ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Young oncologists are at particular risk of professional burnout, and this could have a significant impact on their health and care of their patients. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has forced rapid changes in professionals' jobs and training, with the consequent physical and psychological effects. We aimed to characterize burnout levels and determinants in young oncologists, and the effects of the pandemic on their training and health. METHODS: Two online surveys were conducted among oncology residents and young oncology specialists in Spain. The first addressed professional burnout and its determinants before the COVID-19 pandemic, while the second analyzed the impact of the pandemic on health care organization, training, and physical and psychological health in the same population. RESULTS: In total, 243 respondents completed the first survey, and 263 the second; 25.1% reported significant levels of professional burnout. Burnout was more common among medical oncology residents (28.2%), mainly in their second year of training. It was significantly associated with a poor work-life balance, inadequate vacation time, and the burnout score. Nearly three-quarters of respondents (72%) were reassigned to COVID-19 care and 84.3% of residents missed part of their training rotations. Overall, 17.2% of this population reported that they had contracted COVID-19, 37.3% had scores indicating anxiety, and 30.4% moderate to severe depression. Almost a quarter of young oncologists (23.3%) had doubts about their medical vocation. CONCLUSIONS: Burnout affects a considerable number of young oncologists. The COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound impact on causes of burnout, making it even more necessary to periodically monitor it to define appropriate detection and prevention strategies.
Subject(s)
Burnout, Professional , COVID-19 , Oncologists , Burnout, Professional/epidemiology , Burnout, Psychological/epidemiology , Burnout, Psychological/prevention & control , Humans , Medical Oncology , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To assess the efficacy and safety of a metronomic schedule of oral vinorelbine (mVNR) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients unfit for platinum-based combination chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label phase II study in treatment-naive patients with TNM stage IIIB/IV NSCLC. Patients received mVNR at a fixed dose of 50 mg × 3 or standard schedule 60-80 mg/m2 weekly until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) without grade 4 toxicity (G4PFS; NCI-CTC v4). Main secondary objectives were safety, disease control rate (DCR) without grade 4 toxicity (G4DCR), DCR, PFS, overall survival (OS) and quality of life (QoL). RESULTS: A total of 167 patients were included, 83 and 84 patients in the mVNR and standard arms, respectively. The median G4PFS was 4.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.6-4.3] and 2.2 months (95% CI: 1.5-2.9), hazard ration (HR) = 0.63 (95% CI: 0.45-0.88), P = 0.0068 in favor of metronomic arm; G4DCR was 45.8% and 26.8% in the mVNR and standard arms, respectively. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were less frequent in the mVNR arm (25.3% versus 54.4%) mainly owing to a reduction in all grades (15.7% versus 51.9%) and grade 3-4 neutropenia (10.8% versus 42%). PFS was 4.3 (95% CI: 3.3-5.1) and 3.9 months (95% CI: 2.8-5.2) in mVNR and standard arms, respectively. No difference in median OS was observed. QoL was comparable between arms. CONCLUSIONS: Metronomic oral vinorelbine significantly prolonged median G4PFS in advanced NSCLC patients unfit for platinum combinations as first-line treatment. It was associated with a clear reduction in toxicity and may be considered as an important option in this challenging population.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Humans , Lung , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Platinum/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Vinorelbine/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Mesothelioma is a rare and aggressive tumour with dismal prognosis arising in the pleura and associated with asbestos exposure. Its incidence is on the rise worldwide. In selected patients with early-stage MPM, a maximal surgical cytoreduction in combination with additional antitumour treatment may be considered in selected patients assessed by a multidisciplinary tumor board. In patients with unresectable or advanced MPM, chemotherapy with platinum plus pemetrexed is the standard of care. Currently, no standard salvage therapy has been approved yet, but second-line chemotherapy with vinorelbine or gemcitabine is commonly used. Novel therapeutic approaches based on dual immunotherapy or chemotherapy plus immunotherapy demonstrated promising survival benefit and will probably be incorporated in the future.
