Tolerance of peanuts and tree nuts in Spanish children with exclusive sensitization to lipid transfer proteins.

BACKGROUND: Allergy to peanuts and tree nuts is a common cause of food allergy in Spain, with lipid transfer proteins (LTP) being the most frequently recognized panallergen. LTP sensitization often leads to multiple food group sensitivities, resulting in overly restrictive diets that hinder patient's quality of life. This study aimed to assess the tolerance of peanuts and tree nuts (hazelnuts and walnuts) in children sensitized to LTP, potentially mitigating the need for such diets. METHODS: This prospective study enrolled individuals diagnosed with allergy to peanuts, hazelnuts, or walnuts. Data were collected from medical records, including demographics and clinical history. Allergological assessment comprised skin prick tests using commercial extracts and the nuts in question, alongside measurements of total and specific IgE to nuts and their primary molecular components. Participants showing positive LTP sensitization without sensitization to seed storage proteins underwent open oral nut challenges. RESULTS: A total of 75 individuals labeled as allergic to peanuts, 44 to hazelnuts, and 51 to walnuts were included. All of them underwent an open oral provocation test with the incriminated nut, showing a high tolerance rate. Peanut was tolerated by 98.6% of patients, 97.72% tolerated hazelnut, and 84.3% tolerated walnut. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that the majority of patients allergic to peanuts, hazelnuts, or walnuts, due to LTP sensitization and lacking IgE reactivity to seed storage proteins, can tolerate these nuts. This supports the need for personalized nut tolerance assessments to avoid unnecessary dietary restrictions.

Walnut Jug r 1 is Responsible for Primary Sensitization among Patients Suffering Walnut-Hazelnut 2S Albumin Cross-Reactivity.

Walnut and hazelnut coallergy is a frequent manifestation in clinical practice whose molecular basis remains unclear. For this purpose, walnut-hazelnut cross-reactivity was evaluated in 20 patients allergic to one or both tree nuts and sensitized to their 2S albumins. Immunoblotting assays showed that 85% of patients recognized Jug r 1, walnut 2S albumin, which was associated with the development of severe symptoms; 50% of them corecognized hazelnut 2S albumin, Cor a 14. Both allergens were isolated using chromatographic techniques. Inhibition ELISAs revealed that Jug r 1 strongly inhibited the binding of Cor a 14-specific IgE, but Cor a 14 only partially inhibited Jug r 1-specific IgE binding. Our results showed that patients sensitized to walnut/hazelnut 2S albumins were not a homogeneous population. There were patients sensitized to specific epitopes of walnut 2S albumins and patients sensitized to cross-reactive epitopes between walnut and hazelnut, with Jug r 1 being the primary sensitizer.

Exploring Terebinth Cross-Sensitivity in Individuals with Pistachio Sensitivity.

INTRODUCTION: Terebinth (Pistacia terebinthus) belongs to the same botanical family as pistachio (Pistacia vera) and cashew (Anacardium occidentale). Although it is known that there is cross-sensitivity between pistachio and cashew, the cross-sensitivity of terebinth with pistachio or cashew has not been investigated. The objective of our study was to evaluate the sensitivity to terebinth in children with pistachio sensitivity. METHODS: This study was conducted between September 2021 and June 2022 at Adiyaman University Faculty of Medicine Hospital. It analyzed the results of children who underwent skin prick testing (SPT) for food allergy. Of the 712 food skin prick tests reviewed, 27 children were identified with pistachio sensitivity. Prick tests with commercial extract for cashew and prick-to-prick tests for terebinth were applied to these children. RESULTS: The median age was two, and 78% were male. Of the children with pistachio sensitivity, 96% demonstrated cross-sensitivity to terebinth and 100% to cashew. There was a strong correlation between the size of SPT responses in pistachio, cashew, and terebinth. Only four children had previously consumed terebinth, and two of these children had allergic reactions. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates a high cross-sensitivity between terebinth, pistachio, and cashew. We recommend that individuals with pistachio or cashew allergy/sensitivity avoid terebinth until tests confirm it is safe to consume. Further studies are needed to demonstrate the clinical significance of this cross-sensitivity and identify the major allergen involved.

