Comparison of the IOL Master and Pentacam in the measurement of anterior segment parameters in patients with high myopia and cataracts.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the differences between the Zeiss IOL Master and Oculus Pentacam in keratometry and central anterior chamber depth (ACD) measurements in patients with high myopia and cataracts. METHODS: Between January 2019 and December 2020, 89 patients (103 eyes) with cataracts and high myopia who underwent preoperative cataract evaluation at Nanchang First Hospital were selected for retrospective analysis. Keratometry (K1, K2) and ACD were measured with the IOL Master and Pentacam. Paired t-tests were performed to compare the differences, while the Bland-Altman method was used to evaluate the agreement. RESULTS: The K1 value was (43.15±2.44) D for the IOL Master and (42.98±2.47) D for the Pentacam, and the difference between the two instruments was statistically significant (P<0.01). The K2 value was (44.55±2.63) D for the IOL Master and (44.32±2.55) D for the Pentacam. The ACD was (3.44±0.33)mm for the IOL Master and (3.39±0.36)mm for the Pentacam. There were statistically significant differences between the two instruments in both keratometry and ACD (P<0.01). The absolute values of the maximum difference between the two instruments for K1 and K2 were 1.1 and 1.07; thus, the consistency of the two instruments with respect to this measurement was poor. However, the absolute value of the maximum difference between the two instruments for ACD was 0.34, so the consistency of the two instruments in relation to this measurement was good. CONCLUSIONS: Both the IOL Master and the Pentacam can be used in the measurement of keratometry and ACD in patients with high myopia and cataracts, but the keratometry measurements should be compared in clinical application.

Disappearance of lens epithelial cells detected at the treatment of intraocular lens dislocation 12 months after cataract surgery: A case report.

Purpose: To report a case of disappearance of lens epithelial cells (LECs) detected at the time of treatment for intraocular lens (IOL) dislocation 12 months after cataract surgery. Observations: A 59-year-old male underwent phacoemulsification with implantation of a posterior chamber acrylic IOL for posterior subcapsular cataract without any complications. Twelve months after cataract surgery, the IOL was dislocated inferiorly from the capsular bag due to rubbing the eye strongly, without capsular deviation. Fibrotic changes around the anterior capsular margin and posterior capsular opacification were not observed. During IOL repositioning, adhesions between the anterior and posterior capsules or zonule weakness were not observed. Six months after repositioning, the in-the-bag IOL dislocated into the anterior chamber because of zonular dialysis caused by strong eye rubbing again. Several days after scleral fixation of the IOL, the intraocular pressure decreased, possibly due to leakage from the wound. On inquiring about details, it was informed that the patient had a habit of sleeping in the prone position, with his face touching the pillow. After discontinuing this habit, his visual status stabilized. Conclusions and Importance: LEC may rarely disappear 12 months after cataract surgery. Although LEC survival is affected by various factors, minor trauma, such as slight eye rubbing and sleeping in a prone position, may influence IOL stability in the capsular bag and be related to early postoperative LEC disappearance.

IOL power calculation in long eyes: Selection of the best axial length adjustement factor using the most common formulas.

Purpose: Comparing IOL power calculation formulas in long eyes (AL≥26.00 mm) to find the best axial length (AL) adjustment/IOL power calculation formula combination. Design: Retrospective, comparative, case-series. Participants: Patients with long eyes that underwent cataract surgery. Methods: five-hundred-fifty-four eyes of 554 patients were examined before and after standard phacoemulsification without complications. Eyes were subdivided in 3 groups according to AL: 26.00≤AL<28.00 mm, 28.00≤AL<30.00 mm, AL≥30.00 mm. Eight formulas that do not require anterior chamber depth (ACD) were evaluated: Barrett Universal II (BUII), Emmetropia Verifying Optical (EVO) 2.0, Ladas Super Formula (LSF), Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, SRKT, T2 and T2.2. The lens constant of ULIB database and IOLCon database were used. Each formula was analyzed by using uncorrected AL (ALu) and following AL adjustments: Wang-Koch 1 (wk1), wk2, wk polinomial (wk-pol), estimated Cooke modified axial length (CMALe) and ALc correcting factor. Main outcome measures: Mean absolute error (MAE), median absolute error (MedAE) and percentage of eyes within ±0.50 and ± 1.00 diopters (D) of prediction error. Results: T2-ALu gave best outcome when 26.00 mm ≤ AL<28.00 mm. LSF-ALu, BUII-ALu, EVO 2.0-ALu, Holladay 1-wk-pol and T2.2-CMALe represented valid alternatives. EVO 2.0-ALc gave best outcomes when 28.00 mm ≤ AL<30.00 mm. Other thick-lens or hybrid artificial-intelligence-vergence based formulas (BUII-ALu, LSF-CMALe) and Holladay 1-wk2 demonstrated greater reliability compared to thin lens-based formulas. EVO 2.0-CMALe gave best outcomes when AL≥30.00 mm. Holladay 1-wk-pol e T2.2-wk1 represented valid alternatives (all p < 0.050). LSF could fail in 50 % of cases without ACD when AL≥30.00 mm. Conclusions: Choosing the best AL adjustment/IOL power calculation formula combination for each AL subrange, can improve refractive outcomes in patients with long eyes that undergo cataract surgery.

