Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 4.089
Filtrar
1.
BMJ Case Rep ; 17(8)2024 Aug 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39179262

RESUMO

Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) in mesenteric vessels are exceptionally rare. These congenital vascular anomalies lead to direct vascular flow between the highly pressured arterial system and the low-pressure venous system. We describe the case of a patient with prior left colectomy for splenic flexure colonic adenocarcinoma presenting with persistent abdominal pain after developing multiple mesenteric thromboses. CT and colonoscopy showed left hemicolon congestion, anastomotic stenosis and mucosal oedema. Mesenteric angiogram revealed AVMs in the right colic and left colic arteries. Embolisation of the left colic AVM led to symptom resolution without recurrence at interval follow-up.


Assuntos
Malformações Arteriovenosas , Humanos , Malformações Arteriovenosas/complicações , Malformações Arteriovenosas/diagnóstico por imagem , Trombose/diagnóstico por imagem , Trombose/etiologia , Masculino , Neoplasias do Colo/complicações , Neoplasias do Colo/cirurgia , Embolização Terapêutica , Colectomia , Adenocarcinoma/complicações , Doenças do Colo/etiologia , Doenças do Colo/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças do Colo/cirurgia , Dor Abdominal/etiologia , Colo/irrigação sanguínea , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Colonoscopia , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/diagnóstico por imagem , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/etiologia
2.
BMJ Case Rep ; 17(8)2024 Aug 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39142845

RESUMO

A woman in her 20s presented with haematemesis, post-prandial abdominal pain, weight loss and anaemia. Imaging revealed a non-enhancing mass in the retroperitoneal space along the mesenteric plane, encasing the porto-mesenteric vasculature. Endoscopy showed oesophageal varices. She was diagnosed with sclerosing mesenteritis, causing extrinsic compression of the portal vein and superior mesenteric artery. She underwent endoscopic variceal ligation and received prednisolone and tamoxifen. After 3 months, her post-prandial pain improved, and she did not have further bleeding episodes.


Assuntos
Paniculite Peritoneal , Veia Porta , Humanos , Feminino , Paniculite Peritoneal/complicações , Paniculite Peritoneal/diagnóstico por imagem , Paniculite Peritoneal/diagnóstico , Veia Porta/diagnóstico por imagem , Varizes Esofágicas e Gástricas/etiologia , Dor Abdominal/etiologia , Artéria Mesentérica Superior/diagnóstico por imagem , Prednisolona/uso terapêutico , Prednisolona/administração & dosagem , Ligadura , Hematemese/etiologia , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/etiologia , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
3.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 13(12): e035017, 2024 Jun 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38879458

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Acute mesenteric ischemia is rare, and few large-scale trials have evaluated endovascular therapy (EVT) and open surgical revascularization (OS). This study aimed to assess clinical outcomes after EVT or OS for acute superior mesenteric artery occlusion and identify predictors of mortality and bowel resection. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from the Japanese Registry of All Cardiac and Vascular Diseases-Diagnosis Procedure Combination (JROAD-DPC) database from April 2012 to March 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Overall, 746 patients with acute superior mesenteric artery occlusion who underwent revascularization were classified into 2 groups: EVT (n=475) or OS (n=271). The primary clinical outcome was in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes were bowel resection, bleeding complications (transfusion or endoscopic hemostasis), major adverse cardiovascular events, hospitalization duration, and cost. The in-hospital death or bowel resection rate was ≈30%. In-hospital mortality (22.5% versus 21.4%, P=0.72), bowel resection (8.2% versus 8.5%, P=0.90), and major adverse cardiovascular events (11.6% versus 9.2%, P=0.32) were comparable between the EVT and OS groups. Hospitalization duration in the EVT group was 6 days shorter than that in the OS group, and total hospitalization cost was 0.88 million yen lower. Interaction analyses revealed that EVT and OS had no significant difference in terms of in-hospital death in patients with thromboembolic and atherothrombotic characteristics. Advanced age, decreased activities of daily living, chronic kidney disease, and old myocardial infarction were significant predictive factors for in-hospital mortality. Diabetes was a predictor of bowel resection after revascularization. CONCLUSIONS: EVT was comparable to OS in terms of clinical outcomes in patients with acute superior mesenteric artery occlusion. Some predictive factors for mortality or bowel resection were obtained. REGISTRATION: URL: www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/; Unique Identifier: UMIN000045240.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Endovasculares , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Artéria Mesentérica Superior , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , Idoso , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/cirurgia , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/mortalidade , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/complicações , Artéria Mesentérica Superior/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Japão/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento , Doença Aguda , Bases de Dados Factuais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/métodos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Fatores de Risco
4.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 106: 264-272, 2024 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38815920

