ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To examine the feasibility and usability of EnergyPoints™, an innovative mobile health app that teaches and guides people with cancer to implement daily acupressure to self-manage their fatigue and sleep disturbances. METHODS AND INTERVENTION: The study used an integrated agile, human-centered approach. Adults (age 18 years and over) with cancer experiencing at least moderate fatigue, and living in the Greater New York City community, were recruited from social media, patient advocacy groups, and referrals. Twenty participants (in 3 sprints of 3, 5, and 12) were video-recorded thinking aloud while using the app for the first time. They then used the app at home to self-administer acupressure (twice daily for 1 week) while continuously wearing a fitness tracker. Each participant completed an exit interview and modified Computer System Usability Questionnaire post-participation. RESULTS: Participants were ages 40 to 76 years and 65% female; 65% were non-Hispanic white. Mean pass rates per ritual exceeded 80%. Users completed (totally or partially) greater than 90% of stimulating acupressure and 70% of relaxing acupressure rituals. Sprint 3 SPs totally completed at least 1 ritual 87% of the time. The majority agreed or strongly agreed the app was easy to use (90%), easy to learn (85%), easy to understand (75%), and effective in helping perform self-acupressure (85%). In an analysis of ease of completing 5 key tasks, all successfully completed the tasks; 3 users required some assistance. Of 654 usability statements, those coded as personal experience/context (197), content related to acupressure learning (105), and content related to the onboarding/profile (71) were most frequent. The design team integrated recommendations into the app before the next sprint. CONCLUSIONS: Findings supported feasibility and usability, as well as acceptability, and led to significant alterations and improvements. EnergyPoints™ offers an opportunity to mainstream acupressure and help cancer survivors self-manage their symptoms.
Subject(s)
Acupressure , Cancer Survivors , Mobile Applications , Neoplasms , Adult , Humans , Female , Adolescent , Male , Feasibility Studies , Fatigue , Neoplasms/therapyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Evidenced based guidelines for patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) acknowledge increasing importance of frailty assessment when deciding on treatment, yet comprehensive geriatric assessment (GA) results are not easily incorporated into clinic workflows and the electronic health record. This study assessed the feasibility of electronic GA use in a real-world environment. METHODS: Patients with AML, ≥ 60 years and at a treatment decision-making point were recruited at three academic institutions. An electronic GA (eGA) was completed by patients prior to starting treatment. Results were immediately available on a dashboard. Data on feasibility, useability and acceptability of the intervention were collected immediately after the clinical visit. Patients completed follow up surveys at 3 months and chart reviews were done to capture treatment and toxicities. RESULTS: 77 patients were enrolled with a median age of 71 years (range=61-88). The eGA results were 25 fit (31.0 %), 22 (32.0 %) intermediate, and 23 (31.0 %) frail. There was 62.7 % (n = 47) provider concordance with the eGA result and 27 (36.0 %) post visit reports indicated that the eGA results influenced the treatment decision. On average, patients completed the surveys unassisted in 16.24 min and providers reviewed the dashboard in 3.5 min. CONCLUSION: Patients easily completed an eGA prior to starting treatment. Results were reviewed by the physician and considered in the decision for optimal treatment. One third of physician reports indicated the results were used to inform the treatment decision. Feasibility of completing the eGA in the clinic without workflow disruption and utility of the results was demonstrated.
