Abemaciclib as adjuvant treatment for high-risk early breast cancer / Abemaciclib en adyuvancia para el tratamiento del cáncer de mama precoz de alto riesgo

Objective: To adapt the GHEMA report of abemaciclib, an inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6. European Medicines Agency authorization (April 2022) includes, in combination with endocrine therapy, the adjuvant treatment of adult patients with hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative, node-positive, early breast cancer at high risk of recurrence. Method: The efficacy and safety of abemaciclib were evaluated in a randomized, open-label, and multicenter phase III study. A total of 5637 patients diagnosed with early breast cancer with hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative, node positive, and high risk of recurrence were included. High risk was defined as patients with 4 or more positive axillary lymph nodes, or 1–3 positive axillary lymph nodes and at least one of the following: tumor size ≥5 cm, histologic grade 3, or Ki-67≥20%. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive adjuvant abemaciclib+endocrine therapy (n = 2808) or endocrine therapy alone (n = 2829) for 2 years, with endocrine therapy prescribed for at least 5 years. Results: With a median follow-up of 15.5 months, abemaciclib+endocrine therapy demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in invasive disease-free survival versus endocrine therapy alone [HR = 0.747 (95% CI 0.598–0.932), P = 0.0096]; achieving an absolute improvement of 3.5% invasive disease-free survival rate at 2-years. These results were maintained, with a median follow-up of 27.7 months: absolute improvement of 2.7% and 5.4% in invasive disease-free survival rate at 2 and 3 years, respectively. All-causality grade 3 or 4 adverse events were 45.9% for abemaciclib and 12.9% for endocrine therapy, and included neutropenia (19.6% vs. 0.8%), leukopenia (11.4% vs. 0.4%), and diarrhea (7.8% vs. 0.2%). Conclusions: The results of the pivotal trial are sufficient to consider abemaciclib as adjuvant treatment for...(AU)

Objetivo: Adaptar el informe GHEMA de abemaciclib, un inhibidor de quinasas dependientes de ciclinas 4 y 6, con autorización de la Agencia Europea del Medicamento en abril de 2022 para el tratamiento adyuvante de pacientes adultos con cáncer de mama precoz, receptor hormonal positivo, receptor del factor de crecimiento epidérmico negativo, con afectación ganglionar y riesgo elevado de recaída; en combinación con hormonoterapia. Método: La eficacia y seguridad de abemaciclib se evaluó en un estudio fase III multicéntrico, aleatorizado y abierto. Se incluyeron 5.637 pacientes diagnosticados de cáncer de mama precoz con ganglios positivos, receptor hormonal positivo, receptor del factor de crecimiento epidérmico negativo y alto riesgo de recaída. El criterio de alto riesgo se definió como la presencia de ≥ 4 ganglios positivos, o de 1–3 ganglios y al menos una de las siguientes características: tamaño del tumor ≥5 cm, grado histológico 3 o Ki-67 ≥ 20%. Los pacientes fueron aleatorizados (1:1) a recibir durante 2 años abemaciclib + hormonoterapia (n = 2.808) u hormonoterapia sola (n = 2.829). En ambos brazos el tratamiento con hormonoterapia se mantuvo mínimo 5 años. Resultados: Con una mediana de seguimiento de 15,5 meses, abemaciclib + hormonoterapia mostró beneficio significativo frente a la hormonoterapia sola [HR = 0,747 (IC95% 0,598-0,932), p = 0,0096], con una mejora absoluta del 3,5% en la tasa de supervivencia libre de enfermedad invasiva a 2 los años. Este beneficio se mantuvo con una mediana de seguimiento de 27,7 meses, logrando una mejora en la tasa de supervivencia libre de enfermedad invasiva del 2,7% y del 5,4% a los 2 y 3 años, respectivamente. La incidencia de efectos adversos grado 3–4 fue superior en el brazo de abemaciclib (45,9% vs. 12,9%); e incluía neutropenia (19,6% vs. 0,8%), leucopenia (11,4% vs. 0,4%) y diarrea (7,8% vs. 0,2%). Conclusiones: Los resultados del ensayo pivotal son suficientes para considerar abemaciclib como...(AU)

Abemaciclib en adyuvancia para el tratamiento del cáncer de mama precoz de alto riesgo / Abemaciclib as adjuvant treatment for high-risk early breast cancer

Objective: To adapt the GHEMA report of abemaciclib, an inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6. European Medicines Agency authorization (April 2022) includes, in combination with endocrine therapy, the adjuvant treatment of adult patients with hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative, node-positive, early breast cancer at high risk of recurrence. Method: The efficacy and safety of abemaciclib were evaluated in a randomized, open-label, and multicenter phase III study. A total of 5637 patients diagnosed with early breast cancer with hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative, node positive, and high risk of recurrence were included. High risk was defined as patients with 4 or more positive axillary lymph nodes, or 1–3 positive axillary lymph nodes and at least one of the following: tumor size ≥5 cm, histologic grade 3, or Ki-67≥20%. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive adjuvant abemaciclib+endocrine therapy (n = 2808) or endocrine therapy alone (n = 2829) for 2 years, with endocrine therapy prescribed for at least 5 years. Results: With a median follow-up of 15.5 months, abemaciclib+endocrine therapy demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in invasive disease-free survival versus endocrine therapy alone [HR = 0.747 (95% CI 0.598–0.932), P = 0.0096]; achieving an absolute improvement of 3.5% invasive disease-free survival rate at 2-years. These results were maintained, with a median follow-up of 27.7 months: absolute improvement of 2.7% and 5.4% in invasive disease-free survival rate at 2 and 3 years, respectively. All-causality grade 3 or 4 adverse events were 45.9% for abemaciclib and 12.9% for endocrine therapy, and included neutropenia (19.6% vs. 0.8%), leukopenia (11.4% vs. 0.4%), and diarrhea (7.8% vs. 0.2%). Conclusions: The results of the pivotal trial are sufficient to consider abemaciclib as adjuvant treatment for...(AU)