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to summarize our experience in treating acute superior mesenteric artery embolism (SMAE) by percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT). METHODS: Between January 2023 and October 2023, 18 patients presenting with acute mesenteric ischemia were admitted to our center, including 11 cases of SMAE, 3 cases of superior mesenteric artery thrombosis, and 4 cases of superior mesenteric vein thrombosis. We retrospectively reviewed 8 patients (4 males and 4 females; range, 51-79 years; mean, 62.50 ± 9.67 years) who underwent treatment of acute SMAE using the AcoStream system. The patients had no obvious evidence of intestinal necrosis as shown by peritoneal puncture or computed tomography. Thrombectomy was performed on the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) using an 8F AcoStream thrombus aspiration system (Acotec, China). The demographics, risk factors, therapeutic effect, complications, mortality, and follow-up of the study population were assessed. RESULTS: The technical success rate was 100%. After 1-3 passes (2.38 ± 0.92) and aspiration thrombectomy, complete thrombus removal was achieved in 7 (87.50%) patients. One patient received an adjunctive catheter-directed thrombolysis due to partial thrombus removal. Thrombolysis was conducted for 2 days, resulting in complete resolution of the thrombus. The other 7 patients did not receive adjunctive endovascular intervention due to complete thrombus removal and no residual stenosis. No distal embolization or device-related complications were noted during the procedure. After the procedure, sufficient clinical improvement was seen in 6 patients within 1-2 days. Two patients showed no significant improvement of their symptoms. Laparotomy was performed on day 1 and day 2 after thrombectomy in patients 3 and 7, respectively. Intestinal necrosis was diagnosed operatively and intestinal resection was performed. All patients were discharged 6-15 days (9.50 ± 3.07) after admission without perioperative complication or death. The mean follow-up period was 5.00 ± 3.30 months (range, 1-10 months), and the follow-up rate was 100%. During the follow-up, all patients remained symptom-free. Computed tomography angiography images showed good flow in the trunk and branches of the SMA in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: PMT using the AcoStream system is a minimally invasive, safe, and effective technique for acute SMAE. Early application of PMT can achieve immediate revascularization of the SMA and have the potential advantage of avoiding laparotomy or reducing the extension of enterectomy, as it could theoretically restore intestinal perfusion in less time than open revascularization. If the symptoms do not improve after PMT, exploratory laparotomy should be scheduled as soon as possible. Further studies are necessary on this field to confirm these findings.


Assuntos
Artéria Mesentérica Superior , Isquemia Mesentérica , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica , Trombectomia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Artéria Mesentérica Superior/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Mesentérica Superior/cirurgia , Artéria Mesentérica Superior/fisiopatologia , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/diagnóstico por imagem , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/fisiopatologia , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/terapia , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/cirurgia , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/mortalidade , Resultado do Tratamento , Trombectomia/efeitos adversos , Trombectomia/instrumentação , Isquemia Mesentérica/diagnóstico por imagem , Isquemia Mesentérica/cirurgia , Isquemia Mesentérica/terapia , Isquemia Mesentérica/fisiopatologia , Fatores de Tempo , Doença Aguda , Embolia/etiologia , Embolia/cirurgia , Embolia/diagnóstico por imagem , Sucção , Desenho de Equipamento , China
5.
J Vasc Surg ; 80(3): 831-837, 2024 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38750941