Subject(s)
Frailty , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Humans , Adult , Aged , Middle Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Frailty/diagnosis , Precision Medicine/methods , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/diagnosis , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Current cancer value-based models require documentation of patient goals of care and an evidence-based treatment course commensurate with patient goals. This feasibility study assessed the utility of an electronic tablet-based questionnaire to elicit patient goals, preferences, and concerns at a treatment decision making time point in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-seven patients were recruited from three institutions prior to seeing the physician for treatment decision-making visit. Questionnaires included demographics, patient beliefs, and decision-making preferences. Analyses included standard descriptive statistics appropriate for the level of measurement. RESULTS: Median age was 71 (range = 61-88), 64.9% female, 87.0% white, and 48.6% college educated. On average, patients completed the surveys unassisted in 16.24 min and providers reviewed the dashboard in 3.5 min. All but one patient completed the survey prior to starting treatment (98.7%). Providers reviewed the survey results prior to seeing the patient 97.4% of the time. When asked their goals of care, 57 (74.0%) patients agreed with the statement "my cancer is curable" and 75 (97.4%) agreed that the treatment goal was to get rid of all cancer. Seventy-seven (100%) agreed the goal of care is to feel better and 76 (98.7%) agreed the goal of care is live longer. Forty-one (53.9%) indicated they wanted to make treatment decisions together with the provider. The top two concerns were understanding treatment options (n = 24; 31.2%) and making the right decision (n = 22; 28.6%). DISCUSSION: This pilot demonstrated the feasibility of using technology for decision-making at the point of care. Eliciting patient goals of care, treatment outcomes expectations, decision-making preferences, and top concerns may provide clinicians with information to inform the treatment discussion. A simple electronic tool may provide valuable insight into patient understanding of disease to better tailor patient-provider discussion and treatment decision-making.
Subject(s)
Goals , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Humans , Female , Aged , Male , Decision Making , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Surveys and Questionnaires , EmotionsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To identify symptom clusters among adult survivors of childhood cancers and test associations with health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and physical and neurocognitive performance. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 3,085 survivors (mean age at evaluation 31.9 ± 8.3 years; mean years from diagnosis 28.1 ± 9.1) participating in the St Jude Lifetime Cohort Study. Survivors self-reported the presence of 37 symptoms capturing 10 domains (cardiac, pulmonary, sensory, motor/movement, nausea, pain, fatigue, memory, anxiety, and depression). The Short Form-36's Physical/Mental Component Summaries assessed HRQOL; the Physical Performance Test evaluated physical performance; and neurocognitive batteries tested attention, processing/psychomotor speed, memory, and executive function. Latent class analysis identified subgroups of survivors experiencing different patterns of symptom burden (ie, symptom clusters). Multivariable regression models identified risk of cluster membership and tested associations with health outcomes. RESULTS: Four symptom clusters were identified including cluster 1 (prevalence 52.4%; low physical, somatization, and psychologic domains), cluster 2 (16.1%; low physical, moderate somatic, and high psychologic domains), cluster 3 (17.6%; high physical, moderate somatic, and low psychologic domains), and cluster 4 (13.9%; high in all three domains). Compared with cluster 1, survivors in cluster 4 were more likely to have less than high school education (odds ratio [OR], 7.71; 95% CI, 4.46 to 13.31), no insurance (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.13), and exposure to corticosteroids (OR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.02 to 3.03); survivors in cluster 3 were more likely to have received platinum agents (OR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.34 to 3.68) and brain radiation ≥ 30 Gy (OR, 3.99; 95% CI, 2.33 to 6.86). Survivors in cluster 4 reported the poorest Physical Component Summary/Mental Component Summary scores (31.0/26.7) and physical and neurocognitive performance versus survivors in the other clusters (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Nearly 50% of survivors had moderate to high multisymptom burden, which was associated with sociodemographic, treatment factors, HRQOL, and functional outcomes.
