. The Attractors software allowed independent, multiparametric, simultaneous gating; was able to identically and reproducibly process each list mode file; and yielded population data in spreadsheet form. RESULTS: Statistical analysis (Fisher's z test) revealed no difference between the CD3+ autocontrol and CD3+ isotypic control (correlation = 1, P < .0001) or between the CD3+, CD4+ autocontrol and the CD3+, CD4+ isotypic control (correlation = 1, P < .0001). The elimination of the isotypic control reagent resulted in a total cost savings of $3.36 per test. Additionally, the subtraction of isotypic background can artifactually depress population enumeration. CONCLUSIONS: The use of an isotypic control antibody is not necessary to analyze flow cytometric data that result in discrete cell populations, such as CD3+ and CD3+, CD4+ lymphocyte subsets. The elimination of this unnecessary quality control measure results in substantial cost savings.