External Validation of the SMART Medical Clearance Form for Emergency Patients With Psychiatric Manifestations.

BACKGROUND: The SMART Medical Clearance Form, developed in the USA, is used to standardize the medical evaluation of emergency patients with primarily psychiatric manifestations. The goal of this study was external validation of the use of this form. METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively on emergency patients with psychiatric manifestations. The combined primary clinical endpoint consisted of hospitalization, repeated presentation to the emergency room, and/or death within 30 days. RESULTS: From September 2019 to June 2022, 2404 patients presented with psychiatric manifestations to the emergency room of the Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, Switzerland, of whom 674 were included in the study. 134 did not satisfy any of the parameters of the SMART Medical Clearance Form (the nSMART group), while 540 satisfied at least one parameter (the pSMART group). In the nSMART group, there were no hospitalizations for a medical indication, no repeated presentations for medical reasons, and no deaths within 30 days. In the pSMART group, there were 90 hospitalizations, 4 repeated presentations, and 4 deaths within 30 days. Although 44% of the patients in the nSMART group underwent further diagnostic studies, such as imaging or laboratory tests, none of these studies led to any change in these patients' further clinical management. CONCLUSION: Use of the SMART Medical Clearance Form apparently enables safe standardized processing of patients with psychiatric manifestations in the emergency room.

Do five screening tools identify the same number of runners who require pre-exercise medical clearance? SAFER XXXIV.

OBJECTIVES: Currently, there are five international screening tools that are recommended to identify individuals who require pre-exercise medical clearance to reduce the risk of medical encounters during exercise. Therefore, the aim was to determine the percentage of race entrants who are advised to obtain pre-exercise medical clearance and the observed agreement between these five different international pre-exercise medical screening tools. METHODS: In all, 76,654 race entrants from the Two Oceans Marathon (2012-2015) that completed an online pre-race screening questionnaire. Five pre-exercise medical screening tools (American Heart Association (AHA), pre-2015 American College of Sport Medicine (ACSM), post-2015 ACSM, Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q), and the European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation (EACPR)) were retrospectively applied to all participants. The % (95%CI) race entrants requiring medical clearance identified by each tool and the observed agreement between tools (%) was determined. RESULTS: The % entrants requiring medical clearance varied from 6.7% to 33.9% between the five tools: EACPR (33.9%; 33.5-34.3); pre-2015 ACSM (33.9%; 33.5-34.3); PAR-Q (23.2%; 22.9-23.6); AHA (10.0%; 9.7-10.2); post-2015 ACSM (6.7%; 6.5-6.9). The observed agreement was highest between the pre-2015 ACSM and EACPR (35.4%), for pre-2015 ACSM and PAR-Q (24.8%), PAR-Q and EACPR (24.8%), and lowest between the post-2015 ACSM and AHA (4.1%). CONCLUSION: The percentage of race entrants identified to seek medical clearance (and observed agreement) varied considerably between pre-exercise medical screening tools. Further research should determine which tool has the best predictive ability in identifying those at higher risk of medical encounters during exercise.

Wilderness First Responder Medical Clearance - A Scoping Review with Recommendations.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Due to environmental extremes, as well as the nature of the work itself, wilderness first responders are at risk of incurring medical events in the line of duty. There currently do not exist standardized and scientifically supported methods to screen for a wilderness first responder's risk of incurring a medical event. METHODS: We performed multiple scoping reviews using PubMed and CINAHL. The reviews covered six medical screening criteria based on previous recommendations from the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) and the US Forest Service, and we grouped our reviews into two categories: articles that addressed objective screening criteria, and articles that addressed subjective findings with the first responder. RESULTS: Of the objective criteria, our reviews identified 21 articles addressing the ability to screen for risk of incurring a medical event by evaluation of a first responder's heart rate, 12 by blood pressure assessment, and 56 by assessment of body temperature. Of the subjective criteria we identified 19 articles focused on self-assessment, 34 articles on the use of standardized tools to assess for fatigue and sleepiness, and two articles on assessment of a first responder's urine to determine level of dehydration. We also identified seven additional articles through a hand search. Overall, there were 151 articles identified in our scoping reviews. These articles were largely of low quality, consisting mostly of case series without comparison groups. CONCLUSION: There is a dearth of high-quality research into the medical assessment of first responders. We recommend that this paper, and measures discussed within it, be used as a starting point in the development of an evidence-based assessment protocol for wilderness first responders. We also recommend the development of a national database of medical events incurred by wilderness first responders to facilitate higher-quality research of screening protocols in this community.