Objetivo: Adaptar el informe GHEMA de abemaciclib, un inhibidor de quinasas dependientes de ciclinas 4 y 6, con autorización de la Agencia Europea del Medicamento en abril de 2022 para el tratamiento adyuvante de pacientes adultos con cáncer de mama precoz, receptor hormonal positivo, receptor del factor de crecimiento epidérmico negativo, con afectación ganglionar y riesgo elevado de recaída; en combinación con hormonoterapia. Método: La eficacia y seguridad de abemaciclib se evaluó en un estudio fase III multicéntrico, aleatorizado y abierto. Se incluyeron 5.637 pacientes diagnosticados de cáncer de mama precoz con ganglios positivos, receptor hormonal positivo, receptor del factor de crecimiento epidérmico negativo y alto riesgo de recaída. El criterio de alto riesgo se definió como la presencia de ≥ 4 ganglios positivos, o de 1–3 ganglios y al menos una de las siguientes características: tamaño del tumor ≥5 cm, grado histológico 3 o Ki-67 ≥ 20%. Los pacientes fueron aleatorizados (1:1) a recibir durante 2 años abemaciclib + hormonoterapia (n = 2.808) u hormonoterapia sola (n = 2.829). En ambos brazos el tratamiento con hormonoterapia se mantuvo mínimo 5 años. Resultados: Con una mediana de seguimiento de 15,5 meses, abemaciclib + hormonoterapia mostró beneficio significativo frente a la hormonoterapia sola [HR = 0,747 (IC95% 0,598-0,932), p = 0,0096], con una mejora absoluta del 3,5% en la tasa de supervivencia libre de enfermedad invasiva a 2 los años. Este beneficio se mantuvo con una mediana de seguimiento de 27,7 meses, logrando una mejora en la tasa de supervivencia libre de enfermedad invasiva del 2,7% y del 5,4% a los 2 y 3 años, respectivamente. La incidencia de efectos adversos grado 3–4 fue superior en el brazo de abemaciclib (45,9% vs. 12,9%); e incluía neutropenia (19,6% vs. 0,8%), leucopenia (11,4% vs. 0,4%) y diarrea (7,8% vs. 0,2%). Conclusiones: Los resultados del ensayo pivotal son suficientes para considerar abemaciclib como...(AU)

Low T3 syndrome as a predictor of poor prognosis in peripheral T-cell lymphomas

Purpose The purpose of the study was to evaluate the prognostic value of low T3 syndrome in peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs). Methods One hundred and seventy-four patients of newly diagnosed PTCLs were enrolled in the study. We performed statistical analysis based on the clinical data collected. Results Thirty-Six (20.69%) patients had low T3 syndrome at first admission. Results suggested that the patients with higher score of ECOG PS, International Prognostic Index (IPI) and Prognostic Index for T-cell lymphoma (PIT), bone marrow involvement and lower level of albumin tended to develop low T3 syndrome. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 10 months and 36 months, respectively, for all patients. Pre-existing low T3 syndrome was in correlation with worse PFS and OS. Patients with low T3 syndrome showed worse PFS (4 months vs 13 months, P = 0.0001) and OS (7 months vs 83 months, P < 0.0001) than patients without low T3 syndrome. IPI and PIT, respectively, combined with low T3 syndrome improved the ability to predict OS and PFS of PTCLs. Conclusions The study indicated that low T3 syndrome may be a good candidate for predicting prognosis of peripheral T-cell lymphomas (AU)

Examining the expression and correlation of trip13 and angpt1 in small cell lung cancer: a professional exploration with an analogy to football players

This professional exploration delves into the intricate realm of thyroid hormone receptor interactor 13 (TRIP13) and angiopoietin-1 (ANGPT1) within the context of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Drawing parallels to the precision and teamwork exemplified by football players on the field, we meticulously investigate the expression patterns and correlations of these molecular players in the complex landscape of SCLC. Our study encompassed a cohort of 78 SCLC patients treated at our institution between January 2015 and April 2017. Through rigorous immunohistochemical staining, we scrutinized the expression profiles of TRIP13 and ANGPT1 within tumor tissues, seeking to unravel their associations with clinicopathological characteristics and progression-free survival. Noteworthy findings emerged from our analysis. We observed significantly elevated positive expression rates of TRIP13 in SCLC tissues with lower differentiation levels and liver metastases, highlighting the analogy to football players' precise maneuvers. Similarly, ANGPT1 exhibited markedly increased positive expression rates in cases with larger tumor diameters, lower differentiation, and liver metastases, akin to a coordinated football team's collective effort. Our professional exploration uncovered a compelling positive correlation between the expression levels of TRIP13 and ANGPT1 in SCLC, akin to the synergy seen among football players on the field. This molecular partnership shed light on an intriguing aspect of SCLC's pathophysiology. The impact on progression-free survival time further emphasized the clinical relevance of TRIP13 and ANGPT1 in SCLC. Patients expressing both TRIP13 and ANGPT1 or either molecule alone experienced significantly shorter mean progression-free survival times, akin to the swift tactics and strategies employed by football players in a high-stakes game. (AU)

MRI-Derived Radiomics Model to Predict the Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer Following Seed Brachytherapy

