Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 39
Filtrar
1.
Arch. Soc. Esp. Oftalmol ; 95(1): 42-44, ene. 2020. ilus
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-195317

RESUMO

Se presenta a una niña de 3 meses de edad con un cuadro febril sin foco y con empeoramiento. La exploración fundoscópica mostró una lesión coroidea en el ojo izquierdo junto con lesiones en otros órganos sugestivas de tuberculosis diseminada. La evolución fue favorable tras tratamiento con cuádruple terapia antibiótica asociada a corticoterapia. La tuberculosis diseminada debe tenerse en cuenta ante un cuadro febril de tórpida evolución. La exploración oftalmológica de estos pacientes es fundamental, ya que, aunque es poco frecuente, los signos característicos de las uveítis posteriores nos orientarán hacia el diagnóstico y tratamiento precoz de esta enfermedad


A three-month old baby girl presented with fever of unknown origin and with signs of worsening of this episode. Funduscopy showed a solitary choroidal lesion in her left eye, as well as extraocular lesions suggesting disseminated tuberculosis. A favourable outcome was achieved after quadruple antibiotic course and cortisone therapy. Disseminated tuberculosis should be considered in cases of fever of unknown origin in children with an unsatisfactory evolution. Ocular examination is mandatory, due to the possible posterior uveitis signs that can help with early diagnosis and treatment of some diseases


Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Lactente , Doenças da Coroide/diagnóstico , Tuberculoma/diagnóstico , Tuberculose Miliar/diagnóstico , Tuberculose Ocular/diagnóstico , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Amicacina/uso terapêutico , Antituberculosos/uso terapêutico , Doenças da Coroide/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças da Coroide/tratamento farmacológico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Etambutol/uso terapêutico , Isoniazida/uso terapêutico , Oftalmoscopia , Pirazinamida/uso terapêutico , Rifampina/uso terapêutico , Tuberculoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Tuberculose Miliar/tratamento farmacológico , Tuberculose Ocular/diagnóstico por imagem , Tuberculose Ocular/tratamento farmacológico , Uveíte Posterior/diagnóstico , Uveíte Posterior/tratamento farmacológico
2.
Pharm. pract. (Granada, Internet) ; 17(3): 0-0, jul.-sept. 2019. tab
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-188120

RESUMO

Background: Inappropriate use of antimicrobial agents is one of the most important factors in inducing resistance and prolonged hospitalization as well as increase in patient mortality rate. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate aminoglycosides (AGs) usage pattern at intensive care units (ICUs) of Nemazee hospital Shiraz, Iran. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the usage pattern of AGs was evaluated during 32 months. Guidelines for AGs usage were approved by the drug and therapeutic committee of the hospital, and criteria were developed to assess 11 parameters involving AGs therapy, such as proper indication for the use of the drug, dosage and duration of therapy. Clinical parameters, such as microbial culture and sensitivity, serum creatinine (SCr) and creatinine clearance, and white blood cell count were evaluated. Results: Ninety-five patients were recruited, 50 male and 45 females. In most patients (64%) the origin of infection was hospital and only in 36% of them, community was the source. Ventilator associated pneumonia (27%), central nervous system (25%) and urinary tract infection (10%) were the most important indications for AGs prescription. Scores of AGs usage at Nemazee hospital was calculated as 5.9 out of 11, which meant that in only 54% of cases AGs prescription was based on guideline proposed by the Department of Clinical Pharmacy of Nemazee Hospital. Conclusions: Non-adherence to the guidelines occurred frequently in the ICUs of Nemazee hospital. Prescription of loading dose, and AGs level measurement were not done and evaluating microbiological data was often neglected. Incorporating pharmacists in the health care team and holding training programs for physicians and nurses with the goal of raising awareness about the proposed guideline


No disponible


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Lactente , Pré-Escolar , Criança , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Aminoglicosídeos/uso terapêutico , Estado Terminal/terapia , Prescrição Inadequada/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Farmacêutica/estatística & dados numéricos , Amicacina/uso terapêutico , Gentamicinas/uso terapêutico , Hospitais de Ensino/estatística & dados numéricos , Irã (Geográfico)/epidemiologia , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico
12.
Rev. esp. investig. quir ; 18(3): 131-133, 2015. ilus
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-142370