Development and validation of a novel risk score to predict overall survival following surgical clearance of bilobar colorectal liver metastases.

BACKGROUND: Bilobar liver metastases from colorectal cancer pose a challenge for obtaining a satisfactory oncological outcome with an adequate future liver remnant. This study aimed to assess the clinical and pathological determinants of overall survival and recurrence-free survival among patients undergoing surgical clearance of bilobar liver metastases from colorectal cancer. METHODS: A retrospective international multicentre study of patients who underwent surgery for bilobar liver metastases from colorectal cancer between January 2012 and December 2018 was conducted. Overall survival and recurrence-free survival at 1, 2, 3 and 5 years after surgery were the primary outcomes evaluated. The secondary outcomes were duration of postoperative hospital stay, and 90-day major morbidity and mortality rates. A prognostic nomogram was developed using covariates selected from a Cox proportional hazards regression model, and internally validated using a 3:1 random partition into derivation and validation cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 1236 patients were included from 70 centres. The majority (88 per cent) of the patients had synchronous liver metastases. Overall survival at 1, 2, 3 and 5 years was 86.4 per cent, 67.5 per cent, 52.6 per cent and 33.8 per cent, and the recurrence-free survival rates were 48.7 per cent, 26.6 per cent, 19.2 per cent and 10.5 per cent respectively. A total of 25 per cent of patients had recurrent disease within 6 months. Margin positivity and progressive disease at liver resection were poor prognostic factors, while adjuvant chemotherapy in margin-positive resections improved overall survival. The bilobar liver metastases from colorectal cancer-overall survival nomogram was developed from the derivation cohort based on pre- and postoperative factors. The nomogram's ability to forecast overall survival at 1, 2, 3 and 5 years was subsequently validated on the validation cohort and showed high accuracy (overall C-index = 0.742). CONCLUSION: Despite the high recurrence rates, overall survival of patients undergoing surgical resection for bilobar liver metastases from colorectal cancer is encouraging. The novel bilobar liver metastases from colorectal cancer-overall survival nomogram helps in counselling and informed decision-making of patients planned for treatment of bilobar liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

Streamlining orthopaedic trauma surgical care: do all patients need medical clearance?

INTRODUCTION: Preoperative medical optimization is necessary for safe and efficient care of the orthopaedic trauma patient. To improve care quality and value, a preoperative matrix was created to more appropriately utilize subspecialty consultation and avoid unnecessary consults, testing, and operating room delays. Our study compares surgical variables before and after implementation of the matrix to assess its utility. METHODS: A retrospective review of all orthopaedic trauma cases 6 months before and after the use of the matrix (2/2021-8/2021) was conducted an urban, level one trauma centre in collaboration with internal medicine, cardiology, anaesthesia, and orthopaedics. Patients were separated into two cohorts based on use of the matrix during the initial orthopaedic consultation. Logistic regressions were performed to limit significant differences in comorbidities. Independent samples t-tests and Chi-squared tests were used to compare means and proportions, respectively, between the two cohorts. RESULTS: In total, 576 patients were included in this study (281 pre- and 295 post-matrix implementation). Use of the matrix resulted in no significant difference in time to OR, LOS, readmissions, or ER visits; however, it resulted in 18% fewer overall preoperative consults for general trauma, and 25% fewer pre-operative consults for hip fractures. Older patients were more likely to require a consult regardless of matrix use. When controlling for comorbidities, patients with renal disease were at higher risk for increased LOS. CONCLUSION: Use of an orthopaedic surgical matrix to predict preoperative subspecialty consultation is easy to implement and allows for better care utilization without a corresponding increase in complications and readmissions. Follow-up studies are needed to reassess the relationships between matrix use and a potential decrease in ER to OR time, and validate its use.