Effects of enzymatic hydrolysis combined with pressured heating on tree nut allergenicity.

Hazelnut, pistachio and cashew are tree nuts with health benefits but also with allergenic properties being prevalent food allergens in Europe. The allergic characteristics of these tree nuts after processing combining heat, pressure and enzymatic digestion were analyzed through in vitro (Western blot and ELISA) and in vivo test (Prick-Prick). In the analyzed population, the patients sensitized to Cor a 8 (nsLTP) were predominant over those sensitized against hazelnut seed storage proteins (Sprot, Cor a 9 and 14), which displayed higher IgE reactivity. The protease E5 effectively hydrolyzed proteins from hazelnut and pistachio, while E7 was efficient for cashew protein hydrolysis. When combined with pressured heating (autoclave and Controlled Instantaneous Depressurization (DIC)), these proteases notably reduced the allergenic reactivity. The combination of DIC treatment before enzymatic digestion resulted in the most effective methodology to drastically reduce or indeed eliminate the allergenic capacity of tree nuts.

Poppy Seed Allergy: Molecular Diagnosis and Cross-Reactivity With Tree Nuts.

BACKGROUND: Poppy seed (PS) can be a cause of severe allergic reactions, especially in individuals with concurrent allergy to tree nuts and other seeds, but diagnostic criteria and sensitization patterns are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To assess the role of PS extract and individual allergens in diagnosing PS allergy and their cross-reactivities with tree nuts and buckwheat. METHODS: Our retrospective study included 36 PS-sensitized patients; 10 with a positive and 26 with a negative oral food challenge (OFC). We identified individual PS allergens and compared the diagnostic performance of specific IgE (sIgE) to PS extract with its allergens. Cross-reactivities between PS and related allergens from other seeds were assessed by a competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: We identified 4 novel PS allergens: Pap s 1 (vicilin), Pap s 1 (27-424) (α-hairpinin), Pap s 2 (legumin), and Pap s 3 (small hydrophilic seed protein). A positive OFC correlated with higher PS-sIgE levels and elevated sIgE levels for the PS allergens, except for Pap s 3. PS and α-hairpinin-sIgE effectively differentiated allergic from tolerant patients, with area under the curve values of 0.95 and 0.94. PS-sIgE >10.00 kUA/L exhibited 90% sensitivity and 73% specificity, whereas α-hairpinin-sIgE >2.60 kUA/L showed 100% sensitivity and 77% specificity. PS vicilin and legumin highly cross-reacted with hazelnut and buckwheat homologs, whereas α-hairpinin-sIgE cross-reacted with the related almond allergen. CONCLUSIONS: This is the most extensive study on PS allergy to date. PS and α-hairpinin-sIgE are highly sensitive indicators of clinical reactivity to PS, whereas vicilin and legumin-sIgE contribute to concurrent sensitization to hazelnut and buckwheat.

Identification of New Allergens in Macadamia Nut and Cross-Reactivity with Other Tree Nuts in a Spanish Cohort.

The consumption of macadamia nuts has increased due to their cardioprotective and antioxidant properties. However, this rise is consistent with an increase in the cases of macadamia nut allergy, leading to severe reactions. Although two Macadamia integrifolia allergens (Mac i 1 and Mac i 2) have been identified in Australian and Japanese patients, the allergenic sensitization patterns in Western European populations, particularly in Spain, remain unclear. For this purpose, seven patients with macadamia nut allergy were recruited in Spain. Macadamia nut protein extracts were prepared and, together with hazelnut and walnut extracts, were used in Western blot and inhibition assays. IgE-reactive proteins were identified using MALDI-TOF/TOF mass spectrometry (MS). Immunoblotting assays revealed various IgE-binding proteins in macadamia nut extracts. Mass spectrometry identified three new allergens: an oleosin, a pectin acetylesterase, and an aspartyl protease. Cross-reactivity studies showed that hazelnut extract but not walnut extract inhibited macadamia nut oleosin-specific IgE binding. This suggests that oleosin could be used as marker for macadamia-hazelnut cross-reactivity. The results show an allergenic profile in the Spanish cohort different from that previously detected in Australian and Japanese populations. The distinct sensitization profiles observed highlight the potential influence of dietary habits and environmental factors exposure on allergenicity.