Axial length and keratometry characteristics of patients undergoing cataract surgery in Saudi Arabia.

Cataract surgery is one of the most successful surgical procedures, mainly due to the recent developments in surgical instruments and intraocular lens (IOL) measurements. Understanding the nature of axial length (AL) and keratometry readings (K) in patients with cataracts has significant implications for accurate postoperative IOL size selection. This study aimed to measure AL and K in patients undergoing cataract surgery in Saudi Arabia. This retrospective study included patients who underwent cataract surgery in Madinah, Saudi Arabia. The medical records of adult patients between May 2022 and May 2023 were reviewed, and those with a history of retinal detachment, refractive surgery, or trauma were excluded. The AL and K readings were obtained from the patient's IOL master results. A total of 691 eyes from 451 patients were included in the analysis. The mean age was 64.54 years old. Most of the patients were women (55%). The mean AL, K1, and K2 values were 23.27, 43.42, and 44.69, respectively. Linear regression analysis was used to measure the relationship between AL and K, revealing an inverse relationship in our findings. As AL increased by one unit, the mean K was estimated to decrease by 0.548, with a 95% confidence interval. Our results demonstrated an inverse relationship between AL and K, implying that when AL increases, K decreases, or the corneal curvature becomes flat. Further studies are needed to investigate the biomechanical mechanisms underlying this relationship.

Intraocular Lens Power and Corneal Topographic Change After Pterygium Surgery: Pterygium Effects on IOL Power Calculation.

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of pterygium excision on intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation and corneal astigmatism. DESIGNS: Prospective cohort study METHODS: We enrolled 30 eyes with primary pterygium that underwent pterygium excision with a conjunctival autograft. IOL power calculation and keratometry using the IOL Master 700, along with topographic parameters using the Pentacam Scheimpflug topography system, were performed preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. We analyzed correlations between pterygium length/area and IOL power, as well as corneal topographic changes. RESULTS: The mean pterygium length was 2.08 ± 0.58 mm, and the mean area was 6.05 ± 2.41 mm2. One year after pterygium surgery, the calculated IOL power values using all formulas were lower than the preoperative values. Pterygia with a horizontal length of 1.73 mm and an area of 4.45 mm2, and those with a horizontal length of 2.25 mm and an area of 6.95 mm2 created 0.5 D and 1.0 D errors in calculated IOL power, respectively (p<0.001). The calculated IOL power values changed significantly from preoperative to six months postoperatively but did not change significantly from six to 12 months postoperatively. Pterygia with a horizontal length greater than 1.83 mm (p<0.001) and an area greater than 5.1 mm2 (p < 0.001) created a 2.0 D error in anterior corneal astigmatism. CONCLUSIONS: Pterygium causes errors in IOL power calculation, with greater pterygium length/area exerting a larger effect. Cataract surgery with IOL implantation is recommended at least six months after pterygium surgery. In combined case, calculated IOL power should be decreased by 0.5-1.5 D based on the pterygium length/area.