Objective: We aimed to investigate the predictive value of imaging features derived from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and develop a radiomics model predicting the biochemical recurrence-free survival (BFS) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with seed brachytherapy (seed-BT). Methods: The data of 272 patients with PCa treated with seed-BT at Peking University Third Hospital from 2007 to 2019 was retrospectively investigated. Based on the eligibility criteria, 83 patients were finally included in our study. The cohort was divided into two groups in a ratio of 8:2 (training set: n = 67, test set: n = 16). The Cox survival model combined with the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm was applied to select the radiomics features from T2WI of pretreatment MRI. A radiomics model with selected features was established to predict the BFS. Results: Nineteen patients experienced biochemical recurrence (BCR) during a median follow-up period of 46 months. Three features with non-zero coefficients were selected from 1598 features and used to construct a radiomics model for BCR prediction. The model accurately predicted the BCR in both the training and test groups, for which the concordance index (C-index) were 0.83 and 0.78, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of the test set was conducted to assess the prediction accuracy. The model achieved a high area under the operator curve (AUC) performance for BCR prediction in the test cohort. Conclusions: Our study revealed the considerable potential of a radiomics model based on MRI-derived imaging features in BCR prediction of PCa patients after seed-BT. Radiomics provides a new perspective to clinicians assessing the outcome of radiotherapy, facilitating accurate prognostic evaluation and preoperative consultation for PCa patients followed by seed-BT (AU)

El desabastecimiento de BCG para instilación intravesical se asocia a la recidiva tumoral precoz en pacientes con tumor vesical no-músculo invasor de alto riesgo / BCG shortage for intravesical instillation is associated with early tumor recurrence in patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder tumors

Introducción Durante 2019 se produjo una escasez mundial de cepas de BCG para instilación intravesical, limitando la disponibilidad de esquemas de dosis completas para la fase de mantenimiento. El objetivo principal del estudio fue analizar el impacto del desabastecimiento de BCG sobre la recidiva tumoral en nuestro centro. Los criterios de valoración secundarios incluyeron las tasas de recidiva y supervivencia libre de progresión y las características específicas de la recidiva tumoral. Métodos Estudio de cohortes retrospectivo que incluye a 158 sujetos (64 tratados durante 2019 y 94 durante 2017) con cáncer vesical no infiltrante de alto riesgo y tratados con una combinación de resección transuretral de vejiga (RTUV) seguida de instilación intravesical de BCG adyuvante en un hospital terciario de España. Se analizaron las características basales de ambos grupos. El periodo transcurrido hasta el evento de interés (recaída; incluyendo recurrencia o progresión) se estimó con el análisis de supervivencia de Kaplan-Meier. Las tasas de supervivencia libre de enfermedad se analizaron mediante un modelo multivariable de regresión de Cox de riesgos proporcionales. Resultados La mediana del tiempo de seguimiento fue de 24 y 50 meses en las muestras de 2019 y 2017, respectivamente, con una mediana del número de instilaciones de 8 y 12, respectivamente. Se observó una mediana de tiempo hasta la recurrencia de 285 días (145-448) durante 2019 y de 382 días (215-567) en 2017 (log-rank p=0,025). Un análisis multivariable adicional reveló un HR proporcional para la tasa de supervivencia libre de enfermedad de 1,87 (IC 95%: 1,04-3,37 p=0,036). No se observaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en las características de la recaída tumoral (AU)

Introduction During 2019 there was a worldwide shortage of BCG strains for intravesical instillation, limiting the availability of full dose schemes for maintenance courses. The main objective was to analyze the impact on tumoral relapse secondary to BCG shortage in our center. Secondary outcomes included recurrence and progression–free survival rates and tumoral relapse specific characteristics. Methods Retrospective cohort study including 158 subjects (64 treated during 2019 and 94 during 2017) with high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer and treated with a combination of Transurethral bladder resection (TURB) followed by adjuvant intravesical instillation with BCG in a tertiary hospital in Spain. Basal characteristics of both groups were analyzed. Times to event of interest (relapse; including recurrence and/or progression) were estimated with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Disease-free survival rates were analyzed using a multivariable Cox regression model of proportional hazards. Results Median follow-up in the 2019 sample was 24 months and 50 months in the 2017 group with a median number of instillations of 8 and 12 respectively. Median time to relapse of 285 days (145-448) during 2019 and 382 days (215-567) in 2017 were observed (logRank P=.025). Further multivariable analysis revealed a proportional hazard ratio (HR) for disease-free survival rate of 1.87 (95% CI: 1.04-3.37 P=.036). No statistically significant differences in tumoral relapse characteristics were observed. Conclusion BCG shortage and subsequent reduced-dose schemes used for intravesical instillation due to limited availability, increase early tumoral relapse rates. These findings are consistent with available evidence, showing the need for full-dose BCG courses (AU)

Multiparametric immune profiling of advanced cervical cancer to predict response to programmed death-1 inhibitor combination therapy: an exploratory study of the CLAP trial

Purpose Checkpoint immunotherapy is a promising treatment option for advanced cervical cancer. To aid in selecting patients for this treatment, we identified potential predictors of the response to anti-PD-1 combination therapy. Methods We simultaneously characterized CD8+, FoxP3+, PD-L1+, CD68+, CD31+, PANCK+, and PANCK−PD-L1+ cells at the invasive margin (IM) of tumor by multispectral imaging of tissue sections from 37 patients with advanced cervical cancer in our previous trial cohort. The densities of each cell and cell-to-cell topography were compared between the responder and non-responder groups and evaluated for their predictive value in clinical response and survival. Results CD8+ T cells, PD-L1+ cells, and PANCK−PD-L1+ immune cells showed higher densities at the IM in the responders than in the non-responders (P = 0.022, 0.0094, and 0.049, respectively). A higher density of CD8+ T cells at the IM was related to prolonged progression-free survival (PFS; P = 0.031). A higher ratio of CD68+/CD8+ cells was found in the non-responder group (P = 0.003) and related to poor PFS (P = 0.016). A higher density of PANCK−PD-L1+ immune cells within 20, 30, and 45 µm of PANCK+ tumor cells was correlated with better clinical response (P = 0.017, 0.017, and 0.02, respectively). Conclusions Multiparametric immune profiling of CD8+ T cells, PD-L1+ cells, CD68+ macrophages and PANCK−PD-L1+ immune cells at the invasive margin may help identify patients with cervical cancer who may benefit from anti-PD-1 combination therapy. (AU)

Efectividad y seguridad de palbociclib en mujeres con cáncer de mama metastásico con receptores hormonales positivos: resultados en vida real / Effectiveness and safety of palbociclib in women with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: real-life results

