Relationship between great saphenous vein recanalization, venous symptoms reappearance, and varicose veins recurrence rates after endovenous radiofrequency ablation.

The term "recurrence" in chronic venous disease remains not yet well defined, despite numerous reports describing patterns and causes of the presence of recurrent varicose veins (RVVs). Moreover, saphenous trunk recanalization (STR) has also been documented as one of the major source of RVVs and it is widely used to indicate the "failure" of endovenous ablation. Finally, reappearance of venous symptoms (VSym) should be considered to reach a complete "recurrence" evaluation. RVVs, STR, and VSym rates and mutual co-presence after endovenous treatments are still unclear. The aim of this report is to describe and analyze these three recurrence components after 6 years in patients underwent radiofrequency ablation of the great saphenous vein.

Saphenous vein ablation with a new cyanoacrylate glue device: a systematic review on 1000 cases.

BACKGROUND: To review published evidence regarding an n-butyl-cyanoacrylate (NBCA) injection device for great (GSV) and small (SSV) saphenous vein incompetence in terms of occlusion rate, postoperative complications and quality of life improvement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: International bibliographic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus) were searched to identify possible target articles. The only inclusion criterion was the use of the Variclose® system (Biolas, Ankara, Turkey) for superficial vein insufficiency. Exclusion criteria were case reports, review, meta-analysis, article with <6-month follow-up data, abstracts and congress presentations. PRISMA guidelines were used to lead articles selection. RESULTS: Seven studies were included in the final data analysis. A total of 918 patients (1000 limbs) underwent an NBCA procedure for GSV (947 cases) or SSV (53 cases) incompetence. The average procedure duration was 11.7 min. The most common postoperative complications were postoperative pain (4.8%) and superficial vein thrombosis (2.1%). No deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism cases were described. The occlusion rates at six, 12 and 30 months were 97.3%, 96.8% and 94.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: NBCA injection with the Variclose device seems to be a feasible, effective and safe treatment in GSV incompetence. Long-term follow-up studies and randomized controlled trials are needed to achieve high-quality evidence.

Preliminary Results of Aorfix™ Stent Graft to Treat Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms with Severe Proximal Aortic Neck Angulation.

BACKGROUND: We report a preliminary experience about endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (iAAA) with severe proximal aortic neck angulation (NA) using the Aorfix™ stent graft. METHODS: Data of consecutive patients with iAAA with severe proximal NA submitted to endovascular repair between September 2012 and December 2014 in 2 Italian centers of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery were retrospectively reviewed, and outcomes were analyzed using the software JMP 5.1.2. RESULTS: A total of 26 patients were treated. Median proximal NA was 87.5° (range 68-108°), and 3 patients were treated outside the instruction for use of Aorfix because of a proximal NA > 90°. Eleven patients (42.3%) had severe iliac tortuosity. The primary success rate was 92.3%, as 2 patients required intraoperative correction of a type Ia endoleak. Within 30 days, a right limb occlusion was successfully resolved with endovascular recanalization. The median follow-up period was 14 months (range 1-48 months): 1 patient died for neoplasm and 1 patient presented a type II endoleak from lumbar arteries at 3 months, which is still under surveillance. No other complications were reported during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary results with the Aorfix stent graft seemed to be promising in the aim of reducing endoleak and migration rates in presence of iAAA with severe proximal aortic NA.

Appropriateness of Duplex ultrasound assessment on venous system of the legs: a two-month preliminary analysis.

AIM: The goal of this study is to evaluate the appropriateness to prescribe venous ultrasound of lower limbs. MATERIAL OF STUDY: Over a two months period, 1005 Duplex scans were performed by our Vascular Surgery Unit; out of the total, 225 exams were conducted on venous system of lower limbs. We retrospectively analyzed appropriateness of prescription (according to Lombardy District indications), urgency of prescription, time-lapse between application for the exams and its execution, positive or negative results, National Health System's sustained cost. RESULTS: During the above mentioned period, 87,5% of the exams were conducted as normal screening with no urgency characteristics, 61 exams (27%) were combined with arterial duplex of the same district. General Practitioners' requests accounted for 76,8% while only 9,7% were from vascular surgeons. Following indications of appropriateness, 117 exams (52%) were judged as appropriate. Combining appropriateness and result (χ2 test) we found that if the indication was inappropriate the negative result rate was 90,75%; in the group of exams prescribed with an urgent request the rate of appropriateness raised to 60,7% of whose 94.1% were pathologically positive. DISCUSSION: There is no evidence in Literature about appropriateness of prescription of Duplex ultrasound for vascular districts. While Lombardy District recently published guidelines for prescription, neither vascular surgeon societies nor National Health Service ever provided any indication. CONCLUSION: Nowadays there is increasing demand for appropriateness in healthcare. This study delivered such significant data to make it a pivotal study for an extended analysis during 2016. KEY WORDS: Appropriateness, Vascular Duplex Ultrasound, Venous System.