RESUMO

Gangrena de Fournier es una necrosis de la región genital, potencialmente fatal. Presentamos un caso de una paciente femenina, que acudió a nuestro centro con una necrosis de la región genital. Se trato quirúrgicamente, control metabólico y se utilizó el HEBERPRO P-75 para acelerar la cicatrización del defecto de la región genital


The Fournier gangrene is a necrosis of the genital region, potentially fatal. We present a case of a feminine patient after admission went to our center with a necrosis of the genital region. Early surgical treatment (incision and wide drainage of the whole involved zone as well as debridement of necrosis zone), metabolic control and you uses the HEBERPRO P-75 to accelerate cellular proliferation of the defect of the genital region


Assuntos
Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gangrena de Fournier/cirurgia , Gangrena de Fournier , Cicatrização/fisiologia , Ceftriaxona/uso terapêutico , Controle de Infecções/tendências , Genitália Feminina/patologia , Genitália Feminina/cirurgia , Amicacina/uso terapêutico , Metronidazol/uso terapêutico
13.
Rev. esp. quimioter ; 26(4): 346-352, dic. 2013. tab, ilus
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-118226

RESUMO

Introducción: A pesar del aumento de la diversidad étnica en nuestro entorno, existen pocos estudios sobre la influencia en la farmacocinética de amikacina. En este estudio se compararon las características farmacocinéticas de amikacina en diferentes etnias: asiáticos, hispanos, magrebíes y caucásicos. Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo observacional en un hospital universitario de tercer nivel durante ocho años. Se incluyeron todos los pacientes en tratamiento con amikacina endovenosa en régimen de ampliación de intervalo. Se analizaron los parámetros farmacocinéticos con determinación de niveles plasmáticos. Se realizó un análisis estadístico bivariado y una regresión lineal múltiple. Resultados: Se incluyeron 164 pacientes: 7 asiáticos, 135 caucásicos, 11 hispanos y 11 magrebíes. Se evidenciaron concentraciones plasmáticas inferiores de amikacina en la población magrebí respecto al resto de etnias como consecuencia de su mayor aclaramiento. Conclusiones: Sería recomendable monitorizar las concentraciones plasmáticas de amikacina en pacientes magrebíes para evitar el riesgo de concentraciones subterapéuticas (AU)


Objective: Despite the increasing ethnic diversity, there are few studies of its influence on the pharmacokinetics of amikacin. The objective of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics of amikacin in different populations: Asian, Hispanic, North Africans and Caucasian. Methods: A retrospective observational study was performed in a tertiary teaching hospital during eight years. It was included all patients with intravenous amikacin treatment in extended interval dosing regimen with therapeutic drug monitoring of amikacin. Pharmacokinetic parameters were analysed. A bivariate and multiple linear regression statistical analysis were carried out. Results: 164 patients were included: 7 asians, 135 Caucasians, 11 Hispanics and 11 from North Africa. It was shown a lower plasma concentrations of amikacin in North Africa population due to its greater clearance. Conclusions: Amikacin plasma concentrations monitoring is advisable in patients from North Africa in order to avoid subtherapeutic concentrations (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Amicacina/farmacocinética , Amicacina/uso terapêutico , Aminoglicosídeos/farmacocinética , Etnicidade/etnologia , Distribuição por Etnia , Estudos Retrospectivos , 28599
14.
Rev. esp. quimioter ; 25(1): 37-41, mar. 2012. tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-99751

RESUMO

Pseudomonas aeruginosa es un microorganismo oportunista frecuentemente implicado en infecciones de origen nosocomial que presenta resistencia natural y adquirida a muchos de los antimicrobianos de uso clínico. Se llevo a cabo un estudio de resistencias a antimicrobianos de 3.029 aislamientos de P. aeruginosa de enfermos intra y extrahospitalarios en el periodo 2005-2010. La metodología utilizada fue, el método semiautomatizado WIDER I (Soria Melguizo), para la identificación de las especies y para el estudio de sensibilidades a antimicrobianos. Se consideraron los criterios de sensibilidad y resistencia recomendados por el grupo MENSURA. En nuestro hospital existe un mantenimiento relativo de la sensibilidad antimicrobiana de P. aeruginosa en el periodo 2005-2010, con un aumento de esta en amikacina, gentamicina y cefalosporinas. Existen diferencias de porcentajes de sensibilidades entre las cepas de origen intrahospitalario y extrahospitalario, salvo para fosfomicina y tobramicina. Destacamos la importancia de realizar estudios locales de la sensibilidad y resistencias de P. aeruginosa en cada zona, de forma periódica para poder valorar las diferentes pautas terapéuticas, no siendo posible extrapolar los datos de las diferentes regiones españolas(AU)


Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic microorganism that is frequently the cause of nosocomial infections. Multiple mechanisms are involved in its natural and acquired resistance to many of the antimicrobial agents commonly used in clinical practice. We performed an antibiotic resistance study on P. aeruginosa isolated from intrahospitalary and extrahospitalary samples between 2005 and 2010 years. We included in the study a global amount of 3,029 P. aeruginosa isolates from clinical samples received at University Hospital Reina Sofia. Microbiology Service in Córdoba (Spain). Semiautomatic system WIDER I for strains identification and sensibility testing was employed. We considered susceptibility and resistance criteria recommended by MENSURA group. Results of the analysis showed that P. aeruginosa maintanied similar levels of antimicrobial susceptibility during the period 2005-2010, with increased susceptibility to amikacin, gentamicin and cefalosporins. There were also important differences in the degree of susceptibility between intrahospital and extrahospital strains during 2010 year, except for tobramicin and fosfomycin. The intrahospital difference in susceptibility was also evaluated, emphasizing the importance of periodically surveillance of susceptibility and resistance patterns of P. aeruginosa, in each setting in order to evaluate different therapeutic guidelines, because it is not always advisable to extrapolate data from different regions(AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Tobramicina/uso terapêutico , Cefalosporinas/uso terapêutico , Piperacilina/isolamento & purificação , Ceftazidima/isolamento & purificação , Amicacina/isolamento & purificação , Gentamicinas/isolamento & purificação , Fosfomicina/isolamento & purificação , Ciprofloxacina/isolamento & purificação , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Ticarcilina/isolamento & purificação , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/isolamento & purificação , Ticarcilina/farmacocinética , Piperacilina/farmacocinética , Ceftazidima/farmacocinética , Amicacina/farmacocinética , Gentamicinas/farmacocinética , Fosfomicina/farmacocinética , Ciprofloxacina/farmacocinética
16.
Arch. bronconeumol. (Ed. impr.) ; 47(supl.6): 24-29, jun. 2011.
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-94260

RESUMO

La administración de los antimicrobianos en aerosol se viene utilizando en la práctica clínica desde la décadade los cincuenta del siglo pasado. La principal ventaja y el objetivo de esta vía de administración es el depósitodel fármaco en el sitio de la infección en el pulmón. La consecución de este objetivo puede producir altasconcentraciones en el lugar de la infección o colonización y reducir al mínimo la toxicidad sistémica. Los datosmás convincentes para apoyar el uso de antimicrobianos en aerosol provienen de su uso para el tratamientode mantenimiento en pacientes con fibrosis quística. Además de su utilización en la fibrosis quística,el uso de los antimicrobianos en aerosol también se ha estudiado para el tratamiento o prevención de unaserie de enfermedades adicionales, incluyendo las bronquiectasias no fibrosis quística, la neumonía asociadaa la ventilación mecánica, la profilaxis contra las infecciones pulmonares por hongos, la infección pulmonarpor micobacterias y, más recientemente, en la enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica (EPOC). Aunque lasbases teóricas que hay detrás de la administración de antibióticos en aerosol parecen convincentes, los datosdisponibles son limitados para apoyar el uso rutinario de esta modalidad terapéutica. Debido a las lagunasque aún hay acerca del uso rutinario de antibióticos en aerosol, se debe tener precaución cuando se contemplela administración de antimicrobianos a través de esta vía en situaciones que no respondan con claridad alas indicaciones establecidas, como el tratamiento de pacientes con fibrosis quística, las bronquiectasias o laneumonía por Pneumocystis(AU)


