Doctors of Osteopathic Medicine as Plastic Surgery Residents: Demographics, Credentials, and Pathways to Residency.

OBJECTIVE: Doctors of Osteopathic Medicine (DOs) are sparsely represented within plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) and recent changes including the elimination of step 1 scoring have further disadvantaged DO applicants. The demographics, degrees, and scholarly output of DO PRS trainees were compared to that of Doctors of Medicine (MDs) to identify areas of focus which could be used to increase competitiveness of DO applications. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study was created, including ACGME-accredited PRS program trainees during the 2020 to 2021 academic year. DO and MD trainee demographics and scholarly accomplishments were compared using t-test and chi-squared analysis. SETTING: Web-based publicly available information was collected for subjects. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1092 PRS MD and DO trainees were identified. DOs made up only 2.7% (n = 30) and MDs made up 97.3% (n = 1062). RESULTS: More DOs trained in independent programs (63.3%) than integrated (36.7%) compared to MDs (88.2% v. 11.8%, p < 0.001) and more DOs trained at lower ranked PRS programs (60.0% of DOs and 18.1% of MDs trained at Q4 programs, p < 0.001). DOs had fewer publications (median, IQR: 1, [0-2]) compared to MDs (3, [1-8]), fewer citations (0, [0-6]) vs. (10, [1-56]) and lower H-index (1, [0-1]) vs. (1, [1-3]). CONCLUSION: DO candidates should consider research years in the field of PRS and optimize clinical experience opportunities to increase the competitiveness of their PRS applications. Special attention should be paid to providing networking and research opportunities to DOs who lack home institutions.

Integration of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment for Patients with Chronic Pain.

The Five Models of Osteopathic Medicine offers guidance on creating a treatment plan that includes OMT for patients with chronic pain. Using OMT on one body region or system has numerous downstream effects and can influence multiple models. This paper describes this therapeutic modality.

Osteopathic Medical Schools Produce an Increasing Proportion of Family Medicine Residents.

The Association of American Medical Colleges reported a shortage of 45,000 primary care physicians in 2020 and projects shortages of 65,000 by 2025 and 104,900 by 2030.1 The shortage has been exacerbated by physician retirement due to the COVID-19 pandemic.2 The increasing deficit is partially because of the decline in medical students entering primary care specialties. Interest in family medicine has been flat for the past 10 years, and only 13% of U.S. allopathic and osteopathic graduates enter Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited family medicine programs.3 Most recent residency matches report that only 9% of allopathic medical students choose family medicine.4 There has been more interest in primary care in osteopathic schools, with 23% of these students expressing an interest in primary care.5.

Expansion of osteopathic medicine practitioner education on substance use disorders.

CONTEXT: Medical school graduates are generally not well prepared to treat patients with substance use disorders (SUDs), even though opioid overdose deaths in the United States have increased in recent years. When it comes to training in SUDs, osteopathic medicine lags far behind allopathic medicine. It was only in 2019 that the American Osteopathic Association approved Board Certification in Addiction Medicine to help combat the opioid epidemic. Few articles have been published in the literature pertaining to substance use education for osteopathic students and trainees. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to expand the education of osteopathic medical students and primary care residents in SUDs and measure the effect that education had on the attitudes and knowledge of student and residents about SUDs. METHODS: This study collected anonymous data in the form of a voluntary online survey from third- and fourth-year students at an osteopathic medical school and family medicine residents. The survey was completed by 115 students and 29 family medicine residents. Participants completed a pretest survey and then participated in the Physician Undergraduate and Resident Substance Use Education (PURSUE) curriculum developed by the researchers. This consisted of three online modules covering Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT), substance use assessments, and treatment of SUDs. Upon conclusion of the training modules, medical student participants then completed a posttest survey to assess for any changes in knowledge and attitude. Participants also answered questions related to clinical case scenarios involving patients at varying risk levels who were assessed utilizing SBIRT. RESULTS: Students and residents who participated in the training demonstrated an increase in their average scores between the pretest and posttest, indicating effectiveness in learning from the modules. The overall increase in average scores on the pretest and posttest was 6.5 %, which was determined to be statistically significant (p<0.01). Interestingly, participants who reported growing up in underprivileged circumstances performed worse than those participants who reported not growing up in underprivileged circumstances. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our project support the need and benefit of incorporating educational modules on this topic area within medical school curriculums and residency training. Expanding the number of healthcare workers proficient in providing this type of care in these types of settings will improve the quality of and access to medical care in some of our highest-need populations.

Neurosurgery Clerkships in United States Medical Schools: A Survey of Doctor of Medicine-Granting and Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine-Granting Schools.

OBJECTIVE: Exposure to neurosurgery is important for knowledge of neurosurgical conditions that physicians may encounter. The current status of neurosurgery nonsubinternship clerkships in the United States is unknown; this study determined the availability and format of non-subinternship neurosurgery clerkships in DO (Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine)-granting and MD (Doctor of Medicine)-granting U.S. medical schools. METHODS: Association of American Medical Colleges and American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine websites were used to obtain contact information for all U.S. medical schools. Respondents were asked whether their school offered a non-subinternship neurosurgery clerkship, if it was required, clerkship length, and whether the clerkship was embedded in another clerkship. Nonsubinternship clerkships/electives/selectives were defined as an exploratory neurosurgery rotation. For nonresponding schools, data were collected from school websites. RESULTS: Data were obtained for 180/199 U.S. medical schools; 142 (79%) provided neurosurgery non-subinternships, including 125/150 (83.3%) MD-granting and 17/30 (57%) DO-granting schools. Four MD-granting schools (2.8%) required the clerkship; 87/142 (61%) offered a stand-alone clerkship, 34/142 (24%) an embedded clerkship, and 21/142 (15%) offered both. In total, 200 clerkships were offered across 142 schools. Most were either >1-2 weeks or >3-4 weeks (69/200, 35% and 89/200, 45%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Most U.S. medical schools provide elective neurosurgery non-subinternships. Fewer, although still a majority, of DO-granting schools offer a neurosurgery non-subinternship compared with MD-granting schools.

An assessment of surgery core rotation quality at osteopathic medical schools.

CONTEXT: Osteopathic medical schools have traditionally placed a heavy emphasis on the field of primary care. While graduating osteopathic students continue to pursue family medicine, internal medicine, and pediatrics at higher rates than their allopathic counterparts, it is unknown whether students feel that surgical rotations are held to similar standards. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess osteopathic medical student opinions of the quality of their surgical clerkships and to determine if good or poor experiences influenced their decision to continue pursuing surgery. METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval, a voluntary and anonymous Qualtrics survey was sent to all nationally registered members of the American College of Osteopathic Surgeons, Medical Student Section (ACOS-MSS) in their final 2 years of medical school. Analyses were conducted utilizing R statistical software. RESULTS: A total of 345 responses were recorded from the Qualtrics survey sent to 2182 ACOS students from the national registry (response rate of 15.8 %). Students who found a mentor during their surgical rotations were more likely to consider a surgical career after they completed their rotations (odds ratio [OR]=1.43, p=0.003). Students at academic sites had more opportunities for research than those at community hospitals (p=0.019). Most students responded that they were still considering surgery as a career after rotation completion; a significant portion (OR=0.36, p<0.001) responded that they were no longer interested. CONCLUSIONS: Medical students are most likely to review a surgical rotation favorably if they can connect with a mentor while on rotation. Osteopathic medical schools may benefit from instituting mentorship programs for students interested in surgery, as well as ensuring that their students have ample opportunity for research.

Profession-based manual therapy nomenclature: exploring history, limitations, and opportunities.

OBJECTIVE: The International Consortium on Manual Therapies (ICMT) is a grassroots interprofessional association open to any formally trained practitioner of manual therapy (MT) and basic scientists promoting research related to the practice of MT. Currently, MT research is impeded by professions' lack of communication with other MT professions, biases, and vernacular. Current ICMT goals are to minimize these barriers, compare MT techniques, and establish an interprofessional MT glossary. METHODS: Practitioners from all professions with training in manual therapies were encouraged by e-mail and website to participate (www.ICMTConferene.org). Video conferences were conducted at least bimonthly for 2.5 years by profession-specific and interprofessional focus groups (FGs). Members summarized scopes of practice, technique descriptions, associated mechanisms of action (MOA), and glossary terms. Each profession presented their work to the interprofessional FG to promote dialogue, understanding and consensus. Outcomes were reported and refined at numerous public events. RESULTS: Focus groups with representatives from 5 MT professions, chiropractic, massage therapy, osteopathic, physical therapy and structural integration identified 17 targeting osseous structures and 49 targeting nonosseous structures. Thirty-two techniques appeared distinct to a specific profession, and 13 were used by more than 1. Comparing descriptions identified additional commonalities. All professions agreed on 4 MOA categories for MT. A glossary of 280 terms and definitions was consolidated, representing key concepts in MT. Twenty-one terms were used by all MT professions and basic scientists. Five terms were used by MT professions exclusive of basic scientists. CONCLUSION: Outcomes suggested a third to a half of techniques used in MT are similar across professions. Additional research is needed to better define the extent of similarity and how to consistently identify those approaches. Ongoing expansion and refinement of the glossary is necessary to promote descriptive clarity and facilitate communication between practitioners and basic scientists.

The Effects of Single Accreditation and Pass/Fail Licensing Exams on Osteopathic Medical Students Applying to Surgical Residency Programs.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of single accreditation and pass/fail licensing exams on osteopathic (DO) medical students applying for surgical residency. DESIGN: Electronic surveys were distributed to 1509 program directors (PD) in 10 surgical specialties. PDs were separated into 2categories based on their program's accreditation status prior to single accreditation: formerly accredited by the American Osteopathic Association (AOA) or not accredited by the AOA. Separate chi-squared and binomial tests were used to determine statistical differences between PDs in each category and within each surgical specialty. SETTING: Voluntary, anonymous, electronic survey. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred survey responses were received (response rate 19.8%) and 234 responses were included in statistical analyses. Sixty-six responses were excluded because the survey was incomplete, the survey was not completed by a PD, or the PD indicated disqualification of DO applicants from matching at that program. RESULTS: The majority of PDs in both categories recommend or require that DO students take both United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step1 [Χ2 (2, N = 234) = 8.939, p = 0.011] and USMLE Step 2 CK [Χ2 (2, N = 234) = 4.161, p = 0.125] despite pass/fail outcomes only on Step 1 and Level 1. When deciding whom to interview, PDs in both categories highly ranked USMLE Step 2 CK scores and letters of recommendation (LOR). Formerly-AOA-accredited programs highly ranked COMLEX-USA Level 2 scores (p = < 0.001) and completion of an audition rotation (p = 0.001). Non-AOA-accredited programs highly ranked the Medical Student Performance Evaluation (MSPE) (p = < 0.001) and clerkship grades/evaluations (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences exist in programs despite single accreditation. DO applicants should take both USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 CK to be considered competitive for any surgical specialty. Additionally, DO students should prioritize formerly-AOA-accredited programs for audition rotations.

Defining the landscape of patient harm after osteopathic manipulative treatment: synthesis of an adverse event model.

BACKGROUND: In the United States, osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT), is a popular complementary physical health approach for the treatment of neuromusculoskeletal disorders. However, post-OMT adverse events (AEs) are poorly defined in terms of frequency, severity, and temporal evolution. To date, no benchmark for patient safety exists. To improve understanding in this field, we set out to model the landscape of patient harm after OMT. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search of all available primary clinical research studies reporting on the occurrence of post-OMT AEs in nonpregnant, adult outpatients treated by an osteopathic physician in the United States. The methodology of eligible studies was then reviewed to select those containing the minimum required dataset to model the post-OMT AEs. The minimum required dataset consisted of four model parameters: 'post-OMT interval', 'OMT encounters with post-OMT interval assessment', 'AEs preceded by an OMT encounter', and 'AE severity.' We used the dataset extracted from selected studies to calculate a patient safety benchmark defined as the incidence rate of AEs per 100 post-OMT interval-days. RESULTS: From 212 manuscripts that we identified, 118 primary clinical research studies were assessed for eligibility. A total of 23 studies met inclusion criteria for methodological review, of which 13 studies passed and were selected for modeling. Mild AEs were the most frequent, accounting for n = 161/165 (98%) of total AEs observed in the literature. The cumulative incidence of mild AEs was also significantly greater (P = 0.01) than both moderate and severe grades. The benchmark incidence rate was 1.0 AEs per 100 post-OMT interval-days. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of post-OMT AEs observed in the primary clinical literature were of mild severity. Modeling of the combined dataset on post-OMT AEs allowed for the derivation of a patient safety benchmark that, to date, has not been established in the field of osteopathic manipulative medicine. Additional research is needed to improve model resolution during the post-OMT period. This work conceptualized a model for identifying and grading post-OMT AEs, which should facilitate future comparisons between institutions in order to continually improve patient safety standards in the field of osteopathic manipulative medicine.

Impact of the USMLE Step 1 and COMLEX Level 1 transition to Pass/Fail on osteopathic medical student stress levels and board preparation.

CONTEXT: The United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 and Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Exam (COMLEX) Level 1 transitioned from a numeric scoring system to a Pass/Fail designation in 2022. This transition intended to decrease stress, improve medical student well-being, and encourage residency program directors to emphasize other aspects of residency applications. Pass/Fail score transitions in the undergraduate medical education curriculum have improved medical student psychological well-being and satisfaction; whether these same benefits translate to the board examination period is unknown. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study are to assess the impact of USMLE Step 1 and COMLEX Level 1 grade scale transition on medical student stress, wellness, board preparation decisions, and future residency selection processes. Investigators hypothesized that students under the Pass/Fail designation would experience less stress during the intensive study period leading up to USMLE Step 1 and COMLEX Level 1 and devote more time to other aspects of their residency applications. METHODS: To examine the impact on osteopathic medical student (OMS) stress and approach to board preparation, two surveys were administered to Rocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine (RVU-COM) students before (Class of 2023) and after (Class of 2024) the transition to a Pass/Fail designation. All students within the RVU-COM Classes of 2023 and 2024 were invited to participate. The Cohen Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) was administered at the beginning of the focused board study period in May 2021 and 2022 to the Class of 2023 and 2024, respectively. The investigator-designed Licensing Exam Questionnaire (LEQ), meant to capture board preparation patterns, residency application perspectives, and wellness during examination preparation, was administered immediately after the board examination deadline in July 2021 and 2022 to the Class of 2023 and 2024, respectively. Statistical analysis included the use of independent t tests (numeric variables) and chi-square tests (categorical data). This project was considered exempt from full Institutional Review Board review. RESULTS: Approximately one-third of the Class of 2023 (PSS-10: n=86; LEQ: n=93) and 2024 (PSS-10=89; LEQ: n=92) responded. No difference was detected in mean PSS-10 score, 20.14 (SD=7.3) compared to 19.92 (SD=6.56) for the Class of 2023 and 2024 (p=0.84), respectively. The Class of 2023 reported more weeks studying (mean 6.27 weeks, SD=0.79) vs. the Class of 2024 (mean 5.44 weeks, SD=0.007), p<0.001, more practice examinations taken X 2 (1, n=182)=13.75, p<0.001, and a greater proportion scheduled examinations after June 20 X 2 (1, n=182)=29.01, p<0.001. No difference existed in hours studying per day, sequence of Step 1/Level 1, time between examinations, money spent, or type of study resources utilized. CONCLUSIONS: The transition of USMLE Step 1 and COMLEX Level 1 to a Pass/Fail designation did not reduce stress for OMSs at a single, multicampus COM. Respondents, however, altered board preparation practices in meaningful ways. As student behaviors and board-study patterns emerge, these insights must be connected to outcomes in the future.

Key factors for residency interview selection from the National Resident Matching Program: analysis of residency Program Director surveys, 2016-2020.

CONTEXT: As the number of medical school graduates continues to outpace the available residency training positions, applying for residency in the United States has become a highly competitive process, often associated with a low rate of selection and invitation for interview. The National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) Program Director survey provides data assessing factors considered by Program Directors (PD) in selecting and inviting candidates for interview. Assessing the evolution of these factors over time is efficacious to inform and guide prospective applicants toward improving preparation for residency application. OBJECTIVES: We aim to synthesize NRMP data showing factors that PDs reported and rated as important in their decision to select and invite applicants for interview. METHODS: Data from residency PD surveys from 2008 to 2021 were accessed, but after applying inclusion/exclusion criteria, only the data from 2016 to 2020 were reviewed and analyzed. The NRMP survey reports provided two metrics that characterized PDs' evaluation of the residency factors for interview, namely, "percent citing factor" and "average rating" on a 0 to 5 Likert-type scale. These two metrics were combined into an aggregate measure of importance (AI), and another measure of relative importance (RI) was constructed from normalizing the AI of each individual factor to the sum of the AI within each survey year. RESULTS: The top ranked factors were United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1/Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination (COMLEX) Level 1, Letter of Recommendation (LOR) in the specialty, Medical Student Performance Evaluation (MSPE/Dean's Letter), and USMLE Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK)/COMLEX Level 2 Cognitive Exam (CE) score, any failed attempt in USMLE/COMLEX, and perceived commitment to specialty. Factors rising in importance were Audition Elective/Rotation Within Your Department, Personal Statement (PS), Perceived Commitment to Specialty, Perceived Interest in Program, LOR in the Specialty, Other Life Experience, and Personal Prior Knowledge of the Applicant. Factors with declining importance were Interest in Academic Career, Awards or Special Honors in Basic Sciences, Graduate of Highly Regarded US Medical School, Awards or Special Honors in Clinical Clerkships, Lack of Gaps in Medical Education, Awards or Special Honors in Clerkship in Desired Specialty, and Consistency of Grades. Compared to the 2021 PD survey, our findings show continued predictive consistency, particularly related to specialty and program commitment. CONCLUSIONS: The factors identified for the selection of medical school graduates for interview into a residency program reveal that PDs move toward a more integrated approach. Specifically, PDs are placing increasing emphasis on factors that border on subjective qualities more so than the more traditional, quantitative, and objective metrics. Medical students and educators need to continually apprise themselves of the NRMP data to inform students' preparation endeavors throughout medical school to strengthen their application portfolios and enhance their competitiveness for the matching process.

Equal but Separate: The Slow Assimilation of Osteopathic Surgery Residents Two Years After the Unified Match.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to monitor the integration of general surgery residency programs before and after the 2020 unified match. We hypothesized that integration of osteopathic (DO) surgery residents would increase. DESIGN: We performed a retrospective cohort study of surgery residency programs between 2019 and 2021 utilizing data provided by the Association of American Medical Colleges. Program composition (2021) and changes in composition (2019-2021) were compared by program type. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed variables associated with DO presence (2021) and integration (2019-2021). SETTING: General surgery residency programs across the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Civilian surgery residencies that completed the 2019-2021 program survey. RESULTS: Out of 320 programs, DO residents were integrated at 69% (221/320), including 52% (63/122) university programs, 78% (101/129) university-affiliated programs and 83% (57/69) community programs (p < 0.01). Overall, 23 (8%) programs integrated DO residents from 2019 to 2021, and 9 (21%) ex-American Osteopathic Association programs integrated MD residents (both p < 0.01). The median number of DO residents was 1 (interquartile range, IQR 0-2) at university programs, 2 (IQR 1-7) at university-affiliated programs, and 5 (IQR 2-12) at community programs (p < 0.01). The median number of DO residents at all programs increased from 1 (IQR 0-5) to 2 (IQR 0-6) since 2019 (p < 0.01). Community (OR 2.6, p = 0.04), university-affiliated (OR 2.3, p = 0.02), and programs with DOs in 2019 (OR 19.0, p < 0.01) were associated with increased odds of DOs present in 2021, while DO faculty (OR 2.6, p = 0.02) was the only factor independently associated with integrating DOs after 2019. CONCLUSIONS: While some programs have integrated DO residents, progress is slow, median numbers of DO residents remain low, and familiarity with DOs is most associated with integration. We explore barriers to integration, and advance recommendations to eliminate potential disparities.

Increasing Diversity in the Physician Workforce: Pathway Programs and Predictive Analytics.

PROBLEM: Lack of diversity in the physician workforce has well-documented negative impacts on health outcomes. Evidence supports the use of pathway or pipeline programs to recruit underrepresented in medicine students. However, data on how a pathway program should deliver instruction are lacking. This report describes a multiyear project to build such a system with the goal of increasing diversity within medical school cohorts and ultimately the physician workforce. APPROACH: In the 2015-2016 academic year, the Ponce Health Sciences University started a 3-phase project to create a data-driven medical school feeder system by coupling a pathway program with predictive analytics. Phase 1 launched the pathway program. Phase 2 developed and validated a predictive model that estimates United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 performance. Phase 3 is underway and focuses on adoption, implementation, and support. OUTCOMES: Data analysis compared 2 groups of students (pathway vs direct) across specific factors, including Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) score, undergraduate grade point average (GPA), first-generation status, and Step 1 exam performance. Statistically significant differences were found between the 2 groups on the MCAT exam and undergraduate GPA; however, no significant differences were found between groups for first-generation status and performance on the Step 1 exam. This finding supports the authors' hypothesis that although pathway students have significantly lower mean MCAT exam scores compared with direct students, pathway students perform just as well on the USMLE Step 1 exam. NEXT STEPS: Next steps include expanding the project to another campus, adding more socioeconomic status and first-generation data, and identifying best curricular predictors. The authors recommend that medical school programs use pathway programs and predictive analytics to create a more data-centered approach to accepting students with the goal of increasing physician workforce diversity.

Osteopathic manipulative treatment for concussions and postconcussive syndrome in athletes: a literature review.

CONTEXT: Concussions are the most common type of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and can often occur in athletes. These injuries have many deleterious acute symptoms and can lead to the development of postconcussive syndrome (PCS). Osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) is a treatment option that may benefit patients with concussions and PCS. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review is to determine whether OMT can improve symptoms associated with concussions and PCS in athletes. METHODS: A comprehensive literature review was conducted between August 2021 and March 2022 by two authors (Z.K.L. and K.D.T.) who searched the literature utilizing PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library. Articles reviewed included case reports, case studies, randomized control trials, meta-analyses, and peer-reviewed journal articles. Search terms included concussion, postconcussive symptoms, osteopathic manipulative medicine, and manipulation. To be included into this study, articles must have included OMT from an osteopathic physician or manipulative techniques by nonosteopathic providers for patients with a concussion or PCS, and the insulting injury must have occurred in an athletic setting. No disagreements occurred between authors about what studies to include. However, we were prepared to come to a unanimous decision through discussion among the authors. A narrative synthesis was performed. No other data analyses were conducted in this study. RESULTS: Included in this review were nine articles including randomized control trials, retrospective review, case series, longitudinal, retrospective studies, and case reports. The literature shows the positive effects of OMT and manipulative techniques on symptom resolution after a concussion. However, most of the literature is qualitative rather than quantitative in nature, lacking in randomized control trials. CONCLUSIONS: There is a scarcity of high-quality studies evaluating the effectiveness of OMT on concussions and PCS. More research is needed to understand the degree of benefit for this treatment option.

The effectiveness of disinfection protocols in medical school osteopathic manipulative medicine labs.

CONTEXT: In light of the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare-associated infections have taken center stage. Healthcare has adjusted workflows to accommodate for more robust disinfecting regiments to help protect the community. This has resulted in the need for medical institutions to reevaluate the current disinfection protocols down to the student level. The osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM) laboratory provides an optimal avenue for assessing the effectiveness of medical students' ability to clean examination tables. With OMM laboratories having a high level of interaction, adequate disinfection is important for the health and safety of students and teaching faculties. OBJECTIVES: This study will evaluate the effectiveness of the current disinfection protocols in the medical school OMM labs. METHODS: A cross-sectional, nonrandomized study was performed on 20 OMM examination tables utilized for osteopathic training. Tables were chosen based on their close proximity to the podium. Close proximity was utilized as a criteria to increase the probability of utilization by students. The sampled tables were observed to ensure their use by students during class. Initial samples were collected in the morning after disinfection by Environmental Services. Terminal samples were collected after Osteopathic medical students utilized and disinfected the OMM examination tables. Samples were collected from the face-cradle and midtorso regions and analyzed utilizing adenosine triphosphate (ATP) bioluminescence assays with an AccuPoint Advanced HC Reader. This reader provides a digital readout of the quantity of light measured in relative light units (RLUs), which is directly correlated to the amount of ATP present in the sample, providing an estimated pathogen count. For statistical analysis, a Wilcoxon signed-rank test was utilized to find statistical differences in RLUs in samples after initial and terminal disinfection. RESULTS: The face cradle showed a 40 % increase in failure rate in samples after terminal disinfection when samples were compared after initial disinfection. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test revealed an estimated pathogen level for face cradle that was significantly higher after terminal disinfection (median, 4,295 RLUs; range, 2,269-12919 RLUs; n=20) compared to initial disinfection (median, 769 RLUs; range, 29-2,422 RLUs; n=20), z=-3.8, p=0.00008, with a large effect size, d=2.2. The midtorso region showed a 75 % increase in samples after terminal disinfection when samples were compared after initial disinfection. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test revealed that the estimated pathogen levels for midtorso were significantly higher after terminal disinfecting (median, 656 RLUs; range, 112-1,922 RLUs; n=20) compared to initial disinfecting (median, 128 RLUs; range, 1-335 RLUs; n=20), z=-3.9, p=0.00012, with a large effect size, d=1.8. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that medical students frequently failed to disinfect high-touch regions on examination tables, such as the midtorso and the face cradle. It is recommended that the current OMM lab disinfection protocol be modified to include the disinfection of high-touch regions in order to reduce the possibility of pathogen transmission. Further research should explore the effectiveness of disinfection protocols in clinical settings such as outpatient offices.

Awareness and interest in osteopathic manipulative treatment in allopathic medical students.

CONTEXT: Osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) is utilized by clinicians to diagnose and treat a variety of musculoskeletal conditions including acute and chronic pain, and other medical conditions. Previous studies have examined attitudes of allopathic (MD) residents toward OMT and have implemented residency-based curricula; however, literature is lacking on the attitudes of MD students toward OMT. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine MD students' familiarity with OMT and to evaluate their interest in an elective osteopathic curriculum. METHODS: A 15-item online survey was electronically sent to 600 MD students at a large allopathic academic medical center. The survey assessed familiarity with OMT, interest in OMT and in participating in an OMT elective, educational format preference, and interest in pursuing primary care. Educational demographics were also collected. Descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact test were utilized for categorical variables, and nonparametric tests were utilized for the ordinal and continuous variables. RESULTS: A total of 313 MD students submitted responses (response rate=52.1 %), of which 296 (49.3 %) responses were complete and utilized for analysis. A total of 92 (31.1 %) students were aware of OMT as a modality in treating musculoskeletal disorders. Among the respondents who indicated "very interested" in learning a new pain treatment modality, the majority: (1) observed OMT in a prior clinical or educational setting (85 [59.9 %], p=0.02); (2) had a friend or family member treated by a DO physician (42 [71.2 %], p=0.01); (3) were pursuing a primary care specialty (43 [60.6 %], p=0.02); or (4) interviewed at an osteopathic medical school (47 [62.7 %], p=0.01). Among those interested in developing some OMT competency, the majority: (1) were pursuing a primary care specialty (36 [51.4 %], p=0.01); (2) applied to osteopathic schools (47 [54.0], p=0.002); or (3) interviewed at an osteopathic medical school (42 [56.8 %], p=0.001). A total of 230 (82.1 %) students were somewhat or very interested in a 2-week elective course in OMT; among all respondents, hands-on labs were the preferred method for delivery of OMT education (272 [94.1 %]). CONCLUSIONS: The study found a strong interest in an OMT elective by MD students. These results will inform OMT curriculum development aimed at interested MD students and residents in order to provide them with OMT-specific theoretical and practical knowledge.

Assessing patient experience of the tenets of osteopathic medicine.

CONTEXT: Previous studies document that both osteopathic physicians and third-party observers identify an approach to the patient that is consistent with the philosophy and tenets of osteopathic medicine, often without investigating whether patients identify or are satisfied with it. Osteopathic physicians and the medical education community understand the distinctiveness of an osteopathic approach to the patient. Understanding the outcomes of an osteopathic approach to patient care includes confirming whether patients experience the tenets of osteopathic medicine in physician visits and, if so, how it relates to their experience of physician empathy and satisfaction with the visit. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to assess patient experience of the tenets of osteopathic medicine, physician empathy, and satisfaction with the visit and to compare the results for patients who saw DOs with those who saw MD physicians. METHODS: More than 2000 patients at four outpatient clinic facilities were surveyed after a clinical visit on 22 prompts regarding their experiences of physician behaviors, physician empathy, and their own satisfaction with the encounter. Adult patients who were treated by an osteopathic or allopathic physician for a nonemergency encounter and who were not pregnant were included in the analysis. Survey results for 1,330 patient-physician encounters were analyzed utilizing linear regression models comparing constructs representing patient experiences of the tenets of osteopathic medicine (Tenets), physician empathy (Physician Empathy), satisfaction (Satisfaction) with the encounter, as well as additional demographic and encounter variables. RESULTS: Approximately 23.8 % of patients approached during the study period completed a survey (n=2,793), and among those, 54.7 % of patients who consented to the study and who saw a physician provider (n=1,330/2,431) were included. Significant (p≤0.01), positive associations among patient experiences of Satisfaction with the visit and Physician Empathy were observed among those who saw both DO and MD physicians. Patients experienced the Tenets during encounters with both DO and MD physicians, but linear regression showed that their experience of the Tenets was significantly (p≤0.01) and positively explained by their experience of Physician Empathy (ß=0.332, p=0.00, se=0.052) and Satisfaction with the visit (ß=0.209, p=0.01, se=0.081) only when the physician was a DO. CONCLUSIONS: Patients identified physician behaviors consistent with the Tenets and positively associated their experiences of Physician Empathy and Satisfaction with the visit regardless of physician training background. Patient experience of the Tenets significantly explained their experiences of Physician Empathy and Satisfaction after visits with a DO but not after visits with an MD.