Jug r 1 sensitization in 0- to 35-month-old children with egg, milk, or wheat sensitization.

Background: The incidence of tree nut allergies in children is increasing, with walnut allergy being the most common in the United States and Japan. Allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, frequently occur at the first intake of tree nuts, suggesting prior sensitization. Objective: Our aim was to identify which children should be considered for workup for preexisting sensitization. Methods: Juglans regia (Jug r) 1-specific IgE screening for 0- to 35-month-old children who had a positive specific IgE result for egg white, milk, or wheat and had never ingested walnuts was conducted at a food allergy referral hospital between November 2018 and December 2022. Clinical data regarding age; sex; allergic disease complications; and egg, milk, or wheat allergy were examined retrospectively. Results: The rate of Jug r 1-specific IgE positivity (level > 0.34 kUA/L) of 205 children (125 of whom were boys) was 9.8%, with a median Jug r 1-specific IgE level of 12.5 kUA/L in patients with a positive test result. Eczema was observed in 119 patients (58%). The rate of Jug r 1-specific IgE positivity was significantly higher in the eczema-positive group (15.1% [18 of 119]) than in the eczema-negative group (2.3% [2 of 86]) (P = .002). In the eczema-positive group, the rates of Jug r 1-specific IgE positivity per sensitized antigen were 13.7% for egg, 17.0% for milk, and 17.1% for wheat. The rate of Jug r 1-specific IgE positivity was significantly higher in the group with severe eczema (26.6% [17 of 64]) than in the group with nonsevere eczema (1.8% [1 of 55]) (P < .001). Conclusion: Even in children younger than 3 years, 15% of children with eczema and egg, milk, or wheat sensitization were sensitized to Jug r 1.

Impact of Presumed Tree Nut and Peanut Allergy on Quality of Life at Different Ages.

Tree nut and/or peanut allergy impairs patients' quality of life, but data on the impact of age and the type of nut or peanut on the quality of life are lacking. To evaluate the impact at different ages, age-appropriate survey questionnaires accompanied by FAQLQ and FAIM were distributed to patients with suspected tree nut and/or peanut allergy who presented at the allergy departments of three hospitals in Athens. Out of 200 questionnaires distributed, 106 met the inclusion criteria (46 children, 26 teenagers, 34 adults). The median score of each age group for FAQLQ was 4.6 (3.3-5.1), 4.7 (3.9-5.5), and 3.9 (3.2-5.1) and for FAIM was 3.7 (3.0-4.0), 3.4 (2.8-4.0), and 3.2 (2.7-4.1), respectively. FAQLQ and FAIM scores were correlated with the reported probability of using the rescue anaphylaxis set upon reaction (15.4%, p = 0.04 and 17.8%, p = 0.02, respectively) and pistachio allergy (FAQLQ: 4.8 vs. 4.0, p = 0.04; FAIM: 3.5 vs. 3.2, p = 0.03). Patients with additional food allergies reported worse FAQLQ scores (4.6 vs. 3.8, p = 0.05). Worse FAIM scores were associated with younger age (-18.2%, p = 0.01) and the number of life-threatening allergic reactions (25.3%, p < 0.001). The overall impact of tree nut and/or peanut allergy on patients' quality of life is moderate but differs with age, the type of nut, the use of adrenaline, and the number of previous reactions. The aspects of life affected and contributed factors also vary across age groups.

Natural History of Hazelnut Allergy and Current Approach to Its Diagnosis and Treatment.

