Predictive value of the Killip classification in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction.

The predictive value of Killip classification of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is not well established. We performed a pooled analysis of 2,654 patients with AMI enrolled in 3 primary angioplasty trials. Of these, 2,305 patients were class I, 302 were class II, and 47 were class III (class IV patients were excluded). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine if Killip class at admission was a predictor of in-hospital and 6-month mortality. Higher Killip classification was associated with greater in-hospital (2.4%, 7%, and 19% for class I, II, and III, respectively) and 6-month mortality (4%, 10%, and 28% for class I, II, and III, respectively). Higher Killip class was associated with increased age (p <0.001), history of diabetes (p <0.02), lower systolic blood pressure and higher heart rate at presentation (p <0.0001 for both), more 3-vessel disease (p <0.001), lower left ventricular ejection fraction (p <0.0001), and higher peak creatine phosphokinase (p <0.0001). With each increasing Killip class, there was an increased need for an intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (p <0.001) and greater incidence of renal failure (p <0.001), major arrhythmia (p <0.001), and major bleeding (p <0.001). After controlling for potential confounding variables, Killip classification remained a multivariate predictor of mortality at both time end points. Killip classification at hospital admission remains a simple and useful independent predictor of in-hospital and 6-month mortality in patients with AMI who are undergoing primary PCI.

One-year follow-up after primary coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction in diabetic patients. A substudy of the STENT PAMI trial.

OBJECTIVE: This analysis was undertaken to determine the composite incidence of cumulative adverse events (death, reinfarction, disabling stroke, and target vessel revascularization) at the end of the first year after acute myocardial infarction, in diabetic patients who underwent coronary stenting or primary coronary balloon angioplasty. METHODS: From the STENT PAMI trial, we analyzed the 6-month angiographic and 1-year clinical outcomes of 135 diabetic (112, noninsulin dependent) patients who underwent the randomization process of the trial and compared them with 758 nondiabetic patients. RESULTS: Coronary stenting did not significantly reduce the primary composite clinical end point when compared with PTCA (20 vs. 30%, p=0.2). A significant benefit from stenting was observed in patients with noninsulin dependent diabetes, with a trend toward a lesser need for new revascularization procedures (10 vs. 21%, p<.001), with a significant reduction in the primary composite clinical end point at 1 year (12 vs. 28%, p=. 04). At 6 months, the restenosis rate were significantly reduced only in nondiabetic patients (18 vs. 33%, p<. 001). Diabetic patients had the same restenosis rate (38%) either with stenting or balloon PTCA. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary Stenting in diabetics noninsulin dependent offered a significant reduction in the composite incidence of major clinical adverse events compared with balloon PTCA.

Angiographic and clinical characteristics associated with increased in-hospital mortality in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous intervention (a pooled analysis of the primary angioplasty in myocardial infarction trials).

Advanced age is associated with increased mortality in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) but the mechanism remains unclear. We performed a pooled analysis of 3,032 patients from the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI)-2, Stent-PAMI, and PAMI-No Surgery On Site trials to determine which clinical, hemodynamic, and angiographic characteristics in the elderly were associated with in-hospital death. There were 452 patients aged >/=75 years and 2,580 patients aged <75 years. Older patients had a lower number of risk factors for coronary artery disease but more comorbidities. Acute catheterization demonstrated more 3-vessel disease, higher left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic pressure, lower LV ejection fraction, and higher initial rates of Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial 2 or 3 flow. Elderly patients were equally likely to undergo percutaneous intervention but had a lower procedural success rate and lower rates of final TIMI 3 flow, and older patients were more likely to have post-AMI complications. In-hospital mortality was 10.2% and 1.8%, respectively (p = 0.001). Cardiac and noncardiac mortality was higher in elderly patients, and no significant differences in causes of death were identified. Multivariate analysis revealed that the strongest predictors of death were age >/=75 years, lower LV ejection fraction, lower final TIMI flow, higher Killip class, need for an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), and post-AMI stroke/transient ischemic attack, or significant arrhythmia. Despite avoiding thrombolysis, elderly patients remain at increased risk of bleeding, stroke, and other post-AMI complications, and death. Cardiac risk factor analysis and acute catheterization offer prognostic information but do not completely explain the mechanism of increased in-hospital mortality in the elderly.

Role of cardiac surgery in the hospital phase management of patients treated with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.