Aerosolized antimicrobial agents have been used in clinical practice since the 1950s. The main advantage andaim of using this route of administration is delivery of the drug to the site of infection in the lung. Achievingthis aim may produce high concentrations in the site of infection or colonization and reduce systemic toxicityto a minimum. The most convincing data to support the use of aerosolized antimicrobials comes from theiruse as maintenance treatment in patients with cystic fibrosis. In addition to this indication, the use ofaerosolized antimicrobials has also been studied in the treatment or prevention of a series of other diseases,including noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis, ventilator-associated pneumonia, prophylaxis against fungal lunginfections, mycobacterial lung infections and, more recently, in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Although the theoretical bases underlying aerosol antibiotic administration seem convincing, there isinsufficient evidence to support its routine use. Due to the gaps in knowledge that persist in the routine useof aerosolized antibiotics, caution should be exercised in situations without clearly established indications forthis modality, such as the treatment of patients with cystic fibrosis, bronchiectasis or Pneumocystispneumonia(AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/microbiologia , Aspergilose Pulmonar Invasiva/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia por Pneumocystis/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Mycobacterium não Tuberculosas/tratamento farmacológico , Bronquite Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Administração por Inalação , Anfotericina B/efeitos adversos , Anfotericina B/uso terapêutico , Anfotericina B/administração & dosagem , Pentamidina/administração & dosagem , Pentamidina/uso terapêutico , Amicacina/administração & dosagem , Amicacina/uso terapêutico , Colistina/uso terapêutico , Tobramicina/uso terapêutico
17.
Enferm. infecc. microbiol. clín. (Ed. impr.) ; 29(2): 79-84, feb. 2011. graf, tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-97345

RESUMO

Objectives To study the resistance of biofilms developed by non-pigmented rapidly growing mycobacteria (NPRGM) against amikacin, ciprofloxacin and clarithromycin in an in vitro model using clinical strains of different species. Design Antimicrobial susceptibilities of different clinical strains of Mycobacterium abscessus, Mycobacterium chelonae, Mycobacterium fortuitum, Mycobacterium peregrinum, Mycobacterium mucogenicum and Mycobacterium mageritense using conventional techniques were measured. Biofilm resistance was measured by using the sandwich technique developed by Anderl et al. using a concentration of antibiotic of 50mg/L. Penetration of antibiotics through biofilm was measured using the same technique with minimal modifications. Results NPRGM biofilms showed drug resistance (percentages of viable bacteria >1% of those of controls) against antibiotics that are commonly used for the treatment of infections caused by these organisms, although there are intraspecies differences between strains. We have detected differences in antibiotic penetration through biofilms with an important permeability barrier for ciprofloxacin. However, other mechanisms must be probably more important to explain the antimicrobial resistance of NPRGM biofilm. Conclusions Biofilms formed by NPRGM are resistant to amikacin, ciprofloxacin and clarithromycin. As no resistance differences between the tested antibiotics have been observed, it is likely that biofilm permeability of antibiotics is of low importance for antimicrobial resistance of biofilms (AU)


Objetivos Estudiar la resistencia de biopelículas formadas por micobacterias no pigmentadas de crecimiento rápido (MNPCR) frente amicacina, ciprofloxacino y claritromicina en in modelo in vitro empleando aislamientos clínicos de diferentes especies. Material y MétodosSe estudiaron las sensibilidades de las diferentes cepas clínicas de Mycobacterium abscessus, Mycobacterium chelonae, Mycobacterium fortuitum, Mycobacterium peregrinum, Mycobacterium mucogenicum y Mycobacterium mageritense mediante técnicas convencionales. La resistencia de dichas bacterias en la biopelícula fue estudiada mediante la técnica de sándwich descrita por Anderl et al. utilizando una concentración de antibiótico de 50mg/L. La penetración de los antibióticos a través de la biopelícula fue estudiada mediante la misma técnica con mínimas modificaciones. Resultados Las biopelículas de MNPCR presentaron resistencia (porcentajes de bacterias viables > 1% de los recuentos obtenidos en los controles) frente a todos los antibióticos que son empleados habitualmente en las infecciones causadas por estos organismos, si bien se detectaron diferencias dentro de la misma especie entre las diferentes cepas. Hemos detectado diferencias en la penetración de antibióticos a través de la biopelícula, especialmente con una importante disminución de la permeabilidad frente a ciprofloxacino. Sin embargo, otros mecanismos son, probablemente, más importantes para explicar la resistencia antimicrobiana de las biopelículas de MNPCR. Conclusiones Las biopelículas formadas por MNPCR son resistentes frente a amicacina, ciprofloxacino y claritromicina. Como no se demostraron diferencias importantes entre los distintos antibióticos, es probable que la permeabilidad de la biopelícula frente a los antibióticos tenga poca importancia en la resistencia antimicrobiana de las biopelículas (AU)


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Biofilmes , Amicacina/farmacocinética , Ciprofloxacina/farmacocinética , Claritromicina/farmacocinética , Mycobacteriaceae/patogenicidade
19.
Rev. esp. quimioter ; 23(1): 20-26, mar. 2010. tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-78849