Subject(s)
Mesothelioma, Malignant/diagnosis , Mesothelioma, Malignant/therapy , Pleural Neoplasms/diagnosis , Pleural Neoplasms/therapy , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Asbestos/toxicity , Carcinogens/toxicity , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Deoxycytidine/therapeutic use , Genetic Testing , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Humans , Immunotherapy/methods , Medical Oncology , Mesothelioma, Malignant/etiology , Mesothelioma, Malignant/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Pemetrexed/therapeutic use , Platinum Compounds/therapeutic use , Pleural Neoplasms/etiology , Pleural Neoplasms/pathology , Radiotherapy/methods , Societies, Medical , Spain , Vinorelbine/therapeutic use , GemcitabineABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Brain metastases are frequent complications in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) associated with significant morbidity and poor prognosis. Our goal is to give a global overlook on clinical efficacy from immune checkpoint inhibitors in this setting and to review the role of biomarkers and molecular interactions in brain metastases from patients with NSCLC. METHODS: We reviewed clinical trials reporting clinical outcomes of patients with NSCLC with brain metastases as well as publications assessing the tumor microenvironment and the complex molecular interactions of tumor cells with immune and resident cells in brain metastases from NSCLC biopsies or preclinical models. RESULTS: Although limited data are available on immunotherapy in patients with brain metastases, immune checkpoint inhibitors alone or in combination with chemotherapy have shown promising intracranial efficacy and safety results. The underlying mechanism of action of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the brain niche and their influence on tumor microenvironment are still not known. Lower PD-L1 expression and less T CD8+ infiltration were found in brain metastases compared with matched NSCLC primary tumors, suggesting an immunosuppressive microenvironment in the brain. Reactive astrocytes and tumor associated macrophages are paramount in NSCLC brain metastases and play a role in promoting tumor progression and immune evasion. CONCLUSIONS: Discordances in the immune profile between primary tumours and brain metastases underscore differences in the tumour microenvironment and immune system interactions within the lung and brain niche. The characterization of immune phenotype of brain metastases and dissecting the interplay among immune cells and resident stromal cells along with cancer cells is crucial to unravel effective immunotherapeutic approaches in patients with NSCLC and brain metastases.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy , Brain Neoplasms/secondary , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , B7-H1 Antigen/antagonists & inhibitors , B7-H1 Antigen/immunology , Brain Neoplasms/immunology , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/pathology , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/immunology , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic , Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/immunology , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Lymphocyte Activation , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/antagonists & inhibitors , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/immunology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Tumor Microenvironment/immunologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The Spanish Society for Medical Oncology (SEOM, for its acronym in Spanish) and the National Commission for the Specialty of Medical Oncology seek to highlight the important workload and unrecognized dedication entailed in working as a Medical Oncology (MO) resident mentor, as well as its relevance for the quality of teaching units and the future of the specialty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The current situation and opinion regarding the activity of MO resident mentors was analyzed by reviewing the standing national and autonomic community regulations and via an online survey targeting mentors, residents, and physicians who are not MO mentors. The project was supervised by a specially designated group that agreed on a proposal containing recommendations for improvement. RESULTS: Of the MO mentors, 90% stated that they did not have enough time to perform their mentoring duties. An estimated 172 h/year on average was dedicated to mentoring, which represents 10.1% of the total time. MO mentors dedicate an average of 6.9 h/month to these duties outside their workday. Forty-five percent of the mentors feel that their role is scantly recognized, if at all. CONCLUSIONS: The study reveals the substantial dedication and growing complexity of MO resident mentoring. A series of recommendations are issued to improve the conditions in which it is carried out, including the design of systems that adapt to the professional activity in those departments that have time set aside for mentoring tasks.
Subject(s)
Internship and Residency , Medical Oncology , Mentoring/statistics & numerical data , Mentors/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , WorkloadABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In addition to the mutational status of KRAS, the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) ligands amphiregulin (AREG) and epiregulin (EREG) might function as bona fide biomarkers of cetuximab (Ctx) sensitivity for most EGFR-driven carcinomas. METHODS: Lentivirus-delivered small hairpin RNAs were employed to specifically reduce AREG or EREG gene expression in wild-type KRAS A431 squamous cell carcinoma cells. Colony-forming assays were used to monitor the impact of AREG and EREG knockdown on Ctx efficacy. Amphiregulin and EREG protein expression levels were assessed by quantitative ELISA in parental A431 cells and in pooled populations of A431 cells adapted to grow in the presence of Ctx. A phosphoproteomic platform was used to measure the relative level of phosphorylation of 42 distinct receptor tyrosine kinases before and after the acquisition of resistance to Ctx. RESULTS: Stable gene silencing of either ligand was found to notably reduce the expression of the other ligand. Parental A431 cells with normal expression levels of AREG/EREG exhibited significantly increased growth inhibition in response to Ctx, compared with derivatives that are engineered to produce minimal AREG/EREG. The parental A431 cells acutely treated with Ctx exhibited reduced basal expression levels of AREG/EREG. Pooled populations of Ctx-resistant A431 cells expressed significantly lower levels of AREG/EREG and were insensitive to the downregulatory effects of Ctx. Phosphoproteomic screen identified a remarkable hyperactivation of FGFR3 in Ctx-resistant A431 cells, which gained sensitivity to the cytotoxic and apoptotic effects of the FGFR3 TK inhibitor PD173074. The A431 parental cells acutely treated with Ctx rapidly activated FGFR3 and their concomitant exposure to Ctx and PD173074 resulted in synergistic apoptosis. CONCLUSION: Cross-suppression of AREG/EREG expression may explain the tight co-expression of AREG and EREG, as well as their tendency to be more highly expressed than other EGFR ligands to determine Ctx efficacy. The positive selection for Ctx-resistant tumour cells exhibiting AREG/EREG cross-suppression may have an important role in the emergence of Ctx resistance. As de-repression of FGFR3 activity rapidly replaces the loss of EGFR-ligand signalling in terms of cell proliferation and survival, combinations of Ctx and FGFR3-targeted drugs may be a valuable strategy to enhance the efficacy of single Ctx while preventing or delaying acquired resistance to Ctx.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/drug effects , Epidermal Growth Factor/antagonists & inhibitors , ErbB Receptors/metabolism , Glycoproteins/antagonists & inhibitors , Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 3/metabolism , Signal Transduction/drug effects , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Amphiregulin , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Apoptosis/drug effects , Cell Survival/drug effects , Cetuximab , EGF Family of Proteins , Epidermal Growth Factor/biosynthesis , Epidermal Growth Factor/genetics , Epiregulin , Gene Knockdown Techniques , Glycoproteins/biosynthesis , Glycoproteins/genetics , Humans , Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/biosynthesis , Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/genetics , Ligands , Pyrimidines/pharmacology , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Structure-Activity Relationship , Tumor Cells, CulturedABSTRACT
The molecular biology of cancer has made it possible to identify new targets for attacking tumourous cells. One of these recently proposed targets is the insulin and insulin-like growth factor signaling pathway. This review describes its biological function, laboratory data, population studies that warn of its role in cancer, and the key elements of this signaling pathway: the ligands (insulin, IGF1, IGF2), its receptors and the cascade of intracellular signals that trigger its activation. Also reviewed are the different strategies under investigation for blocking it, some of which are already in phase III advanced studies. The preliminary data indicate that the medicines designed for blocking this pathway might be a new therapeutic weapon for oncology patients in the near future.
Subject(s)
Insulin/physiology , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Somatomedins/physiology , Humans , Insulin Antagonists/therapeutic use , Signal Transduction , Somatomedins/antagonists & inhibitorsABSTRACT
Stem cell therapy is currently at the frontier of biomedical research. A considerable volume of evidence indicates that cancer stem cells are responsible for the development of different types of tumors. Malignant transformation of stem cells may be due to the loss of normal asymmetric division processes, cell fusion, microenviromental factors, generic and epigenetic mechanisms or carcinogenics already implicated in cancer development. A better understanding of these transforming events will allow more rational design of new specific therapeutic strategies targeting the cancer stem cell.