Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 6.793
Filtrar
1.
Inquiry ; 61: 469580241274030, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39237853

RESUMO

There are few validated contextual measures predicting adoption of evidence-based programs. Variation in context at clinical sites can hamper dissemination. We examined organizational characteristics of Veterans Affairs hospitals implementing STRIDE, a hospital walking program, and characteristics' influences on program adoption. Using a parallel mixed-method design, we describe context and organizational characteristics by program adoption. Organizational characteristics included: organizational resilience, implementation climate, organizational readiness to implement change, highest complexity sites versus others, material support, adjusted length of stay (LOS) above versus below national median, and improvement experience. We collected intake forms at hospital launch and qualitative interviews with staff members at 4 hospitals that met the initial adoption benchmark, defined as completing supervised walks with 5+ unique hospitalized Veterans during months 5 to 6 after launch with low touch implementation support. We identified that 31% (n = 11 of 35) of hospitals met adoption benchmarks. Seven percent of highest complexity hospitals adopted compared to 48% with lower complexity. Forty-three percent that received resources adopted compared to 29% without resources. Thirty-six percent of hospitals with above-median LOS adopted compared to 23% with below-median. Thirty-five percent with at least some implementation experience adopted compared to 0% with very little to no experience. Adopters reported higher organizational resilience than non-adopters (mean = 23.5 [SD = 2.6] vs 22.7 [SD = 2.6]). Adopting hospitals reported greater organizational readiness to change than those that did not (mean = 4.2 [SD = 0.5] vs 3.8 [SD = 0.6]). Qualitatively, all sites reported that staff were committed to implementing STRIDE. Participants reported additional barriers to adoption including challenges with staffing and delays associated with hiring staff. Adopters reported that having adequate staff facilitated implementation. Implementation climate did not have an association with meeting STRIDE program adoption benchmarks in this study. Contextual factors which may be simple to assess, such as resource availability, may influence adoption of new programs without intensive implementation support.


Assuntos
Benchmarking , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Hospitais de Veteranos/organização & administração , Tempo de Internação , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/organização & administração , Cultura Organizacional , Caminhada , Hospitalização , Limitação da Mobilidade
3.
BMJ Open ; 14(8): e087231, 2024 Aug 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39174071

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To identify the needs of caregivers of hospitalised adults with dementia in the hospital and during care transitions. DESIGN: Pragmatic qualitative inquiry with semi-structured interviews. SETTING: Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Houston, Texas, USA. PARTICIPANTS: 12 family caregivers (family member (n=11); friend (n=1)) and 15 health professionals (hospital medicine physicians (n=4), inpatient nurse case managers (n=2), social workers (n=4), outpatient geriatrics providers (n=2), a primary care provider (n=1), geriatric psychiatrists (n=2)) were interviewed. Caregivers were recruited while their care recipient was hospitalised and were interviewed at least 2 weeks after the care recipient was discharged from the hospital. Health professionals were eligible for the study if they provided care to patients with dementia in the inpatient or outpatient setting. RESULTS: Four recommendations emerged from the analysis: (1) engage caregivers as partners in the care team, (2) provide dementia-specific information and training, (3) connect caregivers to home and community-based services and (4) provide care navigation and support for the caregiver posthospitalisation. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital care transitions are challenging for caregivers of hospitalised adults living with dementia. Care transition interventions designed to support caregivers with tailored, dementia-specific information and services are needed.


Assuntos
Cuidadores , Demência , Hospitais de Veteranos , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Humanos , Cuidadores/psicologia , Demência/enfermagem , Demência/terapia , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos , Hospitalização , Entrevistas como Assunto , Adulto , Família/psicologia , Texas , Avaliação das Necessidades , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , United States Department of Veterans Affairs
4.
Ann Intern Med ; 177(9): 1179-1189, 2024 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39102729

