[The possibilities and advantages of conducting multicenter clinical trials on the basis of outpatient clinics in Moscow].

The article presents the special role of the outpatient unit (urban polyclinics) in the system of urban medical organizations, which has significant development potential in the field of clinical research. This activity became possible due to the systematic work on equipping outpatient clinics with the most modern diagnostic equipment, the availability of specialists trained in the organization and conduct of clinical trials according to the international rules of good clinical practice. A special value lies in the fact that the polyclinic network has an extensive database that includes millions of patients and provides the opportunity to perform the highest level of medical expertise and research.

Assessing readiness to use electronic health record data for outcome ascertainment in clinical trials - A case study.

BACKGROUND: Variable data quality poses a challenge to using electronic health record (EHR) data to ascertain acute clinical outcomes in multi-site clinical trials. Differing EHR platforms and data comprehensiveness across clinical trial sites, especially if patients received care outside of the clinical site's network, can also affect validity of results. Overcoming these challenges requires a structured approach. METHODS: We propose a framework and create a checklist to assess the readiness of clinical sites to contribute EHR data to a clinical trial for the purpose of outcome ascertainment, based on our experience with the Strategies to Reduce Injuries and Develop Confidence in Elders (STRIDE) study, which enrolled 5451 participants in 86 primary care practices across 10 healthcare systems (sites). RESULTS: The site readiness checklist includes assessment of the infrastructure (i.e., size and structure of the site's healthcare system or clinical network), data procurement (i.e., quality of the data), and cost of obtaining study data. The checklist emphasizes the importance of understanding how data are captured and integrated across a site's catchment area and having a protocol in place for data procurement to ensure consistent and uniform extraction across each site. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest rigorous, prospective vetting of the data quality and infrastructure of each clinical site before launching a multi-site trial dependent on EHR data. The proposed checklist serves as a guiding tool to help investigators ensure robust and unbiased data capture for their clinical trials. ORIGINAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02475850.

"Reality is frequently inaccurate" A case study examining the whens and whys of post-live database changes in a UK clinical trials unit *Douglas Adams.

INTRODUCTION: Accurately estimating the costs of clinical trials is challenging. There is currently no reference class data to allow researchers to understand the potential costs associated with database change management in clinical trials. METHODS: We used a case-based approach, summarising post-live changes in eleven clinical trial databases managed by Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit. We reviewed the database specifications for each trial and summarised the number of changes, change type, change category, and timing of changes. We pooled our experiences and made observations in relation to key themes. RESULTS: Median total number of changes across the eleven trials was 71 (range 40-155) and median number of changes per study week was 0.48 (range 0.32-1.34). The most common change type was modification (median 39, range 20-90), followed by additions (median 32, range 18-55), then deletions (median 7, range 1-12). In our sample, changes were more common in the first half of the trial's lifespan, regardless of its overall duration. Trials which saw continuous changes seemed more likely to be external pilots or trials in areas where the trial team was either less experienced overall or within the particular therapeutic area. CONCLUSIONS: Researchers should plan trials with the expectation that clinical trial databases will require changes within the life of the trial, particularly in the early stages or with a less experienced trial team. More research is required to understand potential differences between clinical trial units and database types.

Selecting trial centers using a standardized, automated site assessment survey instrument (SASI).

BACKGROUND: To improve the site selection process for clinical trials, we expanded a site survey to include standardized assessments of site commitment time, team experience, feasibility of tight timelines, and local medical community equipoise as factors that might better predict performance. We also collected contact information about institutional research services ahead of site onboarding. AIM: As a first step, we wanted to confirm that an expanded survey could be feasible and generalizable-that asking site teams for more details upfront was acceptable and that the survey could be completed in a reasonable amount of time, despite the assessment length. METHODS: A standardized, two-part Site Assessment Survey Instrument (SASI), examining qualitative components and with multiple contact list sections, was developed using a publicly accessible dashboard and later transferred to a REDCap platform. After multiple rounds of internal testing, the SASI was deployed 11 times for multicenter trials. Follow-up questionnaires were sent to site teams to confirm that an expanded survey instrument is acceptable to the research community and could be completed during a brief work shift. RESULTS: Respondents thought the SASI collected useful and relevant information about their sites (100%). Sites were "comfortable" (90%) supplying detailed information early in the site selection process and 57% completed the SASI in one to two hours. CONCLUSIONS: Coordinating centers and sites found the SASI tool to be acceptable and helpful when collecting data in consideration of multicenter trial site selection.

PCM4EU and PRIME-ROSE: Collaboration for implementation of precision cancer medicine in Europe.

BACKGROUND: In the two European Union (EU)-funded projects, PCM4EU (Personalized Cancer Medicine for all EU citizens) and PRIME-ROSE (Precision Cancer Medicine Repurposing System Using Pragmatic Clinical Trials), we aim to facilitate implementation of precision cancer medicine (PCM) in Europe by leveraging the experience from ongoing national initiatives that have already been particularly successful. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PCM4EU and PRIME-ROSE gather 17 and 24 partners, respectively, from 19 European countries. The projects are based on a network of Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP)-like clinical trials that are currently ongoing or soon to start in 11 different countries, and with more trials expected to be established soon. The main aims of both the projects are to improve implementation pathways from molecular diagnostics to treatment, and reimbursement of diagnostics and tumour-tailored therapies to provide examples of best practices for PCM in Europe. RESULTS: PCM4EU and PRIME-ROSE were launched in January and July 2023, respectively. Educational materials, including a podcast series, are already available from the PCM4EU website (http://www.pcm4eu.eu). The first reports, including an overview of requirements for the reimbursement systems in participating countries and a guide on patient involvement, are expected to be published in 2024. CONCLUSION: PCM4EU and PRIME-ROSE were launched in January and July 2023, respectively. Educational materials, including a podcast series, are already available from the PCM4EU website (http://www.pcm4eu.eu). The first reports, including an overview of requirements for the reimbursement systems in participating countries and a guide on patient involvement, are expected to be published in 2024. CONCLUSION: European collaboration can facilitate the implementation of PCM and thereby provide affordable and equitable access to precision diagnostics and matched therapies for more patients.

Comparison of recruitment methodologies for clinical trials: Results from the time for living and caring (TLC) intervention study.

BACKGROUND: Recruiting participants for research studies is a critical yet challenging task. Community-engaged recruitment strategies have gained prominence as effective means to engage diverse populations and ensure the representativeness of study samples. This case study aims to investigate the cost and effectiveness of various recruitment methods in enhancing research participation. METHODS: A comparative approach was employed to assess the outcomes of five different recruitment strategies used in the Time for Living & Caring (TLC) research study. Data on recruitment success, participant demographics, and retention rates were collected and analyzed using descriptive statistics, including ANOVA and Chi-squares, to statistically compare the outcomes associated with 5 different recruitment methodologies. The recruitment methodologies included two community-engaged strategies (community partner referral and community-based recruiters), a clinical database, social media, and word-of-mouth referral. CONCLUSION: The meta-data used to build this methodological case study describe different recruitment methodologies that may be used for clinical trials. This data-driven evaluation provides examples and considerations for researchers when developing budgets and proposals for future clinical trials. The primary finding is that there are tradeoffs in terms of cost, time, labor, and ultimately the representativeness of the sample, based on the type of recruitment methodology chosen.

Supervisión de ensayos clínicos en hospitales del Seguro Social de Salud del Perú: enfoque administrativo y regulatorio / Supervision of clinical trials in Social Health Insurance at Peruvian Hospitals: administrative and regulatory approach

RESUMEN El objetivo del estudio fue describir las características de los ensayos clínicos (EC) supervisados por el Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación en EsSalud entre el 2015 y 2018 y las principales observaciones de las supervisiones realizadas. Se realizó un estudio descriptivo de 82 ensayos clínicos supervisados entre 2015 y 2018. La mayoría de los ensayos clínicos fueron estudios de fase III (81,7%), la vía de administración más frecuente de los productos de estudio fue oral (47,6%) y la mayoría fueron patrocinados por la industria farmacéutica (96,3%). Las observaciones más frecuentes fueron las relacionadas al contrato de estudio (83,8%), al pago por concepto de overhead (57,3%) y a la falta de documentos regulatorios (47,6%). Estos hallazgos permiten la identificación de oportunidades de mejora en la regulación y gestión de la investigación.

ABSTRACT The objective of the study was to describe the characteristics of the Clinical Trials (CT) supervised by the Institute of Health Technology Assessment and Research carried out in EsSalud between 2015 and 2018 and the main observations of the supervisions completed. A descriptive study of 82 supervised clinical trials was conducted between 2015 and 2018. Most of the clinical trials were phase III studies (81.7%); the most frequent route of administration of the study products was oral (47.6%), and most were sponsored by the pharmaceutical industry (96.3%). The most frequent observations were those related to the study contract (83.8%), overhead payment (57.3%), and the lack of regulatory documents (47.6%). These findings allow the identification of opportunities for improvement in research regulation and management.

Importancia de la investigación clínica independiente en la medicina: dificultades y recomendaciones / Importance of independent clinical research in medicine: difficulties and recommendations

Resumen La investigación clínica es la herramienta de mayor importancia para la identificación de estrategias diagnósticas y terapéuticas que deriven en mayor eficacia y seguridad. A pesar de su trascendencia, la implementación exitosa de la investigación clínica presenta numerosas dificultades; entre las más relevantes se encuentra la poca disponibilidad de recursos para realizar ensayos clínicos independientes. Por lo general, la industria farmacéutica absorbe los costos asociados con la mayoría de los ensayos clínicos, sin embargo, esto puede generar una disociación entre los temas de interés y las prioridades en salud, al existir interés económico como principal motivación de estos protocolos. Además del papel relevante de la industria farmacéutica, es importante que las instancias gubernamentales favorezcan las condiciones, tanto económicas como regulatorias, para la implementación de investigación clínica independiente, que aborde temas de interés médico y terapéutico, aunque no genere beneficios económicos empresariales.

Abstract Clinical research is the most important tool for the identification of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies that derive in higher efficacy and safety. Despite its significance, successful implementation of clinical research faces numerous difficulties, with one the most relevant being limited availability of resources for the performance of independent clinical trials. Generally, the pharmaceutical industry absorbs the costs associated with most clinical trials; however, this can generate dissociation between subjects of interest and health priorities when economic interest is the main driver of these protocols. In addition to the relevant role played by the pharmaceutical industry, it is important that government agencies favor adequate conditions, both in economic and regulatory aspects, for the implementation of independent clinical research that addresses subjects of medical and therapeutic interest, even if it does not generate corporate economic benefits.

Data Sharing Statements for Clinical Trials: a Requirement of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors / Declaración sobre compartir datos: un requerimiento del Comité Internacional de Editores de Revistas Médicas

El Comité Internacional de Editores de Revista Médicas (ICMJE) ha tomado la posición que el compartir los datos generados por los ensayos clínicos es una obligación ética, por cuanto los participantes en esos estudios se colocaron en riesgo al aceptar su inclusión. En esta editorial el ICMJE expresa que requerirá desde Julio 2018 que los manuscritos enviados a sus revistas deben incluir una declaración sobre compartir datos. A su vez, los ensayos clínicos que comiencen a enrolar pacientes a partir de Enero 2019, deben incluir un plan sobre compartir datos en el registro de tales ensayos. Se dan en esta declaración cuatro ejemplos de declaraciones sobre compartir datos, referidos a qué datos se compartirán, cuándo estarán disponibles y qué criterios de acceso se establecerán. El ICMJE visualiza un futuro cercano en el cual el compartir los datos será la norma, con el fin de maximizar el conocimiento ganado por los esfuerzos y sacrificios de los participantes.

Data Sharing: A New Editorial Initiative of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Implications for the Editors´ Network / Compartilhamento de dados: Nova Iniciativa Editorial do Comitê Internacional de Editores de Revistas Médicas. Implicações para a Rede de Editores

Abstract The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) provides recommendations to improve the editorial standards and scientific quality of biomedical journals. These recommendations range from uniform technical requirements to more complex and elusive editorial issues including ethical aspects of the scientific process. Recently, registration of clinical trials, conflicts of interest disclosure, and new criteria for authorship - emphasizing the importance of responsibility and accountability-, have been proposed. Last year, a new editorial initiative to foster sharing of clinical trial data was launched. This review discusses this novel initiative with the aim of increasing awareness among readers, investigators, authors and editors belonging to the Editors´ Network of the European Society of Cardiology.

Resumo O Comitê Internacional de Editores de Revistas Médicas (ICMJE) fornece recomendações para aprimorar o padrão editorial e a qualidade científica das revistas biomédicas. Tais recomendações variam desde requisitos técnicos de uniformização até assuntos editoriais mais complexos e elusivos, como os aspectos éticos do processo científico. Recentemente, foram propostos registro de ensaios clínicos, divulgação de conflitos de interesse e novos critérios de autoria, enfatizando a importância da responsabilidade e da responsabilização. No último ano, lançou-se uma nova iniciativa editorial para fomentar o compartilhamento dos dados de ensaios clínicos. Esta revisão discute essa nova iniciativa visando a aumentar a conscientização de leitores, investigadores, autores e editores filiados à Rede de Editores da Sociedade Europeia de Cardiologia.

Practical and conceptual issues of clinical trial registration for Brazilian researchers / Aspectos práticos e conceituais do registro de ensaios clínicos para pesquisadores brasileiros

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Clinical trial registration is a prerequisite for publication in respected scientific journals. Recent Brazilian regulations also require registration of some clinical trials in the Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry (ReBEC) but there is little information available about practical issues involved in the registration process. This article discusses the importance of clinical trial registration and the practical issues involved in this process. DESIGN AND SETTING: Descriptive study conducted by researchers within a postgraduate program at a public university in São Paulo, Brazil. METHODS: Information was obtained from clinical trial registry platforms, article reference lists and websites (last search: September 2014) on the following topics: definition of a clinical trial, history, purpose and importance of registry platforms, the information that should be registered and the registration process. RESULTS: Clinical trial registration aims to avoid publication bias and is required by Brazilian journals indexed in LILACS and SciELO and by journals affiliated to the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). Recent Brazilian regulations require that all clinical trials (phases I to IV) involving new drugs to be marketed in this country must be registered in ReBEC. The pros and cons of using different clinical trial registration platforms are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical trial registration is important and various mechanisms to enforce its implementation now exist. Researchers should take into account national regulations and publication requirements when choosing the platform on which they will register their trial.

CONTEXTO E OBJETIVO: O registro dos ensaios clínicos é pré-requisito para publicação em revistas científicas de prestígio. Recentes mecanismos regulatórios brasileiros também exigem o registro de determinados ensaios clínicos na plataforma nacional (Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clínicos, ReBEC). Porém há pouca informação disponível sobre questões práticas envolvidas no processo de registro. Este trabalho discute a importância do registro de ensaios clínicos e aspectos práticos envolvidos nesse processo. DESENHO DE ESTUDO E LOCAL: Estudo descritivo realizado por pesquisadores de um programa de pós-graduação em uma universidade pública em São Paulo, Brasil. MÉTODOS: Informações foram obtidas em plataformas de registro de ensaios clínicos, referências dos artigos encontrados e websites (última busca: setembro, 2014) sobre os seguintes temas: definição de ensaio clínico, história, objetivo e importância das plataformas de registro, quais informações devem ser registradas e o processo de registro. RESULTADOS: O registro de ensaios clínicos visa evitar viés de publicação e é exigido por revistas brasileiras disponíveis no LILACS, SciELO e revistas afiliadas ao Comitê Internacional de Editores de Revistas Médicas (ICMJE). Recentes normas brasileiras exigem que todos os ensaios clínicos (fases I a IV) envolvendo novos medicamentos no país sejam registrados no ReBEC. São discutidos os prós e contras da utilização de diferentes bases de registro de ensaios clínicos. CONCLUSÃO: O registro de ensaios clínicos é importante e atualmente existem vários mecanismos que obrigam seu uso. Quando forem escolher em qual plataforma registrar seu ensaio clínico, os pesquisadores devem levar em consideração quais são as normas nacionais e as exigências para publicação.