Although cardiac surgery is performed in approximately 10% of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients undergoing a primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) reperfusion strategy before discharge, the indications for and timing of operative revascularization, and the short- and long-term outcomes after surgery have not been characterized. In the prospective, controlled Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction-2 trial, cardiac catheterization was performed in 1,100 patients within 12 hours of onset of AMI at 34 centers, followed by primary PTCA when appropriate. Cardiac surgery was performed before hospital discharge in 120 patients (10.9%), electively in 42.6%, and on an urgent or emergent basis in 57.4%. Surgery was performed in 6.1% of 982 patients after primary PTCA (although emergently for failed PTCA in only 4 cases [0.4%]), and in 53 of 118 patients (44.9%) not undergoing primary PTCA. Patients requiring surgery were older, and more frequently had diabetes and 3-vessel disease than those managed nonoperatively. Internal mammary artery grafts were placed in only 31% of patients. In-hospital mortality was 6.4% in patients undergoing urgent/emergent surgery, 2.0% after elective surgery, and 2.6% in patients not undergoing surgery (p = NS). After multivariate correction for baseline risk factors, early and late survival free of reinfarction were similar in patients undergoing versus not undergoing in-hospital cardiac surgery. Thus, the appropriate use of coronary artery bypass graft surgery in the peri-infarction period is an integral component of the primary PTCA approach, and is frequently used to optimize the prognosis of a high-risk AMI cohort with unfavorable baseline features. The implications for the performance of primary PTCA in AMI at centers without on-site surgical facilities are discussed.

Clinical and angiographic outcomes in patients with previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery treated with primary balloon angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Second Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Trial (PAMI-2) Investigators.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to characterize the presenting characteristics of patients with previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and to determine the angiographic success rate and clinical outcomes of a primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) strategy. BACKGROUND: Patients who have had previous CABG and AMI comprise a high risk group with decreased reperfusion success and increased mortality after thrombolytic therapy. Little is known about the efficacy of primary PTCA in AMI. METHODS: Early cardiac catheterization was performed in 1,100 patients within 12 h of onset of AMI at 34 centers in the prospective, controlled Second Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction trial (PAMI-2), followed by primary PTCA when appropriate. Data were collected by independent study monitors, end points were adjudicated and films were read at an independent core laboratory. RESULTS: Of 1,100 patients with AMI, 58 (5.3%) had undergone previous CABG. The infarct-related vessel in these patients was a bypass graft in 32 patients (55%) and a native coronary artery in 26 patients. Compared with patients without previous CABG, patients with previous CABG were older and more frequently had a previous myocardial infarction and triple-vessel disease. Coronary angioplasty was less likely to be performed when the infarct-related vessel was a bypass graft rather than a native coronary artery (71.9% vs. 89.8%, p = 0.001); Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction trial (TIMI) flow grade 3 was less frequently achieved (70.2% vs. 94.3%, p < 0.0001); and in-hospital mortality was increased (9.4% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.02). As a result, mortality at six months was 14.3% versus 4.1% in patients with versus without previous CABG (p = 0.001). By multivariate analysis, independent determinants of late mortality in the entire study group were advanced age, triple-vessel disease, Killip class and post-PTCA TIMI flow grade <3. CONCLUSIONS: Reperfusion success of a primary PTCA strategy in patients with previous CABG, although favorable with respect to historic control studies, is reduced as compared with that in patients without previous CABG. New approaches are required to treat patients with previous CABG and AMI, especially when the infarct-related vessel is a diseased saphenous vein graft.

Usefulness of intravenous enoxaparin for percutaneous coronary intervention in stable angina pectoris.

This pilot study was designed to determine whether the low molecular weight heparin, enoxaparin, could be used for elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to provide antithrombotic effects without the full systemic anticoagulation that occurs with the use of unfractionated heparin. Sixty patients were randomized to receive intravenous enoxaparin (1 mg/kg bolus dose) or unfractionated heparin at the time of coronary intervention. Laboratory testing was performed at baseline, 5 minutes, and 4 hours after study drug to test if a single bolus dose of intravenous enoxaparin can consistently achieve therapeutic antithrombotic effect, thus eliminating the need for multiple doses of heparin and closely monitoring levels of anticoagulation during PCI. Thirty percent of patients who received unfractionated heparin required a second bolus of intravenous heparin to achieve the target-activated clotting time of 300 seconds before PCI. Enoxaparin showed antithrombotic properties comparable to that of unfractionated heparin as measured by anti-Xa levels, with less inhibition of thrombin (factor IIa) at the time points measured (p <0.0001). Angioplasty success rates, in-hospital ischemia, bleeding, and vascular complications were similar in both groups. Thus, intravenous enoxaparin has predictable and effective antithrombotic effects during elective PCI. Although the level of anticoagulation attained with enoxaparin is significantly lower than that after unfractionated heparin, no increase in ischemic complications were noted. The use of a single bolus of intravenous enoxaparin, without the need for measuring the activated clotting time or titrating heparin anticoagulation, has the potential for simplifying the performance and perhaps enhancing the safety of PCI.

Local intramural heparin delivery during primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: results of the Local PAMI Pilot Study.

The feasibility and safety of local heparin delivery during acute infarct angioplasty was evaluated in a prospective, multicenter, 120-patient series. Angioplasty was performed using standard techniques, after which heparin (4,000 U) was delivered locally; 25% of patients received stents. Procedural success was reported in 98% of patients; 6.7% of patients suffered death, reinfarction, recurrent ischemia, or stroke during the index hospitalization. The 6-month target vessel revascularization rate was 12.5%. Local heparin therapy with provisional stenting in acute myocardial infarction patients is safe, feasible, associated with a low rate of infarct artery revascularization at 6 months, and may potentially eliminate the need for systemic heparin following the procedure.

Long-term outcome after primary angioplasty: report from the primary angioplasty in myocardial infarction (PAMI-I) trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare the two-year outcome after primary percutaneous coronary angioplasty or thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. BACKGROUND: Primary angioplasty, that is, angioplasty without antecedent thrombolytic therapy, has been shown to be an effective reperfusion modality for patients suffering an acute myocardial infarction. This report reviews the two-year clinical outcome of patients randomized in the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction trial. METHODS: At 12 clinical centers, 395 patients who presented within 12 h of the onset of myocardial infarction were randomized to undergo primary angioplasty (195 patients) or to receive tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) (200 patients) followed by conservative care. Patients were followed by physician visits, phone call, letter and review of hospital records for any hospital admission at one month, six months, one year and two years. RESULTS: At two years, patients undergoing primary angioplasty had less recurrent ischemia (36.4% vs. 48% for t-PA, p = 0.026), lower reintervention rates (27.2% vs. 46.5% for t-PA, p < 0.0001) and reduced hospital readmission rates (58.5% vs. 69.0% for t-PA, p = 0.035). The combined end point of death or reinfarction was 14.9% for angioplasty versus 23% for t-PA, p = 0.034. Multivariate analysis found angioplasty to be independently predictive of a reduction in death, reinfarction or target vessel revascularization (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The initial benefit of primary angioplasty performed by experienced operators is maintained over a two-year follow-up period with improved infarct-free survival and reduced rate of reintervention.

Safety and cost-effectiveness of early discharge after primary angioplasty in low risk patients with acute myocardial infarction. PAMI-II Investigators. Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction.

OBJECTIVES: The second Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI-II) study evaluated the hypothesis that primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), with subsequent discharge from the hospital 3 days later, is safe and cost-effective in low risk patients. BACKGROUND: In low risk patients with myocardial infarction (MI), few data exist regarding the need for intensive care and noninvasive testing or the appropriate length of hospital stay. METHODS: Patients with acute MI underwent emergency catheterization with primary PTCA when appropriate. Low risk patients (age <70 years, left ventricular ejection fraction >45%, one- or two-vessel disease, successful PTCA, no persistent arrhythmias) were randomized to receive accelerated care (admission to a nonintensive care unit and day 3 hospital discharge without noninvasive testing [n = 237] or traditional care [n = 234]). RESULTS: Patients who received accelerated care had similar in-hospital outcomes but were discharged 3 days earlier (4.2+/-2.3 vs. 7.1+/-4.7 days, p = 0.0001) and had lower hospital costs ($9,658+/-5,287 vs. $11,604+/-6,125 p = 0.002) than the patients who received traditional care. At 6 months, accelerated and traditional care groups had a similar rate of mortality (0.8% vs. 0.4%, p = 1.00), unstable ischemia (10.1% vs. 12.0%, p = 0.52), reinfarction (0.8% vs. 0.4%, p = 1.00), stroke (0.4% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.07), congestive heart failure (4.6% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.85) or their combined occurrence (15.2% vs. 17.5%, p = 0.49). The study was designed to detect a 10% difference in event rates; at 6 months, only a 2.3% difference was measured between groups, indicating an actual power of 0.19. CONCLUSIONS: Early identification of low risk patients with MI allowed safe omission of the intensive care phase and noninvasive testing, and a day 3 hospital discharge strategy, resulting in substantial cost savings.