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Retrograde open mesenteric stenting (ROMS) is an alternative to mesenteric bypass in patients with acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) with variable reported 30-day mortality rates. Large studies evaluating patient outcomes following ROMS are scarce. Our study aims to assess the results of this approach among patients presenting with AMI. METHODS: We reviewed all the patients with AMI who were treated with ROMS (2011-2022). Patient demographics, presentation, operative details, and outcomes were analyzed. Primary end points were in-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year mortality. Kaplan-Meier estimate for 1-year mortality and primary patency loss were generated. Secondary end points included postoperative 30-day complications. RESULTS: Between 2011 and 2022, ROMS was attempted on a total of 42 patients. The median age was 70 ± 15 years and the majority of patients were female. Pain out of proportion to the physical examination was the most common presenting symptom (n = 18, 42.9%) followed by peritonitis (n = 14, 33.4%). All patients underwent preoperative intravenous contrast computed tomography imaging. In situ thrombosis was identified as the etiology of AMI in 36 patients (85.7%). Technical success was achieved in 40 patients (95.2%). Conventional, non-hybrid operating rooms were used for the majority of cases. Revascularization of all 40 patients involved angioplasty and stenting of superior mesenteric artery. A single stent was placed in 35 patients (87.5%) and the reminder had more than one stent. Eighty percent of patients required bowel resection. A second-look laparotomy was required in 34 patients (85.0%). The mean operative time, including both the general surgery and vascular surgery portions of the index procedure, was 192 ± 57 minutes. Sepsis was the most common complication observed within 30 days, occurring in 8 patients (20.0%). In terms of mortality, 13 patients (32.5%) died during their index hospitalization, and 9 died (22.5%) within 30 days. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, the 1-year overall patient survival rate was 58.6%, and the primary patency rate for stents was 51.4%. CONCLUSIONS: ROMS has an excellent technical success rate in management of AMI with lower than traditionally reported mortality rates for AMI. The dual benefits of rapid revascularization and bowel evaluation should make this surgical modality an alternative approach for treatment of AMI.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Endovasculares , Isquemia Mesentérica , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica , Stents , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Isquemia Mesentérica/cirurgia , Isquemia Mesentérica/mortalidade , Isquemia Mesentérica/fisiopatologia , Isquemia Mesentérica/diagnóstico por imagem , Idoso , Resultado do Tratamento , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Tempo , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/fisiopatologia , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/mortalidade , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/diagnóstico por imagem , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/cirurgia , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/terapia , Doença Aguda , Fatores de Risco , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/instrumentação , Procedimentos Endovasculares/mortalidade , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Circulação Esplâncnica
6.
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord ; 12(5): 101903, 2024 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38754777

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants have shown similar efficacy and lower bleeding rates than vitamin K antagonists for venous thromboembolism. However, this has not been proven in mesenteric vein thrombosis. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of vitamin K antagonists and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants. METHODS: Between January 2014 and July 2022, mesenteric vein thrombosis was diagnosed on computed tomography in 225 patients in a tertiary hospital. Among them, a total of 44 patients who underwent long-term anticoagulation therapy over 3 months were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into two groups based on the anticoagulant used: vitamin K antagonists (Group 1, n = 21) and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (Group 2, n = 23). The efficacy outcomes were symptom recurrence and thrombus resolution on follow-up computed tomography, and the safety outcome was bleeding complications. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 56 years (range, 46-68 years), and 52% were men. The most common risk factors were unprovoked intra-abdominal infections (30%). The median duration of anticoagulation therapy was 13 months (20 months in Group 1 vs 6 months in Group 2; P = .076). Of the 44 patients, 17 (39%) received the standard treatment. The median follow-up period was longer in Group 1 than in Group 2 (57 vs 28 months; P = .048). No recurrence of mesenteric vein thrombosis-related symptoms were observed in either group. The median duration of follow-up computed tomography was 31 months (42 months in Group 1 vs 18 months in Group 2; P = .064). Computed tomography revealed complete thrombus resolution, partial resolution, and no changes in 71%, 19%, and 10%, respectively (P = .075). Regarding bleeding complications, varix bleeding and melena developed in two patients in Group 2, and anticoagulation treatment thereafter ceased. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the short follow-up duration in the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants group, there was no clinically significant difference in the thrombus resolution rate or bleeding complications when compared with the vitamin K antagonists group. Although research on the long-term effects of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients is limited, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants can be considered an alternative to conventional treatments.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica , Veias Mesentéricas , Trombose Venosa , Vitamina K , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Vitamina K/antagonistas & inibidores , Trombose Venosa/tratamento farmacológico , Trombose Venosa/diagnóstico por imagem , Resultado do Tratamento , Estudos Retrospectivos , Veias Mesentéricas/diagnóstico por imagem , Administração Oral , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/tratamento farmacológico , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/diagnóstico por imagem , Recidiva , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Fatores de Tempo , Fatores de Risco
8.
J Vasc Surg ; 80(2): 413-421.e3, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38552885