Subject(s)
Cancer Survivors , Neoplasms , Adult , Humans , Child , Young Adult , Cohort Studies , Quality of Life , Cancer Survivors/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Syndrome , Survivors , Outcome Assessment, Health CareABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Remote patient monitoring became critical for patients receiving cancer treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic. We sought to test feasibility of an electronic patient symptom management program implemented during a pandemic. We collected and analyzed the real-world data to inform practice quality improvement and understand the patient experience. METHODS: Eligible patients had breast, lung, or ovarian cancers, multiple myeloma, or acute myeloid leukemia and 12 weeks of planned chemotherapy. Patients were notified that a symptom survey with common symptoms derived from the National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events was available to complete using a smart phone, tablet, or computer. Patients recorded their symptoms and results were sent to the provider. Patients received care guidelines for mild/moderate severity symptoms and a phone call from the provider for severe reports. RESULTS: A total of 282 patients generated > 119 088 data points. Patients completed 2860 of 3248 assigned surveys (88%), and 152 of 282 patients (54%) had symptom reports that generated an immediate notification to the provider. Longitudinal data were analyzed to determine whether previous reports predicted a notification alert and whether symptoms resolved after the alert was addressed. CONCLUSIONS: An electronic patient symptom management program was implemented in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic. Enrollment of 282 patients and a high survey completion (88%) demonstrated feasibility/acceptance. Patients reported symptoms at severe levels of 54% of the time and received self-management instructions and provider phone calls that resolved or decreased the severity of the symptom. A standard approach and validated instrument provide opportunities for improving and benchmarking outcomes.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasms , COVID-19/epidemiology , Electronics , Humans , Neoplasms/therapy , Palliative Care , Pandemics , Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Pain is a significant problem in patients with cancer. Breakthrough cancer pain contributes to the pain experience, but it is often underassessed and underrecognized. Shared decision-making (SDM), where patient preferences, goals, and concerns are discussed and integrated into a shared decision, can potentially foster earlier identification of pain, including breakthrough cancer pain, and improve pain management. OBJECTIVES: To explore the use of SDM to evaluate its impact on cancer pain management. METHODS: This prospective, multisite study engaged patients with advanced cancer to explore the use of SDM in managing cancer pain using a digital platform with an expanded pain assessment. Decision preferences were noted and incorporated into care. Outcomes included pain and patient-perceived pain care quality. RESULTS: 51 patients with advanced cancer enrolled in the study. The mean pain score was 5 out of 10 throughout the three study time points. 88% of patients experienced breakthrough cancer pain of severe intensity at baseline and approximately 70% at visits two and three. The majority of breakthrough cancer pain episodes lasted longer than 30 minutes. The majority (86%) of participating patients desired shared decision-making or patient-driven decision-making. Most patients expressed satisfaction with the level of shared decision-making in managing their cancer pain. Breakthrough cancer pain remained significant for most patients. CONCLUSIONS: SDM incorporated into pain discussions has the potential to improve pain outcomes, but significant challenges remain in managing breakthrough cancer pain.
ABSTRACT
Firearm violence continues to be a national public health issue. The objective of this study was to collect baseline data regarding North Carolina County Commissioners' perceptions of firearm violence and potential local level interventions. A cross-sectional study of NC County Commissioners (n = 582) was conducted to investigate the research questions. The top 5 firearm violence prevention interventions that would be supported by NC County Commissioners included offering gun safety classes for adults (88.5%), implementing public education campaigns to promote responsible firearm storage (86.0%), developing courtroom processes that ensure domestic abusers turn in their guns as required by law (83.2%), adopting a standard policy of tracing all crime guns (79.4%), and providing firearm violence prevention programs for at-risk neighborhoods and individuals (72.2%). North Carolina County Commissioners perceived lack of understanding regarding which interventions would be most effective as the greatest barrier to supporting various types of firearm violence prevention interventions (50.3%).
Subject(s)
Firearms , Adult , Crime , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , North Carolina , Violence/prevention & controlABSTRACT
This study's aim was to examine the impact of cooperative learner simulation order (LSO) on performance on a haptic intravenous (IV) simulator. Research has highlighted the value of cooperative learning in acquiring skills, but little is known about the processes that might contribute to outcomes. A convenience sample (N = 81) of students were randomized into LSO and then into IV teams. LSO reflected the sequencing pattern and who was to attempt the simulation first, second or third in their team. A randomized posttest only comparison group design was used to determine the impact of LSO on performance, operationalized as initial performance scores and number of attempts to earn a passing performance score. Linear mixed effects ANCOVAs were computed to determine the impact of LSO on performance outcomes, controlling for team size and prior experience. LSO was a significant factor in initial performance scores, explaining 21% of the variance. Past experience accounted for an additional 10% of variance in initial performance while team size explained 17% of variance in number of attempts. The impact of LSO, team size and past experience reflect team processes that relate to performance during learning and are important factors to consider when teaching in simulation.