Objetivos: El objetivo del estudio es evaluar la efectividad y seguridad de palbociclib como tratamiento de primera línea en mujeres con cáncer de mama metastásico con receptores hormonales positivos y receptor del factor de crecimiento epidérmico humano 2 negativo en estado postmenopáusico, y como tratamiento de segunda línea en mujeres en estado post-, pre- y perimenopáusicas.Materiales y métodos: Estudio descriptivo retrospectivo que incluyó a mujeres en tratamiento con palbociclib entre enero del 2017 y julio del 2020. Se incluyeron a los pacientes según si cumplía los criterios del informe de posicionamiento terapéutico para los inhibidores CDK4/6 publicado en 2018, ampliándose su uso tras la posterior actualización. La efectividad se evaluó midiendo la supervivencia libre de progresión y supervivencia global a partir del método Kaplan-Meier. La seguridad se evaluó mediante el número de reacciones adversas y su grado según “Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events” version 5.0.Resultados: Se incluyeron 60 pacientes en el estudio. La mediana de edad fue de 58,7 años, con un 35% de las pacientes pre-/perimenopáusicas. La mediana de SLP para las pacientes en primera línea en estado postmenopáusicas y segunda línea en estado post-, pre- y perimenopáusicas fue de 21,18 meses (IC95%; NA-NA) y 17,79 meses (IC95%; 7,18-28,39) respectivamente y no se alcanzó la mediana para la SG en ninguno de los dos casos. El efecto adverso más frecuente grado ≥3 fue la neutropenia. Conclusiones: Palbociclib ha mostrado un beneficio a nivel de efectividad con un perfil de seguridad tolerable en mujer con cáncer de mama metastásico. (AU)

Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of palbociclib in women with metastatic breast cancer with positive hormone receptors and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative.Materials and methods: A retrospective descriptive study including women receiving palbociclib from January 2017 until July 2020. Patients were included depending on whether it met the criteria of the therapeutic positioning report for CDK4/6 inhibitors published in 2018, expanding their use after further updating. Effectiveness was assessed by measuring progression-free survival and overall survival from the Kaplan-Meier method. Safety was assessed by the number of adverse reactions and their degree according to «Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events» version 5.0.Results: A total of 60 patients were included in the study. The median age was 58.7 years, with 35% of pre-/perimenopausal patients. Median progression-free survival for first-line post-menopausal and second-line post-, pre- and perimenopausal patients was 21.18 months (IC95%; NR-NR) and 17.79 months (IC95%; 7.18-28.39) respectively and the median for overall survival was not reached in either case. The most common side effect of ≥3 was neutropenia. Conclusions: Palbociclib has shown an effectiveness benefit with a tolerable safety profile in women with metastatic breast cancer. (AU)

Excess weight and anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor’s outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are one of the most effective treatments available in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. However, at present, there are no clinical or analytical biomarkers that define which patients benefit with certainty from these treatments. In our study, we evaluated whether excess weight could be a good predictive biomarker of benefit from these drugs.MethodsWe studied a population of 79 patients, divided into a study group with 39 patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer treated with immunotherapy and 40 patients in a control group, diagnosed with different advanced cancers, treated with non-immunotherapy treatment. We analyzed according to the presence of excess weight or not, the treatment’s outcome in the study group and in the control group (objective response, and progression-free and overall survival).ResultsIn our study, we detected a better response rate to immunotherapy in patients with excess weight (62.50 vs 26.08%, OR 4.72, p = 0.02), and a better median progression-free survival (14.19 vs 5.03 months, HR 0.50, p = 0.058) and median overall survival (33.84 months vs 20.76 months, HR 0.43, p = 0.01) in the study group. These findings were specific to the immunotherapy group since in the control group, with patients who did not receive immune checkpoint inhibitors, these findings were not found.ConclusionOur study suggests that patients with excess weight who receive anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer have a better outcome. This effect is specific to patients receiving immunotherapy. (AU)

Cemiplimab in Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Real-World Experience in a Monographic Oncology Center / Cemiplimab en el carcinoma de células escamosas cutáneo avanzado: experiencia del mundo real en un centro oncológico monográfico

Management of advanced cSCC is challenging, and many available systemic medications have modest efficacy. Cemiplimab has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of advanced cSCC in clinical trials, but real-world data are still limited. With the objective of evaluating the efficacy of cemiplimab in a real-world clinical setting, we conducted a prospective observational study of 13 patients with advanced cSCC. Six patients (46%) had locally advanced disease, while 7 (54%) had metastatic disease. A total of 8 patients (62%) responded to cemiplimab. Five (38%) showed a partial response, while 3 (23%) showed a complete response. Four patients with an initial partial response presented subsequent disease progression during follow-up. Six patients (46%) developed AEs, most of which were mild (G1). PFS was 5.9 months, with a median follow-up was 9 months. In conclusion, cemiplimab demonstrated its utility in the treatment of advanced cSCC, with acceptable response rates, a remarkable number of complete responses, and a very good safety profile (AU)

El manejo del carcinoma de células escamosas cutáneo (cSCC) avanzado es complicado, siendo modesta la eficacia de muchos de los fármacos sistémicos disponibles. Cemiplimab ha demostrado su eficacia en el tratamiento del cSCC avanzado en ensayos clínicos, pero los datos del mundo real siguen siendo limitados. Con el objetivo de evaluar la eficacia de cemiplimab en un entorno clínico del mundo real, realizamos un estudio observacional prospectivo de 13 pacientes con cSCC avanzado. Seis pacientes (46%) tenían enfermedad localmente avanzada, mientras que 7 (54%) tenían enfermedad metastásica. Un total de 8 pacientes (62%) respondieron a cemiplimab, 5 (38%) mostraron una respuesta parcial y 3 (23%) mostraron una respuesta completa. Cuatro pacientes con respuesta parcial inicial presentaron una progresión de la enfermedad subsiguiente durante el seguimiento. Seis pacientes (46%) desarrollaron efectos secundarios, siendo leve la mayoría de los mismos (G1). La supervivencia libre de progresión fue de 5,9 meses, con un seguimiento medio de 9 meses. En conclusión, cemiplimab demostró su utilidad en el tratamiento del cSCC avanzado, con unas tasas de respuesta aceptables, un número destacable de respuestas completas y un perfil de seguridad muy bueno (AU)