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Clinical practice guidelines have recommended an endovascular-first approach (ENDO) for the management of patients with chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI), whereas an open mesenteric bypass (OMB) is proposed for subjects deemed to be poor ENDO candidates. However, the impact of a previous failed endovascular or open mesenteric reconstruction on a subsequent OMB is unknown. Accordingly, this study was designed to examine the results of a remedial OMB (R-OMB) after a failed ENDO or a primary OMB (P-OMB) for patients with recurrent CMI. METHODS: All patients who underwent an OMB from 2002 to 2022 at the University of Florida were reviewed. Outcomes after an R-OMB (ie, history of a failed ENDO or P-OMB) and P-OMB were compared. The primary end point was 30-day mortality, whereas secondary outcomes included complications, reintervention, and survival. The Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate freedom from reintervention and all-cause mortality, whereas multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling identified predictors of death. RESULTS: A total of 145 OMB procedures (R-OMB, n = 48 [33%]; P-OMB, n = 97 [67%]) were analyzed. A majority of R-OMB operations were performed for a failed stent (prior ENDO, n = 39 [81%]; prior OMB, n = 9 [19%]). R-OMB patients were generally younger (66 ± 9 years vs P-OMB, 69 ± 11 years; P = .09) and had lower incidence of smoking exposure (29% vs P-OMB, 48%; P = .07); however, there were no other differences in demographics or comorbidities. R-OMB was associated with less intraoperative transfusion (0.6 units vs P-OMB, 1.4 units; P = .01), but there were no differences in conduit choice or bypass configuration.The overall 30-day mortality and complication rates were 7% (n = 10/145) and 53% (n = 77/145), respectively, with no difference between the groups. Notably, R-OMB had decreased cardiac (6% vs P-OMB, 21%; P < .01) and bleeding complication rates (2% vs P-OMB, 15%; P = .01). The freedom from reintervention (1 and 5 years: R-OMB: 95% ± 4%, 83% ± 9% vs P-OMB: 97% ± 2%, 93% ± 5%, respectively; log-rank P = .21) and survival (1 and 5 years: R-OMB: 82% ± 6%, 68% ± 9% vs P-OMB: 84% ± 4%, 66% ± 7%; P = .91) were similar. Independent predictors of all-cause mortality included new postoperative hemodialysis requirement (hazard ratio [HR], 7.4, 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.1-17.3; P < .001), pulmonary (HR, 2.7, 95% CI, 1.4-5.3; P = .004) and cardiac (HR, 2.4, 95% CI, 1.1-5.1; P = .04) complications, and female sex (HR, 2.1, 95% CI, 1.03-4.8; P = .04). Notably, R-OMB was not a predictor of death. CONCLUSIONS: The perioperative and longer-term outcomes for a remedial OMB after a failed intraluminal stent or previous open bypass appear to be comparable to a P-OMB. These findings support the recently updated clinical practice guideline recommendations for an endovascular-first approach to treating recurrent CMI due to the significant perioperative complication risk of OMB. However, among the subset of patients deemed ineligible for endoluminal reconstruction after failed mesenteric revascularization, R-OMB results appear to be acceptable and highlight the utility of this strategy in selected patients.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Endovasculares , Isquemia Mesentérica , Falha de Tratamento , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Isquemia Mesentérica/cirurgia , Isquemia Mesentérica/mortalidade , Idoso , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doença Crônica , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Medição de Risco , Reoperação , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/cirurgia , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/mortalidade , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/diagnóstico por imagem , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/fisiopatologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Recidiva , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/mortalidade , Implante de Prótese Vascular/instrumentação , Florida , Resultado do Tratamento
9.
Hemodial Int ; 28(2): 241-246, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38385856