Varicose veins: new trends in treatment in a Vascular Surgery Unit.

AIM: Less invasive techniques such as foam sclerotherapy, endovenous laser or radiofrequency ablation have recently been introduced as a valid alternative to surgery for the treatment of varicose veins (VVs). We retrospectively reviewed our experience in the treatment of VVs with particular attention to how our therapeutic approach has changed over the last years. MATERIAL OF STUDY: Data of all patients consecutively treated from September 1st 2013 to July 31st 2015 for both primitive and recurrent VVs were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using the software JMP 5.1.2 (SAS Institute). RESULTS: A total of 409 legs in 378 patients were treated. The percentage of stripping of the great saphenous veins (GSV) for primary VVs has decreased over the years (67% in 2013 vs 15.2% in 2015), differently from what happened to the percentage of RFA of the GSV (14.3% vs. 31.5% respectively in 2013 and in 2015) and to the percentage of legs treated with the A.S.V.A.L. technique (8.7% vs. 31.5% respectively in 2013 and in 2015). Likewise, in 2013 most procedures were performed using spinal anesthesia (77.5%), while in 2015 the most used anesthetic techniques were both the local anesthesia and the local anesthesia with conscious sedation (35.9% and 29.3% respectively). Postoperative course was uneventful in all cases but seven (1.7%). At follow-up (median 16.9 months, IQR 7.5-22.6 months), neither major adverse events nor deaths were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: During the years of our experience, we observed a trend towards a less invasive approach for the treatment of VVs, with safe and effective results. KEY WORDS: Ablation Radiofrequency, Stripping, Varicose veins.

A 16-year experience of carotid artery stenting for carotid artery stenosis.

AIM: We report our experience of carotid artery stenting (CAS) for the endovascular treatment of significant carotid stenosis over 16 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of all consecutive patients who came for a significant carotid artery stenosis from January 1st 1999 to August 31st 2015 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Primary outcomes were the occurrence of death and major cerebrovascular events (MCE) both at 30-day and at long-term. RESULTS: In our experience CAS was a safe and effective technique, with acceptable mortality and neurological complication rates, both at 30 days and in the long term. KEY WORDS: Carotid stenting, Carotid stenosis, Long-term follow-up.

Tips About the Cordis INCRAFT Endograft.

BACKGROUND: Recently, the new Cordis INCRAFT abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) Stent-Graft System ultra low-profile device has been introduced in the clinical practice of endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) for the treatment of infrarenal AAAs (iAAAs). In our operative unit, it has been used since November 2014. We report our initial experience with the use of this novel device. We further discuss some technical aspects about the use of the endograft. METHODS: Data of all patients undergoing elective EVAR in our Division of Vascular Surgery using the Cordis INCRAFT AAA Stent-Graft System from November 2014 till now were retrospectively collected in a database and outcomes reviewed. Follow-up data were analyzed to evaluate primary success, survival, complications, and device-related events. Statistical analysis was performed using JMP(®) 5.1.2 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Continuous variables are reported as mean ± standard deviation, and categorical variables are presented as n (%). RESULTS: From November 2014 till now in our institution, a total of 10 patients (7 male; mean age, 76.3 years old; range, 65-87 years) underwent elective exclusion of an iAAA with a challenge iliac anatomy (minimum access vessel, 6.7 mm) using Cordis INCRAFT endoprosthesis. There were 9 AAA and a left common iliac artery aneurysm 50 mm in diameter, involving the internal iliac artery. Primary success was achieved in 90% as 1 patient presented an immediate type Ia endoleak which was resolved by the placement of a proximal aortic cuff. There was 1 intraoperative acute leg ischemia requiring a left popliteal Fogarty thrombectomy. Three patients (30%) presented a postimplantation syndrome. No other complications occurred neither during in-hospital stay (mean, 3.4 days; range, 2-4 days) nor during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, the Cordis INCRAFT AAA System was a safe and effective device. Our reflections about technical aspects of the use of this device will probably find their answer when further studies will report shared experiences and results about using this type of endograft.

New technologies in vascular surgery: San Donato's experience in the last decades.

The Department of Vascular Surgery I at IRCCS Policlinico San Donato has been part of the Cardiovascular Center "Edmondo Malan" since the end of the 1980s. Surgical activity of the Department has always been designed to prevent and treat vascular diseases such as aneurysms of the thoracic and abdominal aorta and peripheral vessels, carotid artery stenosis, peripheral arterial disease, and chronic venous insufficiency. Excellent results have been achieved with the endovascular treatment of both symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis also by using innovative devices. Another point of interest regards the endovascular treatment of more complex thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms. We report our experience in the last decades.

Immediate and Late Open Conversion after Ovation Endograft.

The risk of intraoperative open conversion during endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) still remains a main issue, albeit in a small percentage of cases. Open conversion can be extremely demanding and risky in relation to the type of the stent graft implanted and can be somehow challenging even for the most experienced vascular surgeons. We discuss a case of immediate conversion and 1 case of late conversion in patients previously treated with EVAR using the Ovation stent graft. The design of the endograft and its proximal sealing allowed the partial preservation of the graft and its use for proximal and distal anastomosis with a Dacron graft in both presented cases.

Early experience with Ovation endograft system in abdominal aortic disease.

OBJECTIVE: We describe our initial experience with the use of the TriVascular Ovation endograft system for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data from patients treated for AAA using the Ovation endograft at two institutions from January 2011 to September 2012. Main outcomes included primary success, survival, complications, and device-related events. The mean follow-up period was 10 months (range 1-22 months). RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients (male: 95%, mean age: 76 yr) were treated for AAA (mean diameter: 54 mm) with the Ovation endograft. Local or regional anesthesia was used in 86.5% of cases. Percutaneous access was utilized in 73% of cases. Primary success was 89.2% (33/37). Four adjunctive procedures were required including two distal extensions (type 1b endoleak and iliac limb disconnection resulting in type III endoleak) and two bypass surgeries (limb graft occlusion and gate cannulation failure). No deaths or major complications were reported during the procedure or in follow-up. No type I, III, or IV endoleak, AAA enlargement, AAA rupture, stent fracture, migration, or endovascular or surgical reintervention were reported during the follow-up period. Type II endoleak was observed in two patients. Asymptomatic narrowing of both iliac limbs was observed in one patient at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Our initial experience with the Ovation endograft demonstrated encouraging results in patients with AAA.

Postimplantation syndrome after endovascular aortic repair using the Anaconda™ endograft.

BACKGROUND: We report our retrospective experience on postimplantation syndrome (PIS) after the use of Anaconda™ endograft in patients undergoing elective endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVAR). METHODS: Data of all patients undergoing elective EVAR between May 2000 and June 2013 using the Anaconda endograft were retrospectively reviewed and the outcomes were analyzed. Preoperative and intraoperative data, any early postoperative complications, length of in-hospital stay, incidence of PIS, and long-term complications were recorded in a database. Patients' quality of life (QOL) was also assessed at 1 month after the procedure. Statistical analysis was performed and P values ≤0.05 were considered statistically significant. Chi-squared tests, log-rank tests, Wilcoxon tests, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were performed as appropriate. RESULTS: Between May 2000 and June 2013, 118 patients (8 female, 6.7%) underwent elective EVAR using the Anaconda endograft. Primary success was obtained in 117 cases (99.1%). Patients were divided into 2 groups based on either the occurrence of PIS (group A: 24 patients, 20.3%) or not (group B). The length of the procedure and the in-hospital stay were longer for group A. One patient from group B died on second postoperative day from myocardial infarction (0.8%). Mean follow-up was 48.4 months (range 5-162 months). Seven endoleaks occurred in the long term regardless of the development of PIS. We did not find any correlation between the presence of PIS and the occurrence of long-term complications, but PIS was correlated to the preoperative burden of thrombus of the aneurysmal sac. On the other side, analysis of QOL surveys showed that patients who had PIS after surgery felt significantly more limited in carrying out their daily physical activities and were more emotionally discouraged and depressed/anxious about their state of health than the group that did not have PIS. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, the occurrence of PIS was related to the duration of the procedure and the preoperative burden of thrombus of the aneurysmal sac. Overall, PIS was a benign complication after EVAR using the Anaconda endograft. However, it affected significantly the length of the in-hospital stay. Moreover, patients who had PIS after surgery felt significantly more limited in carrying out their daily physical activities and were more emotionally discouraged and depressed/anxious about their state of health than the group that did not have PIS.

Hybrid endovascular and surgical approach for mycotic pseudoaneurysms of the extracranial internal carotid artery.

OBJECTIVES: Mycotic pseudoaneurysms of the extracranial internal carotid artery are rare, and their management often represents a challenge, but treatment is necessary due to the high risk of rupture and distal brain embolization. Systemic antibiotics associated with open surgical excision of the infected tissues and carotid reconstruction using autologous grafts are the treatment of choice. The use of endovascular techniques still remains controversial in infective fields; however, it can be an attractive alternative in high-risk patients or more often as a "temporary" solution to achieve immediate bleeding control for a safe surgical reconstruction. METHODS: We discuss the unusual case of an extracranial right internal carotid artery mycotic pseudoaneurysm following methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection, in a patient with poor general conditions. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The lesion was successfully treated using a hybrid endovascular and surgical procedure.

Straight aortic endograft in abdominal aortic disease.

BACKGROUND: We describe our 8-year experience with the use of endovascular techniques (ET) for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) through a straight endograft. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data of all patients who were treated for AAA using ET in two centres from 1998 to 2012 and who received a single straight endograft (group A) or a double straight tube (group B). Outcomes were analyzed to assess survival, absence of endoleak and absence of reintervention for both groups. Log-rank and Chi-Square were used as appropriate to make comparison between the two groups. P values < .05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients from 1998 to May 2012 were treated for AAA using a straight endograft. In 28 cases (52.8%) a single aortic straight tube was used (Group A), while in the remaining cases a "double trombone technique" was used (Group B). CONCLUSIONS: In our experience the endovascular repair of AAA using straight aortic endografts was a safe and effective technique. Reintervention and endoleaks were slightly more frequent in patients who had received a single endograft compared to patients who were treated using the "trombone technique".

Long-term results of carotid artery stenting in patients 80 years and older.

INTRODUCTION: We report our experience about carotid artery stenting (CAS) in patients 80 years and older. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Out of 582 patients who underwent CAS at our institution from January 1999 to June 2010, 102 patients (group A) were 80 years or older. The clinical data of these patients were retrospectively reviewed, outcomes analyzed, and compared with those of younger patients who underwent CAS during the same period (group B). RESULTS: Outcomes of group B were similar to those of group A, both at 30 days and at long term. Male gender, symptoms, and not using an embolic protection device were related to long-term complications in both groups. Occurrence of bradycardia/asystole during CAS was a risk factor for long-term myocardial infarction for group A only. CONCLUSIONS: CAS can be safely performed in patients 80 years or older, with results that compare favorably to those of younger patients.

Ruptured hemiarch and descending thoracic aorta aneurysm: hybrid treatment.

Ruptured aortic arch aneurysm is a life threatening disease. Surgical repair has an high perioperative mortality rate and totally endovascular treatment is a challenge. Hybrid repair has been proposed as a valuable approach. We report the case of a patient with a contained rupture of aortic arch aneurysm. We treated him with a debranching of supraortic vessels with carotid-carotid and carotid-subclavian bypass and deployment of two enodgrafts in two different times. We consider hybrid treatment for arch and hemiarch a feasible option for aortic arch aneurysms in non emergent and in an emergency setting with an improvement in perioperative morbidity and mortality.

Endovascular treatment of iatrogenic axillary artery pseudoaneurysm under echographic control: a case report.

AIM: Brief case report of the treatment of a large axillary artery pseudoaneurysm after a pacemaker using a left brachial cutdown and a retrograde delivery of a covered stent using ultrasound and fluoroscopic guidance. The patient's renal function precluded the use of contrast materials. CASE REPORT: A 77 years old man presenting with acute renal failure and haemoglobin decrease arrived with an expanding pseudoaneurysm of the left axillary artery from a pacemaker placement. Considering the site of the lesion and patient's comorbidities, under echographic control, a Hemobahn® stent-graft was placed; fluoroscopy assisted manipulation of guidewires and sheaths into the aortic arch. The procedure was successfully ended without any complications. At 8 months the stent graft was still patent. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound guidance may represent an alternative for pseudo-aneurysm exclusion without any use of contrast medium, especially in those patient where lesions are easily detectable using ultrasonography and when comorbidities contraindicate aggressive surgical or angiographic approach.

Delayed endovascular treatment of descending aorta stent graft collapse in a patient treated for post- traumatic aortic rupture: a case report.

BACKGROUND: We report a case of delayed endovascular correction of graft collapse occurred after emergent Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair (TEVAR) for traumatic aortic isthmus rupture. CASE PRESENTATION: In 7th post-operative day after emergent TEVAR for traumatic aortic isthmus rupture (Gore TAG® 28-150), a partial collapse of the endoprosthesis at the descending tract occurred, with no signs of visceral ischemia. Considering patient's clinical conditions, the graft collapse wasn't treated at that time. When general conditions allowed reintervention, the patient refused any new treatment, so he was discharged.Four months later the patient complained of severe gluteal and sural claudication, erectile disfunction and abdominal angina; endovascular correction was performed. At 18 months the graft was still patent. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Graft collapse after TEVAR is a rare event, which should be detected and treated as soon as possible. Delayed correction of this complication can be lethal due to the risk of visceral ischemia and limbs loss.

Uninfected para-anastomotic aneurysms after infrarenal aortic grafting.

PURPOSE: This single-institution retrospective review examines the management of uninfected para-anastomotic aneurysms of the abdominal aorta (PAAA), developed after infrarenal grafting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From October 1979 to November 2005, 31 PAAA were observed in our Department. Twenty-six uninfected PAAA of degenerative etiology, including 24 false and 2 true aneurysms, were candidates for intervention and retrospectively included in our database for management and outcome evaluation. Six (23%) patients were treated as emergencies. Surgery included tube graft interposition (n = 12), new reconstruction (n = 8), and graft removal with extra-anatomic bypass (n = 3). Endovascular management (n = 3) consisted of free-flow tube endografts. RESULTS: The mortality rate among the elective and emergency cases was 5% and 66.6%, respectively (p = 0.005). The morbidity rate in elective cases was 57.8%, whereas 75% in emergency cases (p = 0.99). The survival rate during the follow-up was significantly higher for elective cases than for emergency cases. CONCLUSION: Uninfected PAAA is a late complication of aortic grafting, tends to evolve silently and is difficult to diagnose. The prevalence is underestimated and increases with time since surgery. The mortality rate is higher among patients treated as an emergency than among patients who undergo elective surgery, therefore, elective treatment and aggressive management in the case of pseudoaneurysm are the keys to obtain a good outcome. Endovascular treatment could reduce mortality. Patients who undergo infrarenal aortic grafting require life-long surveillance after surgery.

[Endovascular repair of aortic abdominal aneurysms in octagenarian patients: early and midterm results]. / Trattamento endovascolare di Aneurismi dell'aorta addominale in pazienti ottantenari. Risultati a medio termine.

AIM OF THE STUDY: This article summarizes our experience in endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in octogenarian patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From January 2000 to December 2005 30 patients (mean age 84 years) underwent endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm; in 28 cases a loco-regional anaesthesia has been performed. Twenty-eight bifurcated graft, one straight graft and one aorto-iliac graft have been used. RESULTS: No operative mortality or early endoleak have been observed; during the follow-up period (20 months) 7 endo-leaks (3 cases type I; 4 cases type II) have been reported; all patients with type I EL underwent endovascular repair; in two patients with type II EL we observed spontaneous regression; the other cases are still monitored in absence of sac enlargement. Four graft occlusions have been observed; one early thrombosis has been treated with surgical thrombectomy, two of the three late occlusions required other procedures. Five patients died during the follow-up period, three of them during the first year. No death has been aneurysm related. DISCUSSION: In accord with other recent studies, our analysis confirms the positive impact on intra-operative and early post-procedural mortality of the endovascular therapy for abdominal aortic aneurysm in octogenarian patients; no evidence of significative benefit on late survival has been observed. CONCLUSION: In conclusion we consider endovascular option as the best approach in octogenarian patients even if a longer follow-up is mandatory.