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based practice in community-acquired pneumonia often assumes an accurate initial diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: To examine the evolution of pneumonia diagnoses among patients hospitalized from the emergency department (ED). DESIGN: Retrospective nationwide cohort. SETTING: 118 U.S. Veterans Affairs medical centers. PATIENTS: Aged 18 years or older and hospitalized from the ED between 1 January 2015 and 31 January 2022. MEASUREMENTS: Discordances between initial pneumonia diagnosis, discharge diagnosis, and radiographic diagnosis identified by natural language processing of clinician text, diagnostic coding, and antimicrobial treatment. Expressions of uncertainty in clinical notes, patient illness severity, treatments, and outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Among 2 383 899 hospitalizations, 13.3% received an initial or discharge diagnosis and treatment of pneumonia: 9.1% received an initial diagnosis and 10.0% received a discharge diagnosis. Discordances between initial and discharge occurred in 57%. Among patients discharged with a pneumonia diagnosis and positive initial chest image, 33% lacked an initial diagnosis. Among patients diagnosed initially, 36% lacked a discharge diagnosis and 21% lacked positive initial chest imaging. Uncertainty was frequently expressed in clinical notes (58% in ED; 48% at discharge); 27% received diuretics, 36% received corticosteroids, and 10% received antibiotics, corticosteroids, and diuretics within 24 hours. Patients with discordant diagnoses had greater uncertainty and received more additional treatments, but only patients lacking an initial pneumonia diagnosis had higher 30-day mortality than concordant patients (14.4% [95% CI, 14.1% to 14.7%] vs. 10.6% [CI, 10.4% to 10.7%]). Patients with diagnostic discordance were more likely to present to high-complexity facilities with high ED patient load and inpatient census. LIMITATION: Retrospective analysis; did not examine causal relationships. CONCLUSION: More than half of all patients hospitalized and treated for pneumonia had discordant diagnoses from initial presentation to discharge. Treatments for other diagnoses and expressions of uncertainty were common. These findings highlight the need to recognize diagnostic uncertainty and treatment ambiguity in research and practice of pneumonia-related care. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: The Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation.


Assuntos
Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas , Hospitais de Veteranos , Pneumonia , Humanos , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/diagnóstico , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Incerteza , Pneumonia/diagnóstico , Pneumonia/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia/terapia , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Hospitalização , Erros de Diagnóstico , Adulto , Alta do Paciente
5.
J Grad Med Educ ; 16(4): 479-483, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39148874

RESUMO

Background Orienting medical trainees to new practice environments is essential. Huddles have been shown to improve communication and safety outcomes. However, their use in orienting trainees to systems processes and changes on inpatient general medicine (GM) wards remains unexplored. Objective Implement a weekly inpatient huddle between residents and hospital leaders to improve dissemination of information around health system operations. Methods In 2019, we established "Resident Huddle," a weekly 20-minute huddle for senior internal medicine residents rotating on GM wards at a US Department of Veterans Affairs Hospital led by the site leads. Resident Huddle content included system updates, rotation updates, process reminders, performance feedback, and systems and patient safety concerns raised by trainees. Reactions to the huddle were assessed via survey. Behavioral change was assessed by rates of complete trainee admission medication reconciliation documentation before and after huddle implementation. Results Resident Huddle started in October 2019 and continues to this day. Between October 2019 and June 2022, 136 of 205 participants completed surveys (66% response rate). Respondents agreed or strongly agreed that the huddle provided useful information for care delivery (94%, 128 of 136), improved work engagement (73%, 99 of 136), provided feedback on practice patterns (90%, 121 of 135), and that issues they experienced were acknowledged and acted upon (86%, 114 of 133). Retrospective medical record analysis demonstrated improvement in admission medication reconciliation completion rate by trainees from pre-intervention (32%, 19 of 60) to post-intervention (73%, 44 of 60). Conclusions A weekly huddle between hospital leaders and residents strengthened communication and equipped trainees with operational health systems knowledge to enhance patient care outcomes while fostering a greater sense of engagement with their work environment.


Assuntos
Comunicação , Hospitais de Veteranos , Medicina Interna , Internato e Residência , Humanos , Medicina Interna/educação , Estados Unidos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Segurança do Paciente
6.
Med Care Res Rev ; 81(5): 395-407, 2024 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39075797

RESUMO

Many Veterans receive Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)-purchased care from non-VA facilities but little is known about factors that Veterans consider for this choice. Between May 2020 and August 2021, we surveyed VA-purchased care-eligible VA patients about barriers and facilitators to choosing where to receive care. We examined the association between travel time to their VA facility and their choice of VA-purchased care (VA-paid health care received in non-VA settings) versus VA facility and whether this association was modified by distrust. We received 1,662 responses and 692 (42%) chose a VA facility. Eighty percent reported quality care was in their top three factors that influenced their decision. Respondents with the highest distrust and who lived >1 hr from the nearest VA facility had the lowest predicted probability (PP) of choosing VA (PP 15%; 95% confidence interval: 10%-20%). Veterans value quality of care. VA and other health care systems should consider patient-centered ways to improve and publicize quality and reduce distrust.


