Spontaneous haemoperitoneum caused by a bleeding gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumour.

Spontaneous haemoperitoneum is described as a collection of blood in the peritoneal cavity due to non-traumatic aetiology. Common causes in the literature include splenic, hepatic and gynaecological pathology. Patients with spontaneous haemoperitoneum usually present with non-specific dull aching abdominal pain. Spontaneous haemoperitoneum can only be radiologically diagnosed and, if not treated in time, is life threatening. Rupture of a gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) presenting as a spontaneous haemoperitoneum is a rare event. Gastric GIST presents as ambiguous abdominal pain, complications of which include melena, obstruction and rupture. This is a report of a male patient in his early 60s who presented with acute abdominal pain. A contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen showed haemoperitoneum with an unknown source of origin. Diagnostic laparoscopy showed a bleeding exophytic mass arising from the stomach, which was resected. Thus, early diagnosis with proper imaging and prompt treatment has a favourable outcome.

Mesenteric ischemia: Recognizing an uncommon disorder and distinguishing among its causes.

Mesenteric ischemia occurs because of inadequate intestinal blood flow. Its severity depends on the vessels involved and whether collateral blood vessels are available to prevent malperfusion. Mesenteric ischemia is an uncommon cause of abdominal pain, but it is associated with high mortality and often poses a diagnostic challenge to clinicians because its symptoms are nonspecific. Early recognition and treatment are imperative to improve patient outcomes.

Perforated ulcer at the gastrojejunal anastomosis: a rare complication of pancreaticoduodenectomy (case report).

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is recognized as one of the most intricate abdominal surgical procedures, often accompanied by high morbidity rates. The occurrence of an anastomotic ulcer at the gastrojejunal anastomosis post-pancreaticoduodenectomy surgery is a relatively uncommon complication, albeit potentially leading to severe, life-threatening consequences. The predominant symptomatology manifests as acute abdominal pain accompanied by peritonitis. Conventionally, diagnosis is achieved through computed tomography (CT) scans, facilitating subsequent management, and surgical management is recommended in the majority of instances. Herein, we present a rare case of a patient who experienced ulcer perforation at the gastrojejunal anastomosis site after undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy with stomach preservation, and we reviewed the available literature to gain more comprehension of this rare complication of this type of surgical intervention.

Unveiling Pheochromocytoma: A Puzzling Prelude of Nausea, Vomiting, and Abdominal Pain.

BACKGROUND Pheochromocytomas, rare tumors arising from the adrenal medulla, can present with highly variable symptoms; therefore, pheochromocytomas frequently remain undiagnosed, leaving the potential for physiological complications. Acutely, these complications include pheochromocytoma crisis, in which high levels of catecholamines are released and cause a life-threatening hypertensive emergency. Over time, undiagnosed pheochromocytomas can lead to cardiovascular damage and end-organ disease related to chronic exposure to elevated blood pressure. CASE REPORT We share a case of pheochromocytoma in a 45-year-old woman who presented with gastrointestinal symptoms of intractable nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain. Imaging revealed an adrenal mass that had radiographic features that were most consistent with myelolipoma. Before exposing the patient to anesthesia and endoscopy for further diagnostic workup of her gastrointestinal symptoms, which can trigger a catecholamine surge in individuals with a pheochromocytoma, further biochemical testing was performed. Testing of plasma and urine confirmed pheochromocytoma, and surgical resection was performed for definitive treatment. Ultimately, the patient had resolution of her symptoms following the removal of the tumor. CONCLUSIONS The resolution of symptoms following surgical resection suggests that symptoms may have been related to the mass effect of the tumor or as an atypical manifestation of increased catecholamine levels. Additionally, by screening for pheochromocytoma, the patient was able to avoid potential complications that can result from common gastroenterological diagnostic procedures. This case report highlights the potential benefit for screening for pheochromocytoma when faced with symptoms that may be non-specific or related to mass effect upon surrounding organs.

Jejunogastric intussusception after pancreaticoduodenectomy in a patient with HIV.

The incidence of jejunogastric intussusception (JGI) after gastric surgery is 0.1%. We report a case of JGI after pancreaticoduodenectomy in a patient with HIV. After presenting to the hospital with abdominal pain and emesis, a CT abdomen/pelvis showed evidence of gastrojejunal anastomosis intussusception into the stomach. Oesophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed, but endoscopic reduction was unsuccessful. Exploratory laparotomy was subsequently performed with a successful reduction of the intussusception and resection of a portion of the small bowel. With only five previously reported cases of JGI after pancreaticoduodenectomy, our case is novel in that it describes JGI in a patient with HIV on highly active antiretroviral therapy, which has been associated with an increased risk of intussusception. While rare, we highlight the importance of having high clinical suspicion for intussusception in patients with risk factors who present with abdominal pain after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Timely diagnosis is critical to optimise patient outcomes.

Idiopathic encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis presenting with abdominal mass.

A man in his late 30s presented with a history of recurrent colicky abdominal pain, bilious vomiting and intermittent mass formation in the lower abdomen. The mass was mobile, non-tender and fluctuant, and appeared in the right iliac fossa during episodes of pain and disappeared once the pain subsided. Contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) scan revealed a thick membrane-like structure covering the clumped small bowel loops, suggestive of an abdominal cocoon. A midline laparotomy was carried out with extensive adhesiolysis, and a membrane incision was performed. The final histopathological diagnosis was primary encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis. Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis of idiopathic origin is rare and typically presents as an acute or subacute intestinal obstruction. A CECT scan is the diagnostic modality of choice, with a thick peritoneal membrane covering the small bowel loops being the hallmark sign. Surgical intervention is the preferred treatment for idiopathic cases, while medical management may address secondary causes.

Metformin-associated lactic acidosis: a serious complication of a common drug.

Metformin-associated lactic acidosis (MALA) is a rare and potentially life-threatening complication of metformin use. It typically occurs in patients who are diabetic and also have other risk factors for lactic acidosis, including kidney and liver conditions, malignancy, or use of certain medications. We report a case of MALA in a man in his 70s with diabetes who presented with gradually worsening gastrointestinal symptoms, including severe abdominal pain and nausea. He reported these symptoms in the setting of metformin use with an acute kidney injury (AKI), likely brought on by poor oral intake and excessive antibiotic use for a urinary tract infection. He was promptly started on intravenous fluids with a bicarbonate drip to concurrently treat his prerenal AKI and lactic acidosis, which resulted in rapid resolution of his symptoms. Renal function normalised within 12 days of admission. Since diabetic patients commonly use metformin and are also at higher risk of renal dysfunction, this case highlights the vulnerability of this group of patients and the need for increased knowledge and awareness of MALA.

Eosinophilic ascites and enteritis: a neglected case report from Vietnam.

Eosinophilic gastroenteritis poses a significant diagnostic challenge, particularly in developing countries, where the awareness of this condition may be limited. Here, the case of a patient in her early 30s, who presented with recurrent episodes of abdominal pain and diarrhea, is reported. Initial standard laboratory investigations revealed normal complete blood counts and elevated total serum immunoglobulin E levels. Upper and lower endoscopic evaluations with systemic biopsies did not reveal any significant abnormalities. However, computed tomography revealed a thickened small intestine wall, halo signs, and mild ascites. Analysis of the ascitic fluid confirmed eosinophilia. These findings prompted a diagnosis of eosinophilic gastroenteritis. The patient responded well to a targeted elimination diet, corticosteroids, and antileukotriene medication. The present case emphasizes the importance of considering eosinophilic gastroenteritis in the differential diagnosis of patients who present with abdominal pain and eosinophilic ascites.

It's Not Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome Until Dietl's is Ruled Out: A Case for Point of Care Renal Ultrasound.

BACKGROUND: Abdominal pain and vomiting are frequent complaints for pediatric patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED). When a diagnosis such as chronic abdominal pain, cyclic vomiting, or abdominal migraine has previously been made, it can lead to diagnostic momentum and confirmation bias on behalf of the treating physician. Dietl's crisis is a commonly missed diagnosis in the pediatric population that presents with intermittent episodes of pain and vomiting. It can be readily diagnosed at the bedside by the emergency physician (EP) through the employment of point of care ultrasound (POCUS). CASE SERIES: We present two cases of pediatric patients with episodic abdominal pain and vomiting who were previously diagnosed with cyclic vomiting syndrome. In both cases, pediatric gastroenterology evaluations had occurred with negative diagnostic testing having been performed. Both patients also presented to their primary pediatrician and the ED multiple times with each encounter resulting in treatment of symptoms and discharge. Each patient eventually presented to the ED when an EP was present who performed a renal POCUS. In each patient, the POCUS revealed severe unilateral hydronephrosis. Subsequent workup confirmed the diagnosis of Dietl's crisis as the etiology of symptoms. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: In pediatric patients, EPs should be wary of the diagnosis of cyclic vomiting syndrome until ureteral obstruction has been ruled out. A bedside POCUS can rapidly establish this diagnosis and potentially preclude recurrent health care visits, unnecessary diagnostic testing, and permanent loss of renal function.

Efficacy of botulinum toxin injection using the right-sided unilateral retrocrural approach for celiac plexus in a cancer survivor with persistent abdominal pain: a case report.

Cancer survivors often face persistent abdominal pain, necessitating optimal pain management. While celiac plexus block (CPB) and botulinum toxin (BT) injection are viable options, traditional methods may encounter challenges due to patient-specific concerns and anatomical complexities. Here, the case of a cancer survivor in his 70 s experiencing recurrent abdominal pain, who declined conventional percutaneous CPB approaches due to anxiety related to aortic puncture, is presented. Following a pancreaticoduodenectomy, the patient developed chronic abdominal pain attributed to adhesions leading to small bowel obstruction. Concurrently, there was notable psychological distress, including anxiety, depression, and heightened concerns regarding tumor recurrence. Considering the patient's specific concerns, a right-sided unilateral retrocrural single-needle technique was proposed, aimed at alleviating pain, while avoiding conventional CPB approaches. Initial right-sided retrocrural CPB offered short-term relief, prompting a subsequent BT injection using the same approach. Following BT injection, the patient reported significant and sustained pain reduction (from 8 to 1 on an 11-point numerical rating scale) at both 12 and 20 weeks post-procedure. Right-sided retrocrural BT injection offers an alternative approach, addressing patient concerns and demonstrating prolonged pain relief. This may benefit cancer survivors with upper abdominal pain, emphasizing the importance of personalized and innovative pain management strategies.

Polyarteritis nodosa complicated by renal aneurysm and intestinal perforation: A case report.

RATIONALE: Polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) is a necrotizing vasculitis that affects small- and medium-sized arteries, presenting with diverse clinical manifestations. It can impact tissues and organs throughout the body and may be life-threatening in severe cases. Common causes of death include cardiac, renal, and gastrointestinal complications or aneurysm rupture. While separate reports of renal aneurysm and intestinal perforation exist, the coexistence of these conditions is rarely documented. This study reports a severe case of PAN complicated by both renal aneurysm and intestinal perforation, aiming to deepen the understanding of this disease, aid in clinical diagnosis and treatment, and improve patient prognosis. PATIENT CONCERNS: The patient presented to the hospital with dorsal foot pain and abdominal pain persisting for more than 4 months, along with pain and discomfort in both lower extremities for over 1 month. INTERVENTIONS: The patient was diagnosed with PAN, renal aneurysm, intestinal perforation, and grade 3 hypertension (high risk). OUTCOMES: After treatment, the patient showed normal temperature and blood pressure, relief from abdominal pain, and disappearance of myalgia and numbness in the lower limbs. Additionally, the renal aneurysm shrank significantly, the intestinal perforation healed, the ileostomy was reduced, and the patient's condition stabilized. LESSONS: The clinical symptoms of PAN mostly lack specificity, and should be distinguished from microscopic polyangiitis and simulated vasculitis. For patients with intestinal perforation similar to this case, tocilizumab treatment may be effective, but further research is needed to confirm it.

Recurrent myocardial infarction in a patient with median arcuate ligament syndrome: a case report and literature review.

Median arcuate ligament (MAL) syndrome, otherwise known as celiac artery compression syndrome, is rare and is characterized by celiac artery compression by the median arcuate ligament. We report a unique case of MAL syndrome with recurrent myocardial infarction as the primary manifestation, and offer new pathophysiological insights. A man in his early 50s experienced recurrent upper abdominal pain, electrocardiographic changes, and elevated troponin concentrations, which suggested myocardial infarction. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography showed considerable celiac artery stenosis due to MAL syndrome. The patient was diagnosed with MAL syndrome and acute myocardial infarction. He declined revascularization owing to economic constraints, and opted to have conservative treatment with Chinese herbal extracts and medications. He succumbed to sudden cardiac death during a subsequent abdominal pain episode. The findings from this case show that MAL syndrome can present with recurrent myocardial infarction rather than typical intestinal angina symptoms. The pathophysiological link may involve intestinal and cardiac ischemia. An accurate diagnosis and appropriate management of MAL syndrome require careful evaluation and investigation.

Impact of different concentration iodinated contrast media on pain and comfort in abdominal computed tomography.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether high concentration iodinated contrast media (CM), compared with low concentration CM, could reduce pain and discomfort levels in patients who had level II and III venous conditions. METHODS: This prospective, single-center study enrolled patients who had level II and III venous conditions and underwent abdominal contrast-enhanced CT scan between July 2021 and February 2022. The venous condition to establish peripheral venous access for CM injection was graded using the Intravenous Access Scoring system, of which level II and III indicated poor venous condition and difficult venous access. Patients received iomeprol 400 in high concentration group and ioversol 320 in low group at an identical iodine delivery rate of 1.12 gI/s. The primary outcomes were pain and comfort levels. The secondary outcomes included adverse events and image quality. Patients rated pain intensity via Numerical Rating Scale and comfort level via Visual Analogue Scale with higher scores indicating higher levels of pain and discomfort. Quantitative and qualitative image assessment were compared between two groups. Continuous variables were compared using Student's t test or Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were compared using χ2 test, χ2 test for trend or Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: A total of 206 patients (mean age, 60.13 ± 12.14 years; 81 males) were included with 99 in the high concentration group and 107 in the low concentration group. The high group had significantly lower pain scores (median 1 [IQR: 0-2] vs 2 (IQR 2-4), p < 0.001) and comfort scores (1 [IQR: 0-3] vs 3 [IQR: 2-5], p < 0.001) than the low group. Incidence of CM extravasation did not significantly differ (1.0 % vs 4.5 %, p = 0.214). No hypersensitivity reaction was observed. Qualitative assessment showed higher clarity scores of intrahepatic hepatic artery and portal vein in the high group. Quantitative assessment results were comparable between two groups. CONCLUSION: High concentration iodinated CM could lower pain intensity and improve comfort levels without comprising image quality of CT scan. High concentration CM is a preferable choice in patients with poor venous conditions during contrast-enhanced CT scan.

Symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease: a critical appraisal.

INTRODUCTION: Symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease (SUDD) is a clinical condition included in the spectrum of symptomatic diverticular disease. The symptom profile associated with SUDD is highly heterogeneous, as there are currently discordant definitions, that encompass many clinical scenarios. AREAS COVERED: We conducted a narrative review to assess the symptom profile and diagnostic criteria of SUDD based on the available evidence. A thorough literature search was performed on PubMed following the SANRA scale. Abdominal pain, regardless of its duration and location, emerges as the cardinal symptom of SUDD, suggesting that it should be central to its diagnosis. Although abdominal bloating and changes in bowel habits are commonly reported, they do not appear to be specifically attributable to SUDD. Other issues considered are the possible overlap with irritable bowel syndrome and the identification of a subcategory of SUDD patients with chronic symptoms following an episode of acute diverticulitis. EXPERT OPINION: The future agenda should include the development of shared diagnostic criteria for SUDD, including well-defined inclusion and exclusion clinical features and symptom patterns.

Gastric Bezoars: A Retrospective Analysis of 44 Cases.

BACKGROUND Gastric bezoars are a relatively rare condition. We aim to summarize the clinical characteristics and endoscopic features of patients with gastric bezoars, and analyze the treatment process. MATERIAL AND METHODS The medical records of 44 patients with gastric bezoars treated at Henan Provincial People's Hospital from September 2017 to December 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS Among the 44 patients, there were 20 males and 24 females. The average age was 55.36±15.17 years. Abdominal pain was the primary symptom in patients with gastric bezoars. Single gastric bezoars were more common than multiple ones, accounting for 86.4% of all cases. Endoscopic examination revealed ulcers in 36 (81.8%) patients, mainly at the gastric angle and antrum. Single ulcers were more common than multiple ulcers, with most ulcer diameters being less than 2 cm. The occurrence of ulcers was not significantly related to patient age or the size of the bezoars. Endoscopic examination confirmed complete clearance of gastric bezoars in 30 patients. In the 26 patients treated successfully under endoscopy, the number of endoscopic treatments ranged from 1 to 4, with an average of 1.27 interventions per patient. The interval for the second endoscopic re-examination ranged from 2 to 6 days, with an average of 3.87±1.22 days. CONCLUSIONS The most common type of gastric bezoar is phytobezoars. There is a close association between ulcer formation and gastric bezoars. Endoscopic therapy combined with oral treatment can effectively treat gastric bezoars. Most patients require only 1 endoscopic treatment to be successful. The appropriate interval for a follow-up endoscopy after the first endoscopic treatment is around 4 days.

Experience of admission and readmission to the emergency department for patients with acute abdominal pain: A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Abdominal pain is one of the most common complaints when patients are admitted to emergency departments (ED). Unfortunately, many of these patients are readmitted to the ED shortly after initial discharge. The perspectives of these patients have not yet been explored. PURPOSE: The study aimed to explore how patients readmitted with acute abdominal pain in the ED experienced their initial admission, the time after discharge, and the cause of readmission. METHODS: The study had a qualitative explorative design with a phenomenological-hermeneutic approach. Semi-structured individual telephone interviews were conducted with 14 patients readmitted with acute abdominal pain. RESULTS: The analysis showed four themes: 1) being vulnerable during hospitalisation, 2) the meaning of information during hospitalisation, 3) discharged without being diagnosed, and 4) readmitted in the pursuit of relief. The patients wanted more knowledge and better communication despite their vulnerable condition. Patients were discharged whilst still in pain, and uncertainty of the situation at home contributed to mistrust of the health professionals. CONCLUSION: Patients' experience of the first ED admission due to acute abdominal pain was loneliness, minimal contact with healthcare professionals, and lack of information and involvement in pain management. Discharge was associated with feelings of insignificance and contributed to a fear of death. Pain was the main reason for readmission. Patients described how multiple readmissions contributed to being taken seriously by healthcare professionals.