Hazelnut allergy is the most prevalent type of nut allergy in Europe, with symptoms that can range from mild, such as hives and itching, to severe, such as anaphylaxis, particularly in patients who are sensitized to highly stable allergens, such as storage proteins. Compared to other types of food allergies, allergies to tree nuts, including hazelnuts, tend to persist throughout life. Although symptoms can appear in early childhood, they often continue into adulthood, with a minority of cases improving during adolescence. Currently, there is no curative treatment available for hazelnut allergy, and patients must adhere to a restrictive diet and carry autoinjective epinephrine. However, oral allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is a promising treatment option. Patients can be categorized based on their risk for severe reactions using various clinical, in vivo, and in vitro tests, including component-resolved diagnosis and oral food challenge. This review aims to provide an overview of the current knowledge of the natural history of hazelnut allergy and new approaches for its diagnosis and management.

Multi-Target Detection of Nuts and Peanuts as Hidden Allergens in Bakery Products through Bottom-Up Proteomics and High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry.

Due to the growing global incidence of allergy to nuts and peanuts, the need for better protection of consumers sensitive to those products is constantly increasing. The best strategy to defend them against adverse immunological reactions still remains the total removal of those products from their diet. However, nuts and peanuts traces can also be hidden in other food products, especially processed ones, such as bakery products, because of cross-contamination occurring during production. Precautionary labelling is often adopted by producers to warn allergic consumers, usually without any evaluation of the actual risk, which would require a careful quantification of nuts/peanuts traces. In this paper, the development of a multi-target method based on liquid chromatography-tandem high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-MS, MS/MS), able to detect traces of five nuts species (almonds, hazelnuts, walnuts, cashews and pistachios) and of peanuts in an in-house incurred bakery product (cookie) through a single analysis is described. Specifically, allergenic proteins of the six ingredients were used as the analytical targets, and the LC-MS responses of selected peptides resulting from their tryptic digestion, after extraction from the bakery product matrix, were exploited for quantification, following a bottom-up approach typical of proteomics. As a result, nuts/peanuts could be detected/quantified down to mg·kg-1 levels in the model cookie, thus opening interesting perspectives for the quantification of hidden nuts/peanuts in bakery products and, consequently, for a more rational use of precautionary labelling.

Co-sensitization to the three non-homologous major cashew allergens Ana o 1, Ana o 2 and Ana o 3 is caused by IgE cross-reactivity.

BACKGROUND: Cashew nuts often cause strong allergic reactions, even exceeding those of peanuts. Ana o 1 (vicilin), Ana o 2 (legumin) and Ana o 3 (2S albumin) are major cashew allergens. Co-sensitization to all three non-homologous cashew nut allergens has been observed. We hypothesize that this might be due to IgE cross-reactivity. METHODS: IgE cross-inhibitions were performed with Ana o 1-3 using sera from cashew nut allergic patients. Related hazelnut allergens Cor a 11, 9 and 14 were used as controls. For comparison, IgE cross-reactivity between the hazelnut allergens was investigated using sera from hazelnut allergic patients. RESULTS: Median percentages of cross-inhibitions between Ana o 1-3 were 84-99%. In comparison, medians of cross-inhibitions between hazelnut allergens were 33-62%. The IC50 values revealed the highest IgE affinity to Ana o 3 and Cor a 14. Hazelnut legumin Cor a 9 inhibited IgE-binding to Ana o 1, 2, and 3 with median percentages of 75%, 56%, and 48%, respectively. No cross-reactivity was observed between allergenic vicilins or between 2S albumins from cashew and hazelnut. In silico identified potentially cross-reactive peptides of Ana o 3 overlapped with previously reported IgE epitopes of all three allergens. CONCLUSIONS: IgE with high affinity to Ana o 3 that cross-reacts with the other two major non-homologous cashew nut allergens might be responsible for the high allergenic potency of cashew nut. These cross-reactive IgE comprises the major fraction of specific IgE in cashew allergic patients, and might be responsible for cross-reactivity between unrelated tree nuts.

Patterns of Clinical Reactivity in a Danish Cohort of Tree Nut Allergic Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults.

Background: Tree nut allergy is associated with severe reactions and poly-sensitization to other nuts and peanuts often occurs. There are regional differences in sensitization profiles that result in differences in clinical presentation. Denmark is located in a birch pollen endemic area, which could influence the allergy patterns due to pollen cross-sensitization. Objective: This study aimed to investigate patterns of sensitization and clinical reactivity to tree nuts and peanuts and threshold levels for oral food challenges (OFCs) in a Danish cohort of tree nut allergic children, adolescents, and young adults. Methods: Forty tree nut allergic subjects were assessed for clinical reactivity to six nuts, i.e., hazelnut, walnut, pistachio, cashew, almond, and peanut, by OFCs or convincing medical history of an immediate allergic reaction or tolerance. Clinical presentation and allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) levels together with eliciting dose and rescue medication in OFCs were furthermore assessed. Results: Allergy to two or more tree nuts was observed in most cases. Hazelnut-walnut dual allergy was common but not exclusively observed as concomitant allergies. Allergy to cashew was coincided in all but one of the assessed subjects with pistachio allergy. Half of all assessed subjects were allergic to peanuts. Oral symptoms followed by a skin reaction were the most common symptomatology that lead to OFC cessation and subjects often presented with symptoms from two or more organ systems. OFC threshold levels were within the same range, but cashew was distinguished from other nuts by causing allergic symptoms at the lowest dose. Clinical reactivity and the allergy patterns were to some extent reflected by sIgE levels and by correlations in sIgE between the nuts. Conclusions: In this Northern European cohort, subjects with clinically relevant tree nut allergy were generally allergic to two or more tree nuts and close to half of them also to peanuts. There were two distinct and independent allergic phenotypes; the majority of hazelnut allergic subjects were also allergic to walnut, and all but one subject with cashew allergy were dual allergic to pistachio. These findings are consistent with a strong sIgE correlation between hazelnut and walnut and a close to total sIgE correlation between cashew and pistachio.

Pru du 1, the Bet v 1-homologue from almond, is a major allergen in patients with birch pollen associated almond allergy.

Background: Almond allergy is common and can manifest in two different forms. Primary almond allergy has been reported to be associated with sensitization to almond legumin Pru du 6. In birchendemic regions, there is a link between birch-pollinosis which is likely based on a cross-reactive Bet v 1 homologue, a yet unidentified allergen in almond. Therefore, we sought to identify and characterize a Bet v 1-homologue in almond. Methods: The expression of a Bet v 1 homologue in almond kernels was confirmed by mass spectrometry. The recombinant protein was produced in Escherichia coli and its cross-reactivity and allergenic potency was analyzed by IgE quantitative and competitive ELISA, immunoblotting and basophil histamine release using sera from 17 almond allergic patients. Results: The identified Bet v 1 homologue received the designation Pru du 1.0101. Pru du 1.0101 bound IgE from 82 % of almond allergic patients. Bet v 1 was able to inhibit IgE-binding to rPru du 1 by 100%, while rPru du 1 inhibited IgE binding to rBet v 1 by 48%. Pru du 1.0101 activated basophils, though 100- to 1000-fold higher concentrations were required for maximum activation in comparison to rBet v 1. Conclusion: Considering the strong inhibition capacity and higher allergenic potency of Bet v 1, the results provide compelling evidence for primary sensitization to Bet v 1 in case of birch pollen associated almond allergy. Combining Pru du 6 and Pru du 1 in diagnostic approaches may help to discriminate between primary and birch-pollen associated almond allergy.

Tolerance induction through non-avoidance to prevent persistent food allergy (TINA) in children and adults with peanut or tree nut allergy: rationale, study design and methods of a randomized controlled trial and observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Peanuts (PN) and tree nuts (TN) are among the most frequent elicitors of food allergy and can lead to life-threatening reactions. The current advice for allergic patients is to strictly avoid the offending food independently of their individual threshold level, whereas sensitized patients without allergic symptoms should frequently consume the food to avoid (re-)development of food allergy. The aim of this trial is to investigate (I) whether the consumption of low allergen amounts below the individual threshold may support natural tolerance development and (II) to what extent regular allergen consumption in sensitized but tolerant subjects prevents the (re-)development of PN or TN allergy. METHODS: The TINA trial consisting of (part I) a randomized, controlled, open, parallel group, single-center, superiority trial (RCT), and (part II) a prospective observational exploratory cohort study. Children and adults (age 1-67 years) with suspected or known primary PN and/or TN allergy will undergo an oral food challenge (OFC) to determine their clinical reactivity and individual threshold. In the RCT, 120 PN or TN allergic patients who tolerate ≥100 mg of food protein will be randomized (1:1 ratio) to consumption of products with low amounts of PN or TN on a regular basis or strict avoidance for 1 year. The consumption group will start with 1/100 of their individual threshold, increasing the protein amount to 1/50 and 1/10 after 4 and 8 months, respectively. The primary endpoint is the clinical tolerance to PN or TN after 1 year assessed by OFC. In the cohort study, 120 subjects sensitized to PN and/or TN but tolerant are advised to regularly consume the food and observed for 1 year. The primary endpoint is the maintenance of clinical tolerance to PN and/or TN after 1 year assessed by challenging with the former tolerated cumulative dose. DISCUSSION: This clinical trial will help to determine the impact of allergen consumption versus avoidance on natural tolerance development and whether the current dietary advice for PN or TN allergic patients with higher threshold levels is still valid. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register; ID: DRKS00016764 (RCT), DRKS00020467 (cohort study). Registered on 15 January 2020, http://www.drks.de .

Tree nut introduction in a peanut-allergic child: To eat, to screen, or to avoid?

There is no defined standard of care around tree nut introduction in a peanut-allergic child, and the role of screening prior to tree nut introduction is controversial. There is some evidence that peanut-allergic children are at increased risk of tree nut allergy, with approximately 23-68% of children with co-existent peanut/tree nut allergy. In some studies, it has been shown that tree nut allergy in children has the potential to be a severe allergy. However, this appears to be age-specific as infant anaphylaxis in general tends to be milder, and there has been no fatality reported on the first ingestion of an allergen in infancy. Familial hesitancy has been identified as a possible condition for undertaking screening tests prior to allergen introduction. Indeed, there has been limited evidence that caregiver hesitancy may exist in peanut-allergic families with tree nut introduction. However, pre-emptive screening has the potential to overdiagnose tree nut allergy and delay introduction (which could paradoxically increase risk). As a result, the decision is best made in the context of shared decision-making and patient preference-sensitive care.

Identification of vicilin, legumin and antimicrobial peptide 2a as macadamia nut allergens.

Macadamia nut is an increasingly popular food item of a healthy diet. However, macadamia nut is also a potent allergenic food. To date, there is little information about the allergenic proteins involved. In this study, using sera from macadamia nut allergic individuals, four IgE-binding proteins were detected. Their identities were determined by tandem mass spectrometry with de novo sequencing. Three IgE-reactive proteins, the vicilin Mac i 1, the legumin Mac i 2 and the antimicrobial peptide 2a/Mac i 1 (28-76) were purified from the nut while the non-specific lipid transfer protein was produced as a recombinant in Pichia pastoris. IgE-binding assays using sera from well-characterized groups of tree nut and/or peanut allergic patients revealed that the allergens were mainly recognized by sera from macadamia nut allergic individuals. Hence, these newly discovered allergens will enable molecular diagnostics to identify patients at high risk of macadamia nut allergy.

Tree nut allergy.