Assuntos
Hospitais de Veteranos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Veteranos , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Feminino , Masculino , Veteranos/psicologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Inquéritos e Questionários , Motivação , Comportamento de Escolha , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Adulto , Confiança
7.
J Healthc Risk Manag ; 44(1): 17-23, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39046927

RESUMO

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has committed to becoming a High Reliability Organization (HRO). The Truman VA Medical Center (VAMC) successfully implemented and sustained foundational HRO elements over a period with several changes in facility executive leadership. We interviewed current and past leaders at Truman to understand how they retained fidelity to the HRO transformation. We conducted 16 interviews with 14 leaders involved in the HRO transformation and identified three themes related to the Truman HRO transformation: (1) Leadership visibly drove culture change through intentional communication and modeling HRO principles; (2) Leadership deferred to frontline expertise and empowered staff to make changes and to fail; (3) Hiring the right team members for the organizational culture and investing in training can support HRO principles and values. Our findings highlight key actions for leaders in the context of HROs: regularly communicate the significance of HRO, demonstrate behavior consistent with what they hope to see from staff, celebrate failure, allocate time and resources to the creation of hiring frameworks that identify employee skillsets conducive to HRO principles, and substantial and recurring investments in employee development. Importantly, successive executive leaders at Truman VAMC modeled these skills to promote and sustain the HRO transformation.


Assuntos
Hospitais de Veteranos , Liderança , Cultura Organizacional , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Hospitais de Veteranos/organização & administração , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/organização & administração , Entrevistas como Assunto , Inovação Organizacional , Masculino
8.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(30): e38934, 2024 Jul 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39058822

RESUMO

Hospitals within the Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system exhibited growing use of observation care. It is unknown how this affected VA hospital performance since observation care is not included in acute inpatient measures. To examine changes in VA hospitalization outcomes and whether it was affected by shifting acute inpatient care to observation care. Longitudinal analysis of 986,355 acute hospitalizations and observation stays in 11 states 2011 to 2017. We estimated temporal changes in 30-day mortality, 30-day readmissions, costs, and length of stay (LOS) for all hospitalizations and 6 conditions in adjusted models. Changes in mortality and readmissions were compared including and excluding observation care. A 9% drop in acute hospitalizations was offset by a 157% increase in observation stays 2011 to 2017. A 30-day mortality decreased but readmissions did not when observation stays were included (all P < .05). Mean costs increased modestly; mean LOS was unchanged. There were differences by condition. VA hospital mortality decreased; there was no change in readmissions.


Assuntos
Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitalização , Hospitais de Veteranos , Tempo de Internação , Readmissão do Paciente , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Masculino , Feminino , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Hospitais de Veteranos/estatística & dados numéricos , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/economia , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Estudos Longitudinais , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos
10.
Health Serv Res ; 59(5): e14332, 2024 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38825849

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine changes in hospitalization trends and healthcare utilization among Veterans following Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks (MISSION) Act implementation. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING: VA Corporate Data Warehouse and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services datasets. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study to compare 7- and 30-day rates for unplanned readmission and emergency department visits following index hospital stays based on payor type (VHA facility stay, VA-funded stay in community facility [CC], or Medicare-funded community stay [CMS]). Segmented regression models were used to compare payors and estimate changes in outcome levels and slopes following MISSION Act implementation. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Veterans with active VA primary care utilization and ≥1 acute hospitalization between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2021. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Monthly index stays increased for all payors until MISSION Act implementation, when VHA and CMS admissions declined while CC admissions accelerated and overtook VHA admissions. In December 2021, CC admissions accounted for 54% of index admissions, up from 25% in January 2016. From adjusted models, just prior to implementation (May 2019), Veterans with CC admissions had 47% greater risk of 7-day readmission (risk ratio [RR]: 1.47, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.43, 1.51) and 20% greater risk of 30-day readmission (RR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.19, 1.22) compared with those with VHA admissions; both effects persisted post-implementation. Pre-implementation CC admissions were also associated with higher 7- and 30-day ED visits, but both risks were substantially lower by study termination (RR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.88, 0.91) and (RR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.87, 0.90), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: MISSION Act implementation was associated with substantial shifts in treatment site and federal payor for Veteran hospitalizations. Post-implementation readmission risk was estimated to be higher for those with CC and CMS index admissions, while post-implementation risk of ED utilization following CC admissions was estimated to be lower compared with VHA index admissions. Reasons for this divergence require further investigation.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Hospitalização , Readmissão do Paciente , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Humanos , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Readmissão do Paciente/tendências , Estados Unidos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/tendências , Estudos Retrospectivos , Masculino , Feminino , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/tendências , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Veteranos/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais de Veteranos/estatística & dados numéricos , Visitas ao Pronto Socorro
11.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 72(8): 2329-2335, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38899955

