Low Rate of Hepatitis B Reactivation Among Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C During Direct Acting Antiviral Therapy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation has been reported in patients co-infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) during direct acting antiviral (DAA) therapy, leading the United States Food and Drug Administration (U.S. FDA) to issue a black box warning on all DAA drug labels recommending monitoring for HBV reactivation. We conducted a comprehensive evaluation to assess the rate of HBV reactivation among patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) during DAA therapy. METHODS: Patients with CHC and recovered HBV infection (hepatitis B surface antigen negative (HBsAg)/anti-hepatitis B core positive), treated with DAAs were included if stored sera were available. Samples were tested for HBV DNA, HBsAg, and ALT. HBV reactivation was considered if (1) HBV DNA was undetectable pre-DAA therapy and became detectable post-therapy, or (2) HBV DNA was detectable pre-treatment, but not quantifiable (< 20 IU/mL) and became quantifiable post-treatment. RESULT: 79 patients with median age of 62 years were included. 68% were male and Caucasian. Various DAA regimens were administered for 12-24 weeks. Reactivation occurred in 8/79 (10%) of patients and occurred more frequently in men compared to women: 6 during treatment and 2 after treatment. Neither an ALT flare nor HBsAg seroreversion were observed. Detectable HBV DNA was transient in 5/8 and could not be determined in 3/8 but ALT flares were not observed in follow-up of these patients. CONCLUSION: The risk of HBV reactivation was low in CHC patients with resolved HBV during DAA therapy. Our data support testing for HBV DNA only in selected patients with ALT flares or failure of ALT normalization during DAA treatment.

Hepatitis B virus reactivation in a myeloma patient with resolved infection who received daratumumab-containing salvage chemotherapy.

A 72-year-old female complaining of back pain was diagnosed with IgG-κ multiple myeloma. After osteosynthesis for fracture of the left femoral shaft due to myeloma, she received bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisolone as an initial regimen for multiple myeloma, but discontinued it after three courses due to progressive disease. The patient subsequently received lenalidomide and dexamethasone as a second-line regimen for 2.5 years, and pomalidomide and dexamethasone as a third-line regimen for only 2 months. An anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, daratumumab (DARA), and bortezomib and dexamethasone (DVd) as a fourth-line regimen were administered for refractory myeloma. However, hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation occurred on day 15 of the third course of DVd. The HBV DNA level in peripheral blood suddenly increased to 2.2 log IU/mL. An anti-HBV nucleotide analog, entecavir, was subsequently administered when the HBV DNA level increased to 2.6 log IU/mL. No HBV-related hepatitis was observed during follow-up. DARA can improve the prognosis of patients with multiple myeloma, but also potentially increase the risk of HBV reactivation. Host and viral risk factors need to be identified in such patients in order to implement a more cost-effective strategy against HBV reactivation.

Performance Evaluation of the Beckman Coulter DxN VERIS Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Assay in Comparison With the Abbott RealTime HBV Assay.

The detection and quantification of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA plays an important role in diagnosing and monitoring HBV infection as well as in assessing the therapeutic response. We compared the analytical performance of a random access, fully automated HBV assay-DxN VERIS Molecular Diagnostics System (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA)-with that of Abbott RealTime HBV assay (Abbott Laboratories, Des Plaines, IL, USA). The between-day precision of the VERIS assay ranged from 0.92% (mean 4.68 log IU/mL) to 4.15% (mean 2.09 log IU/mL) for pooled sera from HBV patients. HBV DNA levels measured by the VERIS HBV assay correlated with the calculated HBV DNA levels (r²=0.9994; P<0.0001). The lower limit of quantification was estimated as 8.76 IU/mL (Probit analysis, 95% confidence interval: 7.32-12.00 IU/mL). Passing-Bablok regression analysis showed good concordance between the VERIS and RealTime assays for 187 chronic HBV samples (y=-0.2397+0.9712x; r=0.981), as well as for 20 drug-resistant HBV genotype C positive samples (y=-0.5415+0.9954x; r=0.961). The VERIS assay demonstrated performance similar to the RealTime assay and is suitable for high-throughput HBV DNA monitoring in large hospital laboratories.

Novel monitoring of hepatitis B reactivation based on ultra-high sensitive hepatitis B surface antigen assay.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection should be evaluated before systemic chemotherapy to prevent HBV reactivation-related hepatitis. We investigated HBV reactivation using high sensitivity HB surface antigen (HBsAg) chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (HBsAg-HQ) and ultra-high sensitive HBsAg assay employing a semi-automated immune complex transfer chemiluminescence enzyme technique (ICT-CLEIA). METHODS: Of 120 HBV-resolved patients with haematological malignancy receiving systemic chemotherapy from 2012 to 2015 in our hospital, 13 patients had HBV DNA reactivation (in 12/13 patients HBV DNA became quantifiable) according to HBV DNA monitoring. These patients were applied for Architect HBsAg-QT (detection limit:50 mIU/mL), HBsAg-HQ (5 mIU/mL) and ICT-CLEIA (0.5 mIU/mL) using stored samples. RESULTS: When HBV DNA was firstly quantifiable by regular HBV DNA monitoring, HBsAg-QT was detected in 1/12 patients (8%), HBsAg-HQ was detected in 4/12 patients (33%) and ICT-CLEIA was detected in all 12 patients (100%), suggesting that the sensitivity of ICT-CLEIA was comparable to that of HBV DNA quantification. Interestingly, two patients were HBsAg positive by ICT-CLEIA before HBV DNA became detectable. Median difference of detectable point between HBV DNA and ICT-CLEIA was zero (range from -28 to 56 days), while median delay by HBsAg-QT or HBsAg-HQ was 52.5 days after HBV DNA became detectable. Although anti-HBs titres were high (131.9 mIU, 80.4 mIU) in two patients with escape mutations (Saa126V, Saa145R), HBsAg by ICT-CLEIA and HBV DNA were detectable concurrently. CONCLUSIONS: ICT-CLEIA is a novel assay for HBV monitoring to prevent hepatitis caused by HBV reactivation.

Monitoring of Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) DNA and Risk of HBV Reactivation in B-Cell Lymphoma: A Prospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: There is no standard management of reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in HBV-resolved patients without hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), but with antibodies against hepatitis B core antigen and/or antibodies against HBsAg (anti-HBs). METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study to evaluate the occurrence of HBV reactivation by serial monthly monitoring of HBV DNA and to establish preemptive therapy guided by this monitoring in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) treated with rituximab plus corticosteroid-containing chemotherapy (R-steroid-chemo). The primary endpoint was the incidence of HBV reactivation defined as quantifiable HBV DNA levels of ≥ 11 IU/mL. RESULTS: With a median HBV DNA follow-up of 562 days, HBV reactivation was observed in 21 of the 269 analyzed patients. The incidence of HBV reactivation at 1.5 years was 8.3% (95% confidence interval, 5.5-12.4). No hepatitis due to HBV reactivation was observed in patients who received antiviral treatment when HBV DNA levels were between 11 and 432 IU/mL. An anti-HBs titer of <10 mIU/mL and detectable HBV DNA remaining below the level of quantification at baseline were independent risk factors for HBV reactivation (hazard ratio, 20.6 and 56.2, respectively; P < .001). Even in 6 patients with a rapid increase of HBV due to mutations, the monthly HBV DNA monitoring was effective at preventing HBV-related hepatitis. CONCLUSIONS: Monthly monitoring of HBV DNA is useful for preventing HBV reactivation-related hepatitis among B-NHL patients with resolved HBV infection following R-steroid-chemo (UMIN000001299).