[Artículo traducido] Cemiplimab en el carcinoma de células escamosas cutáneo avanzado: experiencia del mundo real en un centro oncológico monográfico / Cemiplimab in Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Real-World Experience in a Monographic Oncology Center

El manejo del carcinoma de células escamosas cutáneo (cSCC) avanzado es complicado, siendo modesta la eficacia de muchos de los fármacos sistémicos disponibles. Cemiplimab ha demostrado su eficacia en el tratamiento del cSCC avanzado en ensayos clínicos, pero los datos del mundo real siguen siendo limitados. Con el objetivo de evaluar la eficacia de cemiplimab en un entorno clínico del mundo real, realizamos un estudio observacional prospectivo de 13 pacientes con cSCC avanzado. Seis pacientes (46%) tenían enfermedad localmente avanzada, mientras que 7 (54%) tenían enfermedad metastásica. Un total de 8 pacientes (62%) respondieron a cemiplimab, 5 (38%) mostraron una respuesta parcial y 3 (23%) mostraron una respuesta completa. Cuatro pacientes con respuesta parcial inicial presentaron una progresión de la enfermedad subsiguiente durante el seguimiento. Seis pacientes (46%) desarrollaron efectos secundarios, siendo leve la mayoría de los mismos (G1). La supervivencia libre de progresión fue de 5,9 meses, con un seguimiento medio de 9 meses. En conclusión, cemiplimab demostró su utilidad en el tratamiento del cSCC avanzado, con unas tasas de respuesta aceptables, un número destacable de respuestas completas y un perfil de seguridad muy bueno (AU)

Management of advanced cSCC is challenging, and many available systemic medications have modest efficacy. Cemiplimab has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of advanced cSCC in clinical trials, but real-world data are still limited. With the objective of evaluating the efficacy of cemiplimab in a real-world clinical setting, we conducted a prospective observational study of 13 patients with advanced cSCC. Six patients (46%) had locally advanced disease, while 7 (54%) had metastatic disease. A total of 8 patients (62%) responded to cemiplimab. Five (38%) showed a partial response, while 3 (23%) showed a complete response. Four patients with an initial partial response presented subsequent disease progression during follow-up. Six patients (46%) developed AEs, most of which were mild (G1). PFS was 5.9 months, with a median follow-up was 9 months. In conclusion, cemiplimab demonstrated its utility in the treatment of advanced cSCC, with acceptable response rates, a remarkable number of complete responses, and a very good safety profile (AU)

Análisis coste-utilidad de venetoclaxen combinación con obinutuzumab comotratamiento de primera línea de la leucemia linfocítica crónica en España / Cost-utility analysis of venetoclax in combination with obinutuzumab as first-line treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in Spain

Objetivo: Venetoclax en combinación con obinutuzumab ha mostradofrente a la inmunoquimioterapia mejoras significativas en términos de eficacia(supervivencia libre de progresión) en pacientes con leucemia linfocíticacrónica que no han recibido tratamiento previo. El objetivo de este estudiofue evaluar su eficiencia en España a partir de un análisis de coste-utilidad.Método: A partir de un modelo de análisis de la supervivencia adaptadoal contexto español y basado en tres estados de salud (supervivencia librede progresión, supervivencia tras progresión y muerte), se llevó a cabouna simulación de la evolución de los pacientes candidatos a iniciar unaprimera línea de tratamiento para un horizonte temporal de toda la vida. Venetoclax en combinación con obinutuzumab se comparó frente a lasopciones terapéuticas más utilizadas para estos pacientes en el momentodel diseño del estudio: clorambucilo en combinación con binutuzumab,ibrutinib, fludarabina en combinación con ciclofosfamida y rituximab, ybendamustina en combinación con rituximab. Los datos de eficacia paraestimar las curvas de supervivencia fueron derivados del estudio CLL14 y de un metaanálisis en red. El análisis consideró la perspectiva del Sistema Nacional de Salud incluyendo los costes sanitarios directos, en concreto losfarmacológicos y su administración, y los asociados al manejo de la enfermedady acontecimientos adversos. El uso de recursos fue validado por ungrupo de expertos. Se emplearon datos de calidad de vida para estimarlos años de vida ajustados por calidad obtenidos para cada alternativa.Se consideró un umbral de 25.000 €/años de vida ajustados por calidad. La robustez del modelo se evaluó mediante análisis de sensibilidad determinísticosy probabilísticos.

Objective: Venetoclax in combination with obinutuzumab has significantlyimproved efficacy versus immunochemotherapy (progression-freesurvival) in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia who have notreceived prior treatment. The objective of this study was to evaluate itsefficiency in Spain using a cost-utility analysis.Method: Using a partitioned-survival analysis model adapted to theSpanish context and based on three health states (progression-free urvival,survival after progression, and death), a simulation of the evolutionof patients who were candidates for initiating first-line treatment wasconducted for a lifetime time horizon. Venetoclax in combination withobinutuzumab was compared to the most commonly used therapeuticoptions for these patients at the time of study design: chlorambucil incombination with obinutuzumab, ibrutinib, fludarabine in combinationwith cyclophosphamide and rituximab, and bendamustine in combinationwith rituximab. In order to estimate survival curves, efficacy datawere derived from the CLL14 trial and a network meta-analysis. The analysis was conducted from the perspective of the Spanish NationalHealthcare System and included direct healthcare costs (i.e. pharmacologicalcosts and their administration), and those associated with themanagement of the disease and adverse events. The resource use wasvalidated by an expert group. Quality of life data were used to estimatethe quality-adjusted life years obtained for each alternative. A thresholdof €25,000/quality-adjusted life years was used. The robustness of themodel was evaluated using deterministic and probabilistic sensitivityanalyses.

Evaluación de la relación exposición-respuestade cetuximab en pacientes con cáncer colorrectal metastásico y cáncer de cabeza y cuello / Assessment of exposure-response relationship for cetuximab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and head and neck cancer

Objetivo: Evaluar, en condiciones de vida real, la relación entre lasconcentraciones valle en estado estacionario de cetuximab y el control dela enfermedad, así como buscar la relación entre estas concentraciones y lasupervivencia. Además, estudiar si existe una concentración límite que sepueda asociar con la probabilidad de beneficio clínico.Método: Estudio observacional prospectivo llevado a cabo en pacientescon cáncer colorrectal metastásico o cáncer de cabeza y cuello entratamiento con cetuximab. Se realizó un análisis de regresión de ecuacionesde estimación generalizadas para evaluar la asociación entre laconcentración valle en estado estacionario de cetuximab y la respuesta altratamiento (progresión o beneficio clínico). Mediante modelos de riesgosproporcionales de Cox, se evaluó la asociación entre la mediana de concentracionesvalle en estado estacionario de cetuximab en cada pacienteo la última medida con la supervivencia global y la supervivencia librede progresión, en cada una de las patologías. Asimismo, se buscó unpunto de corte óptimo a través del área bajo la curva de característicasoperativas del receptor. Resultados: Se analizaron 30 muestras de 16 pacientes. La concentraciónvalle en estado estacionario mediana fue 26,86 mg/l y se encontróuna gran variabilidad inter e intraindividual (desviación estándar de 32,4 y16,9 mg/l, respectivamente). Se observó una asociación positiva entre laconcentración valle en estado estacionario y el beneficio clínico (odds ratio1,24; intervalo de confianza del 95%: 0,95-1,63; p = 0,113), aunque noalcanzó significación estadística debido a la baja potencia.

Objective: There is limited scientific evidence on the cetuximab exposure-response relationship and no concentration threshold has been associatedwith optimal disease control. The aims were to assess, in a real-lifesetting, the relationship between steady state cetuximab concentrations(Ctrough, SS) and disease control.Method: A prospective observational study in patients with metastaticcolorectal cancer or head and neck cancer treated with cetuximab. Steadystate trough concentrations were compared with the results of radiologicalassessment of response (progression or clinical benefit). Generalizedestimating equations analysis was performed. To test the association betweensteady state concentrations and overall survival and progression-freesurvival, Cox proportional hazard models were developed. An optimalcut-off point was searched using the area under the receiver operatingcharacteristic curve.Results: A total of 30 steady state cetuximab concentrations from16 patients were analysed. Median Ctrough, SS was 26.86 mg/L andthere was marked inter- and intraindividual variability (standard deviation 32.4 mg/L and 16.9 mg/L, respectively). A positive associationwas found between cetuximab Ctrough, SS and clinical benefit (odds ratio1.24, 95% confidence interval: 0.95-1.63, p = 0.113), although withoutreaching statistical significance. The area under the receiver operatingcharacteristic curve (n = 30) had moderate discrimination power (0.71;95% confidence interval 0.49‑0.93), and the empirical optimal cutoffpoint was 19.12 mg/L. However, no association was observed betweencetuximab Ctrough, SS and survival in metastatic colorectal cancer or neckcancer patients.

Efectividad y seguridad del tratamiento con panitumumab en cáncer colorrectal metastásico / Effectiveness and safety of panitumumab for metastatic colorectal cancer treatment

Objetivos: Evaluar la efectividad y seguridad de panitumumab en los pacientes con cáncer colorrectal metastásico y comparar los resultados obtenidos con los publicados en los ensayos clínicos.Material y métodos: Estudio observacional retrospectivo de los pacientes con cáncer colorrectal metastásico en tratamiento con panitumumab desde junio de 2010 hasta septiembre de 2017. Se recogieron de la historia clínica informatizada datos demográficos, clínicos y terapéuticos. Las variables principales de efectividad fueron: supervivencia libre de progresión, supervivencia global y tipo de respuesta al tratamiento. Los efectos adversos presentados y su gravedad establecieron el perfil de seguridad al mismo.Resultados: Se incluyeron 85 pacientes, 60 varones. La tasa de respuesta global fue de 17,8%, de las cuales el 15,3% fueron respuestas parciales. El 14% presentaron estabilización de la enfermedad y el 51,8% progresión de la misma. La mediana de supervivencia libre de progresión fue de 6 meses (IC 95% 4,7-6,2). El tratamiento fue, en general, bien tolerado. La toxicidad más frecuente fue la cutánea, afectando al 82,4% de los pacientes.Conclusiones: Panitumumab constituye una terapia con una efectividad y tolerabilidad aceptable en el tratamiento del CCRm en la población KRAS WT. La combinación del fármaco con esquemas de quimioterapia produce una mejora significativa en la supervivencia libre de progresión. (AU)

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of panitumumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and to compare the results obtained with those published in clinical trials.Material and methods: Retrospective observational study of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with panitumumab from June 2010 to September 2017. Demographic, clinical and therapeutic data were collected from the computerised clinical history. The main effectiveness endpoints were: progression-free survival, overall survival and type of response to treatment. Adverse events and their severity established the safety profile.Results: 85 patients, 60 males, were included. The overall response rate was 17.8%, of which 15.3% were partial responses. Disease stabilisation occurred in 14% and disease progression in 51.8%. Median progression-free survival was 6 months (95% CI 4.7-6.2). Treatment was generally well tolerated. The most frequent toxicity was skin toxicity, affecting 82.4% of patients.Conclusions: Panitumumab is a therapy with acceptable effectiveness and tolerability in treatment of mRCC in KRAS WT population. The combination of the drug with chemotherapy regimens produces a significant improvement in progression-free survival. (AU)