From a botanical point of view, a nut is a kind of dry, closed, unbroken, single-seeded fruit, which has a ligneous pericarp made up of several fruiting bodies surrounded by one free semen. The term "allergy to tree nuts" includes allergies to almonds, Brazil nuts, cashew nuts, hazelnuts, chestnuts, macadamia nuts, pecan nuts, pistachios and walnuts. All tree nuts belong to five orders of plants: Rosaceae, Fagales, Sapindales, Ericales and Proteales. Allergies to tree nuts usually start in childhood, but unlike other food allergies, they rarely fade away and generally persist throughout life. They are one of the main causes of serious allergic reactions ending in death in both children and adults. The epidemiology of allergy to nuts is variable and depends mainly on the geographical zone and eating habits. In northern Europe, hazelnut allergy is prevalent, whereas in the USA the most common is allergy to peanuts and, when taking tree nuts into consideration, to walnuts. The diagnosis of allergies to nuts is difficult and requires the use of the most modern research tools including molecular diagnostic techniques.

Prevalence and early-life risk factors for tree nut sensitization and allergy in young adults.

BACKGROUND: Tree nut allergy may cause anaphylaxis. There are limited population-based studies on prevalence and early-life risk factors. METHODS: We evaluated the prevalence of reported symptoms and allergic sensitization to tree nuts at age 24 years in the BAMSE population-based cohort study and assessed early-life factors associated with the development of tree nut allergy. We estimated tree nut allergy prevalence, by analysing questionnaire data on tree nut ingestion and symptoms at age 12, 16 and 24 years, and IgE sensitization at age 24 years to hazelnut, walnut, pecan, cashew, pistachio, Brazil nut, almond extracts and allergen molecules Cor a 1, 9, 14 (hazelnut), Jug r 1 (walnut) and Ana o 3 (cashew). We evaluated eczema, asthma, food allergies, inherited risk of allergy and gender as potential early-life risk factors. RESULTS: Data were available for 2215/4089 (54%) BAMSE study participants, for estimation of the prevalence of tree nut sensitization (21.2%), tree nut allergy symptoms (9.8%) and combined sensitization and symptoms (7.9%, 2.1% for storage protein sensitization and symptoms, 4.3% for any sensitization and non-mild symptoms). Sixty-three per cent of sensitized individuals (295/470) were asymptomatic, but only 76/470 (16%) storage protein sensitized individuals. Egg allergy (ORadj 8.50 95% CI 2.15-33.6), eczema (ORadj 2.53 95% CI 1.21-5.32) and asthma (ORadj 5.59 95% CI 2.35-13.3)) at pre-school age were associated with future development of tree nut symptoms and storage protein sensitization. At age 24 years, tree nut allergy was associated with current eczema and with markers of current asthma severity. Sensitization to storage proteins was more strongly associated with symptoms than sensitization to whole extract for all tree nuts evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: In this Swedish cohort, we found tree nut whole extract sensitization is common but usually asymptomatic. Storage protein sensitization is a more reliable indicator of tree nut symptoms. Tree nut allergy is associated with early onset, persistent and severe atopic disease.

A remarkable food allergy in children: cashew nut allergy.

OBJECTIVE: The prevalence of cashew nut allergy is increasing. Clinical reaction to cashew nuts may be severe, including anaphylaxis. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the frequency of cashew nut sensitivity in a group of children with food allergy and the clinical features and course of cashew nut allergy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on 516 children who presented with food allergy at a pediatric allergy department. Individuals sensitized to cashew nuts were examined. RESULTS: Cashew nut sensitization was detected in 17 (64.7% male; mean age of symptom onset, 14 months) of 516 patients with food allergy. Skin symptoms were the most frequent clinical presentation, followed by gastrointestinal symptoms. Overall, 29.4% of the patients presented with anaphylaxis. All anaphylactic reactions were developed after the first consumption of cashew nuts. Of the cashew nut-sensitized patients, 82.3% were diagnosed with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, and all of them had multiple food allergies. During the follow-up, 90% of the patients who had cashew nut sensitization and co-existing food allergies to cow's milk and/or hen's egg developed tolerance to cow's milk and/or hen's egg, but none of the patients could tolerate cashew nut ingestion. CONCLUSION: Cashew nut is a potent allergen, causing severe allergic reactions that persist long term compared with other food allergies. Early onset of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis and multiple food allergies are remarkable co-existing conditions in children who have been diagnosed with cashew nut allergy. Pediatricians should be aware of this emerging food allergy.