RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a negative impact on socioeconomic and public health conditions of the population. AIM: To measure the temporal evolution of COVID-19 cases in cities near the countryside outside metropolitan areas of northeastern Brazil and the impact of the primary care organization in its containment. METHODS: This is a time-series study, based on the first three months of COVID-19 incidence in northeastern Brazil. Secondary data were used, the outcome was number of COVID-19 cases. Independent variables were time, coverage and quality score of basic health services, and demographic, socioeconomic and social isolation variables. Generalizable Linear Models with first order autoregression were applied. RESULTS: COVID-19 spreads heterogeneously in cities near the countryside of Northeastern Brazilian cities, showing associations with the city size, socioeconomic and organizational indicators of services. The Family Health Strategy seems to mitigate the speed of progression and burden of the disease, in addition to measures such as social isolation and closure of commercial activities. CONCLUSION: The spread of COVID-19 reveals multiple related factors, which require coordinated intersectoral actions in order to mitigate its problems, especially in biologically and socially vulnerable populations.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Brasil/epidemiología , Pandemias , Ciudades/epidemiología , Factores Socioeconómicos , Atención Primaria de SaludRESUMEN
Purpose: Evaluate the level of health literacy and quality of life of patients with hypertension. Methods: A cross-sectional, observational study was carried out in the Northeast region of Brazil with 105 patients with hypertension through the SAHLPA-18, S-TOFHLA and MINICHAL tests. Results: For both literacy tests applied, it can be observed that about 60% of the interviewed patients did not present adequate health literacy. It was found that factors such as increasing age, lower economic class and lower education were associated with a lower level of health literacy. In the evaluation of the quality of life by the MINICHAL, 46.7% of the patients reported that hypertension interferes with quality of life. It was also possible to show that the time of diagnosis (pâ¯=â¯0.04) and the economic class (pâ¯=â¯0.008) influence the quality of life. Conclusion: Hypertension is a chronic condition that requires continuous treatment and has potential risks of evolving with fatal and non-fatal complications that can affect the patients' quality of life. The data presented reflect the difficulty in understanding and processing health information, which may directly impact on the therapeutic management of hypertension.
RESUMEN
OBJETIVO: To determine agreement between the Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (S-TOFHLA) and the Short Assessment of Health Literacy for Portuguese-speaking Adults (SAHLPA-18) measurement instruments as a strategy for estimating concurrent validity. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study conducted with users of the Brazilian National Health System. An agreement approach using a weighted Kappa test for qualitative data was applied in order to test for concurrent validity. RESULTS: 372 individuals participated. It was found that 66% and 62% of them did not have an adequate level of literacy according to SAHLPA-18 and S-TOFHLA, respectively. There was strong correlation between the instruments (p<0.001; r=0.60), although the 65.3% agreement of correct answers found was considered weak (Kappa=0.35; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The SAHLPA-18 and S-TOFHLA instruments have different constructs and poor agreement. Use of different instruments is indicated in research intended to measure level of literacy, as is the development of instruments specific to health conditions that allow results close to the real context of individuals to be obtained.
Asunto(s)
Alfabetización en Salud , Adulto , Brasil , Estudios Transversales , Exactitud de los Datos , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
Objetivo: Determinar a concordância entre os instrumentos de mensuração short test of functional health literacy in adults (S-TOFHLA) e short assessment of health literacy for Portuguese-speaking adults (SAHLPA-18) como estratégia para estimar a validade concorrente. Métodos: Estudo transversal, com usuários do Sistema Único de Saúde. Para testar a validade concorrente, aplicou-se abordagem de concordância com teste de Kappa ponderado para dados qualitativos. Resultados: Participaram 372 indivíduos, dos quais 66% e 62% não apresentaram nível de letramento adequado, segundo o SAHLPA-18 e o S-TOFHLA, respectivamente. Observou-se correlação forte entre os instrumentos (p<0,001; r=0,60); e a concordância de acertos encontrada, 65,3% (Kappa=0,35; p<0,001), foi considerada fraca. Conclusão: Os instrumentos SAHLPA-18 e S-TOFHLA apresentam constructos diferentes e fraca concordância. É indicado o uso de diferentes instrumentos em pesquisas de mensuração do nível de letramento; e desenvolvimento de instrumentos específicos às condições de saúde que permitam obter resultado próximo ao real contexto dos indivíduos.
Objetivo: Determinar la concordancia entre instrumentos de medición psicométrica short test of functional health literacy in adults (S-TOFHLA) y short assessment of health literacy for portuguese-speaking adults (SAHLPA-18) como estrategia para estimar la validez concurrente. Métodos: estudio transversal realizado con usuarios del Sistema Único de Salud. Para testear la validez concurrente se aplicó un enfoque de concordancia con una prueba ponderada de Kappa para datos cualitativos. Resultados: participaron 372 individuos. Se encontró que 66% y 62% de estos no tenía un nivel adecuado de letramiento según SAHLPA-18 y S-TOFHLA, respectivamente. Hubo una fuerte correlación entre los instrumentos (p<0.001; r=0.60), sin embargo 65.3% de concordancia, se consideró débil (Kappa=0.35; p<0.001). Conclusión: Los instrumentos SAHLPA-18 y S-TOFHLA tienen diferentes construcciones y escasa concordancia. En la investigación se indica el uso de diferentes instrumentos para medir el nivel de letramiento y el desarrollo de instrumentos específicos a las condiciones de salud que permitan obtener resultados cercanos al contexto real de los individuos.
Objetivo: To determine agreement between the Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (S-TOFHLA) and the Short Assessment of Health Literacy for Portuguese-speaking Adults (SAHLPA-18) measurement instruments as a strategy for estimating concurrent validity. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted with users of the Brazilian National Health System. An agreement approach using a weighted Kappa test for qualitative data was applied in order to test for concurrent validity. Results: 372 individuals participated. It was found that 66% and 62% of them did not have an adequate level of literacy according to SAHLPA-18 and S-TOFHLA, respectively. There was strong correlation between the instruments (p<0.001; r=0.60), although the 65.3% agreement of correct answers found was considered weak (Kappa=0.35; p<0.001). Conclusion: The SAHLPA-18 and S-TOFHLA instruments have different constructs and poor agreement. Use of different instruments is indicated in research intended to measure level of literacy, as is the development of instruments specific to health conditions that allow results close to the real context of individuals to be obtained.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Educación en Salud/tendencias , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Alfabetización en Salud/tendencias , Brasil , Estudios Transversales , Exactitud de los Datos , Enfermedades no Transmisibles/clasificaciónRESUMEN
The emergence of a new form of Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) exposed weaknesses of health services in several countries, with overcrowding of hospitals, and lack of supplies and professionals in combating the disease, which sometimes contributed to the installation of social, political, and economic chaos. The critical situation experienced made the subject widely publicized so that the current pandemic also deals with an information epidemic. However, the data received and transmitted require prior critical analysis of its content, although not everyone is able to make the necessary judgment before using or sharing information, partly due to the lack of adequate health knowledge. Health literacy is a broad and important topic in public health but still globally underestimated, thus considered a silent epidemic. The exponential increase in the number of confirmed cases shows the world population's inadequacy and difficulty in understanding basic prevention guidelines. The COVID-19 pandemic warns of gaps in the health literacy levels of the world population and exposes the need for a comprehensive mapping to identify the overall health literacy status in more countries.
Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Alfabetización en Salud , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , COVID-19 , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Salud Pública , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Coarctation of the aorta is a congenital heart disease characterized by a narrowing that occurs in the aortic artery. This constriction can occur anywhere along its entire length; however, it is more common between the origin of the left subclavian artery and the ductus arteriosus. Its incidence corresponds to 3 cases per 10,000 births. Thus, it is a common cardiopathy, but with high mortality and morbidity rates, which are related to a failure in the early diagnosis. METHOD: In the research, articles of the national and international literature in Pubmed, Scielo and Lilacs databases were selected using the following descriptors: coarctation, aorta, diagnosis, heart diseases, congenital abnormalities. RESULTS: The pathophysiology of CoA and its systemic implications in the life of newborn and adults are well elucidated. However, due to the lack of habit to palpate pulses and to check the blood pressure in both upper and lower limbs during the physical examination, it is still a pathology little diagnosed in childhood. There are several techniques used in the repair of coarctation, each with their specifics, although, when not treated, aneurysms, heart failure, coronary diseases, and stroke are the main complications arising from the evolution of this pathology, which explains the low survival rate of these patients. CONCLUSION: Coarctation of the aorta is, therefore, a cardiac malformation of significant importance due to its incidence and its significant mortality risk. In this sense, the early diagnosis stands out as an essential piece for better prognosis of the patient.
Asunto(s)
Coartación Aórtica/diagnóstico , Coartación Aórtica/fisiopatología , Coartación Aórtica/cirugía , Diagnóstico Precoz , HumanosRESUMEN
SUMMARY INTRODUCTION: Coarctation of the aorta is a congenital heart disease characterized by a narrowing that occurs in the aortic artery. This constriction can occur anywhere along its entire length; however, it is more common between the origin of the left subclavian artery and the ductus arteriosus. Its incidence corresponds to 3 cases per 10,000 births. Thus, it is a common cardiopathy, but with high mortality and morbidity rates, which are related to a failure in the early diagnosis. METHOD: In the research, articles of the national and international literature in Pubmed, Scielo and Lilacs databases were selected using the following descriptors: coarctation, aorta, diagnosis, heart diseases, congenital abnormalities. RESULTS: The pathophysiology of CoA and its systemic implications in the life of newborn and adults are well elucidated. However, due to the lack of habit to palpate pulses and to check the blood pressure in both upper and lower limbs during the physical examination, it is still a pathology little diagnosed in childhood. There are several techniques used in the repair of coarctation, each with their specifics, although, when not treated, aneurysms, heart failure, coronary diseases, and stroke are the main complications arising from the evolution of this pathology, which explains the low survival rate of these patients. CONCLUSION: Coarctation of the aorta is, therefore, a cardiac malformation of significant importance due to its incidence and its significant mortality risk. In this sense, the early diagnosis stands out as an essential piece for better prognosis of the patient.
RESUMO INTRODUÇÃO: A coarctação da aorta é uma cardiopatia congênita caracterizada por um estreitamento que ocorre na artéria aorta. Essa constrição pode ocorrer em qualquer local ao longo de toda a sua extensão, entretanto, é mais comum entre a origem da artéria subclávia esquerda e o ducto arterioso. Sua incidência corresponde a três casos a cada 10.000 nascimentos, sendo, desse modo, uma cardiopatia comum, porém com elevada taxa de mortalidade e morbidade, as quais estão relacionadas à falha no diagnóstico precoce. MÉTODOS: Este artigo trata-se de uma revisão bibliográfica narrativa da literatura. Na pesquisa foram selecionados artigos na literatura nacional e internacional nas bases de dados PubMed, SciELO e Lilacs, utilizando-se os seguintes descritores: coarctação, aorta, diagnóstico, cardiopatias, anormalidades congênitas. RESULTADOS: A fisiopatologia da coarctação da aorta e as implicações sistêmicas dessa cardiopatia na vida do recém-nascido e do adulto estão bem elucidadas. Entretanto, devido à falta de costume em palpar pulsos e aferir a pressão arterial nos membros superiores e inferiores durante o exame físico, ainda é uma patologia pouco diagnosticada na infância. Existem diversas técnicas utilizadas no reparo da coarctação, cada uma com suas especificidades, porém, quando não tratada, aneurismas, insuficiência cardíaca, coronariopatias e acidentes vasculares encefálicos são as principais complicações provenientes da evolução dessa patologia, o que explica uma baixa sobrevida desses pacientes. CONCLUSÃO: A coarctação da aorta é, portanto, uma malformação cardíaca de importância relevante devido a sua incidência e ao seu potencial risco de mortalidade. Nesse sentido, o diagnóstico precoce destaca-se como peça fundamental para um melhor prognóstico do paciente.