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Among hemodialysis patients, acute superior mesenteric artery (SMA) thrombosis a condition with a high mortality rate. Very few larger case series have been reported. METHOD: We reviewed eight hemodialysis patients with diabetes mellitus and SMA thrombosis managed with endovascular therapy in our institution. Demographic, clinical, and radiological data were described. The patency of the SMA was assessed by computed tomography angiography (CTA) at one month after the endovascular procedure. At the last visit, clinical symptoms and check of mortality were recorded. RESULTS: Multidetector CTA scan revealed severe stenosis of SMA in 6 patients and SMA occlusion in the other two patients. The severe stenosis of SMA were verified by angiography. Balloon angioplasty without stenting was performed to obtain satisfactory patency of SMA. Seven of eight patients achieved resolution of abdominal pain after the endovascular procedure. One patient died of suspected intestinal necrosis after 6 days of balloon angioplasty. All seven surviving patients did not experience a recurrence of symptoms with a median follow-up of 2 years. No significant residual stenotic or occlusive lesions were noted in follow-up CTA at one month after the endovascular procedure. CONCLUSION: SMA thrombosis should be systematically suspected in hemodialysis patients experiencing abdominal pain. Prompt diagnosis of SMA thrombosis as soon as possible and early endovascular therapy are required to obtain a favorable prognosis in the hemodialysis patient with SMA thrombosis.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Endovasculares , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica , Trombose , Humanos , Dor Abdominal , Constrição Patológica , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/diagnóstico , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/terapia , Diálise Renal , Estudos Retrospectivos , Stents , Resultado do Tratamento
10.
Am J Case Rep ; 25: e942641, 2024 Jan 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38238995

RESUMO

BACKGROUND Chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) is defined as ischemic symptoms caused by insufficient supply of blood to the gastrointestinal tract. Patients diagnosed with advanced symptomatic CMI should be treated subsequently, as the transition from CMI to acute mesenteric ischemia can be unpredictable. However, there is little information regarding the management of potential procedural complications during endovascular therapy (EVT) for CMI. CASE REPORT A 70-year-old man was admitted to our hospital with recurrent abdominal pain just after hemodialysis. The angiogram showed significant stenosis with heavy calcification in the proximal of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA), leading to the diagnosis of CMI. To alleviate the symptom, EVT for the stenotic lesion of the SMA was indicated. During the procedure, a cutting balloon was inflated to facilitate vessel expansion in the target lesion. As a result, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging revealed dissection into the media with extension into the medial space without reentry and demonstrated a semilunar intramural hematoma. We were able to contain the intramural hematoma by covering the whole dissection in the SMA with implantation of self-expandable stents. CONCLUSIONS This case highlights the potential of EVT for heavy calcification of the SMA complicated by dissection without reentry. Intramural hematoma was observed with IVUS examination. We were able to contain the hematoma by the implantation of self-expandable stents over the whole length of the SMA dissection under IVUS-guided EVT.