Implementation of a Medical Clearance Algorithm for Psychiatric Emergency Patients.

BACKGROUND: Despite evidence demonstrating limited benefit, many clinicians continue to perform routine laboratory testing of well-appearing children to medically clear them before psychiatric admission. METHODS: We conducted a quality improvement project to reduce routine laboratory testing among pediatric patients requiring admission to our psychiatric unit. We convened key stakeholders whose input informed the modification of an existing pathway and the development of a medical clearance algorithm. Our outcome was a reduction in routine laboratory testing for children requiring psychiatric admission. Our balancing measure was the number of patients requiring transfer from the inpatient psychiatry unit to a medical service. We used run charts to evaluate nonrandom variation and demonstrate sustained change. RESULTS: Before the introduction of the new medical clearance algorithm, 93% (n = 547/589) of children with psychiatric emergencies received laboratory testing. After implementing the medical clearance algorithm, 19.6% (n = 158/807) of children with psychiatric emergencies received laboratory testing. Despite a decreased rate of routine testing, there were no transfers to the medical service. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing a medical clearance algorithm can decrease routine laboratory testing without increasing transfers to the medical service among children requiring psychiatric admission.

Utilizing a Standardized Handoff Initiative Incorporating Both Medical Clearance Postoperative Recommendations and Orthopaedic-Specific Context to Improve Information Transfer.

Patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA) with multiple comorbidities require medical clearance recommendations from their primary care provider, which if not adhered to can lead to adverse postoperative complications. In this quality improvement initiative, we explore the impact of a standardized handoff process incorporating medical clearance postoperative recommendations and orthopaedic-specific context on information transfer in TJA. A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies from 2014 to 2019 was completed to draw a conclusion about the best practice methods for the development of a standardized handoff process. Prior to implementation, evidence was reviewed to inform activities such as baseline chart audits, attainment of stakeholder input regarding handoff, exploration of wound closure equipment utilization, and standardization of a structured "smart phase" that incorporates medical clearance recommendations and orthopaedic-specific context information. After provider education was completed and the new handoff approach initiated, data were collected to compare postintervention outcomes such as transfer of information and wound kit distribution cost analysis. At baseline, 42% of patients had medical clearance postoperative recommendations handed off when they were provided. At completion, the new handoff smart phrase was used 97% for the first handoff and 100% for the second handoff. Medical clearance postoperative recommendations were captured in the electronic health record 83% of the time when they were provided. When the new smart phrases were utilized, wound closure, precautions, and postoperative void status were always handed off. Once wound closure technique was specified, bedside nurses were able to provide the appropriate wound closure removal equipment at discharge, projecting cost savings of $0.69 per case (∼234 cases per month). The use of a standardized handoff smart phrase that includes specialty specific context and postoperative medical management requirements successfully improved the information transfer between providers in a large academic orthopaedic medical center.

Screening Electrocardiograms Have Low Utility in Medical Clearance Before Pediatric Inpatient Psychiatric Admission.

OBJECTIVES: Children presenting to the emergency department (ED) requiring psychiatric admission often undergo screening electrocardiograms (ECG) as part of the medical clearance process. The diagnostic yield of screening ECGs for this purpose has not been reported. The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical utility of screening ECGs in children and adolescents requiring acute inpatient psychiatric admission. METHODS: A single-center retrospective study of patients aged 5 to 18 years who did not have documented indications for ECG and underwent screening ECG before psychiatric inpatient admission over a 2-year period was conducted. Abnormal ECGs were identified via chart review and were reinterpreted by a pediatric cardiologist to determine potential significance to psychiatric care. Impact on treatment and disposition was examined. RESULTS: From January 2018 through December 2019, 252 eligible pediatric patients had a screening ECG in the ED before psychiatric admission. Twenty-one (8.3%) of these ECGs were interpreted as abnormal, and 6 (2.4%) were determined to be potentially relevant to psychiatric care in the setting of specific medication use. The abnormal ECG interpretations resulted in additional workup and/or cardiology consultation for 7 (2.7%) patients but had no impact on psychiatric admission. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of concerning individual or family history or cardiac symptoms, routine screening ECGs as part of medical clearance for psychiatric admission are not warranted given the low yield of meaningful findings. The decision to obtain an ECG should be made with careful consideration of medical history and in the presence of specific indications.

Medical Clearance for Common Dental Procedures.

Medical consultations before dental procedures present opportunities to integrate cross-disciplinary preventive care and improve patient health. This article presents recommendations related to patients with certain medical conditions who are planning to undergo common dental procedures, such as cleanings, extractions, restorations, endodontic procedures, abscess drainage, and mucosal biopsies. Specifically, prophylactic antibiotics are not recommended for preventing prosthetic joint infections or infectious endocarditis except in certain circumstances. Anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapies typically should not be suspended for common dental treatments. Elective dental care should be avoided for six weeks after myocardial infarction or bare-metal stent placement or for six months after drug-eluting stent placement. It is important that any history of antiresorptive or antiangiogenic therapies be communicated to the dentist. Ascites is not an indication for initiating prophylactic antibiotics before dental treatment, and acetaminophen is the analgesic of choice for patients with liver dysfunction or cirrhosis who abstain from alcohol. Nephrotoxic medications should be avoided in patients with chronic kidney disease, and the consultation should include the patient's glomerular filtration rate. Although patients undergoing chemotherapy may receive routine dental care, it should be postponed when possible in those currently undergoing head and neck radiation therapy. A detailed history of head and neck radiation therapy should be provided to the dentist. Multimodal, nonnarcotic analgesia is recommended for managing acute dental pain.

Preliminary data demonstrate the Geriatric Surgery Verification program reduces postoperative length of stay.

OBJECTIVES/BACKGROUND: The Geriatric Surgery Verification (GSV) Program promotes clinical standards aimed to optimize the quality of surgical care delivered to older adults. The purpose of this study was to determine if preliminary implementation of the GSV Program standards improves surgical outcomes. DESIGN: Prospective study with cohort matching. SETTING: Data from a single institution compared with a national data set cohort. PARTICIPANTS: All patients aged ≥75 years undergoing inpatient operations between January 2018 and December 2019 were included. Cohort matching by age and procedure code was performed using a national data set. MEASUREMENTS: Baseline pre- and intraoperative characteristics prospectively recorded using Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP) variable definitions. Postoperative outcomes were recorded including complications as defined by VASQIP, 30-day mortality, and length of stay. RESULTS: A total of 162 patients participated in the GSV program, and 308 patients comprised the matched comparison group. There was no difference in postoperative occurrence of one or more complications (p = 0.81) or 30-day mortality (p = 0.61). Patients cared for by the GSV Program had a reduced postoperative length of stay (median 4 days [range 1,31] vs. 5 days [range 1,86]; p < 0.01; and mean 5.4 ± 4.8 vs. 8.8 ± 11.8 days; p < 0.01) compared with the matched cohort. In a multivariable regression model, the GSV Program's reduced length of stay was independent of other associated covariates including age, operative time, and comorbidities (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Preliminary implementation of the GSV Program standards reduces length of stay in older adults undergoing inpatient operations. This finding demonstrates both the clinical and financial value of the GSV Program.

The fate of patients with large abdominal aortic aneurysms referred for consideration for elective repair.

BACKGROUND: The premise of the Vascular Services Quality Improvement Programme (VSQIP) in management of patients with asymptomatic large abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) is reducing mortality from ruptured AAA in a sustainable way without introducing excessive procedure related mortality. Inevitably a proportion of patients are deemed unfit for elective repair. The aim of this study was to report outcomes of patients who were referred with large asymptomatic AAAs including those turned down for elective repair and identify independent risk factors for being turned down for elective open or endovascular repair of AAA. METHODS: Consecutive patients referred to a regional vascular center with a large AAA (greater than 55 mm) between 1st January 2008 and 31st March 2018 were included. All patients underwent the nationally agreed VSQIP pathway which included preoperative cardio-pulmonary exercise testing and contrast enhanced CT scan of aorta. The decision to repair and the modality of repair were made through a Multi-Disciplinary Team MDT process on each patient. Patients were classified into two groups; those managed non-operatively and those offered elective repair. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Factors associated with non-operative management were examined using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: A total of 876 patients of whom 768 were men and 108 were women with a mean age of 74 years (SD: 7.2) and a diagnosis of a large asymptomatic AAA were assessed. One hundred and seventy-four patients (19.9%) were turned down for elective repair and 702 (80.1%) underwent repair [Open: 244(34.8%), EVAR: 458 (65.2%] with perioperative and 30 day mortality of 1.13% (8 patients). Median duration of follow-up was 1530 days (51 months), (inter quartile range: 1714 days). Patients who underwent repair had significantly higher survival rates compared with those who were turned down (P<0.0001). Risk factors for being turned down for elective AAA included anaerobic threshold <8 mL kg-1 min-1 [OR: (95% CI): 2.27 (1.31-3.92)], (P=0.0005), Age>80 yrs. [OR (95% CI): 1.32 (1.012-1.52], (P=0.0203), complex aneurysm morphology [OR (95% CI): 3.70 (2.82-4.87], (P<0.0001), Female gender: [OR: (95% CI): 2.41 (1.32-3.92)], (P<0.0001) and being classed high or very high risk for open AAA repair OR: (95% CI): 6.48 (4.01-10.49)], (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: A significant cohort of patients with large asymptomatic AAA is turned down for elective AAA repair. These patients appear to have significantly lower survival rates than those who are treated. Information on patients turned down for elective AAA repair should be routinely reported.

Neurometabolites and sport-related concussion: From acute injury to one year after medical clearance.

Sport-related concussion is associated with acute disturbances in neurometabolic function, with effects that may last weeks to months after injury. However, is presently unknown whether these disturbances resolve at medical clearance to return to play (RTP) or continue to evolve over longer time intervals. Moreover, little is known about how these neurometabolic changes correlate with other measures of brain physiology. In this study, these gaps were addressed by evaluating ninety-nine (99) university-level athletes, including 33 with sport-related concussion and 66 without recent injury, using multi-parameter magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which included single-voxel spectroscopy (SVS), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and resting-state functional MRI (fMRI). The concussed athletes were scanned at the acute phase of injury (27/33 imaged), medical clearance to RTP (25/33 imaged), one month post-RTP (25/33 imaged) and one year post-RTP (13/33 imaged). We measured longitudinal changes in N-acetyl aspartate (NAA) and myo-inositol (Ins), over the course of concussion recovery. Concussed athletes showed no significant abnormalities or longitudinal change in NAA values, whereas Ins was significantly elevated at RTP and one month later. Interestingly, Ins response was attenuated by a prior history of concussion. Subsequent analyses identified significant associations between Ins values, DTI measures of white matter microstructure and fMRI measures of functional connectivity. These associations varied over the course of concussion recovery, suggesting that elevated Ins values at RTP and beyond reflect distinct changes in brain physiology, compared to acute injury. These findings provide novel information about neurometabolic recovery after a sport-related concussion, with evidence of disturbances that persist beyond medical clearance to RTP.

Apparent diffusion coefficients for predicting primary cholesteatoma risk of recurrence after surgical clearance.

PURPOSE: Beside the well-known accuracy of non-EPI DWI techniques and relative ADC maps in detecting cholesteatomatous tissue, ADC can also represent a useful tool for stratifying cholesteatoma risk of recurrence. Aim of this study is to test the role of ADC in determining risk of recurrence for primary middle ear cholesteatoma, proposing stratification based on pre-operative mean (mADC) and normalized (nADC) ADC values. METHODS: In this prospective study, 60 patients with primary unilateral middle ear cholesteatoma underwent a three-years-long follow-up to assess the presence of recurrent disease after macroscopically complete excisional surgery. Baseline MRI examination mADC and nADC values in the group with early evidence of recurrent cholesteatoma were compared to the group with no evidence of recurrence by using T statistics. RESULTS: ADC values on pre-operative MRI examination were lower in cholesteatomas with early evidence of recurrence, and statistical significance was slightly higher for nADC compared to mADC measurements. We also determined a cut-off between the two groups, proposing stratification in high-risk of recurrence cholesteatomas (mADC≤ 1000 or nADC< 1.3) and low-risk cholesteatomas (mADC>1000 or nADC≥1.3). CONCLUSIONS: ADC values resulted discriminating in identifying cholesteatomas with higher risk of early recurrence, both for mean and normalized ADC, with optimized tissue characterization and outcome prediction.

Endovascular Aneurysm Repair May Provide a Survival Advantage in Patients Deemed Physiologically Ineligible for Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) provides an objective assessment of functional capacity and fitness. It can be used to guide decision making prior to major vascular surgery. The EVAR-2 trial suggested that endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in patients unfit for open repair failed to provide a significant survival advantage over nonsurgical management. The aim of this study is to assess contemporary survival differences between patients with poor CPET measures who underwent EVAR or were not offered surgical intervention. METHODS: A prospectively maintained database of CPET results of patients considered for elective infrarenal aortic aneurysm repair were interrogated. Anaerobic threshold (AT) of <11 mL/min/kg was used to indicate poor physical fitness. Hospital electronic records were then reviewed for perioperative, reintervention, and long-term outcomes. RESULTS: Between November 2007 and October 2017, 532 aortic aneurysm repairs were undertaken, of which 376 underwent preoperative CPET. Seventy patients were identified as having an AT <11 mL/min/kg. Thirty-seven patients underwent EVAR and 33 were managed nonsurgically. All-cause survival at 1, 3, and 5 years for those patients who underwent EVAR was 97%, 92%, and 81%, respectively. For those not offered surgical intervention survival at the same points was 72%, 48%, and 24% [hazard ratio, HR = 5.13 (1.67-15.82), P = 0.004]. Aneurysm-specific survival at 1, 3, and 5 years for those patients who underwent EVAR was 97%, 94%, and 94%, respectively. Survival at the same time points for those not offered surgical intervention was 90%, 69%, and 39%, respectively [HR = 7.48 (1.37-40.82), P = 0.02]. CONCLUSIONS: In this small, retrospective, single-center, nonrandomized cohort, EVAR may provide a survival advantage in patients with poor physical fitness identified via CPET. Randomized studies with current generation EVAR are required to validate the results shown here.

Clinical clearance of the thoracic and lumbar spine: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: In patients who are awake with normal mental and neurologic status, it has been suggested that the thoracolumbar (TL) spine may be cleared by clinical examination, irrespective of the mechanism of injury. The aim of this pilot study was to test the feasibility and accuracy of a clinical decision tool focused towards clearance of the TL spine during assessment of patients in the emergency department after trauma. METHODS: A prospective interventional study was conducted at two major trauma centres. The intervention of a clinical decision tool for assessment of the TL spine was applied prospectively to all patients with subsequent imaging results acting as the comparator. The primary outcome variable was fracture of the thoracic or lumbar vertebra(e). The clinical decision tool was assessed using sensitivity and specificity for detecting a TL fracture and reported with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: There were 188 cases included for analysis that all underwent imaging of the thoracic and/or lumbar vertebrae. There were 34 (18%) patients diagnosed with fractures of the thoracic and/or lumbar vertebrae. In this pilot study, sensitivity of the clinical decision tool was 100% (95% CI 87.3-100%) and specificity was 37.0% (95% CI 29.5-45.2%) for the detection of a thoracic or lumbar vertebral fracture. CONCLUSIONS: Feasibility of clinical clearance of the TL spine in two major trauma centres was demonstrated in a clinical study setting. Evaluation of this clinical decision tool in patients following blunt trauma, particularly in reducing imaging rates, is indicated using a larger prospective study.