Predictive Factors for Bowel Resection in Childhood Intussusception.

BACKGROUND: Intestinal intussusception is the most common cause of intestinal obstruction in infants and children under 3 years of age. Any delay in diagnosis or management can lead to intestinal ischaemia and perforation. The aim of this study is to determine the sociodemographic and clinical risk factors associated with bowel resection in infants and children with intussusception. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective analytical study of 118 patients operated at the Hassan II Hospital and University of Fez between 1 January 2008 and 1 January 2018. A comparison of risk factors between patients with and without bowel resection was performed using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: One hundred and eighteen patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 44% had undergone bowel resection. Age >2 years (P = 0.006), duration of symptoms progression of more than 2 days (P = 0.002), bilious vomiting (P = 0.04) and palpation of an abdominal mass (P = 0.01) were significantly associated with bowel resection. Multivariate logistic regression showed that age <2 years (odds ratio [OR] =4.47 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12-17.78) and duration of symptom progression of more than 2 days (OR = 2.62 95% CI: 1.12-6.11) were independent risk factors for bowel resection. CONCLUSION: Intussusception that occurs in child old than 2 years of age, or which has progressed for more than 2 days, is associated with an increased risk of intestinal resection.

The effects of remimazolam in combination with estazolam on postoperative hemodynamics and pain intensity in patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effects of combining remimazolam with estazolam on hemodynamics and pain levels after laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery. METHODS: A total of 184 patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery were enrolled in this double-blind randomized controlled trial. The patients were divided into four groups: Study Group 1(Remimazolam), Study Group 2(Estazolam), Study Group 3(Remimazolam + Estazolam), and Control Group. Anesthesia induction included intravenous injection of remimazolam and estazolam in the study groups, while the control group received normal saline. Hemodynamic parameters, stress responses, anxiety levels, and pain intensity were assessed at various time points. RESULTS: The results showed that the combination of remimazolam and estazolam significantly improved hemodynamic parameters compared to the control group. Study Group 3 exhibited the lowest anxiety levels and stress responses among all groups. Furthermore, Study Group 3 had the lowest pain intensity scores at different postoperative time points. CONCLUSION: The combination of remimazolam and estazolam effectively stabilized hemodynamics, reduced anxiety levels, and alleviated pain intensity after laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery. These findings suggest that this combination therapy has the potential to improve surgical outcomes and patient comfort.

Is reoperation required for patients presenting with hepatic portal venous gas after gastrointestinal surgery: a review of the literature.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Hepatic portal venous gas(HPVG) represents a rare radiographic phenomenon frequently linked to intestinal necrosis, historically deemed to need immediate surgical intervention. The pivotal query arises about the imperative of urgent surgery when a patient manifests HPVG after gastrointestinal surgery. This inquiry seeks to elucidate whether emergent surgical measures remain a requisite in such cases. METHODS: The investigation into 14 cases of HPVG after gastrointestinal procedures was conducted through a comprehensive review of relevant literature. This methodological approach contributes to a nuanced understanding of HPVG occurrences following gastrointestinal surgery, informing clinical considerations and potential therapeutic strategies. RESULTS: Among the 14 patients, 12 recovered and 2 died. 6 patients underwent surgical exploration, 4 with negative findings and recovered. 8 cases received conservative treatment, resulting in improvement for 5, and 1 initially treated conservatively, revealed perforation during later surgical exploration, leading to improvement, 1 case ended in mortality. CONCLUSION: After gastrointestinal surgery, in Computed Tomography (CT) imaging, the coexistence of HPVG and gastrointestinal dilatation, without signs of peritoneal irritation on abdominal examination, may suggest HPVG due to acute gastrointestinal injury, intestinal gas, and displacement of gas-producing bacteria. These patients can be managed conservatively under close supervision. In cases where HPVG coexists with gastrointestinal dilatation and Pneumatosis intestinalis (PI) without signs of peritoneal irritation, conservative treatment may be continued under close supervision. However, if progressive exacerbation occurs despite close monitoring and the aforementioned treatments, timely surgical exploration is deemed necessary. When HPVG is combined with signs of peritoneal irritation, prompt laparotomy and exploration are preferred.