Assuntos
Isquemia Mesentérica , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica , Masculino , Humanos , Idoso , Artéria Mesentérica Superior/diagnóstico por imagem , Isquemia Mesentérica/diagnóstico por imagem , Isquemia Mesentérica/etiologia , Isquemia Mesentérica/terapia , Intestinos , Ultrassonografia , Doença Crônica , Isquemia , Stents , Resultado do Tratamento
11.
BMC Surg ; 24(1): 21, 2024 Jan 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38218808

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Acute mesenteric ischemia is a rare but lethal disease. Acute occlusive mesenteric ischemia consists of mesenteric artery embolism, mesenteric artery thrombosis, and mesenteric vein thrombosis. This study aimed to investigate the factors that may affect the outcome of acute occlusive mesenteric ischemia. METHODS: Data from acute occlusive mesenteric ischemia patients admitted between May 2016 and May 2022 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether complications(Clavien‒Dindo ≥ 2) occurred within 6 months of the first admission. Demographics, symptoms, signs, laboratory results, computed tomography angiography features, management and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: 59 patients were enrolled in this study. Complications(Clavien‒Dindo ≥ 2) occurred within 6 months of the first admission in 17 patients. Transmural intestinal necrosis, peritonitis, white blood cell count, percentage of neutrophils, percentage of lymphocytes, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, lactate dehydrogenase, creatine kinase isoenzyme, cardiac troponin I, laparoscopic exploration rate, open embolectomy rate, enterostomy rate, length of necrotic small bowel, length of healthy small bowel, surgical time and intraoperative blood loss differed significantly between groups. Creatine kinase isoenzyme (OR = 1.415, 95% CI: 1.060-1.888) and surgical time (OR = 1.014, 95% CI: 1.001-1.026) were independent risk factors associated with complications(Clavien‒Dindo ≥ 2). CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis suggests that acute occlusive mesenteric ischemia patients with a creatine kinase isoenzyme level greater than 2.22 ng/mL or a surgical time longer than 156 min are more likely to experience complications'(Clavien‒Dindo ≥ 2) occurrence within 6 months of the first admission.


Assuntos
Isquemia Mesentérica , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica , Trombose , Humanos , Isquemia Mesentérica/etiologia , Isquemia Mesentérica/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Isoenzimas , Doença Aguda , Isquemia/etiologia , Creatina Quinase , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/complicações , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/diagnóstico , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/cirurgia
12.
Am Surg ; 90(3): 377-385, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37655480

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Mesenteric bypass (MB) for patients with acute (AMI) and chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) is associated with cardiovascular (CV) and pulmonary morbidity. METHODS: Patients with AMI and CMI from 2008 to 2019 were identified to determine independent predictors of CV (cardiac arrest, MI, DVT, and stroke) and pulmonary (pneumonia and ventilator time>48 h) morbidities in patients undergoing MB. RESULTS: 377 patients were identified. Patients with AMI had higher rates of preoperative SIRS/sepsis (28 vs 12%, P < .0001), were more likely to be ASA class 4/5 (55 vs 42%, P = .005), were more likely to require bowel resection (19 vs 3%, P < .0001), and were more likely to have vein utilized as their bypass conduit (30 vs 14%, P < .0001). There were no differences in use of aortic or iliac inflow (P = .707) nor in return to the OR (24 vs 19%, P = .282). Both postoperative sepsis (12 vs 2.6%, P = .003) and mortality (31.4% vs 9.8%, P < .0001) were significantly increased in patients with AMI. After adjusting for both patient and procedural factors, multivariable logistic regression (MLR) identified international normalized ratio (INR) (OR 3.16; 95% CI 1.56-6.40, P = .001) and chronic heart failure (CHF) (OR 5.88; 95% CI 1.15-29.97, P = .033) to be independent predictors of pulmonary morbidity, while preoperative sepsis (OR 1.96; 95% CI 1.45-2.66, P < .0001) alone was predictive of CV morbidity in all patients undergoing MB. DISCUSSION: Mesenteric bypass for mesenteric ischemia leads to high rates of morbidity and mortality, whether done in an acute or chronic setting. Preoperative sepsis, independent of AMI or CMI, predicts CV morbidity, regardless of bypass configuration or conduit, while elevated INR or underlying CHF carries a higher risk of pulmonary morbidity.


Assuntos
Isquemia Mesentérica , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica , Sepse , Humanos , Isquemia Mesentérica/etiologia , Isquemia Mesentérica/cirurgia , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Fatores de Tempo , Isquemia/cirurgia , Sepse/epidemiologia , Sepse/etiologia , Fatores de Risco , Estudos Retrospectivos
15.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 59(11)2023 Oct 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38003939

RESUMO

Background: Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is a life-threatening condition, and in 50% of patients, AMI is caused by acute superior mesenteric artery (SMA) embolism. Endovascular treatment is increasingly being considered the primary modality in selected cases. Many studies have reported that percutaneous aspiration embolectomy using a guiding catheter and thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) are effective in treating SMA embolism. However, no reports on treating SMA embolism using rtPA administered via a microcatheter exist. Case presentation: A 64-year-old man with underlying atrial fibrillation presented with acute SMA embolism revealed using computed tomography (CT). rtPA (total 3 mg) was carefully administered into the occluded SMA through a microcatheter. No complications occurred, and complete revascularization of the SMA was revealed on follow-up CT. Conclusions: Compared with previous reports, this case report reveals that successful revascularization can be achieved using rtPA administered via a microcatheter, with a low dose of rtPA and a short duration of thrombolysis.


Assuntos
Embolia , Gastroenteropatias , Isquemia Mesentérica , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica , Masculino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ativador de Plasminogênio Tecidual/uso terapêutico , Artéria Mesentérica Superior , Resultado do Tratamento , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/etiologia , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/terapia , Embolia/complicações , Embolia/tratamento farmacológico , Isquemia Mesentérica/complicações , Isquemia Mesentérica/terapia , Terapia Trombolítica/métodos , Gastroenteropatias/complicações
17.
Indian J Gastroenterol ; 42(6): 833-838, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37768446

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) is a rare, debilitating disease associated with higher morbidity and mortality if not treated on time. In the past two decades, there has been a paradigm shift in its management with endovascular modality due to reduced perioperative morbidity and mortality. In the endovascular era, only a few patients require surgical therapy. We conducted this study to report our experience with open surgical revascularization at our hospital. METHODS: We have conducted a retrospective study after obtaining approval from Institutional Ethics Committee. Data regarding patients who underwent open revascularization for CMI with long-segment occlusion from 2016 to 2021 has been retrieved from the institutional database. The demographic data, clinical presentation, type of surgery and graft used, perioperative mortality and morbidity and length of hospital stay were evaluated. Overall survival and disease-free survival were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients underwent open surgical revascularization; 16 were males and five females. The median age was 43 years. Fourteen (66.7%) were smokers. The mean duration of follow-up was 28.4 ± 13.6 months. Thirty-day postoperative mortality was 0% and morbidity was 28%. The average duration of hospital stay and postoperative weight gain were 6.9 ± 3.7 days and 11 ± 4.9 kgs, respectively. One patient died at two years of follow-up due to myocardial infarction and one had a recurrence. Long-term survival at 60 months of follow-up was 91.6% and the primary-patency rate was 95.2%. CONCLUSION: Owing to better long-term and reintervention-free patency, open revascularization should be considered in patients who are fit for surgery, particularly in patients with long-segment mesenteric artery occlusion.


Assuntos
Isquemia Mesentérica , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica , Masculino , Feminino , Humanos , Adulto , Isquemia Mesentérica/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Doença Crônica , Isquemia , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/cirurgia , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/complicações , Fatores de Risco
18.
Rozhl Chir ; 102(5): 204-207, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37527947

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: This case report describes surgical treatment of chronic mesenteric ischemia in a polymorbid patient with the history of an aorto-bifemoral bypass implant. CASE REPORT: The patient suffered from chronic occlusions of the mesenteric arteries. He experienced postprandial pain and significant weight loss. Endovascular repair of the occlusions failed. Open single retrograde bypass from the left branch of the aorto-bifemoral graft to the superior mesenteric artery was implanted successfully. CONCLUSION: The discussion briefly mentions current trends in the treatment of chronic mesenteric ischemia. Despite the development of interventional radiology, surgical treatment remains a relevant alternative for the management of chronic mesenteric ischemia.


Assuntos
Isquemia Mesentérica , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica , Masculino , Humanos , Isquemia Mesentérica/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares , Intestinos , Isquemia/etiologia , Isquemia/cirurgia , Doença Crônica
19.
Surg Clin North Am ; 103(4): 703-731, 2023 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37455033

RESUMO

This article provides an overview of acute mesenteric ischemia, chronic mesenteric ischemia, and visceral aneurysms, with a focus on treatment. Acute mesenteric ischemia can be a challenging diagnosis. Early recognition and adequate revascularization are key to patient outcomes. Chronic mesenteric ischemia is a more insidious process, typically caused by atherosclerosis. Various options for revascularization exist, which must be tailored to each patient. Visceral aneurysms are rare and the natural history is not well defined. However, given the risk of rupture and high mortality, treatment may be complex.


Assuntos
Aneurisma , Isquemia Mesentérica , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica , Humanos , Isquemia Mesentérica/diagnóstico , Isquemia Mesentérica/etiologia , Isquemia Mesentérica/cirurgia , Aneurisma/diagnóstico , Aneurisma/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares , Isquemia , Doença Crônica , Resultado do Tratamento , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/terapia
20.
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg ; 29(6): 685-690, 2023 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37278073

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Acute mesenteric ischemia is a serious condition with high mortality rate, resulting internal organ damage and intestinal necrosis due to sudden occlusion in the arteries feeding the abdominal solid organs and intestines. The most common causes of acute mesenteric artery ischemia are embolic processes and thrombosis that develops on the basis of primary mesenteric artery atherosclerosis. Whole blood viscosity (WBV) was defined by De Simon and could be calculated with a formula that consists of total plasma protein and hematocrit (HCT). In our study, we aimed to investigate the predictive value of WBV for acute mesenteric ischemia caused by primary mesenteric artery occlusion. METHODS: Between January 2015 and February 2021, a total of 55 patients with a retrospective diagnosis of acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) and 50 healthy volunteers as a control group were included in the study. WBV was calculated with the De Simon for-mula using the HCT and plasma protein levels from the blood tests of healthy volunteers and patients at the time of admission with acute abdomen. RESULTS: No significant differences between the two groups in terms of baseline demographic characteristics except the preva-lence of age (72.1±12.4 vs. 65.7±6.4; p<0.001) and hypertension (40% vs. 23% p=0.002). AMI patients had significantly higher WBV values both at low shear rate (LSR) ([46.3±21.7 vs. 33.4±±13.1, p<0.001] and high shear rate [HSR] [16.5±11 vs. 15.8±0.7, p<0.001]). The univariate analysis identified several variables for predicting AMI including age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.066 confidence interval [CI]: 1.023-1.111, p=0.003), hypertension (OR: 3.612 CI: 1.564-8.343, p=0.003), WBV at HSR (OR: 2.074 CI: 1.193-3.278, p=0.002), and WBV at LSR (OR: 2.156 CI: 1.331-3.492, p=0.002). However, after multivariate analysis, only hypertension (OR: 3.537 CI: 1.298-9.639, p=0.014) and age (OR: 1.085 CI: 1.026-1.147, p=0.004) showed significance. In receiver operating characteristic analysis, a cut-off value of 43.5 WBV for LSR had a 72% sensitivity and a 70% specificity for prediction of mesenteric ischemia patients (area under curve [AUC]: 0.743, p<0.001) and a cut-off value of 16.29 WBV for HSR had a 78% sensitivity and 76% specificity for prediction of mesen-teric ischemia patients (AUC: 0.773, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: In our study, we determined that the WBV value obtained with the De Simon formula is a valuable parameter in predicting the development of acute mesenteric artery ischemia caused by primary mesenteric artery occlusion.


Assuntos
Hipertensão , Isquemia Mesentérica , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica , Humanos , Isquemia Mesentérica/diagnóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Viscosidade Sanguínea , Isquemia , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/complicações , Hipertensão/complicações
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA