RESUMEN
STUDY QUESTION: Does an increased FSH dose result in higher cumulative live birth rates in women with a predicted poor ovarian response, apparent from a low antral follicle count (AFC), scheduled for IVF or ICSI? SUMMARY ANSWER: In women with a predicted poor ovarian response (AFC < 11) undergoing IVF/ICSI, an increased FSH dose (225/450 IU/day) does not improve cumulative live birth rates as compared to a standard dose (150 IU/day). WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: In women scheduled for IVF/ICSI, an ovarian reserve test (ORT) can predict ovarian response to stimulation. The FSH starting dose is often adjusted based on the ORT from the belief that it will improve live birth rates. However, the existing RCTs on this topic, most of which show no benefit, are underpowered. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Between May 2011 and May 2014, we performed an open-label multicentre RCT in women with an AFC < 11 (Dutch Trial Register NTR2657). The primary outcome was ongoing pregnancy achieved within 18 months after randomization and resulting in a live birth. We needed 300 women to assess whether an increased dose strategy would increase the cumulative live birth rate from 25 to 40% (two-sided alpha-error 0.05, power 80%). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Women with an AFC ≤ 7 were randomized to an FSH dose of 450 IU/day or 150 IU/day, and women with an AFC 8-10 were randomized to 225 IU or 150 IU/day. In the standard group, dose adjustment was allowed in subsequent cycles based on pre-specified criteria. Both effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the strategies were evaluated from an intention-to-treat perspective. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: In total, 511 women were randomized, 234 with an AFC ≤ 7 and 277 with an AFC 8-10. The cumulative live birth rate for increased versus standard dosing was 42.4% (106/250) versus 44.8% (117/261), respectively [relative risk (RR): 0.95 (95%CI, 0.78-1.15), P = 0.58]. As an increased dose strategy was more expensive [delta costs/woman: 1099 (95%CI, 562-1591)], standard FSH dosing was the dominant strategy in our economic analysis. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Despite our training programme, the AFC might have suffered from inter-observer variation. As this open study permitted small dose adjustments between cycles, potential selective cancelling of cycles in women treated with 150 IU could have influenced the cumulative results. However, since first cycle live birth rates point in the same direction we consider it unlikely that the open design masked a potential benefit for the individualized strategy. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Since an increased dose in women scheduled for IVF/ICSI with a predicted poor response (AFC < 11) does not improve live birth rates and is more expensive, we recommend using a standard dose of 150 IU/day in these women. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was funded by The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMW number 171102020). T.C.T., H.L.T. and S.C.O. received an unrestricted personal grant from Merck BV. H.R.V. receives monetary compensation as a member on an external advisory board for Ferring pharmaceutical BV. B.W.J.M. is supported by a NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship (GNT1082548) and reports consultancy for OvsEva, Merck and Guerbet. F.J.M.B. receives monetary compensation as a member of the external advisory board for Ferring pharmaceutics BV (the Netherlands) and Merck Serono (the Netherlands) for consultancy work for Gedeon Richter (Belgium) and Roche Diagnostics on automated AMH assay development (Switzerland) and for a research cooperation with Ansh Labs (USA). All other authors have nothing to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Registered at the ICMJE-recognized Dutch Trial Registry (www.trialregister.nl). Registration number NTR2657. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 20 December 2010. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLMENT: 12 May 2011.
Asunto(s)
Fertilización In Vitro/métodos , Hormona Folículo Estimulante/administración & dosificación , Folículo Ovárico/fisiología , Ovario/fisiología , Inyecciones de Esperma Intracitoplasmáticas/métodos , Adulto , Tasa de Natalidad , Criopreservación , Femenino , Fertilización In Vitro/economía , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Infertilidad/terapia , Reserva Ovárica/efectos de los fármacos , Inducción de la Ovulación/métodos , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Inyecciones de Esperma Intracitoplasmáticas/economía , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of elevated early follicular progesterone (P) levels in gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist cycles on clinical outcome using prospective data in combination with a systematic review and meta-analysis. DESIGN: Nested study within a multicenter randomized controlled trial and a systematic review and meta-analysis. SETTING: Reproductive medicine center in an university hospital. PATIENT(S): 158 in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF-ICSI) patients. INTERVENTION(S): Recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) (150-225 IU) administered daily from cycle day 2 onward; GnRH antagonist treatment randomly started on cycle day 2 or 6; assignment into two groups according to P level on cycle day 2: normal or elevated (>4.77 nmol/L or >1.5 ng/mL, respectively). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) per started cycle. RESULT(S): The incidence of elevated P was 13.3%. A non-statistically-significant difference in OPR was present between the normal and elevated P groups (27.0% vs. 19.0%). No differential impact of early or late GnRH antagonist initiation on the effect of elevated or normal P on OPR was observed. A systematic search of Medline and EMBASE from 1972-2013 was performed to identify studies analyzing elevated early P levels in GnRH antagonists. The meta-analysis (n=1,052) demonstrated that elevated P levels statistically significantly decreased the OPR with 15% (95% CI -23, -7 %). Heterogeneity across the studies, presumably based on varying protocols, may have modulated the effect of elevated P. CONCLUSION(S): From the present meta-analysis it appears that early elevated P levels are associated with a lower OPR in GnRH antagonists. The incidence of such a condition, however, is low. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00866034.
Asunto(s)
Fármacos para la Fertilidad Femenina/administración & dosificación , Fertilización In Vitro , Infertilidad/terapia , Folículo Ovárico/efectos de los fármacos , Inducción de la Ovulación/métodos , Progesterona/metabolismo , Adulto , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Femenino , Fármacos para la Fertilidad Femenina/efectos adversos , Hormona Folículo Estimulante/administración & dosificación , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/antagonistas & inhibidores , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/metabolismo , Antagonistas de Hormonas/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Infertilidad/diagnóstico , Infertilidad/metabolismo , Infertilidad/fisiopatología , Países Bajos , Folículo Ovárico/metabolismo , Inducción de la Ovulación/efectos adversos , Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Proteínas Recombinantes/administración & dosificación , Inyecciones de Esperma Intracitoplasmáticas , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Regulación hacia ArribaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Costs of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) are high, which is partly due to the use of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH). FSH is usually administered in a standard dose. However, due to differences in ovarian reserve between women, ovarian response also differs with potential negative consequences on pregnancy rates. A Markov decision-analytic model showed that FSH dose individualisation according to ovarian reserve is likely to be cost-effective in women who are eligible for IVF. However, this has never been confirmed in a large randomised controlled trial (RCT). The aim of the present study is to assess whether an individualised FSH dose regime based on an ovarian reserve test (ORT) is more cost-effective than a standard dose regime. METHODS/DESIGN: Multicentre RCT in subfertile women indicated for a first IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle, who are aged < 44 years, have a regular menstrual cycle and no major abnormalities at transvaginal sonography. Women with polycystic ovary syndrome, endocrine or metabolic abnormalities and women undergoing IVF with oocyte donation, will not be included. Ovarian reserve will be assessed by measuring the antral follicle count. Women with a predicted poor response or hyperresponse will be randomised for a standard versus an individualised FSH regime (150 IU/day, 225-450 IU/day and 100 IU/day, respectively). Participants will undergo a maximum of three stimulation cycles during maximally 18 months. The primary study outcome is the cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate resulting in live birth achieved within 18 months after randomisation. Secondary outcomes are parameters for ovarian response, multiple pregnancies, number of cycles needed per live birth, total IU of FSH per stimulation cycle, and costs. All data will be analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed to assess whether the health and associated economic benefits of individualised treatment of subfertile women outweigh the additional costs of an ORT. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will be integrated into a decision model that compares cost-effectiveness of the three dose-adjustment strategies to a standard dose strategy. The study outcomes will provide scientific foundation for national and international guidelines. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NTR2657.
Asunto(s)
Fertilización In Vitro/métodos , Hormona Folículo Estimulante/administración & dosificación , Infertilidad Femenina/terapia , Adulto , Protocolos Clínicos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Esquema de Medicación , Cálculo de Dosificación de Drogas , Femenino , Fertilización In Vitro/economía , Hormona Folículo Estimulante/economía , Humanos , Infertilidad Femenina/economía , Análisis de Intención de Tratar , Modelos Logísticos , Análisis Multivariante , Países Bajos , Folículo Ovárico/fisiología , Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To test whether ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization (IVF) affects oocyte quality and thus chromosome segregation behaviour during meiosis and early embryo development, preimplantation genetic screening of embryos was employed in a prospective, randomized controlled trial, comparing two ovarian stimulation regimens. METHODS: Infertile patients under 38 years of age were randomly assigned to undergo a mild stimulation regimen using gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist co-treatment (67 patients), which does not disrupt secondary follicle recruitment, or a conventional high-dose exogenous gonadotrophin regimen and GnRH agonist co-treatment (44 patients). Following IVF, embryos were biopsied at the eight-cell stage and the copy number of 10 chromosomes was analysed in 1 or 2 blastomeres. RESULTS: The study was terminated prematurely, after an unplanned interim analysis (which included 61% of the planned number of patients) found a lower embryo aneuploidy rate following mild stimulation. Compared with conventional stimulation, significantly fewer oocytes and embryos were obtained following mild stimulation (P < 0.01 and < 0.05, respectively). Consequently, both regimens generated on average a similar number (1.8) of chromosomally normal embryos. Differences in rates of mosaic embryos suggest an effect of ovarian stimulation on mitotic segregation errors. CONCLUSIONS: Future ovarian stimulation strategies should avoid maximizing oocyte yield, but aim at generating a sufficient number of chromosomally normal embryos by reduced interference with ovarian physiology.
Asunto(s)
Aneuploidia , Blastocisto , Inducción de la Ovulación/métodos , Adulto , Biopsia , Blastómeros/ultraestructura , Cromosomas/ultraestructura , Embrión de Mamíferos/metabolismo , Femenino , Fertilización In Vitro , Humanos , Hibridación Fluorescente in Situ , Modelos Genéticos , Diagnóstico Preimplantación , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence and etiology of the empty follicle syndrome (EFS). DESIGN: Observational longitudinal study. SETTING: Tertiary fertility centers. PATIENT(S): All patients beginning in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment from December 2002 to November 2004 were included. Couples undergoing IVF with donor oocytes or participating in an experimental IVF study were excluded from analysis. INTERVENTION(S): Identification of EFS cycles. Comparing ovarian hyperstimulation strategy, follicle count, and timing of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) for final oocyte maturation of the EFS cycles with normal IVF cycles. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Number of follicles punctured, number of oocytes recovered, previous and future IVF attempts, and serum hormone levels. RESULT(S): Twenty-five of a total of 1,849 patients were identified with an EFS cycle. Reasons for occurrence of EFS cycles were mistiming of hCG for final oocyte maturation, premature ovulation, and poor ovarian response. None of the affected patients had experienced EFS cycles in earlier IVF attempts nor were there any recurrence in subsequent treatments. CONCLUSION(S): Accurate timing of induction of final oocyte maturation, properly scheduled ovarian hyperstimulation, instruction of patients and doctors, and full workup for IVF are essential for the successful recovery of oocytes. Occurrence of EFS in IVF can normally be attributed to a failure of at least one of these factors and probably rarely or never occurs otherwise.