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Thousands of health systems have been recognized as "Age-Friendly" for implementing geriatric care practices aligned with the "4Ms" (What Matters, Medication, Mentation, and Mobility). However, the effect of Age-Friendly recognition on patient outcomes is largely unknown. We sought to identify this effect in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA)-one of the largest Age-Friendly integrated health systems in the United States. METHODS: There were 50 VA medical centers (VAMCs) recognized as Age-Friendly by December 2021. We used a time-event difference-in-difference analysis to identify the association of a VAMC's recognition as Age-Friendly on the change in facility-free days (days outside the hospital or nursing home) among Veterans treated at that facility. We also evaluated this association in three subgroups: Veterans at particularly high risk of nursing home entry, Veterans who lived within 10 miles of a medical center, and facilities that had reached Level 2 Age-Friendly recognition. We also evaluated individual components of the endpoint in terms of change in hospital and nursing home days separately. RESULTS: We found Age-Friendly recognition was associated with small statistically significant improvements in facility-free days (0.2% on a base of 97% facility-free days on average per year, or an additional 0.73 days per year on a base of 354 days). There were no differences in any subgroup, or any individual component of the endpoint across all groups. CONCLUSIONS: At the individual level, an increase of 0.2% in facility-free days is a weak effect. However, sites were early in implementation, and facility-free days may not be a responsive outcome measure. However, across an entire population, small changes in facility-free days may accrue large cost savings. Future evaluations should consider a broader variety of process and outcome measures.


Assuntos
Casas de Saúde , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Veteranos , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Idoso , Masculino , Veteranos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Casas de Saúde/organização & administração , Casas de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais de Veteranos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais
12.
Surgery ; 176(3): 857-865, 2024 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38862281

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Failure to rescue, or the death of a patient after a surgical complication, largely occurs in patients who develop a cascade of postoperative complications. However, it is unclear whether there are specific types of index complications that are more strongly associated with failure to rescue, additional secondary complications, or other types of postoperative outcomes. This is a national cohort study of veterans who underwent noncardiac surgery at Veterans Affairs hospitals using data from the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (January 1, 2016 to September 30, 2021). Index complications were grouped into categories (cardiovascular, venous thromboembolism, pulmonary, bleeding/transfusion, renal, central nervous system, wound, sepsis, Clostridium difficile colitis, graft, or minor [defined as complications having an associated mortality rate <1%]). The association between type of index complication and failure to rescue, secondary complications, reoperation, and postoperative length of stay was evaluated with multivariable, hierarchical regression, and risk of death assessed with shared frailty modeling. RESULTS: Among 574,195 patients, 5.3% had at least 1 complication (of which 26.1% had secondary complications, and 8.2% had failure to rescue), and 4.5% had a reoperation. Secondary complication (5.0%-61.4%) and failure to rescue (0.8%-34.2%) rates varied by the type of index complication. Relative to index minor complications, index bleeding was most associated with secondary complication (subdistribution hazard ratio 1.4, 95% confidence interval [1.1-1.8]), index cardiac complications were most associated with failure to rescue (odds ratio 45.4 [34.5-59.7]), index graft complications were most associated with reoperation (odds ratio 96.0 [79.5-115.8]), and index pulmonary complications were associated with 2.6 times longer length of stay (incident rate ratio 2.6 [2.6-2.7]). Index cardiac and central nervous system complications were most strongly associated with risk of death (cardiac-hazard ratio 2.45, 95% confidence interval [2.14-2.81]; central nervous system-hazard ratio 1.84 [1.49-2.27]). CONCLUSION: Different types of index complications are associated with different outcome profiles. This suggests surgical quality improvement efforts should be tailored not only to the type of index complication to be addressed but also to the desired outcome to improve.


Assuntos
Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Humanos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/mortalidade , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Hospitais de Veteranos/estatística & dados numéricos , Falha da Terapia de Resgate/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Coortes , Fatores de Risco
13.
J Surg Res ; 300: 199-204, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38823270

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Veteran satisfaction of care within the Veterans Affairs is typically very high. Yet recommendation ratings of VA medical center (VA) hospitals as measured by Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems are generally lower than non-VA hospitals.Therefore, it was our objective to assess Veteran satisfaction and recommendation scores and then examine whether satisfaction correlates to recommendation. METHODS: We identified all acute care VAs as our primary analytic cohort. As a comparator group, we also included all acute care academic hospitals (non-VAs), as designated by the Centers for Medicare Services. Using data from Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems and Strategic Analytics for Improvement and Learning (SAIL) Value Model, we collated patient satisfaction scores, as well as markers of surgical safety from Hospital Compare. We then analyzed the correlation within VAs and non-VAs, primarily focusing the relationship between the "would you recommend Hospital Rating" and subdomains of the "Overall Hospital Rating," as well as a composite score of patient safety. RESULTS: A total of 133 VAs and 1116 non-VAs were identified. Among VAs, the "Would you Recommend" hospital rating was significantly and positively correlated with markers of patient satisfaction including care transitions (Pearson's r = 0.59, P = 0.03), Nursing communication (Pearson's R 0.79, P = 0.001), and percent of primary care provider wait times less than 30 min (Pearson's r = 0.25, P = 0.01). VA-recommended scores were negatively correlated with factors such as time to emergency department discharge, and the "leaving the emergency department before being evaluated." When looking at non-VAs, correlation directions were similar, albeit with stronger associations at almost every metric. While recommended scores correlated strongly to overall hospital ratings for both groups, VAs had no significant correlation between "would you recommend" and patient safety. However, there was a slight negative correlation between patient safety and "recommend" among non-VAs. CONCLUSIONS: Although satisfiers and dissatisfiers of care appear similar between VAs and non-VAs, "would you recommend" is a far weaker marker of patient perceptions of safety and quality. These seemingly empathetic markers such as "would you recommend" should be used with caution as they may not address the fundamental question being asked.


Assuntos
Hospitais de Veteranos , Satisfação do Paciente , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Hospitais de Veteranos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais de Veteranos/normas , Hospitais de Veteranos/organização & administração , Estados Unidos , Segurança do Paciente/normas , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/organização & administração , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estatística & dados numéricos , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/organização & administração
15.
Am J Surg ; 234: 156-161, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38755025

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Veterans with primary hyperparathyroidism are under diagnosed and undertreated. We report the results of a pilot study to address this problem. METHODS: We implemented a stakeholder-driven, multi-component intervention to increase rates of diagnosis and treatment for primary hyperparathyroidism at a single VA hospital. Intervention effects were evaluated using an interrupted time series analysis. RESULTS: The mean age of Veterans affected by the intervention was 67 years (SD 12.1) and 84 â€‹% were men. Compared to the pre-intervention period, the intervention doubled the proportion of Veterans who were appropriately evaluated for hyperparathyroidism (absolute difference 25 â€‹%, 95 â€‹% CI 11 â€‹%-38 â€‹%, p â€‹< â€‹0.001) and increased referrals for treatment by 27 â€‹% (95 â€‹% CI 7 â€‹%-47 â€‹%, p â€‹< â€‹0.012). CONCLUSION: Our pilot study suggests it is feasible to address the underdiagnosis and undertreatment of primary hyperparathyroidism among Veterans.


Assuntos
Hiperparatireoidismo Primário , Humanos , Hiperparatireoidismo Primário/diagnóstico , Hiperparatireoidismo Primário/terapia , Hiperparatireoidismo Primário/complicações , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Projetos Piloto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Paratireoidectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais de Veteranos/estatística & dados numéricos , Veteranos/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Análise de Séries Temporais Interrompida , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos
16.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf ; 50(9): 638-644, 2024 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38821745

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hospital-acquired complications add to patient morbidity and mortality, costs, length of stay, and negative patient experience. Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs) are a validated and widely used metric to evaluate hospital administrative data on preventing these events. Although many studies have addressed PSI validity, few have aimed to reduce PSI through clinical care. The authors aimed to reduce PSI events by addressing both validity and clinical care. METHODS: Frontline clinicians used a deep dive template to provide input on all PSI cases, which were then reviewed by a PSI task force to identify performance gaps. After analyzing the frequency of gaps and cost-vs.-impact of potential solutions, five interventions were implemented to address the three most common, highly weighted PSIs: pressure ulcers, postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE), and postoperative sepsis. Clinical care interventions included increasing patient mobility by creating a specialized mobility technician position, skin care audits to prevent pressure ulcers, and increasing use of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis. Administrative interventions addressed improving clinician-coding concordance for sepsis and increasing documentation of comorbidities. RESULTS: After interventions, the number of PSI events for composite PSI, VTE, and sepsis decreased by 41.3% (p = 0.039), 85.2% (p = 0.0091), and 51.5% (p = 0.063), respectively, relative to the preintervention period. Pressure ulcers increased by 33.3% (p = 0.0091). CONCLUSION: Hospital complications cause substantial burden to hospitals, patients, and caregivers. Addressing administrative and clinical factors with targeted interventions led to reduction in composite PSI. Further efforts are needed locally to reduce the pressure ulcer PSI.


Assuntos
Hospitais de Veteranos , Segurança do Paciente , Úlcera por Pressão , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Tromboembolia Venosa , Humanos , Segurança do Paciente/normas , Úlcera por Pressão/prevenção & controle , Hospitais de Veteranos/normas , Hospitais de Veteranos/organização & administração , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevenção & controle , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Sepse/prevenção & controle , Estados Unidos , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/organização & administração
17.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 601, 2024 May 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38714970

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Previous studies found that documentation of comorbidities differed when Veterans received care within versus outside Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Changes to medical center funding, increased attention to performance reporting, and expansion of Clinical Documentation Improvement programs, however, may have caused coding in VHA to change. METHODS: Using repeated cross-sectional data, we compared Elixhauser-van Walraven scores and Medicare Severity Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) severity levels for Veterans' admissions across settings and payers over time, utilizing a linkage of VHA and all-payer discharge data for 2012-2017 in seven US states. To minimize selection bias, we analyzed records for Veterans admitted to both VHA and non-VHA hospitals in the same year. Using generalized linear models, we adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: Following adjustment, VHA admissions consistently had the lowest predicted mean comorbidity scores (4.44 (95% CI 4.34-4.55)) and lowest probability of using the most severe DRG (22.1% (95% CI 21.4%-22.8%)). In contrast, Medicare-covered admissions had the highest predicted mean comorbidity score (5.71 (95% CI 5.56-5.85)) and highest probability of using the top DRG (35.3% (95% CI 34.2%-36.4%)). CONCLUSIONS: More effective strategies may be needed to improve VHA documentation, and current risk-adjusted comparisons should account for differences in coding intensity.


Assuntos
Comorbidade , Hospitais de Veteranos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Hospitais de Veteranos/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/estatística & dados numéricos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Veteranos/estatística & dados numéricos
18.
J Palliat Med ; 27(8): 1001-1008, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38608234

RESUMO

Background: Heart failure (HF) is a progressive, life-limiting illness for which palliative care (PC) is considered standard of care. Among patients that do receive PC, consultation tends to occur late in the illness course. Objective: Our primary aim was to examine patient factors associated with receiving PC in HF. Secondarily, we sought to determine factors associated with early PC encounters. Design: This was a retrospective cohort study of U.S. Veterans with prior hospitalization who died between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2020. Setting/Subjects: Subjects were Veterans with HF who died with a prior admission to a Veterans Affairs hospital in the United States. Measurements: We calculated the time from PC encounter to death. We characterized HF patients who died without PC, with late PC (≤90 days before death), and with early PC (>90 days before death). Results: We identified 232,079 Veterans with a mean age of (76.5 ± 10.7) years. Within the cohort, 56.5% (n = 131,122) of Veterans died with no PC, 22.5% (n = 52,114) had PC <90 days before death, and 21.0% (n = 48,843) had PC >90 days before death. Veterans who died without PC tended to be younger with fewer comorbidities. Conclusions: While more than 20% of HF patients in our cohort had PC well in advance of death, more than half died without PC. PC involvement seemed to be driven by comorbidities rather than HF. Effective collaboration with Cardiology is needed to identify patients who would benefit from earlier PC involvement.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Cuidados Paliativos , Veteranos , Humanos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hospitais de Veteranos , Fatores de Tempo
19.
Dig Dis Sci ; 69(6): 2008-2017, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38616215

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Veterans Health Administration provides care to more than 100,000 Veterans with cirrhosis. AIMS: This implementation evaluation aimed to understand organizational resources and barriers associated with cirrhosis care. METHODS: Clinicians across 145 Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers (VAMCs) were surveyed in 2022 about implementing guideline-concordant cirrhosis care. VA Corporate Data Warehouse data were used to assess VAMC performance on two national cirrhosis quality measures: HCC surveillance and esophageal variceal surveillance or treatment (EVST). Organizational factors associated with higher performance were identified using linear regression models. RESULTS: Responding VAMCs (n = 124, 86%) ranged in resource availability, perceived barriers, and care processes. In multivariable models, factors independently associated with HCC surveillance included on-site interventional radiology and identifying patients overdue for surveillance using a national cirrhosis population management tool ("dashboard"). EVST was significantly associated with dashboard use and on-site gastroenterology services. For larger VAMCs, the average HCC surveillance rate was similar between VAMCs using vs. not using the dashboard (47% vs. 41%), while for smaller and less resourced VAMCs, dashboard use resulted in a 13% rate difference (46% vs. 33%). Likewise, higher EVST rates were more strongly associated with dashboard use in smaller (55% vs. 50%) compared to larger (57% vs. 55%) VAMCs. CONCLUSIONS: Resources, barriers, and care processes varied across diverse VAMCs. Smaller VAMCs without specialty care achieved HCC and EVST surveillance rates nearly as high as more complex and resourced VAMCs if they used a population management tool to identify the patients due for cirrhosis care.


Assuntos
Cirrose Hepática , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Humanos , Cirrose Hepática/terapia , Cirrose Hepática/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/organização & administração , Varizes Esofágicas e Gástricas/terapia , Varizes Esofágicas e Gástricas/epidemiologia , Varizes Esofágicas e Gástricas/etiologia , Varizes Esofágicas e Gástricas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/epidemiologia , Hospitais de Veteranos/organização & administração , Masculino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino
20.
BMC Med Educ ; 24(1): 457, 2024 Apr 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38671440

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Team-based care is critical to achieving health care value while maximizing patient outcomes. Few descriptions exist of graduate-level team training interventions and practice models. Experience from the multisite, decade-long Veterans Affairs (VA) Centers of Excellence in Primary Care Education provides lessons for developing internal medicine training experiences in interprofessional clinical learning environments. METHODS: A review of multisite demonstration project transforming traditional silo-model training to interprofessional team-based primary care. Using iterative quality improvement approaches, sites evaluated curricula with learner, faculty and staff feedback. Learner- and patient-level outcomes and organizational culture change were examined using mixed methods, within and across sites. Participants included more than 1600 internal medicine, nurse practitioner, nursing, pharmacy, psychology, social work and physical therapy trainees. This took place in seven academic university-affiliated VA primary care clinics with patient centered medical home design RESULTS: Each site developed innovative design and curricula using common competencies of shared decision making, sustained relationships, performance improvement and interprofessional collaboration. Educational strategies included integrated didactics, workplace collaboration and reflection. Sites shared implementation best practices and outcomes. Cross-site evaluations of the impacts of these educational strategies indicated improvements in trainee clinical knowledge, team-based approaches to care and interest in primary care careers. Improved patient outcomes were seen in the quality of chronic disease management, reduction in polypharmacy, and reduced emergency department and hospitalizations. Evaluations of the culture of training environments demonstrated incorporation and persistence of interprofessional learning and collaboration. CONCLUSIONS: Aligning education and practice goals with cross-site collaboration created a robust interprofessional learning environment. Improved trainee/staff satisfaction and better patient care metrics supports use of this model to transform ambulatory care training. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This evaluation was categorized as an operation improvement activity by the Office of Academic Affairs based on Veterans Health Administration Handbook 1058.05, in which information generated is used for business operations and quality improvement (Title 38 Code of Federal Regulations Part 16 (38 CFR 16.102(l)). The overall project was subject to administrative oversight rather Human Subjects Institutional Review Board, as such informed consent was waived as part of the project implementation and evaluation.


Assuntos
Currículo , Cultura Organizacional , Atenção Primária à Saúde , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Humanos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/normas , Estados Unidos , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Melhoria de Qualidade , Inovação Organizacional , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/normas , Hospitais de Veteranos/normas , Medicina Interna/educação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA