Exploring Publicly Accessible Optical Coherence Tomography Datasets: A Comprehensive Overview.

Artificial intelligence has transformed medical diagnostic capabilities, particularly through medical image analysis. AI algorithms perform well in detecting abnormalities with a strong performance, enabling computer-aided diagnosis by analyzing the extensive amounts of patient data. The data serve as a foundation upon which algorithms learn and make predictions. Thus, the importance of data cannot be underestimated, and clinically corresponding datasets are required. Many researchers face a lack of medical data due to limited access, privacy concerns, or the absence of available annotations. One of the most widely used diagnostic tools in ophthalmology is Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). Addressing the data availability issue is crucial for enhancing AI applications in the field of OCT diagnostics. This review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of all publicly accessible retinal OCT datasets. Our main objective is to compile a list of OCT datasets and their properties, which can serve as an accessible reference, facilitating data curation for medical image analysis tasks. For this review, we searched through the Zenodo repository, Mendeley Data repository, MEDLINE database, and Google Dataset search engine. We systematically evaluated all the identified datasets and found 23 open-access datasets containing OCT images, which significantly vary in terms of size, scope, and ground-truth labels. Our findings indicate the need for improvement in data-sharing practices and standardized documentation. Enhancing the availability and quality of OCT datasets will support the development of AI algorithms and ultimately improve diagnostic capabilities in ophthalmology. By providing a comprehensive list of accessible OCT datasets, this review aims to facilitate better utilization and development of AI in medical image analysis.

Improving quality control of whole slide images by explicit artifact augmentation.

The problem of artifacts in whole slide image acquisition, prevalent in both clinical workflows and research-oriented settings, necessitates human intervention and re-scanning. Overcoming this challenge requires developing quality control algorithms, that are hindered by the limited availability of relevant annotated data in histopathology. The manual annotation of ground-truth for artifact detection methods is expensive and time-consuming. This work addresses the issue by proposing a method dedicated to augmenting whole slide images with artifacts. The tool seamlessly generates and blends artifacts from an external library to a given histopathology dataset. The augmented datasets are then utilized to train artifact classification methods. The evaluation shows their usefulness in classification of the artifacts, where they show an improvement from 0.10 to 0.01 AUROC depending on the artifact type. The framework, model, weights, and ground-truth annotations are freely released to facilitate open science and reproducible research.

The ACROBAT 2022 challenge: Automatic registration of breast cancer tissue.

The alignment of tissue between histopathological whole-slide-images (WSI) is crucial for research and clinical applications. Advances in computing, deep learning, and availability of large WSI datasets have revolutionised WSI analysis. Therefore, the current state-of-the-art in WSI registration is unclear. To address this, we conducted the ACROBAT challenge, based on the largest WSI registration dataset to date, including 4,212 WSIs from 1,152 breast cancer patients. The challenge objective was to align WSIs of tissue that was stained with routine diagnostic immunohistochemistry to its H&E-stained counterpart. We compare the performance of eight WSI registration algorithms, including an investigation of the impact of different WSI properties and clinical covariates. We find that conceptually distinct WSI registration methods can lead to highly accurate registration performances and identify covariates that impact performances across methods. These results provide a comparison of the performance of current WSI registration methods and guide researchers in selecting and developing methods.

ROCOv2: Radiology Objects in COntext Version 2, an Updated Multimodal Image Dataset.

Automated medical image analysis systems often require large amounts of training data with high quality labels, which are difficult and time consuming to generate. This paper introduces Radiology Object in COntext version 2 (ROCOv2), a multimodal dataset consisting of radiological images and associated medical concepts and captions extracted from the PMC Open Access subset. It is an updated version of the ROCO dataset published in 2018, and adds 35,705 new images added to PMC since 2018. It further provides manually curated concepts for imaging modalities with additional anatomical and directional concepts for X-rays. The dataset consists of 79,789 images and has been used, with minor modifications, in the concept detection and caption prediction tasks of ImageCLEFmedical Caption 2023. The dataset is suitable for training image annotation models based on image-caption pairs, or for multi-label image classification using Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) concepts provided with each image. In addition, it can serve for pre-training of medical domain models, and evaluation of deep learning models for multi-task learning.

A systematic comparison of deep learning methods for Gleason grading and scoring.

Prostate cancer is the second most frequent cancer in men worldwide after lung cancer. Its diagnosis is based on the identification of the Gleason score that evaluates the abnormality of cells in glands through the analysis of the different Gleason patterns within tissue samples. The recent advancements in computational pathology, a domain aiming at developing algorithms to automatically analyze digitized histopathology images, lead to a large variety and availability of datasets and algorithms for Gleason grading and scoring. However, there is no clear consensus on which methods are best suited for each problem in relation to the characteristics of data and labels. This paper provides a systematic comparison on nine datasets with state-of-the-art training approaches for deep neural networks (including fully-supervised learning, weakly-supervised learning, semi-supervised learning, Additive-MIL, Attention-Based MIL, Dual-Stream MIL, TransMIL and CLAM) applied to Gleason grading and scoring tasks. The nine datasets are collected from pathology institutes and openly accessible repositories. The results show that the best methods for Gleason grading and Gleason scoring tasks are fully supervised learning and CLAM, respectively, guiding researchers to the best practice to adopt depending on the task to solve and the labels that are available.

RegWSI: Whole slide image registration using combined deep feature- and intensity-based methods: Winner of the ACROBAT 2023 challenge.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The automatic registration of differently stained whole slide images (WSIs) is crucial for improving diagnosis and prognosis by fusing complementary information emerging from different visible structures. It is also useful to quickly transfer annotations between consecutive or restained slides, thus significantly reducing the annotation time and associated costs. Nevertheless, the slide preparation is different for each stain and the tissue undergoes complex and large deformations. Therefore, a robust, efficient, and accurate registration method is highly desired by the scientific community and hospitals specializing in digital pathology. METHODS: We propose a two-step hybrid method consisting of (i) deep learning- and feature-based initial alignment algorithm, and (ii) intensity-based nonrigid registration using the instance optimization. The proposed method does not require any fine-tuning to a particular dataset and can be used directly for any desired tissue type and stain. The registration time is low, allowing one to perform efficient registration even for large datasets. The method was proposed for the ACROBAT 2023 challenge organized during the MICCAI 2023 conference and scored 1st place. The method is released as open-source software. RESULTS: The proposed method is evaluated using three open datasets: (i) Automatic Nonrigid Histological Image Registration Dataset (ANHIR), (ii) Automatic Registration of Breast Cancer Tissue Dataset (ACROBAT), and (iii) Hybrid Restained and Consecutive Histological Serial Sections Dataset (HyReCo). The target registration error (TRE) is used as the evaluation metric. We compare the proposed algorithm to other state-of-the-art solutions, showing considerable improvement. Additionally, we perform several ablation studies concerning the resolution used for registration and the initial alignment robustness and stability. The method achieves the most accurate results for the ACROBAT dataset, the cell-level registration accuracy for the restained slides from the HyReCo dataset, and is among the best methods evaluated on the ANHIR dataset. CONCLUSIONS: The article presents an automatic and robust registration method that outperforms other state-of-the-art solutions. The method does not require any fine-tuning to a particular dataset and can be used out-of-the-box for numerous types of microscopic images. The method is incorporated into the DeeperHistReg framework, allowing others to directly use it to register, transform, and save the WSIs at any desired pyramid level (resolution up to 220k x 220k). We provide free access to the software. The results are fully and easily reproducible. The proposed method is a significant contribution to improving the WSI registration quality, thus advancing the field of digital pathology.

Understanding metric-related pitfalls in image analysis validation.

Validation metrics are key for tracking scientific progress and bridging the current chasm between artificial intelligence research and its translation into practice. However, increasing evidence shows that, particularly in image analysis, metrics are often chosen inadequately. Although taking into account the individual strengths, weaknesses and limitations of validation metrics is a critical prerequisite to making educated choices, the relevant knowledge is currently scattered and poorly accessible to individual researchers. Based on a multistage Delphi process conducted by a multidisciplinary expert consortium as well as extensive community feedback, the present work provides a reliable and comprehensive common point of access to information on pitfalls related to validation metrics in image analysis. Although focused on biomedical image analysis, the addressed pitfalls generalize across application domains and are categorized according to a newly created, domain-agnostic taxonomy. The work serves to enhance global comprehension of a key topic in image analysis validation.

The Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative: Standardized Convolutional Filters for Reproducible Radiomics and Enhanced Clinical Insights.

Filters are commonly used to enhance specific structures and patterns in images, such as vessels or peritumoral regions, to enable clinical insights beyond the visible image using radiomics. However, their lack of standardization restricts reproducibility and clinical translation of radiomics decision support tools. In this special report, teams of researchers who developed radiomics software participated in a three-phase study (September 2020 to December 2022) to establish a standardized set of filters. The first two phases focused on finding reference filtered images and reference feature values for commonly used convolutional filters: mean, Laplacian of Gaussian, Laws and Gabor kernels, separable and nonseparable wavelets (including decomposed forms), and Riesz transformations. In the first phase, 15 teams used digital phantoms to establish 33 reference filtered images of 36 filter configurations. In phase 2, 11 teams used a chest CT image to derive reference values for 323 of 396 features computed from filtered images using 22 filter and image processing configurations. Reference filtered images and feature values for Riesz transformations were not established. Reproducibility of standardized convolutional filters was validated on a public data set of multimodal imaging (CT, fluorodeoxyglucose PET, and T1-weighted MRI) in 51 patients with soft-tissue sarcoma. At validation, reproducibility of 486 features computed from filtered images using nine configurations × three imaging modalities was assessed using the lower bounds of 95% CIs of intraclass correlation coefficients. Out of 486 features, 458 were found to be reproducible across nine teams with lower bounds of 95% CIs of intraclass correlation coefficients greater than 0.75. In conclusion, eight filter types were standardized with reference filtered images and reference feature values for verifying and calibrating radiomics software packages. A web-based tool is available for compliance checking.

METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS): a quality scoring tool for radiomics research endorsed by EuSoMII.

PURPOSE: To propose a new quality scoring tool, METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS), to assess and improve research quality of radiomics studies. METHODS: We conducted an online modified Delphi study with a group of international experts. It was performed in three consecutive stages: Stage#1, item preparation; Stage#2, panel discussion among EuSoMII Auditing Group members to identify the items to be voted; and Stage#3, four rounds of the modified Delphi exercise by panelists to determine the items eligible for the METRICS and their weights. The consensus threshold was 75%. Based on the median ranks derived from expert panel opinion and their rank-sum based conversion to importance scores, the category and item weights were calculated. RESULT: In total, 59 panelists from 19 countries participated in selection and ranking of the items and categories. Final METRICS tool included 30 items within 9 categories. According to their weights, the categories were in descending order of importance: study design, imaging data, image processing and feature extraction, metrics and comparison, testing, feature processing, preparation for modeling, segmentation, and open science. A web application and a repository were developed to streamline the calculation of the METRICS score and to collect feedback from the radiomics community. CONCLUSION: In this work, we developed a scoring tool for assessing the methodological quality of the radiomics research, with a large international panel and a modified Delphi protocol. With its conditional format to cover methodological variations, it provides a well-constructed framework for the key methodological concepts to assess the quality of radiomic research papers. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: A quality assessment tool, METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS), is made available by a large group of international domain experts, with transparent methodology, aiming at evaluating and improving research quality in radiomics and machine learning. KEY POINTS: • A methodological scoring tool, METRICS, was developed for assessing the quality of radiomics research, with a large international expert panel and a modified Delphi protocol. • The proposed scoring tool presents expert opinion-based importance weights of categories and items with a transparent methodology for the first time. • METRICS accounts for varying use cases, from handcrafted radiomics to entirely deep learning-based pipelines. • A web application has been developed to help with the calculation of the METRICS score ( https://metricsscore.github.io/metrics/METRICS.html ) and a repository created to collect feedback from the radiomics community ( https://github.com/metricsscore/metrics ).

Large language model-based information extraction from free-text radiology reports: a scoping review protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Radiological imaging is one of the most frequently performed diagnostic tests worldwide. The free-text contained in radiology reports is currently only rarely used for secondary use purposes, including research and predictive analysis. However, this data might be made available by means of information extraction (IE), based on natural language processing (NLP). Recently, a new approach to NLP, large language models (LLMs), has gained momentum and continues to improve performance of IE-related tasks. The objective of this scoping review is to show the state of research regarding IE from free-text radiology reports based on LLMs, to investigate applied methods and to guide future research by showing open challenges and limitations of current approaches. To our knowledge, no systematic or scoping review of IE from radiology reports based on LLMs has been published. Existing publications are outdated and do not comprise LLM-based methods. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol is designed based on the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis, chapter 11.2: 'Development of a scoping review protocol'. Inclusion criteria and a search strategy comprising four databases (PubMed, IEEE Xplore, Web of Science Core Collection and ACM Digital Library) are defined. Furthermore, we describe the screening process, data charting, analysis and presentation of extracted data. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol describes the methodology of a scoping literature review and does not comprise research on or with humans, animals or their data. Therefore, no ethical approval is required. After the publication of this protocol and the conduct of the review, its results are going to be published in an open access journal dedicated to biomedical informatics/digital health.

Artifact Augmentation for Learning-based Quality Control of Whole Slide Images.

The acquisition of whole slide images is prone to artifacts that can require human control and re-scanning, both in clinical workflows and in research-oriented settings. Quality control algorithms are a first step to overcome this challenge, as they limit the use of low quality images. Developing quality control systems in histopathology is not straightforward, also due to the limited availability of data related to this topic. We address the problem by proposing a tool to augment data with artifacts. The proposed method seamlessly generates and blends artifacts from an external library to a given histopathology dataset. The datasets augmented by the blended artifacts are then used to train an artifact detection network in a supervised way. We use the YOLOv5 model for the artifact detection with a slightly modified training pipeline. The proposed tool can be extended into a complete framework for the quality assessment of whole slide images.Clinical relevance- The proposed method may be useful for the initial quality screening of whole slide images. Each year, millions of whole slide images are acquired and digitized worldwide. Numerous of them contain artifacts affecting the following AI-oriented analysis. Therefore, a tool operating at the acquisition phase and improving the initial quality assessment is crucial to increase the performance of digital pathology algorithms, e.g., early cancer diagnosis.

Deep Density Estimation for Cone Counting and Diagnosis of Genetic Eye Diseases From Adaptive Optics Scanning Light Ophthalmoscope Images.

Purpose: Adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscope (AOSLO) imaging offers a microscopic view of the living retina, holding promise for diagnosing and researching eye diseases like retinitis pigmentosa and Stargardt's disease. The technology's clinical impact of AOSLO hinges on early detection through automated analysis tools. Methods: We introduce Cone Density Estimation (CoDE) and CoDE for Diagnosis (CoDED). CoDE is a deep density estimation model for cone counting that estimates a density function whose integral is equal to the number of cones. CoDED is an integration of CoDE with deep image classifiers for diagnosis. We use two AOSLO image datasets to train and evaluate the performance of cone density estimation and classification models for retinitis pigmentosa and Stargardt's disease. Results: Bland-Altman plots show that CoDE outperforms state-of-the-art models for cone density estimation. CoDED reported an F1 score of 0.770 ± 0.04 for disease classification, outperforming traditional convolutional networks. Conclusions: CoDE shows promise in classifying the retinitis pigmentosa and Stargardt's disease cases from a single AOSLO image. Our preliminary results suggest the potential role of analyzing patterns in the retinal cellular mosaic to aid in the diagnosis of genetic eye diseases. Translational Relevance: Our study explores the potential of deep density estimation models to aid in the analysis of AOSLO images. Although the initial results are encouraging, more research is needed to fully realize the potential of such methods in the treatment and study of genetic retinal pathologies.

On-cloud decision-support system for non-small cell lung cancer histology characterization from thorax computed tomography scans.

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) accounts for about 85% of all lung cancers. Developing non-invasive techniques for NSCLC histology characterization may not only help clinicians to make targeted therapeutic treatments but also prevent subjects from undergoing lung biopsy, which is challenging and could lead to clinical implications. The motivation behind the study presented here is to develop an advanced on-cloud decision-support system, named LUCY, for non-small cell LUng Cancer histologY characterization directly from thorax Computed Tomography (CT) scans. This aim was pursued by selecting thorax CT scans of 182 LUng ADenocarcinoma (LUAD) and 186 LUng Squamous Cell carcinoma (LUSC) subjects from four openly accessible data collections (NSCLC-Radiomics, NSCLC-Radiogenomics, NSCLC-Radiomics-Genomics and TCGA-LUAD), in addition to the implementation and comparison of two end-to-end neural networks (the core layer of whom is a convolutional long short-term memory layer), the performance evaluation on test dataset (NSCLC-Radiomics-Genomics) from a subject-level perspective in relation to NSCLC histological subtype location and grade, and the dynamic visual interpretation of the achieved results by producing and analyzing one heatmap video for each scan. LUCY reached test Area Under the receiver operating characteristic Curve (AUC) values above 77% in all NSCLC histological subtype location and grade groups, and a best AUC value of 97% on the entire dataset reserved for testing, proving high generalizability to heterogeneous data and robustness. Thus, LUCY is a clinically-useful decision-support system able to timely, non-invasively and reliably provide visually-understandable predictions on LUAD and LUSC subjects in relation to clinically-relevant information.

A scoping review of interpretability and explainability concerning artificial intelligence methods in medical imaging.

PURPOSE: To review eXplainable Artificial Intelligence/(XAI) methods available for medical imaging/(MI). METHOD: A scoping review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute's methodology. The search was performed on Pubmed, Embase, Cinhal, Web of Science, BioRxiv, MedRxiv, and Google Scholar. Studies published in French and English after 2017 were included. Keyword combinations and descriptors related to explainability, and MI modalities were employed. Two independent reviewers screened abstracts, titles and full text, resolving differences through discussion. RESULTS: 228 studies met the criteria. XAI publications are increasing, targeting MRI (n = 73), radiography (n = 47), CT (n = 46). Lung (n = 82) and brain (n = 74) pathologies, Covid-19 (n = 48), Alzheimer's disease (n = 25), brain tumors (n = 15) are the main pathologies explained. Explanations are presented visually (n = 186), numerically (n = 67), rule-based (n = 11), textually (n = 11), and example-based (n = 6). Commonly explained tasks include classification (n = 89), prediction (n = 47), diagnosis (n = 39), detection (n = 29), segmentation (n = 13), and image quality improvement (n = 6). The most frequently provided explanations were local (78.1 %), 5.7 % were global, and 16.2 % combined both local and global approaches. Post-hoc approaches were predominantly employed. The used terminology varied, sometimes indistinctively using explainable (n = 207), interpretable (n = 187), understandable (n = 112), transparent (n = 61), reliable (n = 31), and intelligible (n = 3). CONCLUSION: The number of XAI publications in medical imaging is increasing, primarily focusing on applying XAI techniques to MRI, CT, and radiography for classifying and predicting lung and brain pathologies. Visual and numerical output formats are predominantly used. Terminology standardisation remains a challenge, as terms like "explainable" and "interpretable" are sometimes being used indistinctively. Future XAI development should consider user needs and perspectives.

Improving the classification of veterinary thoracic radiographs through inter-species and inter-pathology self-supervised pre-training of deep learning models.

The analysis of veterinary radiographic imaging data is an essential step in the diagnosis of many thoracic lesions. Given the limited time that physicians can devote to a single patient, it would be valuable to implement an automated system to help clinicians make faster but still accurate diagnoses. Currently, most of such systems are based on supervised deep learning approaches. However, the problem with these solutions is that they need a large database of labeled data. Access to such data is often limited, as it requires a great investment of both time and money. Therefore, in this work we present a solution that allows higher classification scores to be obtained using knowledge transfer from inter-species and inter-pathology self-supervised learning methods. Before training the network for classification, pretraining of the model was performed using self-supervised learning approaches on publicly available unlabeled radiographic data of human and dog images, which allowed substantially increasing the number of images for this phase. The self-supervised learning approaches included the Beta Variational Autoencoder, the Soft-Introspective Variational Autoencoder, and a Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representations. After the initial pretraining, fine-tuning was performed for the collected veterinary dataset using 20% of the available data. Next, a latent space exploration was performed for each model after which the encoding part of the model was fine-tuned again, this time in a supervised manner for classification. Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representations proved to be the most beneficial pretraining method. Therefore, it was for this method that experiments with various fine-tuning methods were carried out. We achieved a mean ROC AUC score of 0.77 and 0.66, respectively, for the laterolateral and dorsoventral projection datasets. The results show significant improvement compared to using the model without any pretraining approach.

An AI-based algorithm for the automatic evaluation of image quality in canine thoracic radiographs.

The aim of this study was to develop and test an artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithm for detecting common technical errors in canine thoracic radiography. The algorithm was trained using a database of thoracic radiographs from three veterinary clinics in Italy, which were evaluated for image quality by three experienced veterinary diagnostic imagers. The algorithm was designed to classify the images as correct or having one or more of the following errors: rotation, underexposure, overexposure, incorrect limb positioning, incorrect neck positioning, blurriness, cut-off, or the presence of foreign objects, or medical devices. The algorithm was able to correctly identify errors in thoracic radiographs with an overall accuracy of 81.5% in latero-lateral and 75.7% in sagittal images. The most accurately identified errors were limb mispositioning and underexposure both in latero-lateral and sagittal images. The accuracy of the developed model in the classification of technically correct radiographs was fair in latero-lateral and good in sagittal images. The authors conclude that their AI-based algorithm is a promising tool for improving the accuracy of radiographic interpretation by identifying technical errors in canine thoracic radiographs.

Modelling digital health data: The ExaMode ontology for computational pathology.

Computational pathology can significantly benefit from ontologies to standardize the employed nomenclature and help with knowledge extraction processes for high-quality annotated image datasets. The end goal is to reach a shared model for digital pathology to overcome data variability and integration problems. Indeed, data annotation in such a specific domain is still an unsolved challenge and datasets cannot be steadily reused in diverse contexts due to heterogeneity issues of the adopted labels, multilingualism, and different clinical practices. Material and methods: This paper presents the ExaMode ontology, modeling the histopathology process by considering 3 key cancer diseases (colon, cervical, and lung tumors) and celiac disease. The ExaMode ontology has been designed bottom-up in an iterative fashion with continuous feedback and validation from pathologists and clinicians. The ontology is organized into 5 semantic areas that defines an ontological template to model any disease of interest in histopathology. Results: The ExaMode ontology is currently being used as a common semantic layer in: (i) an entity linking tool for the automatic annotation of medical records; (ii) a web-based collaborative annotation tool for histopathology text reports; and (iii) a software platform for building holistic solutions integrating multimodal histopathology data. Discussion: The ontology ExaMode is a key means to store data in a graph database according to the RDF data model. The creation of an RDF dataset can help develop more accurate algorithms for image analysis, especially in the field of digital pathology. This approach allows for seamless data integration and a unified query access point, from which we can extract relevant clinical insights about the considered diseases using SPARQL queries.

Multimodal video and IMU kinematic dataset on daily life activities using affordable devices.

Human activity recognition and clinical biomechanics are challenging problems in physical telerehabilitation medicine. However, most publicly available datasets on human body movements cannot be used to study both problems in an out-of-the-lab movement acquisition setting. The objective of the VIDIMU dataset is to pave the way towards affordable patient gross motor tracking solutions for daily life activities recognition and kinematic analysis. The dataset includes 13 activities registered using a commodity camera and five inertial sensors. The video recordings were acquired in 54 subjects, of which 16 also had simultaneous recordings of inertial sensors. The novelty of dataset lies in: (i) the clinical relevance of the chosen movements, (ii) the combined utilization of affordable video and custom sensors, and (iii) the implementation of state-of-the-art tools for multimodal data processing of 3D body pose tracking and motion reconstruction in a musculoskeletal model from inertial data. The validation confirms that a minimally disturbing acquisition protocol, performed according to real-life conditions can provide a comprehensive picture of human joint angles during daily life activities.

How far MS lesion detection and segmentation are integrated into the clinical workflow? A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Over the past few years, the deep learning community has developed and validated a plethora of tools for lesion detection and segmentation in Multiple Sclerosis (MS). However, there is an important gap between validating models technically and clinically. To this end, a six-step framework necessary for the development, validation, and integration of quantitative tools in the clinic was recently proposed under the name of the Quantitative Neuroradiology Initiative (QNI). AIMS: Investigate to what extent automatic tools in MS fulfill the QNI framework necessary to integrate automated detection and segmentation into the clinical neuroradiology workflow. METHODS: Adopting the systematic Cochrane literature review methodology, we screened and summarised published scientific articles that perform automatic MS lesions detection and segmentation. We categorised the retrieved studies based on their degree of fulfillment of QNI's six-steps, which include a tool's technical assessment, clinical validation, and integration. RESULTS: We found 156 studies; 146/156 (94%) fullfilled the first QNI step, 155/156 (99%) the second, 8/156 (5%) the third, 3/156 (2%) the fourth, 5/156 (3%) the fifth and only one the sixth. CONCLUSIONS: To date, little has been done to evaluate the clinical performance and the integration in the clinical workflow of available methods for MS lesion detection/segmentation. In addition, the socio-economic effects and the impact on patients' management of such tools remain almost unexplored.

CheckList for EvaluAtion of Radiomics research (CLEAR): a step-by-step reporting guideline for authors and reviewers endorsed by ESR and EuSoMII.

Even though radiomics can hold great potential for supporting clinical decision-making, its current use is mostly limited to academic research, without applications in routine clinical practice. The workflow of radiomics is complex due to several methodological steps and nuances, which often leads to inadequate reporting and evaluation, and poor reproducibility. Available reporting guidelines and checklists for artificial intelligence and predictive modeling include relevant good practices, but they are not tailored to radiomic research. There is a clear need for a complete radiomics checklist for study planning, manuscript writing, and evaluation during the review process to facilitate the repeatability and reproducibility of studies. We here present a documentation standard for radiomic research that can guide authors and reviewers. Our motivation is to improve the quality and reliability and, in turn, the reproducibility of radiomic research. We name the checklist CLEAR (CheckList for EvaluAtion of Radiomics research), to convey the idea of being more transparent. With its 58 items, the CLEAR checklist should be considered a standardization tool providing the minimum requirements for presenting clinical radiomics research. In addition to a dynamic online version of the checklist, a public repository has also been set up to allow the radiomics community to comment on the checklist items and adapt the checklist for future versions. Prepared and revised by an international group of experts using a modified Delphi method, we hope the CLEAR checklist will serve well as a single and complete scientific documentation tool for authors and reviewers to improve the radiomics literature.