A prospective, randomized evaluation of prophylactic intraaortic balloon counterpulsation in high risk patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty. Second Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI-II) Trial Investigators.

OBJECTIVES: A large, international, multicenter, prospective, randomized trial was performed to determine the role of prophylactic intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) counterpulsation after primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that routine IABP use after primary PTCA reduces infarct-related artery reocclusion, augments myocardial recovery and improves clinical outcomes. METHODS: Cardiac catheterization was performed in 1,100 patients within 12 h of onset of AMI at 34 clinical centers. Clinical and angiographic variables were used to stratify patients undergoing primary PTCA into high and low risk groups. High risk patients were then randomized to 36 to 48 h of IABP (n = 211) or traditional care (n = 226). The study had 80% power to detect a reduction in the primary end point from 30% to 20%. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the predefined primary combined end point of death, reinfarction, infarct-related artery reocclusion, stroke or new-onset heart failure or sustained hypotension in patients treated with an IABP versus those treated conservatively (28.9% vs. 29.2%, p = 0.95). The IABP strategy conferred modest benefits in reduction of recurrent ischemia (13.3% vs. 19.6%, p = 0.08) and subsequent unscheduled repeat catheterization (7.6% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.05) but did not reduce the rate of infarct-related artery reocclusion (6.7% vs. 5.5%, p = 0.64), reinfarction (6.2% vs. 8.0%, p = 0.46) or mortality (4.3% vs. 3.1%) and was associated with a higher incidence of stroke (2.4% vs. 0%, p = 0.03). IABP use did not result in enhanced myocardial recovery as assessed by paired admission to predischarge and 6-week rest and exercise left ventricular ejection fraction. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous studies, a prophylactic IABP strategy after primary PTCA in hemodynamically stable high risk patients with AMI does not decrease the rates of infarct-related artery reocclusion or reinfarction, promote myocardial recovery or improve overall clinical outcome.

Opinions of pharmacy, medicine, and pharmaceutical industry leaders about hypothetical therapeutic-interchange legislation.

The beliefs of representatives of organized pharmacy and medicine and the pharmaceutical industry about the effect of hypothetical therapeutic-interchange legislation on various health-care issues were studied. Questionnaires designed to gauge respondents' beliefs about the impact of two hypothetical bills (A and B) concerning selection of therapeutic alternates by pharmacists were mailed to the directors of 307 organizations in April 1986. Bill A would permit pharmacists in any setting to select therapeutic alternates. Bill B would permit therapeutic interchange by pharmacists within organized health-care settings in accordance with guidelines approved by physicians. Issues addressed included the efficient delivery of health care, professional liability, interprofessional and pharmacist-patient relationships, and competition and profitability in the pharmaceutical industry. The response rate was 63% (194 usable responses). Bill A received some support from representatives of state pharmaceutical associations only. However, bill B was supported by respondents from state pharmaceutical associations, state hospital pharmacy societies, boards of pharmacy, and generic manufacturers. Respondents from medical associations and member companies of the Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association (PMA) were concerned about the impact of the hypothetical bills on the quality of drug therapy and the efficiency of health-care delivery. Respondents from medical associations also were concerned about the impact of the bills on physician liability. The responses from the medical associations and the PMA-member companies suggest that a program should be developed to educate physicians about the process used by pharmacists and physicians to develop guidelines for therapeutic interchange in various practice settings.

Prescribing authority for pharmacists as viewed by organized pharmacy, organized medicine, and the pharmaceutical industry.

This study identifies attitudes of organized pharmacy, organized medicine, and the pharmaceutical industry about prescribing authority for pharmacists. A questionnaire designed to assess the impact of a legislative bill permitting a pharmacist in an organized health care setting to initiate or modify drug therapy was mailed to state pharmacy associations, state hospital pharmacy associations, state pharmacy boards, state medical associations, Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association (PMA)-member manufacturers, and non-PMA-member generic manufacturers. Responses from 194 of the 307 invited organizations were used. The six organization types viewed the impact of the legislative bill differently (p less than 0.05). Hospital pharmacy associations and boards of pharmacy, to a lesser extent, supported the legislative bill; non-PMA-member generic manufacturers and state pharmacy associations were relatively neutral. The medical associations and the PMA-member companies opposed the passage of the bill. Furthermore, medical associations believed that the bill would not be passed in the majority of states in the next five years.