RESUMO

Estudio retrospectivo de la resistencia de 1.943 aisladosclínicos de Pseudomonas aeruginosa a amikacina, tobramicina,gentamicina, ceftazidima, cefepima, meropenem, piperacilina-tazobactam y ciprofloxacino durante un periodo de 5años.La resistencia global osciló desde el 2,07% para amikacinaal 15,89% para ciprofloxacino con diferencias según la procedenciadel paciente, servicios y muestras: los aislamientos depacientes ingresados fueron significativamente más resistentesque los de los ambulatorios, (p≤0,001: tobramicina, 13,74%vs 5,05%; gentamicina, 13,74% vs 8,26%; ceftazidima, 12,67%vs 4,24%; cefepima, 11,48% vs 7,07%; meropenem, 8,57% vs2,06%), salvo para amikacina (1,98% vs 2,2%, p=0,74), piperacilina/tazobactam (6,07% vs 4,55%, p=0,14) y ciprofloxacino(17,17% vs 13,97%, p=0,06). Los servicios de críticos y lasmuestras respiratorias presentaron las tasas más altas de resistenciamientras que los servicios quirúrgicos y las muestras invasivaspresentaron la mejor sensibilidad. Un 4,8% de los aislamientosfueron multirresistentes.Comparado con nuestro anterior estudio (1.992-2.003)observamos un descenso significativo de resistencia a amikacina(7,74% vs 2,07%, p<0,001), tobramicina (13,61% vs10,26%, p<0,001), gentamicina (30,85% vs 14,73%, p<0,001)ceftazidima (14,63% vs 9,28%, p<0,001), cefepima (12,31% vs9,71%, p=0,005) y meropenem (8,84% vs 5,96%, p=0,001) y semantienen piperacilina/tazobactam (4,26% vs 5,46%, p=0,06)y ciprofloxacino (16,02% vs 15,89%, p=0,89).En nuestra zona se ha producido en los últimos años uncambio en los patrones de susceptibilidad de P. aeruginosa,alejado del descrito a nivel nacional, lo que incide en la importanciadel seguimiento local periódico de la susceptibilidad delos aislados clínicos(AU)


Retrospective study of antimicrobial susceptibility of1.943 Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates to amikacin,tobramycin, gentamicin, ceftazidime, cefepime,meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam and ciprofloxacinduring a five year period.The percentage of resistance went from 2.07% toamikacin from 15.89% to ciprofloxacin. These percentagesshowed differences depending on the extra or intrahospitalaryorigin, departments and samples. Isolatesfrom hospital patients were significantly more resistantthan the ones from ambulatory patients (p≤0.001:tobramycin,13.74% vs 5.05%; gentamicin, 13.74% vs8.26%; ceftazidime, 12.67% vs 4.24%; cefepime, 11.48%vs 7.07%; meropenem, 8.57% vs 2.06%),except for amikacin(1.98% vs 2.2%, p=0.74), piperacillin/tazobactam(6.07% vs 4.55%, p=0.14) and ciprofloxacin (17.17% vs13.97%, p=0.06). Critical care department and respiratorysamples showed the highest resistance percentageswhile surgery department and invasive samples showedthe lowest. Multidrug-resistance was found in 4.8% ofthe isolates.When comparing our data with those from our previousstudy (1992-2003), we observed a significant reductionin antibiotic resistance to amikacin (7.74% vs2.07%, p<0.001), tobramycin (13.61% vs 10.26%,p<0.001), gentamicin (30,85% vs 14.73%, p<0,001), ceftazidime(14.63% vs 9,28%, p<0.001), cefepime (12,31%vs 9.71%, p=0.005), and meropenem (7.74% vs 2.07%,p=0.001); and there were no changes in resistance to piperacillin-tazobactam (4.26% vs 5.46%, p=0,06) and ciprofloxacin (16.02% vs 15.89%, p=0.89).In the last years, the susceptibility pattern of P. aeruginosato antimicrobial agents has changed in our healthdistrict, and it is very different from the one describedin national studies so it would be very important tomonitore susceptibility of clinical isolates periodically(AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/isolamento & purificação , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/patogenicidade , Resistência a Medicamentos , Cuidados Críticos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Amicacina/uso terapêutico , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapêutico , Tobramicina/uso terapêutico , Gentamicinas/uso terapêutico , Ceftazidima/uso terapêutico , Piperacilina/uso terapêutico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...