Observations of the efficacy of the artificial lens cushion plate technique in hard-core cataract surgery.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of intraocular lens (IOL) cushion plate technology in reducing corneal endothelial cell loss during hard-core cataract surgery compared with conventional ultrasonic emulsification. Methods: Seventy-six patients with hard-core cataracts who underwent surgery at our institution from April 2019 to June 2022 were included. The patients were divided into an observation group (IOL cushion plate technology, 38 patients) and a control group (conventional ultrasonic emulsification, 38 patients). Surgical outcomes, including the corneal endothelial cell loss rate, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and central corneal thickness (CCTc), were compared between the two groups. Results: Preoperative patient characteristics were similar between the groups. Postoperatively, both groups demonstrated similar BCVA and CCTc values on days 7 and 30. However, compared with the observation group, the control group presented a significantly greater rate of corneal endothelial cell loss on postoperative days 7 and 30 (p < 0.05). Intraoperative complications and postoperative complications were notably greater in the control group (p < 0.05). The observation group had reduced ultramilk time and total energy consumption (p < 0.05). Conclusion: IOL cushion plate technology offers advantages in preserving corneal endothelial cells during hard-core cataract surgery, potentially improving surgical safety and efficacy.

Six versus 12-Hours Balloon Catheter Placement for the Induction of Labor: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

OBJECTIVE: Balloon catheters have shown promising results in the induction of labor (IOL); however, evidence regarding the optimal time of balloon catheter placement is still lacking. Thus, this study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of six-hour placement compared to 12 hours. DATA SOURCE: We conducted a comprehensive search through a search strategy across "Embase, SCOPUS, PubMed (via MEDLINE), and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL)" from inception until April 20, 2024. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy and safety of six-hour balloon catheter placement compared with 12 hours for cervical ripening in IOL. Covidence was used to screen eligible articles. METHODS: All relevant outcome data were synthesized using risk ratios (RR) or mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in meta-analysis models within RevMan 5.4. PROSPERO ID: CRD42024540935 RESULTS: We included five RCTs with 960 women undergoing the IOL with balloon catheter placement. Six-hour placement was associated with significant lower insertion to overall delivery interval (MD: -4.25, 95% CI [-5.34, -3.15], P< 0.00001) and insertion to vaginal delivery interval (MD: -4.65, 95% CI [-6.08, -3.23], P< 0.00001) without significant difference in BISHOP score change (MD: -0.02, 95% CI [-0.23, 0.20], P= 0.88), catheter removal to delivery interval (MD: 0.72, 95% CI [-0.39, 1.83], P= 0.20) and total duration of oxytocin infusion (MD: -0.36, 95% CI [-0.85, 0.14], P= 0.16) compared to twelve hours. Also, significantly lower overall cesarean delivery (CD) rate (RR: 0.81, 95% CI [0.68, 0.96], P= 0.01) and CD due to malpresentation (RR: 0.39, 95% CI [0.16, 0.93], P= 0.03) were observed with six-hour placement. CONCLUSION: A planned six-hour balloon catheter placement reduced insertion to delivery intervals and CD rate and has equal efficacy in BISHOP score change and catheter removal to delivery interval compared to twelve hours.

A novel method to optimize personal IOL constants.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a novel method called 'three variable optimization' that entails a process of doing just one calculation to zero out the mean prediction error of an entire dataset (regardless of size), using only 3 variables: 1) the constant used, 2) the average intraocular lens (IOL) power and 3) the average PE. DESIGN: Development, evaluation, and testing of a method to optimize personal IOL constants. METHODS: A dataset of 876 eyes was used as a training set, and another dataset of 1,079 eyes was used to test the method. The Barrett Universal II, Cooke K6, Haigis, RBF 3.0, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Holladay 2, SRK/T and T2 were analyzed. The same dataset was also divided into 3 subgroups (short, medium and long eyes). The three variable optimization process was applied to each dataset and subset, and the obtained optimized constants were then used to obtain the mean PE of each dataset. We then compared those results with those obtained by zeroing out the mean PE in the classical method. RESULTS: The three variable optimization showed similar results to classical optimization with less data needed to optimize and no clinically significant difference. Dividing the dataset into subsets of short, medium and long eyes, also shows that the method is useful even in those situations. Finally, the method was tested in multiple formulas and it was able to reduce the PE with no clinical significant difference from classical optimization. CONCLUSION: This method could then be applied by surgeons to optimize their constants by reducing the mean prediction error to zero without prior technical knowledge and it is available online for free at http://wwww.ioloptimization.com.

Capsular Waves: A Warning Indicator for Potentially Malpositioned Intraocular Lenses.

Purpose: To share examination findings of the lens capsule which may act as an indicator for malpositioned intraocular lenses (IOL). Setting: Single large multi-specialty private practice, Houston, Texas, USA. Design: Focused, observational case series. Methods: A review of pre-operative images of malpositioned single-piece IOLs with at least one haptic in the ciliary sulcus was conducted. The review included five cases who were referred to a single large multi-specialty private practice from June 2023 to December 2024 for an evaluation of posterior capsular opacification (PCO) and potential Nd:YAG capsulotomy. Findings: A total of five eyes which previously had undergone cataract surgery and were referred for Nd:YAG capsulotomy for PCO were identified on slit lamp examination to have capsular waves, defined as a centripetal and circumferential striated pattern of PCO that results from a fused anterior and posterior capsule with at least part of the IOL anterior to the capsule. While one eye exhibited transillumination defects and pigment dispersion, the remainder of eyes did not. In some cases, the capsular wave was the only clue to IOL malpositioning due to a small pupil. These eyes had single-piece IOLs with at least one haptic in the sulcus and required subsequent IOL repositioning or exchange. Conclusion: If capsular waves are seen on slit lamp exam, a thorough inspection of IOL placement should be conducted, especially before treatment with Nd:YAG capsulotomy. Capsular waves result from anterior and posterior capsule contact with an anteriorly situated IOL. This finding is a potential indicator of at least part of an IOL positioned anterior to the anterior capsule.

Relationship between anterior segment biometry and primary angle-closure glaucoma in Hubei region: a retrospective case-control study.

Objective: To investigate the pathogenesis of Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma (PACG) and its relationship with the anatomical structure of the anterior segment by obtaining biometric parameters using the IOL-Master 700. Methods: A retrospective case-control study was conducted. Clinical data from 39 PACG patients and 40 normal controls treated at the Aier Eye Hospital affiliated with Wuhan University from January to December 2022 were collected. Anterior chamber depth (AC), white-to-white (WTW), lens thickness (LT), central corneal thickness (CCT), axial length (AL), corneal curvature (K1), corneal curvature (K2), and lens position (LP) were measured using the IOL-Master 700 to analyze the characteristics and differences in the anterior segment structure of both groups. Statistical methods included independent sample t-tests and logistic regression analysis. Results: Significant differences were found in the anterior segment biometric parameters between PACG patients and normal controls (p < 0.05). Anterior chamber depth, white-to-white, lens thickness, central corneal thickness, axial length, and K2 were all related to the occurrence of PACG (p < 0.05). The occurrence of PACG was negatively correlated with ACD, CCT, and AL (OR = 0.12-0.64, p < 0.05), and positively correlated with LT. Conclusion: Compared to the normal control group, PACG patients in the Hubei region have a smaller anterior segment space, narrower angles, thicker lens, thinner cornea, shorter axial length, flatter cornea, and more anteriorly positioned lens.

Comparative Analysis of Refractive Outcomes Following Cataract Surgery Using IOL Master 500 and IOL Master 700 Biometry Devices: A Retrospective Analysis.

Background: This study aims to compare the refractive outcomes of cataract surgery using two different biometry devices, the IOL Master 500 and IOL Master 700, and to investigate the influence of patient-related factors on these outcomes. Methods: In this retrospective study, we analyzed data from 2994 eyes that underwent cataract surgery. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to examine the impact of the biometry device (IOL Master 500 or IOL Master 700), patient age, time elapsed between biometry and surgery, gender, and insurance status, as well as biometric parameters (anterior chamber depth, axial length, and corneal curvature), on postoperative refractive outcomes, specifically the deviation from target refraction. Results: The choice of the IOL Master device did not result in a statistically significant difference between the two devices (p = 0.205). Age (p = 0.006) and gender (p = 0.001) were identified as significant predictors of refractive outcomes, with older patients and males experiencing slightly more hyperopic outcomes compared to younger patients and females, respectively. The time elapsed between biometry and surgery and insurance status did not significantly influence the refractive outcomes. Conclusions: Our study, supported by a large cohort and a diverse group of patients representing typical anatomical variants seen in cataract surgery, supports the thesis that the IOL Master 500 and IOL Master 700 can be regarded as equivalent and effective for biometry in cataract surgery. The differences between the devices were negligible. Therefore, switching between the devices is safe for bilateral patients.

Lens Factor Choice in IOL Power Calculation after Laser Refractive Surgery: The Right Constant for Advanced Lens Measurement Approach (ALMA).

Background/Objectives: To evaluate the advanced lens measurement approach (ALMA) formula accuracy using different lens constants available on the user group for laser interference biometry (ULIB) and IOL Con platforms. Methods: In this retrospective, comparative, case-series study, 150 eyes of 160 patients with previous myopic Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK) or laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), who underwent uneventful cataract surgery and IOL implantation, were examined. The ALMA formula was evaluated to calculate the refractive prediction error (PE), analysing four different categories of lens constants: both nominal and optimized A-Constant for SRKT, which are available on the ULIB and IOL Con platforms. An additional analysis was carried out in this study, evaluating if a decreased ULIB optimized constant (DUOC) with different fixed factors (-1.2 -1.3 -1.4 -1.5) could improve refractive outcomes. Median absolute error (MedAE) and percentage of eyes within ±0.50 and ±1.00 diopters (D) of prediction error were measured as the main outcomes. Results: Comparing the lens factors available on ULIB and IOL Con platforms, the ALMA formula reported a lower MedAE and higher percentages of eyes with a refractive PE within 1.0 D using ULIB nominal constants (all p < 0.05). Using DUOC (-1.3), and there was a statistically significant improvement of both MedAE and of the percentages of eyes with PE within ±0.50 D with the ALMA method compared to nominal ULIB constants (all p < 0.05). Conclusions: The impact of different lens factors in the IOL power calculation after myopic LRS should be carefully evaluated. The ALMA formula, in the absence of optimized constants by zeroing the mean error, should be used by subtracting 1.3 from the optimized ULIB constants available on the IOL Con website. This finding suggests further studies to test which of these constants could work better with the other post-refractive surgery formulas.

Modified technique for sutured scleral fixated intraocular lens in a patient with post-traumatic aniridia and aphakia: a case report.

BACKGROUND: A modified surgical technique of sutured scleral fixated intraocular lens (SSF-IOL) was applied in a patient with post-traumatic aniridia and aphakia. CASE PRESENTATION: A 51-year-old man was referred to our clinic with decreased vision (finger count) in his right eye. This patient had previously undergone primary repair of the ruptured globe and pars plana vitrectomy to manage ocular trauma in the same eye. On presentation, the best corrected visual acuity in his right eye was 20/40. The slit lamp examination of his right eye revealed loss of total iris and lens. Corneal endothelial cell density was 1462 cells/mm2. Fundoscopic examination of the right eye revealed a retinal attachment. For IOL implantation, a rigid poly methyl methacrylate IOL was used with a 2-point scleral fixation performed using a polypropylene suture. One year postoperatively, the uncorrected distance visual acuity was 20/32, and the manifest refraction was - 0.5/-1.5 × 130 (20/20). Pentacam revealed that the astigmatism of the anterior corneal surface and the total cornea was 1.1 D (axis: 59.8°) and 1.0 D (axis: 35.6°), respectively. The horizontal (3°-183°) cross-section image displayed an IOL with a 1° tilt and 0.425 mm decentration. The patient reported no dysphotopsia or photophobia and was satisfied with the visual results. OPD-scan III revealed that higher-order aberrations in the right eye were slightly higher than those in the left eye. No suture-related or other serious complications were observed. CONCLUSION: The modified SSF-IOL technique can offer improved visual quality for patients with aniridia and aphakia by ensuring proper IOL positioning and reducing astigmatism.

[Correction of aphakia in cases of insufficient capsular bag stability]. / Aphakiekorrektur bei unzureichender Kapselsackstabilität.

A variety of situations can lead to the need for an alternative method of intraocular lens (IOL) fixation if implantation in the capsular bag is not possible. Depending on the situation, sulcus-fixated IOLs, iris-fixated IOLs (IFIOLs) and scleral-fixated IOLs (SFIOLs) are available. With SFIOLs, a distinction is made between suture-fixated and sutureless-fixated techniques. This paper summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of the different approaches, including the newer methods of sutureless SFIOLs. The decision on a specific approach in the individual case depends on both the individual circumstances of the patient and the experience of the surgeon.

Thermo-sensitive Poloxamer based antibacterial anti-inflammatory and photothermal conductive multifunctional hydrogel as injectable, in situ curable and adjustable intraocular lens.

Cataract patients look forwards to fewer postoperative complications and higher vision quality after surgery. However, the current intraocular lens (IOL) implanted after cataract surgery neither can adjust focal length in response to ciliary muscle contraction as natural lens nor have the ability to prevent postoperative complications. Herein, a thermosensitve Poloxamer based hybrid hydrogel with antibacterial anti-inflammatory and photothermal functional elements doping was designed and used as injectable, in situ curable, and adjustable IOL (FHTAB IOL). The FHTAB IOL was composed of thermosensitve triblock-polymer F127DA and a small amount of HAMA, combined with BP NS, TA, and Ag NPs. FHTAB IOL can be injected into the empty lens capsule after cataract surgery via an injectable thermos-gel under NIR illumination and then be rapidly cured to form a full-size IOL under short-time blue light irradiation. The designed injectable FHTAB IOL possesses high transparency and transmittance, with a refractive index similar to the natural lens and adjustable properties. It was stabilized as a refractive medium without any leakage in the eye. In addition, the TA and Ag NPs loaded in the FHTAB IOL displayed significant antibacterial and anti-inflammatory effects in vitro and vivo. This study presents a potentially effective new strategy for the development of multifunctional adjustable IOLs.

A Comprehensive Evaluation of 16 Old and New Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Pediatric Eyes.

Purpose: To compare the accuracy of 16 intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas in pediatric cataract eyes. Patients and Methods: The data records of pediatric patients who had been implanted with three IOL models (SA60AT, MA60AC, and enVista-MX60) between 2012 and 2018 were analyzed. The accuracy of 16 IOL power calculation methods was evaluated: Barrett Universal II (BUII), Castrop, EVO 2.0, Haigis, Hill-RBF 3.0, Hoffer Q, Hoffer QST, Holladay 1, Kane, LSF AI, Naeser 2, Pearl-DGS, SRK/T, T2, VRF, and VRF-G. The non-optimized (ULIB/IOLcon) and optimized constants were used for IOL power calculation. The mean prediction error (PE), Performance Index (FPI), and all descriptive statistics were calculated. Results: Ninety-seven eyes of 97 pediatric patients aged 13.2 (IQR 11.2-17.1) were included. No statistically significant difference (HS-test) was observed (p > 0.818) except for the Hoffer Q, and Naeser 2 (P = 0.014). With optimized lens constants, the best FPI indices were obtained by Hoffer Q (0.256) and VRF-G (0.251) formulas, followed by Hill-RBF 3.0 and BUII, with an index of 0.248. The highest FPI indices with non-optimized constants showed SRK/T and T2 formulas (0.246 and 0.245, respectively), followed by VRF-G and Holladay 1, with an index of 0.244. The best median absolute error values (MedAE) were achieved by Hoffer Q (0.50 D), VRF-G (0.53 D), and Hill-RBF 3.0 (0.54 D), all P ≥ 0.074. Conclusion: Our results place the Hoffer Q, VRF-G, Hill-RBF 3.0, and BUII formulas as more accurate predictors of postoperative refraction in pediatric cataract surgery.

Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulae for the Yamane technique of secondary fixation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the refractive outcomes of the Yamane technique for intrascleral fixation of intraocular lenses (SF-IOL) and compare the predictive ability of the various intraocular lens power calculation formulae commonly used in conjunction with the technique. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in the Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases for articles published from January 2014 to May 2023. Studies that met the predetermined inclusion criteria were included and subjected to analysis. The primary outcome evaluated was the refractive predictive error, defined as the difference between predicted refraction and post-operative manifest refraction. RESULTS: Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria, with a cumulative sample size of 615 patients (mean age: 66.6 years). Various IOL formulae were used, with SRK/T being the most frequently adopted formula. The overall mean refractive predictive error for all formulae combined was -0.02 D, which was not statistically significant (p = 0.99). Subgroup analysis for individual formulae also showed no significant difference from predicted error for any formula (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The Yamane technique for SF-IOL shows promising refractive outcomes, and the choice of IOL power calculation formula should be tailored based on patient characteristics and surgeon preference. No formula demonstrated superior predictive ability over others. Further research is needed to develop formulae specifically for eyes with secondary aphakia and poor capsular support.

Outcomes of retropupillary iris claw lens implantation in patients with intraocular lens dislocation and low (less than 1000 cells/mm2) corneal endothelial cell density.

BACKGROUND: Posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) dislocation is a common complication of cataract surgery. Dislocated IOLs often require surgical intervention due to the potentially severe risks of leaving this condition untreated. If a patient with extremely low corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) presents with IOL dislocation, the surgeon faces a crucial dilemma of choosing the most optimal surgical treatment option. We sought to investigate the efficacy and safety of retropupillary iris claw intraocular lens (R-IOL) implantation in patients with IOL dislocation and extremely low (< 1000 cells/mm2) ECD. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of nine patients (all men) whose pre-operative ECD was < 1000 cells/mm2 and who underwent R-IOL implantation due to intraocular subluxation or total dislocation into the vitreous cavity between 2014 and 2020. We evaluated corneal endothelial function and visual outcomes after surgery. RESULTS: Nine patients were included in this study. The mean age at diagnosis was 64.89 ± 7.15 years (range 57-76 years), and the follow-up duration was 37.93 ± 23.72 months (range 18.07-89.07 months). No patients developed bullous keratopathy during follow-up. Compared to the initial ECD, corneal thickness (CT), coefficient variation of cell area (CV) and percentage of hexagonal cells (HEX), there was no statistically significant decrease in the ECD, CV, and HEX at last follow-up (P = 0.944, 0.778, 0.445, 0.443). There was significant improvement in the mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) at the last follow-up (average 0.13 logMAR, 20/27 Snellen) compared to the pre-operative mean UDVA (average 1.09 logMAR, 20/250 Snellen) (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: R-IOL implantation did not result in a statistically significant decline in corneal endothelial function in patients with preoperatively low ECD, and it significantly improved the mean UDVA postoperatively. R-IOL implantation appears to be a safe and effective treatment modality for intraocular lens dislocation in patients with low ECD (< 1000 cells/mm²); however, long-term follow-up studies are warranted to corroborate these findings.

Comparative long-term outcomes of vitrectomy combined with anterior chamber intraocular lens to intra-scleral haptic fixation of posterior chamber intraocular lens.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes in patients with combined pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with anterior chamber intraocular lens (ACIOL) to intrascleral haptic fixation (ISHF) using the Agarwal technique with fibrin glue to secure the scleral flap of a posterior chamber intraocular lens. METHODS: Retrospective, consecutive, single-center, comparative case series. 83 eyes were studied. Patients with < 8 months of follow-up were excluded. Detailed pre-, intra-, and post-operative complications were analyzed using mixed model univariate analysis and t-test. Pre- and post-operative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty-five subjects met entry criteria. Mean age at time of surgery was 70.4 ± 17.7 years in the ACIOL group (n = 12) and 54.6 ± 21.1 years in the ISHF group (n = 13; p = 0.03). Mean follow-up was 38.2 months. Incidence of corneal decompensation was similar in the ACIOL and ISHF lens group (p = 0.93). There was no difference in the BCVA mean change or cystoid macular edema (CME) at the final visit between the groups (p = 0.47; p = 0.08), but there was a trend toward increased CME in the ACIOL group. CONCLUSIONS: PPV with concomitant placement of either ACIOL or ISHF lens result in improvement in BCVA. Both procedures are well tolerated and result in favorable outcomes with long-term follow-up though varying patient populations do not allow precise comparison between the two groups.

Comparison of visual efficacy and patient's satisfaction between two toric IOLs, enhanced for intermediate vision and monofocal.

BACKGROUND: To compare the visual efficacy and patient satisfaction between 2 toric IOLs (TIOL), enhanced for intermediate vision or monofocal. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of 100 eyes from 68 astigmatic patients who underwent cataract surgery with implantation of a Tecnis Eyhance Toric II IOL (Johnson & Johnson Vision, Irvine, CA, USA) (Group 1, 50 eyes) or Tecnis TIOL (Group 2, 50 eyes). The uncorrected distant (UDVA), intermediate (UIVA), and near (UNVA) visual acuities; residual refractive astigmatism; defocus curve; and IOL axis rotation were evaluated at 1 week, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The postoperative UDVA and UNVA refractive astigmatism values of the two groups were better than the preoperative measurements (P < 0.05), but there was no statistical difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). The postoperative UIVA of group 1 (0.18 ± 0.15 logMAR) was significantly better than that of group 2 (0.30 ± 0.25) (P < 0.05). The mean postoperative IOL rotation of group 1 (2.51 ± 0.79°) was lower than that of group 2 (3.02 ± 0.84°) (P < 0.05). Overall satisfaction of group 1 (1.27 ± 0.47) was better than that of group 2 (2.02 ± 0.53) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The Tecnis Eyhance Toric II IOL demonstrated less postoperative IOL rotation and excellent uncorrected intermediate vision compared with the Tecnis TIOL. Near visual acuity and overall satisfaction with the Tecnis Eyhance Toric II IOL were also higher than those with the Tecnis TIOL.