Faculty perceptions and practices regarding carrying concealed handguns on university campuses.

The presence of firearms in an environment significantly increases firearm trauma. So far, four states have passed legislation permitting the carrying of concealed handguns on university campuses and several other states are considering such legislation. The purpose of this study to assess the perceptions and practices of college faculty regarding support for carrying concealed handguns on their campuses. A valid and reliable questionnaire was sent to a random sample of 1,125 faculty at 15 randomly selected state universities in five Great Lakes states. A two wave postal mailing in the Spring of 2012 was conducted to help ensure an adequate response rate. A total of 791 (70 %) of the faculty responded. The vast majority felt safe on their campuses (98 %) and were not supportive of people carrying concealed handguns on their campuses (94 %). Seven of the eight potential disadvantages of carrying concealed handguns on campus were supported by the majority of faculty members. Those who were significantly more likely to perceive there to be disadvantages to carrying concealed handguns on campus were: those who did not own a firearm (OR = 4.89), Democrats (OR = 4.52) or Independents (OR = 2.25), Asians (OR = 2.49), and females (OR = 1.51). The vast majority of faculty felt safe on their campuses and perceived that carrying concealed handguns on campuses create more risks than benefits to the campus environment. Aggressive efforts are needed to help maintain the uniquely safe environment of college campuses.

Radiological safety concerns for the accelerator production of diagnostic and therapeutic radionuclides in a university setting.

Accelerator production of radionuclides for diagnostic and therapeutic research at a university has many advantages. Radionuclides not commonly available through commercial suppliers may be readily produced for innovative research applications. Loss of material due to decay in transit is minimized, and product lead times may be significantly reduced. Furthermore, graduate students and research assistants have the opportunity to gain considerable hands-on experience during the production, extraction, and processing operations. However, the benefits of implementing accelerator production into an existing radiological protection program must be balanced against increased safety procedures and maintenance of as-low-as-reasonably-achievable work practices. This article outlines the basics for radioactive material production and corresponding issues in radiological protection associated with the production, use, and disposal on a college campus.

Radiological safety at a broad scope radioactive materials license: Texas A&M University.

Operating a radiological safety program under a broad-scope license at a major research university introduces many elements not encountered by general or industrial licenses. This article outlines elements of the radiological safety program in place at Texas A&M University.

Open by default: a proposed copyright license and waiver agreement for open access research and data in peer-reviewed journals.

Copyright and licensing of scientific data, internationally, are complex and present legal barriers to data sharing, integration and reuse, and therefore restrict the most efficient transfer and discovery of scientific knowledge. Much data are included within scientific journal articles, their published tables, additional files (supplementary material) and reference lists. However, these data are usually published under licenses which are not appropriate for data. Creative Commons CC0 is an appropriate and increasingly accepted method for dedicating data to the public domain, to enable data reuse with the minimum of restrictions. BioMed Central is committed to working towards implementation of open data-compliant licensing in its publications. Here we detail a protocol for implementing a combined Creative Commons Attribution license (for copyrightable material) and Creative Commons CC0 waiver (for data) agreement for content published in peer-reviewed open access journals. We explain the differences between legal requirements for attribution in copyright, and cultural requirements in scholarship for giving individuals credit for their work through citation. We argue that publishing data in scientific journals under CC0 will have numerous benefits for individuals and society, and yet will have minimal implications for authors and minimal impact on current publishing and research workflows. We provide practical examples and definitions of data types, such as XML and tabular data, and specific secondary use cases for published data, including text mining, reproducible research, and open bibliography. We believe this proposed change to the current copyright and licensing structure in science publishing will help clarify what users - people and machines - of the published literature can do, legally, with journal articles and make research using the published literature more efficient. We further believe this model could be adopted across multiple publishers, and invite comment on this article from all stakeholders in scientific research.

Patent and license pearls and pitfalls for taking an idea to the marketplace.

Technology transfer is the process by which novel ideas at academic institutions emanating from research supported by public and private funds are transferred to the private sector for developing marketable products for public use and benefit. Because the primary mission of universities is education and research, technology transfer in an academic environment introduces many challenges. This field is new to most faculty members and is seldom a core mission of their academic careers. The process is also new and unfamiliar to most university administrators. However, universities are increasingly challenged to demonstrate how their research with public funds translates into public benefit. Technology transfer by universities has taken on a new dimension with a focus first on protecting the intellectual property emanating from academic research, then finding means to develop and commercialize such intellectual property for launching new products in the market for public use and benefit. The Bayh-Dole Act enacted in 1980 (Public Law 96-517) allowed universities to elect to retain title to inventions arising from their federally funded research and to grant licenses to the patents, copyrights, or trademarks deriving from these inventions. Universities are allowed to retain the royalties and to share them with the inventors. This article presents the perspectives of technology transfer professionals, specifically, what technology transfer offices do or can do to assist researchers with commercialization of the novel ideas in biomedical research. It also provides a list of successful therapeutics that stemmed from academic research. In conclusion, reference is made to some of the challenges of technology transfer.

Patenting and licensing of university research: promoting innovation or undermining academic values?

Since the 1980s in the US and the 1990s in Europe, patenting and licensing activities by universities have massively increased. This is strongly encouraged by governments throughout the Western world. Many regard academic patenting as essential to achieve 'knowledge transfer' from academia to industry. This trend has far-reaching consequences for access to the fruits of academic research and so the question arises whether the current policies are indeed promoting innovation or whether they are instead a symptom of a pro-intellectual property (IP) culture which is blind to adverse effects. Addressing this question requires both empirical analysis (how real is the link between academic patenting and licensing and 'development' of academic research by industry?) and normative assessment (which justifications are given for the current policies and to what extent do they threaten important academic values?). After illustrating the major rise of academic patenting and licensing in the US and Europe and commenting on the increasing trend of 'upstream' patenting and the focus on exclusive as opposed to non-exclusive licences, this paper will discuss five negative effects of these trends. Subsequently, the question as to why policymakers seem to ignore these adverse effects will be addressed. Finally, a number of proposals for improving university policies will be made.

One hundred years ago: Start of the Optometry School at Columbia University.

An optometry school at Columbia University entered its first students in 1910. This was the first optometry school at a university. This article examines what was said in optometry periodicals of 1910 and 1911 about this significant development.

Concealed carry weapon permits: a Second Amendment right or a recipe for disaster on our nation's campuses?

Crimes on college campuses can "strike fear" into the lives of those in higher education and a shooting is one of the crimes that ranks at the top of the most feared acts of violence. Maybe more direct counseling for clients who have weapons with regard to anticipatory guidance on firearms is needed. However, the debate continues with proposed legislation in different states regarding Second Amendment rights to legally carry concealed weapons on our Nation's campuses. What should be our response to this legislation?

Minimizing leakage of value from R&D alliances.

Alliances, which are a key component of the research and development (R&D) strategies of most major pharmaceutical companies, demand significant management time and resources. There is no doubt that considerable value can be derived from R&D alliances, and much has been written about how companies can maximize such value, but the issue of how the associated risks can be minimized has been neglected in comparison. Here, we summarize recent trends in alliance formation and discuss approaches to minimize risk in alliances, which are growing in importance as alliance activity increases.

Reconocimiento del CES como Universidad / Acknowledgement of ces as university

El año 2006 estuvo enmarcado en un momento histórico para la Institución: su proceso de conversión a universidad y el reconocimiento de su carácter de tal por el Ministerio de Educación Nacional. En el Plan de Desarrollo 2000-2010, que es la carta de navegación del CES para esta primera década del nuevo milenio, uno de sus objetivos estratégicos, fue obtener el reconocimiento como universidad plena en la segunda parte de la década. Toda la comunidad CES, con una mirada estratégica, se trazó esta meta y para ello definió seis grandes macropolíticas que orientarían el quehacer institucional en este periodo: modernización académica, modernización administrativa, crecimiento institucional, consolidación económica, desarrollo de las relaciones nacionales e internacionales y desarrollo de su campus universitario...