Appropriate timing for the removal of urinary catheters in gastrointestinal surgery with epidural anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate whether early urinary catheter removal is feasible during epidural anesthesia during gastrointestinal surgery in male patients at high risk for urinary retention. METHODS: Male patients who underwent radical surgery for gastric or colon cancer were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomized 1:1 into 2 groups: the early group, in which the urinary catheter was removed before removal of the epidural catheter on the second or third postoperative day, and the late group, in which the urinary catheter was removed after removal of the epidural catheter. The randomization adjustment factors were age (≥ 65 or < 65 years) and operative site (gastric or colon). The primary endpoint was urinary retention. The secondary endpoints were the incidence of urinary tract infection and length of postoperative hospital stay. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients were enrolled between March 2020 and February 2024 and assigned to the Early (n = 37) and Late (n = 36) groups. Four patients withdrew their consent after randomization. The intention-to-treat analysis showed that urinary retention occurred in 4 patients (11.1%) in the early group and 1 patient (3.0%) in the late group (P = 0.20). Urinary tract infection occurred in 1 patient (3.0%) in the late group. The median postoperative hospital stay was 9 days in both groups. CONCLUSION: Early urinary catheter removal in male patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery with epidural anesthesia could increase urinary retention within the expected acceptable range. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000040468, Date of registration: May 21, 2020.

Artificial intelligence-aided ultrasound imaging in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery: where are we now?

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) models have been applied in various medical imaging modalities and surgical disciplines, however the current status and progress of ultrasound-based AI models within hepatopancreatobiliary surgery have not been evaluated in literature. Therefore, this review aimed to provide an overview of ultrasound-based AI models used for hepatopancreatobiliary surgery, evaluating current advancements, validation, and predictive accuracies. METHOD: Databases PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science were searched for studies using AI models on ultrasound for patients undergoing hepatopancreatobiliary surgery. To be eligible for inclusion, studies needed to apply AI methods on ultrasound imaging for patients undergoing hepatopancreatobiliary surgery. The Probast risk of bias tool was used to evaluate the methodological quality of AI methods. RESULTS: AI models have been primarily used within hepatopancreatobiliary surgery, to predict tumor recurrence, differentiate between tumoral tissues, and identify lesions during ultrasound imaging. Most studies have combined radiomics with convolutional neural networks, with AUCs up to 0.98. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-based AI models have demonstrated promising accuracies in predicting early tumoral recurrence and even differentiating between tumoral tissue types during and after hepatopancreatobiliary surgery. However, prospective studies are required to evaluate if these results will remain consistent and externally valid.

SURGICAL SITE INFECTION IN RESECTIONS OF DIGESTIVE SYSTEM TUMOURS.

Postoperative infectious complications are extremely important to surgeons and the entire medical care team. Among these complications, surgical site infection (SSI) appears to be one of the earliest and most prevalent events and is considered an inherent complication of surgical procedures. In oncological patients submitted to resections of digestive system tumors, there is a confluence of several risk factors for SSI, making it necessary to establish measures to maximize the control of this condition to provide a better prognosis for these patients. Some risk factors for SSI are the manipulation of structures hosting the highest density of pathogenic microorganisms, such as the colon, the patient's performance status, the patient's nutritional status, the use of chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, and the surgical procedure itself, which tends to last longer and be more complex than surgeries for benign conditions of the digestive system. Therefore, this review sought to provide a qualitative analysis and a summary of the literature regarding the SSI of postoperative tumor patients who underwent surgical resection and were well-structured postoperatively, to provide objective data on this problem, and alert about the well-structured needs of individualized pre-, peri-, and post-protocols to avoid the development of these events.

Feasibility of initiating robotic surgery during the early stages of gastrointestinal surgery education.

PURPOSE: Minimally invasive surgery for gastrointestinal cancers is rapidly advancing; therefore, surgical education must be changed. This study aimed to examine the feasibility of early initiation of robotic surgery education for surgical residents. METHODS: The ability of staff physicians and residents to handle robotic surgical instruments was assessed using the da Vinci® skills simulator (DVSS). The short-term outcomes of 32 patients with colon cancer who underwent robot-assisted colectomy (RAC) by staff physicians and residents, supervised by a dual console system, between August 2022 and March 2024 were compared. RESULTS: The performances of four basic exercises were assessed after implementation of the DVSS. Residents required less time to complete these exercises and achieved a higher overall score than staff physicians. There were no significant differences in the short-term outcomes, operative time, blood loss, incidence of postoperative complications, and length of the postoperative hospital stay of the two surgeon groups. CONCLUSION: Based on the evaluation involving the DVSS and RAC results, it appears feasible to begin robotic surgery training at an early stage of surgical education using a dual console system.

Transabdominal levatorplasty technique in laparoscopic mesh rectopexy for rectal prolapse.

Rectal prolapse is characterized by a full-thickness intussusception of the rectal wall and is associated with a spectrum of coexisting anatomic abnormalities. We developed the transabdominal levatorplasty technique for laparoscopic rectopexy, inspired by Altemeier's procedure. In this method, following posterior mesorectum dissection, we expose the levator ani muscle just behind the anorectal junction. Horizontal sutures, using nonabsorbable material, are applied to close levator diastasis associated with rectal prolapse. The aim of the transabdominal levatorplasty is to (i) reinforce the pelvic floor, (ii) narrow the anorectal hiatus, and (iii) reconstruct the anorectal angle. We report a novel transabdominal levatorplasty technique during laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse. The laparoscopic mesh rectopexy with levatorplasty technique was performed in eight cases: six underwent unilateral Orr-Loygue procedure, one modified Wells procedure, and one unilateral Orr-Loygue procedure combined with sacrocolpopexy for uterine prolapse. The median follow-up period was 178 (33-368) days, with no observed recurrences. Six out of seven patients with fecal incontinence experienced symptomatic improvement. Although the sample size is small and the follow-up period is short, this technique has the potential to reduce the recurrence rate and improve functional outcomes, as with levatorplasty of Altemeier's procedure. We believe that this technique may have the potential to become an option for rectal prolapse surgery.

The Genome-wide DNA methylation changes in gastrointestinal surgery patients with and without postoperative delirium: Evidence of immune process in its pathophysiology.

AIM: The pathophysiological mechanisms of postoperative delirium (POD) are still unclear, and there is no reliable biomarker to distinguish between those with and without POD. Our aim was to discover DNAm markers associated with POD in blood collected from patients before and after gastrointestinal surgery. METHOD: We collected blood samples from 16 patients including 7 POD patients at three timepoints; before surgery (pre), the first and third postoperative days (day1 and day3). We measured differences in DNA methylation between POD and control groups between pre and day1 as well as between pre and day3 using the Illumina EPIC array method. Besides, enrichment analysis with Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes terms were also performed after excluding influence of common factors related to surgery and anesthesia. RESULT: The results showed that pre and day1 comparisons showed that immune and inflammatory signals such as 'T-cell activation' were significantly different, consistent with our previous studies with non-Hispanic White subjects. In contrast, we found that these signals were not significant any more when pre was compared with day3. CONCLUSION: These results provide strong evidence for the involvement of inflammatory and immune-related epigenetic signals in the pathogenesis of delirium, including POD, regardless of ethnic background. These findings also suggest that DNAm, which is involved in inflammation and immunity, is dynamically altered in patients with POD. In summary, the present results indicate that these signals may serve as a new diagnostic tool for POD.

Contrasting seasonality of the incidence of incisional surgical site infection after general and gastroenterological surgery: an analysis of 8436 patients in a single institute.

BACKGROUND: While seasonality of hospital-acquired infections, including incisional SSI after orthopaedic surgery, is recognized, the seasonality of incisional SSI after general and gastroenterological surgeries remains unclear. AIM: To analyse the seasonality and risk factors of incisional SSI after general and gastroenterological surgeries. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-institute, observational study using univariate and multivariate analyses. The evaluated variables included age, sex, surgical approach, surgical urgency, operation time, wound classification, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA-PS). FINDINGS: A total of 8436 patients were enrolled. General surgeries (N = 2241) showed a pronounced SSI incidence in summer (3.9%; odds ratio (OR): 1.87; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.05-3.27; P = 0.025) compared to other seasons (2.1%). Conversely, gastroenterological surgeries (N = 6195) showed a higher incidence in winter (8.3%; OR: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.10-1.73; P = 0.005) than in other seasons (6.1%). Summer for general surgery (OR: 1.90; 95% CI: 1.12-3.24; P = 0.018) and winter for gastroenterological surgery (1.46; 1.17-1.82; P = 0.001) emerged as independent risk factors for incisional SSI. Open surgery (OR: 2.72; 95% CI: 1.73-4.29; P < 0.001) and an ASA-PS score ≥3 (1.64; 1.08-2.50; P = 0.021) were independent risk factors for incisional SSI in patients undergoing gastroenterological surgery during winter. CONCLUSION: Seasonality exists in the incisional SSI incidence following general and gastroenterological surgeries. Recognizing these trends may help enhance preventive strategies, highlighting the elevated risk in summer for general surgery and in winter for gastroenterological surgery.

Comparing total mesorectal excision with partial mesorectal excision for proximal rectal cancer: evaluating postoperative and long-term oncological outcomes.

The treatment role of Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) in proximal rectal cancers (PRC) is still debated. Partial Mesorectal Excision (PME) can reduce morbidity in PRC patients. The purpose of this study was to compare short-term clinical and long-term oncological outcomes between the two groups. A total of 157 PRC patients were enrolled in this study (114 performed with PME and 43 with TME). The two groups were compared in terms of perioperative and long-term oncological outcomes. The overall postoperative complications rate was higher in TME group (18.4% vs. 32.5%, p < 0.05). The incidence of diverting ileostomy was also significantly higher in TME group (86.0% vs. 2.6%, p < 0.001). Overall survival rates for 3, 5, and 7 years in PME and TME group accordingly were: 94.6%, 89.3%, 81.5% and 93.2%, 87.6%, 78.4% (p = 0.324). Disease-free survival rates for 3, 5, and 7 years in PME and TME group were: 90.2%, 84.5%, 78.6% and 88.7%, 81.2%, 75.3% (p = 0.297), respectively. Local recurrence rates for 3, 5, and 7 years in PME and TME group were: 2.6%, 6.1%, 8.8% and 4.6%, 9.3%, 11.2% (p = 0.061), respectively. PME is feasible and can be safely performed in PRC patients with favorable oncological outcomes. TME is associated with increasing risk of surgical complications and requires a two-step surgery for stoma takedown.

Efficacy and safety of intraperitoneal ropivacaine in pain management following laparoscopic digestive surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.

BACKGROUND: Managing postoperative pain effectively with an opioid-free regimen following laparoscopic surgery (LS) remains a significant challenge. Intraperitoneal instillation of ropivacaine has been explored for its potential to reduce acute postoperative pain, but its efficacy and safety are still under debate. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intraperitoneal instillation of ropivacaine for acute pain management following laparoscopic digestive surgery. METHODS: We used PRISMA 2020 and a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews 2 guidelines to conduct this review. The random-effects model was adopted using Review Manager Version 5.4 for pooled estimates. RESULTS: We retained 24 eligible RCTs involving 1705 patients (862 patients in the intraperitoneal instillation group and 843 patients in the control group). The intraperitoneal instillation group reduced total opioid consumption during the first 24 hours postoperatively (MD = -21.93 95% CI [-27.64, -16.23], P < .01), decreased pain scores at different time (4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours and 24 hours), shorter the hospital stay (MD = -0.20 95% CI [-0.36, -0.05], P < .01), reduced the postoperative shoulder pain (MD = 0.18 95% CI [0.07, 0.44], P < .01), and decreased postoperative nausea and vomiting (MD = 0.47 95% CI [0.29, 0.77], P < .01). CONCLUSION: Intraperitoneal instillation of ropivacaine appears to be an effective component of multimodal pain management strategies following laparoscopic digestive surgery, significantly reducing opioid consumption and improving postoperative recovery markers. Despite these promising results, additional high-quality trials are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of this approach. REGISTRATION: The registration number at PROSPERO was CRD42021279238.

Classification and Surgical Management of Anorectal Malformations: A Systematic Review and Evidence-based Guideline From the APSA Outcomes and Evidence-based Practice Committee.

OBJECTIVE: Treatment of neonates with anorectal malformations (ARMs) can be challenging due to variability in anatomic definitions, multiple approaches to surgical management, and heterogeneity of reported outcomes. The purpose of this systematic review is to summarize existing evidence, identify treatment controversies, and provide guidelines for perioperative care. METHODS: The American Pediatric Surgical Association Outcomes and Evidence Based Practice Committee (OEBP) drafted five consensus-based questions regarding management of children with ARMs. These questions were related to categorization of ARMs and optimal methods and timing of surgical management. A comprehensive search strategy was performed, and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used to perform the systematic review to attempt to answer five questions related to surgical care of ARM. RESULTS: A total of 10,843 publications were reviewed, of which 90 were included in final recommendations, and some publications addressed more than one question (question: 1 n = 6, 2 n = 63, n = 15, 4 n = 44). Studies contained largely heterogenous groups of ARMs, making direct comparison for each subtype challenging and therefore, no specific recommendation for optimal surgical approach based on outcomes can be made. Both loop and divided colostomy may be acceptable methods of fecal diversion for patients with a diagnosis of anorectal malformation, however, loop colostomies have higher rates of prolapse in the literature reviewed. In terms of timing of repair, there did not appear to be significant differences in outcomes between early and late repair groups. Clear and uniform definitions are needed in order to ensure similar populations of patients are compared moving forward. Recommendations are provided based primarily on A-D levels of evidence. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence-based best practices for ARMs are lacking for many aspects of care. Multi-institutional registries have made progress to address some of these gaps. Further prospective and comparative studies are needed to improve care and provide consensus guidelines for this complex patient population.

Enucleation for intestinal duplications: a comparative study with intestinal resection and anastomosis.

PURPOSE: Duplication enucleation (DE) has been described as an alternative to intestinal resection with primary anastomosis (IRA) for intestinal duplications, but no comparative study exists. The aim of this study was to compare both surgical procedures for intestinal duplication. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed, including all children treated for intestinal duplication (2005-2023). Patients that underwent DE were compared to those that underwent IRA. Statistical significance was determined using p < 0.05. Ethical approval was obtained. RESULTS: A total of 51 patients (median age: 5 months) were treated for intestinal duplication, including 27 patients (53%) that underwent DE and 24 IRA (47%). A cystic image was detected prenatally in 19 patients (70%) with DE and 11 patients (46%) with IRA (p = 0.09). Enucleation was performed using laparoscopy in 7 patients (14%). Patients that underwent DE had shorter time to first feed (1 vs 3 days, p = 0.0001) and length of stay (4 vs 6 days, p < 0.0004) compared to IRA. A muscular layer was identified in 68% of intestinal resection specimens. CONCLUSION: Compared to intestinal resection with anastomosis, duplication enucleation is associated with decreased postoperative length of stay and delay to first feeds without increasing post-operative complications. Regarding histological analysis, enucleation seems feasible in most cases.

Surgical maneuvers for long-segment Hirschsprung pull-through in unique patients.

PURPOSE: Patients with Hirschsprung disease affecting the splenic flexure or more proximal segments present a surgical challenge. Mobilizing the transverse colon to the pelvis during a pull-through may obstruct the distal ileum, or the length may be insufficient to reach the lower pelvis. This retrospective study aimed to describe two surgical techniques that facilitate mobilization of the transverse colon and their outcome. METHODS: We included patients operated on between April 2017 and April 2024 and analyzed sex, comorbidities, type of pull- through, age at pull-through, history of previous surgeries, cause of the proximal transverse colon pull-through, technique used (Deloyers or Turnbull), complications , postoperative outcome and follow-up. The first technique used was the maneuver described by Turnbull. This operation creates a mesenteric defect and mobilizes the colon into this mesenteric window at the distal ileum level. The second technique was described by Deloyers and involves a 180-degree rotation of the right colon by dissecting the right colon attachment and the hepatocolic ligament. The cecum and the ileocecal valve are placed in the right upper quadrant, and the distal colon is mobilized into the pelvis. RESULTS: We included 13 patients, 12 boys and 1 girl. Eight patients had previous surgeries in another hospital: five had an initial transverse colostomy, and three had an ileostomy. The remaining five had the initial operation in our hospital: two had an ileostomy, two had a colostomy, and one had a primary pull-through. The median age at pull-through was 16 months (4-59 months). We used the Turnbull technique in four patients whose aganglionosis was limited to the middle transverse colon. The Deloyers technique was used in the remaining patients, with ganglion cells in the proximal transverse colon. We left a protective ileostomy in five patients. The median follow-up was 4.5 years (3 months to 10 years). The stoma takedown is pending in one patient. CONCLUSION: The Turnbull and Deloyers techniques were helpful in patients with aganglionosis affecting the transverse colon.

[Comparison of early operative treatment and 48-hour conservative treatment in small bowel obstruction (COTACSO): intermediate results]. / Promezhutochnye rezul'taty otkrytogo prospektivnogo randomizirovannogo mnogotsentrovogo sravnitel'nogo issledovaniya rannei operatsii i 48-chasovogo neoperativnogo lecheniya spaechnoi kishechnoi neprokhodimosti.

Optimal treatment for adhesive small bowel obstruction (SBO) is not defined. Surgery is the only method of treatment for obvious strangulating SBO. Non-operative management (NOM) is widely used among patients with low risk of strangulation, i.e. no clinical, laboratory and CT signs. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are recommended to determine the optimal method (early intervention or NOM), but their safety is unclear due to possible delay in surgery for patients needing early intervention. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A RCT is devoted to outcomes of early operative treatment and NOM for adhesive SBO. The estimated trial capacity is 200 patients. Thirty-two patients were included in interim analysis. In 12 hours after admission, patients without apparent signs of strangulation were randomized into two clinical groups after conservative treatment. Group I included 12 patients who underwent immediate surgery, group II - 20 patients after 48-hour NOM. The primary endpoint was success of non-surgical regression of SBO and reduction in mortality. To evaluate patient safety, we analyzed mortality, complication rates and bowel resection in this RCT with previously published studies. RESULTS: In group I, all 12 (100%) patients underwent surgery. Only 4 (20%) patients required surgery in group II. Mortality, complication rates and bowel resection rates were similar in both groups. Strangulating SBO was found in 8 (25%) patients. Overall mortality was 6.3%, bowel resection rate - 6.3%, iatrogenic perforation occurred in 3 (18.8%) patients. These values did not exceed previous findings. CONCLUSION: Non-operative management within 48 hours prevented surgery in 80% of patients with SBO. Interim analysis found no significant between-group differences in mortality, complication rates and bowel resection rate. Patients had not been exposed to greater danger than other patients with adhesive SBO. The study is ongoing.

Comparison of outcomes in small bowel surgery for Crohn's disease: a retrospective NSQIP review.

INTRODUCTION: Despite advances in medical therapy, approximately 33% of Crohn's disease (CD) patients will need surgery within 5 years after initial diagnosis. Several surgical approaches to CD have been proposed including small bowel resection, strictureplasty, and combined surgery with resection plus strictureplasty. Here, we utilize the American College of Surgeons (ACS) national surgical quality registry (NSQIP) to perform a comprehensive analysis of 30-day outcomes between these three surgical approaches for CD. METHODS: The authors queried the ACS-NSQIP database between 2015 and 2020 for all patients undergoing open or laparoscopic resection of small bowel or strictureplasty for CD using CPT and IC-CM 10. Outcomes of interest included length of stay, discharge disposition, wound complications, 30-day related readmission, and reoperation. RESULTS: A total of 2578 patients were identified; 87% of patients underwent small bowel resection, 5% resection with strictureplasty, and 8% strictureplasty alone. Resection plus strictureplasty (combined surgery) was associated with the longest operative time (p = 0.002). Patients undergoing small bowel resection had the longest length of hospital stay (p = 0.030) and the highest incidence of superficial/deep wound infection (44%, p = 0.003) as well as the highest incidence of sepsis (3.5%, p = 0.03). Small bowel resection was found to be associated with higher odds of wound complication compared to combined surgery (OR 2.09, p = 0.024) and strictureplasty (1.9, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Our study shows that various surgical approaches for CD are associated with comparable outcomes in 30-day related reoperation and readmission, or disposition following surgery between all three surgical approaches. However, small bowel resection displayed higher odds of developing post-operative wound complications.

Impact of surgical specialization on emergency upper gastrointestinal surgery outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Emergency presentations make up a large proportion of a general surgeon's workload. Patients who have emergency surgery carry a higher rate of mortality and complications. We aim to review the impact of surgical subspecialization on patients following upper gastrointestinal (UGI) emergency surgery. METHODS: A systematic search of Ovid Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases using a predefined search strategy was completed reviewing studies published from 1st of January 1990 to August 27, 2023. The study was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022359326). Studies were reviewed for the following outcomes: 30-day mortality, in-hospital mortality, conversion to open, length of stay, return to theater, and readmission. RESULTS: Of 5181 studies, 24 articles were selected for full text review. Of these, seven were eligible and included in this study. There was a statistically significant improvement in 30-day mortality favoring UGI specialists (OR 0.71 [95% CI 0.55-0.92 and p = 0.009]) and in-hospital mortality (OR 0.29 [95% CI 0.14-0.60 and p = 0009]). There was a high degree of study heterogeneity in 30-day mortality; however, a low degree of heterogeneity within in-hospital mortality. There was no statistical significance when considering conversion to open and insufficient data to allow meta-analysis for return to theater or readmission rates. CONCLUSION: In emergency UGI surgery, there was improved 30-day and in-hospital mortality for UGI specialists. Therefore, surgeons should consider early involvement of a subspecialist team to improve patient outcomes.