Estudio observacional de práctica habitual con palbociclib y hormonoterapia para carcinoma de mama avanzado / Observational real world data with palbociclib associated to hormone therapy for advanced breast carcinoma

Objetivo: Los inhibidores de quinasas dependientes de ciclina CDK4y CDK6 poseen efecto sinérgico al asociarse con hormonoterapia. Suuso está extendido en primera y sucesivas líneas de carcinoma de mamaavanzado tipo luminal por mejorar la supervivencia libre de progresión.Los objetivos de nuestro estudio se basaron en analizar la evolución clínica y la toxicidad presentada en las pacientes tratadas en nuestro centrocon palbociclib, así como relacionar la evolución con las diferentes variables clínico-patológicas.Método: El estudio, de tipo observacional y retrospectivo, recogió datosde pacientes con cáncer de mama avanzado o metastásico tratados conhormonoterapia y palbociclib en el Hospital Universitario de Cabueñesentre los años 2017 y 2020. Se analizaron diferentes variables clínicopatológicas, así como información sobre toxicidad y supervivencia.Resultados: Un total de 72 mujeres y 1 varón con una mediana deedad de 63 años recibieron palbociclib asociado a inhibidor de aromatasa o fulvestrant. En primera línea la supervivencia libre de progresión fuede 22 meses, y en segunda o sucesivas líneas de 13 meses. El 95,9% de las pacientes presentaron algún tipo de efecto adverso, principalmentehematológico. No se produjo ningún abandono por toxicidad, aunquelos retrasos y los ajustes de dosis fueron frecuentes (61,7% y 42,7%, respectivamente). Solo la situación funcional al inicio del tratamiento influyóde manera significativa en la supervivencia libre de progresión (22 mesesen ECOG 0 versus 12 meses en ECOG ≥ 1; p = 0,021). (AU)

Objective: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors have a synergisticeffect in combination with endocrine therapy. This combination is usedas first and subsequent-line treatment for advanced luminal breast carcinoma because it increases progression-free survival. We analysed clinicalcourse and toxicity in patients treated with palbociclib in our hospital anddetermined potential associations between these variables and clinicopathological variables.Method: Observational retrospective study including patients withadvanced or metastatic breast cancer treated with palbociclib plus endocrine therapy at the Hospital Universitario de Cabueñes between 2017and 2020. We analysed clinicopathological variables, toxicity, and survival.Results: In total, 72 women and 1 man (median age: 63 years) receivedpalbociclib plus an aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant. When used as firstline treatment, progression-free survival was 22 months, and as secondand subsequent-line treatment, progression-free survival was 13 months.Adverse effects (mainly haematological) were experienced by nearly all patients (95.9%). Treatment was not discontinued because of toxicity inany patient, although delays and dose adjustments were common (61.7%and 42.7%, respectively). Performance status alone had a significantimpact on progression-free survival (22 months in patients with ECOG 0vs 12 months in patients with ECOG ≥ 1; P = 0.021). (AU)

Long-term disease outcome and volume-based decision strategy in a large cohort of multiple brain metastases treated with a mono-isocentric linac-based Stereotactic Radiosurgery technique

Purpose Radiosurgery (SRS) is an effective treatment option for brain metastases (BMs). Long-term results of the first worldwide experience with a mono-isocentric, non-coplanar, linac-based stereotactic technique in the treatment of multiple BMs are reported. Methods patients with multiple BMs, life expectancy > 3 months, and good performance status (≤ 2) were treated with simultaneous SRS with volumetric modulated arc technique. Data were retrospectively evaluated. Results 172 patients accounting for 1079 BMs were treated at our institution from 2017 to 2020. The median number of treated metastases was 4 (range 2–22). Primary tumor histology was: lung (44.8%), breast (32%), and melanoma (9.4%). The 2-year LPFS was 71.6%, respectively. A biological effective dose (BED) ≥ 51.3 Gy10 correlated with higher local control. Uncontrolled systemic disease and melanoma histology were independent prognostic factors correlated with decreased iPFS. Patients with > 10 BMs had a trend towards shorter iPFS (p = 0.055). 31 patients received multiple SRS courses (2–7) in case of intracranial progression. The median iOS was 22.4 months. Brainstem metastases and total PTV > 7.1 cc correlated with shorter iOS. The 1- and 2-year WBRT-free survival was 83.2% and 61.1%, respectively. Conclusion Long-term results in a large patient population treated with a mono-isocentric, dedicated technique demonstrated its effectiveness and safety also in the case of multiple courses. The shortened treatment time and the possibility to safely spare healthy brain tissue allows the safe treatment of patients with a large number of metastases and to deliver multiple courses of SRS. In selected cases, the administration of WBRT can be delayed (AU)

Peripheral blood T-cell receptor repertoire as a predictor of clinical outcomes in gastrointestinal cancer patients treated with PD-1 inhibitor

Background Identifying valid biomarkers for patient selection impressively promotes the success of anti-PD-1 therapy. However, the unmet need for biomarkers in gastrointestinal (GI) cancers remains significant. We aimed to explore the predictive value of the circulating T-cell receptor (TCR) repertoire for clinical outcomes in GI cancers who received anti-PD-1 therapy. Methods 137 pre- and 79 post-treated peripheral blood samples were included. The TCR repertoire was evaluated by sequencing of complementarity-determining region 3 (CDR3) in the TRB gene. The Shannon index was used to measure the diversity of the TCR repertoire, and Morisita’s overlap index was used to determine TCR repertoire similarities between pre- and post-treated samples. Results Among all enrolled patients, 76 received anti-PD-1 monotherapy and 61 received anti-PD-1 combination therapy. In the anti-PD-1 monotherapy cohort, patients with higher baseline TCR diversity exhibited a significantly higher disease control rate (77.8% vs. 47.2%; hazard ratio [HR] 3.92; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14–13.48; P = 0.030) and a longer progression-free survival (PFS) (median: 6.47 months vs. 2.77 months; HR 2.10; 95% CI 1.16–3.79; P = 0.014) and overall survival (OS) (median: NA vs. 8.97 months; HR 3.53; 95% CI 1.49–8.38; P = 0.004) than those with lower diversity. Moreover, patients with a higher TCR repertoire similarity still showed a superior PFS (4.43 months vs. 1.84 months; HR 13.98; 95% CI 4.37–44.68; P < 0.001) and OS (13.40 months vs. 6.12 months; HR 2.93; 95% CI 1.22–7.03; P = 0.016) even in the cohort with lower baseline diversity. However, neither biomarker showed predictive value in the anti-PD-1 combination therapy cohort. Interestingly, the combination of TCR diversity and PD-L1 expression can facilitate patient stratification in a pooled cohort. Conclusion The circulating TCR repertoire can serve as a predictor of clinical outcomes in anti-PD-1 therapy in GI cancers (AU)