Subject(s)
Students, Nursing , Clinical Competence , Humans , LearningABSTRACT
CONTEXT: Collegiate student-athletes continue competing after experiencing symptoms of a concussion. Self-report of concussion symptoms is a critical element of the recovery process. Identifying factors related to concussion disclosure can aid in encouraging self-reporting. OBJECTIVE: To use latent profile analysis to categorize and describe athletes based on factors related to concussion disclosure. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Web-based survey. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 2â881 (52.4% female; 65.3% in-season; 40% collision sport) student-athletes from 16 National Collegiate Athletic Association member institutions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Student-athlete concussion expectations, attitudes, and norms were the profile variables and reporting intentions served as the distal outcome variable. We conducted latent profile analysis using select profile variables to determine the optimal number of classes. Differences in concussion-reporting intentions by profile assignment were then examined. Lastly, the extent to which a student-athlete's sex, season status, and level of contact predicted his or her intentions to report a concussion within each profile was investigated. RESULTS: Five unique student-athlete profiles emerged, including 1 profile that was most risky and another that was least risky. Females had significantly higher odds of being in the least risky profile. Those participating in collision sports had significantly higher odds of being in the top 2 most risky profiles. Contact-sport and in-season athletes were less likely to be in the least risky profile. CONCLUSIONS: With a better understanding of student-athlete profiles, athletic trainers have an opportunity to encourage concussion disclosure. Prompt disclosure would allow student-athletes to begin the return-to-play protocol in a more timely manner.
Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries/diagnosis , Brain Concussion/diagnosis , Disclosure , Self Report , Athletes/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Intention , Male , Sports , Students/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , UniversitiesABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate the Family Caregiver Identity Scale (FCIS), an instrument designed to measure the extent to which an individual identifies with the family caregiver role. The process of instrument development outlined in the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing was combined with Dillman's four stages of pretesting. This was a multistage, iterative process, including several revisions based on feedback from experts, interviews, and pilot testing. Factor analyses were performed to test the hypothesized model of caregiver identity. A version of the FCIS consisting of 18 items was created and demonstrated initial evidence of validity. The FCIS will enable gerontological professionals to assess caregiver identity. The absence of caregiver identity is a factor in caregivers not accessing support services. This study contributes to the growing body of research connecting caregiver identity and support service utilization by caregivers.
Subject(s)
Caregivers , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Humans , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: America is amid an opioid epidemic, best characterized by liberal prescribing practices; widespread opioid misuse, abuse, and diversion; and rising rates of prescription-related opioid overdose. While many contributors to opioid overprescribing exist, orthopedic surgery is identified as a key driver. The purpose of this study is to determine predictors of ongoing opioid use >15 days post-total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and those patients prescribed >1350 morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) in the 15 days following surgery. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in patients undergoing TKA (January 2016-December 2017) in an integrated healthcare system. Outcomes of interest were patient and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 621 patients were included in the study. The majority were female (57.6%), were non-Hispanic/Latino white (92.3%), and from metropolitan areas (64.3%) with fewer than 110,000 population. Mean age was 66.3. Being female (odds ratio [OR] = 1.547, P = .092), having a higher body mass index (OR = 1.043, P = .036), and receipt of more postdischarge prescriptions in the 60-day follow-up period (OR = 8.815, P < .0001) were associated with a greater likelihood of receipt of opioid prescriptions for more than 15 days. Older patients (OR = 0.954, P = .01) and those discharged to home (OR = 0.478, P = .045) were less likely to receive >1350 MME; longer length of stay (OR = 1.447, P = .013) was more likely in those prescribed >1350 MMEs. CONCLUSION: Several predictors were associated with longer duration and higher doses of opioid prescriptions post-TKA. Further research is needed to ascertain the challenges of opioid prescribing from both the metropolitan surgical team and rural healthcare provider perspective.
Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Aftercare , Aged , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Pain, Postoperative/epidemiology , Patient Discharge , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The incidence of AML is increasing, in part due to an aging population. Since 2017, eight novel agents have been introduced, 6 of which are oral: midostaurin, enasidenib, ivosidenib, gilteritinib, glasdegib, and venetoclax. With an increase in oral medications (OMs), patients face associated side effects that accompany OMs, which often decreases adherence. We aimed to identify and summarize adherence to OMs in this population. METHODS: Our mixed method design used focus groups (FG) and patient surveys. After IRB approval, 11 patients and 4 caregivers participated in 4 FGs. Themes from the FGs were used to develop a 37-item OMs adherence needs assessment. Participants were recruited and consented at three cancer centers to complete surveys (online, at the clinic, hospital, or from home). RESULTS: A total of 100 patients completed OMs survey. The number of pills to be taken was the most frequent and troublesome challenge. The most frequently reported interventions that would improve patient adherence were smaller pills, easier packaging, and scheduling assistance. Nearly 33% of patients indicated they skip OMs dose altogether when they forget to take it. Younger patients (< 65 years) were more accepting of taking oral compared with intravenous medications (p = .03). CONCLUSION: This study represents the first assessment of OMs adherence in adults with AML. Findings provide the basis for further exploration of interventions to enhance and increase adherence to OMs regimens.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy , Medication Adherence , Administration, Oral , Age Factors , Aged , Caregivers , Humans , Male , Middle AgedABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Geriatric assessment (GA) results predict toxicity/survival in older adults, yet GA is not routinely used in care for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). We tested a tablet-based modified GA (mGA) providing real-time results to clinicians. METHODS: One hundred sixty-five patients with MM aged ≥ 65 years facing a treatment decision from 4 sites completed a tablet-based mGA with Katz Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Lawton Instrumental ADL, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and variables from the Cancer and Aging Research Group's Chemotherapy Toxicity Calculator. Providers reviewed the assessment results at the treatment visit. RESULTS: Patients were white (72%; n = 86), mean age was 72 years (range, 65-85 years), and averaged 7.71 minutes (range, 2-17 minutes) for survey completion. Providers averaged 3.2 minutes (range, 1-10 minutes) to review mGA results. Using International Myeloma Working Group frailty score, patients were fit (39%; n = 64), intermediate fit (33%; n = 55), or frail (28%; n = 46). Providers selected more aggressive treatments in 16.3% of patients and decreased treatment intensity in 34% of patients; treatment intensification was more common for fit patients and milder treatments for frail patients (χ2 = 20.02; P < .0001). Transplant eligibility significantly correlated with fit status and transplant ineligibility with frail status (P = .004). Outcomes on 144 patients 3 months post study visit showed 19.4% (n = 28) had grade ≥ 3 hematologic toxicities, 38.9% (n = 56) had dose modifications, and 18% (n = 26) had early therapy cessation. CONCLUSION: Limited patient time required for survey completion and provider time for results review show mGA can be easily incorporated into clinical workflow. Real-time mGA results indicating fit/frailty status influenced treatment decisions.
Subject(s)
Geriatric Assessment/methods , Multiple Myeloma/diagnosis , Precision Medicine/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Frail Elderly , Humans , Male , Mass Screening , Multiple Myeloma/pathology , Pilot Projects , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To examine changes in organizations' workplace health promotion (WHP) initiatives over time associated with repeated self-assessment using the Well Workplace Checklist (WWC). DESIGN: Well Workplace Checklist data include a convenience sample of US organizations that selected to assess their performance against quality WHP benchmarks. SETTING: Workplaces. SUBJECTS: In total, 577 US organizations completed the WWC in 2 or more years from 2008 to 2015. MEASURES: The WWC is a 100-item organizational assessment that measures performance against the original set of quality benchmarks that were established by the Wellness Council of America (WELCOA). ANALYSIS: This study examined changes in overall WWC scores as well as 7 separate benchmark scores. Multilevel modeling was used to examine changes in scores associated with repeated assessments, controlling for the year of assessment and organizational characteristics. RESULTS: There were significant increases in overall WWC scores (ß = 2.93, P < .001) associated with the repeated WWC assessments, after controlling for organizational characteristics. All 7 benchmark scores had significant increases associated with reassessment. Compared to other benchmarks, operating plan (ß = 6.18, P < .001) and evaluation (ß = 4.91, P < .001) scores increased more with each reassessment. CONCLUSION: Continued reassessment may represent more commitment to and investment in WHP initiatives which could lead to improved quality. Other factors that may positively influence changes in performance against benchmarks include company size, access to outside resources for WHP, and a history with implementing WHP.
Subject(s)
Benchmarking/trends , Health Promotion/standards , Health Promotion/trends , Occupational Health/education , Occupational Health/standards , Occupational Health/trends , Workplace/organization & administration , Adult , Benchmarking/statistics & numerical data , Female , Forecasting , Health Promotion/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Health/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States , Workplace/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To determine if patients and providers perceived improved care processes through the delivery of personalized, electronic care plans (CPs) generated from the Carevive Care Planning System™. SAMPLE & SETTING: 121 women (51 with gynecologic cancer from Billings Clinic and 70 with breast cancer from Moffit Cancer Center) completed electronic patient-reported outcome assessments and were given electronically generated, personalized supportive CPs tailored to individual symptoms and local healthcare resources. METHODS & VARIABLES: Quantitative instruments evaluated feasibility, usability, acceptability, and satisfaction of the CPs from patient and provider perspectives. Qualitative interviews described patient perceptions of the CPs. RESULTS: Patients with cancer reported the CPs to be useful. Most perceived that CPs improved team communication, helped find needed resources, and helped manage symptoms. Provider satisfaction was highest with the platform's ability to customize patient recommendations. Interviews indicated that patients with cancer used their CP as a resource, preferred delivery at treatment initiation, and valued information to manage symptoms. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Nurses play an integral role in patient education and in discussing individual care. Tailored CPs can be used as a teaching tool that patients with cancer can refer to for self-care.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/nursing , Electronic Health Records/statistics & numerical data , Genital Neoplasms, Female/nursing , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Patient Care Planning/statistics & numerical data , Patient Education as Topic/standards , Patient-Centered Care/standards , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Practice Guidelines as Topic , United States , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study explored subgroups of performance profiles measured by organizations' Well Workplace Checklist (WWC) benchmark scores and examined company characteristics associated with performance subgroups. METHODS: The sample included 3728 US organizations that completed the WWC in 2008 to 2015. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was used to extract distinct subgroups of organizations based on benchmark performance. Multinomial logistic regression analysis was used to examine associations between the characteristics of organizations and their performance subgroup. RESULTS: Three distinct subgroups of performance resulted from the LPA. Significant associations were found between subgroup assignment and characteristics such as size, industry, how WHP initiatives were paid for, and reasons for implementing WHP initiatives. CONCLUSION: The characteristics associated with subgroups of performance suggest utility for developing specific interventions tailored to different types of organizations to improve their overall quality of WHP initiatives.
Subject(s)
Benchmarking , Health Promotion/standards , Occupational Health , Workplace , Checklist , Humans , Logistic Models , Surveys and Questionnaires , United StatesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Oxidative stress in the auditory system contributes to acquired sensorineural hearing loss. Systemic oxidative stress, which may predict auditory oxidative stress, can be assessed by measuring volatile organic compound metabolite concentrations in urine. The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine if hearing decreased in those with higher concentrations of urinary volatile organic compound metabolites. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Audiometric, demographic, and metabolite concentration data were downloaded from the 2011-2012 cycle of the U.S. National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey. Participants were first grouped by reported noise exposure. For each metabolite, an analysis of covariance was used to look for differences in age-adjusted hearing loss among urinary volatile organic compound metabolite concentration groups. Participants were grouped into quartiles based on concentration for each metabolite separately because many individuals were at the lower limit of concentration detection for several metabolites, leading to a non-normal distribution. RESULTS: Age-adjusted high-frequency pure-tone thresholds were significantly (FDRâ¯<â¯0.05) increased by about 3 to 4â¯dB in high concentration quartile groups for five metabolites. All five metabolites were glutathione-dependent mercapturic acids. The parent compounds of these metabolites included acrylonitrile, 1,3 butadiene, styrene, acrylamide, and N,N-dimethylformamide. Significant associations were only found in those with no reported noise exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Urinary metabolites may help to explain susceptibility to oxidative stress-induced hearing loss.
Subject(s)
Acetylcysteine/urine , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/diagnosis , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/etiology , Oxidative Stress , Volatile Organic Compounds/metabolism , Volatile Organic Compounds/urine , Acrylamide/metabolism , Acrylonitrile/metabolism , Adult , Audiometry, Pure-Tone , Auditory Threshold , Biomarkers/urine , Butadienes/metabolism , Dimethylformamide/metabolism , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Styrene/metabolismABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The Center for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation Oncology Care Model (OCM) requires documentation of a 13-point Institute of Medicine care management plan for Medicare patients. In addition, OCM includes evaluation of quality using key performance measures that align with the ASCO Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI). Both efforts are designed to improve patient-centered care and foster patients' engagement in their care plan. METHODS: A multicenter quality improvement project was conducted to develop a strategy to meet the OCM treatment planning (TP) requirement (Plan), pilot clinician education coupled with use of electronic TP in early-stage breast cancer (Do), evaluate the impact of TP on QOPI measures (Study), and develop recommendations for future implementation (Act). RESULTS: Thirty-three clinical providers and 171 women with breast cancer were included. Improved performance on several QOPI measures was observed for the intervention group compared with the historical control group. CONCLUSION: Meeting the OCM TP requirement through incorporating a technology solution provided an opportunity for quality improvement and preparation for full-scale TP within the OCM. TP delivery was associated with improved performance on select ASCO QOPI measures, which is likely to correspond with improved performance on quality measures within OCM.
Subject(s)
Health Planning , Patient Care , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Quality of Health Care , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Female , Humans , Medicare , Neoplasm Staging , Patient-Centered Care , Quality Improvement , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Determine the effectiveness of a 16-week modified diabetes prevention program (DPP) administered simultaneously to multiple rural communities from a single urban site, as compared with a similar face-to-face intervention. A 12-week intervention was evaluated to consider minimization of staff costs in communities where resources are limited. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study compared DPP interventions implemented in rural (via telehealth technology) and urban (face-to-face) communities using an intent-to-treat analysis. Primary outcome measures included 5% and 7% body weight loss. Logistic regression analyses were used to determine predictors of intervention success and included a variable for treatment effect. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2015, up to 667 participants were enrolled in the study representing one urban and 15 rural communities across Montana. The 16-week urban and rural interventions were comparable; 33.5% and 34.6% of participants lost 7% body weight, respectively; 50% and 47% lost 5% (p=0.22). Participants who were male (OR=2.41; 95% CI 1.32 to 4.40), had lower baseline body mass index (OR=1.03; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.07), attended more sessions (OR=1.33; 95% CI 1.11 to 1.58), and more frequently reported (OR=3.84; 95% CI 1.05 to 14.13) and met daily fat gram (OR=4.26; 95% CI 1.7 to 10.6) and weekly activity goals (OR=2.46; 95% CI 1.06 to 5.71) were more likely to meet their 7% weight loss goal. Predictors of meeting weight loss goals were similar for participants enrolled in the 12-week intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Using telehealth technology to administer a modified DPP to multiple rural communities simultaneously demonstrated weight loss results comparable to those in a face-to-face intervention. Given the limitation of resources, linking rural areas to urban centers using telemedicine may increase access to much needed services to prevent or delay progression to diabetes.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: A permanent drug donation box ("drop-box") is one strategy implemented in communities across the United States to reduce the availability of excess controlled medications, including prescription opioids, for diversion. The objective of this study was to examine correlates of the diffusion and implementation of drop-boxes in North Carolina. METHODS: We assessed the number and location of drop-boxes implemented in North Carolina. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine covariates associated with drop-box implementation in NC counties (nâ¯=â¯100) between 2007 and 2016. RESULTS: There were 311 drop-boxes implemented in 91 (out of 100) counties. Most drop-boxes were in law enforcement agencies (78.8%) and a growing number were in pharmacies (14.5%). Counties with a higher percentage of whites, more educated residents, a substance abuse prevention coalition, higher rates of controlled medications dispensed and prescription opioid overdose, and that were Appalachian were more likely to be early adopters. Rural counties were less likely to have a drop-box. In the multivariate model, only higher rate of controlled medicines dispensed was significant. CONCLUSIONS: A growing number of drop-boxes are being implemented in law enforcement offices and pharmacies. Given that communities with higher rates of controlled medication dispensing likely have the highest need for disposal opportunities, it is promising that they are early adopters of drop-boxes. Future research should assess the effectiveness of drop-boxes as they become more widespread in a variety of locations.