Sequential chemotherapy regimen of induction with panitumumab and paclitaxel followed by radiotherapy and panitumumab in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer unfit for platinum derivatives. The phase II, PANTERA/TTCC-2010-06 study

Background Sequential treatment of Panitumumab (Pb) plus Paclitaxel (Px) as induction treatment (IT) followed by concurrent bioradiotherapy (Bio–RT) with Pb may be an alternative for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA-SCCHN) in patients ineligible for high-dose cisplatin therapy. Methods Phase II, single-arm, multicentre study, with two-stage design, in patients ≥ 18 years with stage III–IVa–b LA-SCCHN unfit for platinum. Patients received Px + Pb (9 weeks) as IT followed by Bio–RT + Pb. Primary endpoint: overall response rate (ORR) after IT, defined as: more than 70% of patients achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) to IT. Secondary end-points: progression-free survival, organ preservation rate, safety profile. Results Study ended prematurely (51 patients) due to slow recruitment. ORR: 66.7% (95% CI: 53.7–79.6), 8 (15.7%) CR and 26 (51.0%) PR. 39 patients (76%) completed radiotherapy (RT). Pb and/or Px-related adverse events (AEs) grade 3–4: 56.9% during IT and 63.4% during the concomitant phase, of which most common were skin toxicity (33.3%). Five deaths occurred during treatment, two of them (3.9%) were Pb and/or Px-related. Conclusions Although underpowered, ORR was higher than the pre-specified boundary for considering the treatment active. Although Px + Pb as IT provides some benefit, the safety profile is worse than expected. To consider Pb + Px as IT as an alternative for platinum-unsuitable LA-SCCHN, further research/investigation would be needed (AU)

PILE: a candidate prognostic score in cancer patients treated with immunotherapy

Background Although the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) became a vital part of cancer care, many patients do not respond to treatment, indicating need for biomarkers. The Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value (PIV) is a recently developed peripheral blood count-based biomarker. Herein, we evaluated a PIV-based candidate scoring system as a prognostic biomarker in ICI-treated patients. Methods A total of 120 advanced cancer patients treated with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 inhibitors for any cancer type were included in this study. The PILE scoring system incorporating the PIV (< median vs. ≥ median), lactate dehydrogenase levels (normal vs. > normal) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0 vs. ≥ 1) was constructed from the multivariate analyses and used for stratification. The association between overall survival (OS), progression-free survival and PILE risk category was evaluated with multivariate analysis. Results The median follow-up was 9.62 months and the median OS of all cohort were 12.42 ± 2.75 months. Patients with higher PIV had significantly decreased OS (7.75 ± 1.64 vs. 18.63 ± 4.26 months, p = 0.037). The patients in the PILE high-risk group (PILE score 2–3) had decreased OS (18.63 ± 4.02 vs. 5.09 ± 1.23 months, HR: 2.317, 95% CI: 1.450–3.700, p < 0.001) and PFS (7.69 ± 1.30 vs. 2.69 ± 0.65 months, HR: 1.931, 95% CI: 1.263–2.954, p = 0.002) compared to PILE low-risk group (PILE score 0–1). The Harrell C-Index values were 0.65 and 0.61 for OS and PFS prediction, respectively. Conclusion In this study, we demonstrated a decreased overall survival in ICI-treated patients with a higher PILE score. If prospective studies validate our results, PILE score could be a biomarker for immunotherapy. (AU)

Long-term outcomes of induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy vs chemoradiotherapy alone as treatment of unresectable head and neck cancer: follow-up of the Spanish Head and Neck Cancer Group (TTCC) 2503 Trial

Background Our previous phase-3 study (TTCC 2503) failed to show overall survival advantage of 2 induction chemotherapy (IC) regimens followed by standard concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) over CRT alone in patients with unresectable locally advanced head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma (LAHNSCC). This study described the long-term survival of those patients. Materials and methods Long-term follow-up study of patients with untreated LAHNSCC assigned to IC (three cycles), with either docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (TPF arm) or cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (PF arm), followed by CRT, or CRT alone, included in the previous TTCC 2503 trial. Results In the intention-to-treat population (n = 439), the median OS times were 25.4 (95% CI, 16.8–34.4), 26.2 (95% CI, 18.2–36.6) and 25.4 months (95% CI, 17.4–36.0) in the TPF-CRT, PF-CRT and CRT arms, respectively (log-rank p = 0.51). In the per-protocol population (n = 355), patients with larynx–hypopharynx primary tumors treated with IC (TPF or PF) followed by CRT had a longer median PFS than those who received CRT alone. Moreover, patients with ECOG 0 treated with IC (TPF or PF) followed by CRT had a better TTF than those with CRT alone. There were no statistically significant differences in terms of OS, PFS or TTF, according to the tumor load or affected nodes. Conclusion After a long follow-up, the TTCC 2503 trial failed to show the benefit of IC-CRT in unresectable LAHNSCC regarding the primary end point. However, fit patients with ECOG 0 and primary larynx–hypopharyngeal tumors may benefit from the use of IC if administered by an experienced team (AU)