RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Current consensus recommends hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for patients with myelofibrosis with intermediate or high-risk disease and age of less than 70 years. However, a higher chronological age should not be prohibitive for the eligibility decision in general, acknowledging that current life expectancy for the general population aged 70 years is â¼15 years, and current numbers of patients transplanted at 70 years or older is steadily increasing. OBJECTIVE: The following study aimed to evaluate characteristics and outcomes of HCT in 115 myelofibrosis patients aged 70 years or older. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective multicenter study, using the German Registry for Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (DRST). Adult myelofibrosis patients were included who received HCT up until 2021. Patients with secondary leukemia were excluded. Main endpoints were HCT demographics over time and outcomes after HCT (including overall survival, relapse incidence, non-relapse mortality, and graft-versus-host disease/relapse-free survival). RESULTS: Numbers of HCT increased over the past decade, with a significant spike since 2019. Comorbidity status of transplanted patients improved over time, while reduced intensity conditioning was the preferred HCT platform especially in most recent years. The 3-year overall survival was 55% (95% confidence interval, 44-65%). The 1-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 7% (95% CI, 3-13%) and the 1-year cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality was 22% (95% CI, 14-31%). The 3-year graft-versus-host disease and relapse-free survival was 37% (95% CI, 27-47%). Driver mutation genotype (in particular non-CALR/MPL genotype) appeared to be the only variable that was significantly and independently associated with better survival in multivariable analysis, whereas neither comorbidity index nor dose intensity of pre-transplant conditioning appeared to influence outcome. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated feasibility of curative treatment with HCT for myelofibrosis aged 70 or older, with significant increases in HCT numbers and improved fitness of the elderly over recent years.
RESUMO
Improved long-term survival rates after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) make family planning for young adult cancer survivors an important topic. However, treatment-related infertility risk poses challenges. To assess pregnancy and birth rates in a contemporary cohort, we conducted a national multicenter study using data from the German Transplant Registry, focusing on adult women aged 18-40 who underwent alloHCT between 2003 and 2018. Out of 2,654 transplanted women, 50 women experienced 74 pregnancies, occurring at a median of 4.7 years post-transplant. Fifty-seven of these resulted in live births (77%). The annual first birth rate among HCT recipients was 0.45% (95%CI: 0.31 - 0.59%), which is more than six times lower than in the general population. The probability of a live birth 10 years after HCT was 3.4 % (95%CI: 2.3- 4.5%). Factors associated with an increased likelihood of pregnancy were younger age at alloHCT, non-malignant transplant indications, no total-body-irradiation (TBI) or a cumulative dose of <8 Gray, and non-myeloablative/reduced-intensity conditioning. 72% of pregnancies occurred spontaneously, with assisted reproductive technologies (ART) used in the remaining cases. Preterm delivery and low birth weight were more common than in the general population. This study represents the largest dataset reporting pregnancies in a cohort of adult female alloHCT recipients. Our findings underscore a meaningful chance of pregnancy in alloHCT recipients. ART techniques are important and funding should be made available. However, the potential for spontaneous pregnancies should not be underestimated, and patients should be informed of the possibility of unexpected pregnancy despite reduced fertility. Further research is warranted to understand the impact of conditioning decisions on fertility preservation.
RESUMO
This case report presents the successful management of relapsed/refractory (r/r) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in a 54-year-old male post-allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. The combinatorial approach of sequential antibody treatment (Inotuzumab [InO] and Blinatumomab [Blina]) combined with three donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) applications and cytoreductive chemotherapy-induced sustained complete molecular remission as documented at the last follow-up 30 months later. This case highlights the feasibility and potential synergistic efficacy of a Blina/DLI regimen and supports the hypothesis that T-cell engagers could enhance the DLI effect. Furthermore, the co-administration of InO, Blina, DLI, and cytoreductive chemotherapy was proven to be feasible without severe adverse events.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Reactivation of viral infections, in particular cytomegalovirus (CMV) and adenovirus (ADV), cause morbidity and non-relapse-mortality in states of immune deficiency, especially after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Against the background of few available pharmacologic antiviral agents, limited by toxicities and resistance, adoptive transfer of virus-specific T-cells (VST) is a promising therapeutic approach. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of adult patients treated with ADV- or CMV-specific T-cells in 2012-2022. Information was retrieved by review of electronic health records. Primary outcome was a response to VST by decreasing viral load or clinical improvement. Secondary outcomes included overall survival and safety of VST infusion, in particular association with graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). RESULTS: Ten patients were included, of whom four were treated for ADV, five for CMV, and one for ADV-CMV-coinfection. Cells were derived from stem cell donors (6/10) or third-party donors (4/10). Response criteria were met by six of 10 patients (4/4 ADV, 2/5 CMV, and 0/1 ADV-CMV). Overall survival was 40%. No infusion related adverse events were documented. Aggravation of GVHD after adoptive immunotherapy was observed in two cases, however in temporal association with a conventional donor lymphocyte infusion and a stem cell boost, respectively. CONCLUSION: In this cohort, CMV- and ADV-specific T-cell therapy appear to be safe and effective. We describe the first reported case of virus-specific T-cell therapy for CMV reactivation not associated with transplantation but with advanced HIV infection. This encourages further evaluation of adoptive immunotherapy beyond the context of allo-HCT.
Assuntos
Infecções por Citomegalovirus , Citomegalovirus , Infecções por HIV , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Linfócitos T , Humanos , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/imunologia , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/virologia , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Citomegalovirus/imunologia , Linfócitos T/imunologia , Infecções por HIV/imunologia , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro , Imunoterapia Adotiva/métodos , Carga Viral , Transferência Adotiva/métodos , Adenoviridae/imunologia , Idoso , Resultado do Tratamento , Infecções por Adenoviridae/imunologiaRESUMO
One key aspect of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is pretransplant conditioning, balancing risk for relapse versus non-relapse mortality. Conditioning regimens with different alkylators at different doses can influence outcome, but data are missing for myelofibrosis, a challenging cohort of patients usually presenting at older age and with comorbidities. We evaluated in a multicenter retrospective study the comparative efficacy and safety of busulfan versus treosulfan in combination with fludarabine for myelofibrosis patients undergoing HCT. This study included 1115 patients (busulfan, n = 902; treosulfan, n = 213) receiving first HCT between 2005 and 2021. Patients were generally balanced for key patient characteristics. Overall survival at 4 years was 62% for the busulfan group versus 58% for the treosulfan group (p = .22). Impact on outcome was dose-dependent. Overall survival was 65% (95% CI, 61%-69%) for reduced intensity busulfan versus 69% (95% CI, 54%-84%) for reduced intensity treosulfan, 53% (95% CI, 44%-63%) for higher intensity busulfan, and 55% (95% CI, 46%-63%) for higher intensity treosulfan. Incidence of relapse was similar across intensity groups. In multivariable analysis, the hazard for death (with reduced intensity busulfan as reference) was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.39-2.01) for reduced intensity treosulfan (p = .77), 1.42 (95% CI, 0.96-2.10) for higher intensity busulfan (0.08), and 1.61 (95% CI, 1.14-2.26) for higher intensity treosulfan (p = .006). In terms of non-relapse mortality, comparison was not significantly different, while the hazard ratio for higher intensity treosulfan was 1.48 (95% CI, 0.98-2.23; p = .06). Here, we showed comparable outcomes and improved survival in myelofibrosis undergoing HCT with reduced intensity busulfan or treosulfan.
Assuntos
Bussulfano , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Mielofibrose Primária , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante , Vidarabina , Bussulfano/análogos & derivados , Bussulfano/administração & dosagem , Bussulfano/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Mielofibrose Primária/terapia , Mielofibrose Primária/mortalidade , Mielofibrose Primária/tratamento farmacológico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Feminino , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Adulto , Vidarabina/análogos & derivados , Vidarabina/administração & dosagem , Vidarabina/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/administração & dosagem , Adulto JovemRESUMO
This case series reports durable remissions in 2 patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with allogeneic bispecific CD19/CD22-targeting chimeric antigen receptor T cells.
Assuntos
Antígenos CD19 , Imunoterapia Adotiva , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras B , Lectina 2 Semelhante a Ig de Ligação ao Ácido Siálico , Humanos , Antígenos CD19/imunologia , Lectina 2 Semelhante a Ig de Ligação ao Ácido Siálico/imunologia , Imunoterapia Adotiva/métodos , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras B/terapia , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras B/imunologia , Masculino , Receptores de Antígenos Quiméricos/imunologia , Feminino , Adulto , Transplante HomólogoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Whether high-dose cytarabine-based salvage chemotherapy, administered to induce complete remission in patients with poor responsive or relapsed acute myeloid leukaemia scheduled for allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) after intensive conditioning confers a survival advantage, is unclear. METHODS: To test salvage chemotherapy before allogeneic HSCT, patients aged between 18 and 75 years with non-favourable-risk acute myeloid leukaemia not in complete remission after first induction or untreated first relapse were randomly assigned 1:1 to remission induction with high-dose cytarabine (3 g/m2 intravenously, 1 g/m2 intravenously for patients >60 years or with a substantial comorbidity) twice daily on days 1-3 plus mitoxantrone (10 mg/m2 intravenously) on days 3-5 or immediate allogeneic HSCT for the disease control group. Block randomisation with variable block lengths was used and patients were stratified by age, acute myeloid leukaemia risk, and disease status. The study was open label. The primary endpoint was treatment success, defined as complete remission on day 56 after allogeneic HSCT, with the aim to show non-inferiority for disease control compared with remission induction with a non-inferiority-margin of 5% and one-sided type 1 error of 2·5%. The primary endpoint was analysed in both the intention-to-treat (ITT) population and in the per-protocol population. The trial is completed and was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02461537. FINDINGS: 281 patients were enrolled between Sept 17, 2015, and Jan 12, 2022. Of 140 patients randomly assigned to disease control, 135 (96%) proceeded to allogeneic HSCT, 97 (69%) after watchful waiting only. Of 141 patients randomly assigned to remission induction, 134 (95%) received salvage chemotherapy and 128 (91%) patients subsequently proceeded to allogeneic HSCT. In the ITT population, treatment success was observed in 116 (83%) of 140 patients in the disease control group versus 112 (79%) of 141 patients with remission induction (test for non-inferiority, p=0·036). Among per-protocol treated patients, treatment success was observed in 116 (84%) of 138 patients with disease control versus 109 (81%) of 134 patients in the remission induction group (test for non-inferiority, p=0·047). The difference in treatment success between disease control and remission induction was estimated as 3·4% (95% CI -5·8 to 12·6) for the ITT population and 2·7% (-6·3 to 11·8) for the per-protocol population. Fewer patients with disease control compared with remission induction had non-haematological adverse events grade 3 or worse (30 [21%] of 140 patients vs 86 [61%] of 141 patients, χ2 test p<0·0001). Between randomisation and the start of conditioning, with disease control two patients died from progressive acute myeloid leukaemia and zero from treatment-related complications, and with remission induction two patients died from progressive acute myeloid leukaemia and two from treatment-related complications. Between randomisation and allogeneic HSCT, patients with disease control spent a median of 27 days less in hospital than those with remission induction, ie, the median time in hospital was 15 days (range 7-64) versus 42 days (27-121, U test p<0·0001), respectively. INTERPRETATION: Non-inferiority of disease control could not be shown at the 2·5% significance level. The rate of treatment success was also not statistically better for patients with remission induction. Watchful waiting and immediate transplantation could be an alternative for fit patients with poor response or relapsed acute myeloid leukaemia who have a stem cell donor available. More randomised controlled intention-to-transplant trials are needed to define the optimal treatment before transplantation for patients with active acute myeloid leukaemia. FUNDING: DKMS and the Gert and Susanna Mayer Stiftung Foundation.
Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Indução de Remissão , Transplante Homólogo , Humanos , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/terapia , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Idoso , Citarabina/uso terapêutico , Citarabina/administração & dosagem , Adulto Jovem , Adolescente , Mitoxantrona/uso terapêutico , Mitoxantrona/administração & dosagem , Terapia de Salvação/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , RecidivaAssuntos
Infecções por Vírus Epstein-Barr , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B , Neoplasias do Mediastino , Humanos , Infecções por Vírus Epstein-Barr/complicações , Infecções por Vírus Epstein-Barr/patologia , Herpesvirus Humano 4/isolamento & purificação , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/virologia , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/patologia , Neoplasias do Mediastino/patologia , Neoplasias do Mediastino/virologia , Feminino , AdultoRESUMO
Short-term outcome of myeloablative (MAC) and reduced intensity (RIC) conditioning in the prospective randomized international EBMT RICMAC study in patients with myelodyplastic syndrome (MDS) was comparable but longer follow up is lacking. Patients with MDS aged 18-65 years were randomized to receive MAC (N = 64) with busulfan/cyclophosphamide or RIC (n = 65) with busulfan/fludarabine followed by stem cell transplantation -(HCT) from HLA matched or mismatched donor. After a median follow-up of 6.2 (0.4-12.5) years, 10-year OS and RFS were 54.0% and 43.9% for RIC and 44.4% and 44.2% for MAC (p = 0.15 and p = 0.78), respectively. Since the first report, 6 patients died on NRM, 4 after RIC, and 2 after MAC. Similarly, 8 patients relapsed (4 in each arm), increasing the number of relapsed patients to 28. The second HCT was performed in 18 pts, 8 in the MAC, and 10 in the RIC arm. In a multivariate analysis, ECOG status and chemotherapy prior to HCT were independent risk factors for OS and RFS, ECOG and low cytogenetic risk for NRM and chemotherapy prior to HCT for RI. Patients with low cytogenetic risk had better OS [p = 0.002], RFS [p = 0.02], and NRM (p = 0.015) after RIC as compared to MAC.
Assuntos
Síndromes Mielodisplásicas , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante , Humanos , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante/métodos , Síndromes Mielodisplásicas/terapia , Síndromes Mielodisplásicas/mortalidade , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Bussulfano/uso terapêutico , Bussulfano/administração & dosagem , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Adolescente , Vidarabina/análogos & derivados , Vidarabina/uso terapêutico , Vidarabina/administração & dosagem , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapêutico , Agonistas Mieloablativos/uso terapêutico , Adulto Jovem , Seguimentos , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a disease of older patients. Progress in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) allowed the delivery of allo-HCT to older patients. We assessed changes over time in transplant characteristics and outcomes in patients with AML ages 65 years and above. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified 7,215 patients with AML (median age 68 years, range 65-80) allografted between 2000 and 2021 in first complete remission (CR1; 64%), second or subsequent remission (CR2+; 14%), or active disease (22%). RESULTS: Median follow-up was 40 months. The 3-year cumulative relapse incidence (RI) gradually and significantly decreased from 37% to 31%, then to 30% (P = 0.001) over the three time periods (2000-2009; 2010-2014; 2015-2021), whereas nonrelapse mortality (NRM) decreased from 31% and 31% to 27% (P = 0.003). The 3-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS) gradually and significantly improved from 32% to 38%, and then to 44% (P = 0.001) and from 37% to 42%, and then to 49% (P = 0.001), respectively. In multivariate analysis, significant improvement in the RI, LFS, and OS were noted after 2015, whereas NRM was not significantly affected. This improvement was observed regardless of disease status at transplant. CONCLUSIONS: In older patients with AML, we observed an impressive improvement over time in posttransplant outcomes, mostly attributed to decreased RI rather than decreased NRM, and regardless of disease status at transplant. These large-scale, real-world data can serve as a benchmark for future studies in this setting and indicate that the opportunity for transplant for the elderly should be mandatory and no longer an option.
Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Humanos , Idoso , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/terapia , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/mortalidade , Feminino , Masculino , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Resultado do Tratamento , Transplante Homólogo , Seguimentos , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/etiologia , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/epidemiologia , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante/métodos , Indução de Remissão , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) refractory to initial or reinduction chemotherapy have a dismal prognosis if they do not undergo hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HCT). However, data assessing HCT outcomes from different donors are scarce. We evaluated results from a retrospective analysis on patients aged ≥70 years, with AML not in remission who received an allogeneic HCT from HLA-matched sibling donor (MSD), HLA-10/10 matched unrelated donor (MUD), or T-cell replete haploidentical (Haplo) donor, from 2010 to 2021, reported to the ALWP-EBMT database. A total of 360 patients (median age 72 years, range 70-79) were included in the analysis. Median follow-up for the entire population was 35.5 months. Donors were MSD (n = 58), 10/10 HLA-MUD (n = 228), and Haplo (n = 74). A total of 213 (59.2%) patients were primary induction failures, while 147 (40.8%) were in first or subsequent relapse. Graft source was peripheral blood in 92% of the patients. Patients transplanted from Haplo donors more frequently received marrow grafts (p < 0.01) and presented the combination female donor to male recipient (p < 0.01). The overall 2-year rates of overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) were: 62.4% (95% CI 47.2-74.3) and 47.6% (95% CI 33.1-60.8) for MSD, 43% (95% CI 35.8-49.9), and 37.5% (95% CI 30.7-44.4) for MUD, and 25.9% (95% CI 15.8-37.2), and 26.5% (95% CI 16.3-37.8) for recipients of Haplo transplants. The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (RI) was slightly lower for Haplo recipients at 29.6% (95% CI 19-40.9), for MUD it was 30.2% (95% CI 23.9-36.7), and for MSD 34.9% (95% CI 22-48.2); counterbalanced by a higher incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) of 43.9% (95% CI 31.6-55.6) for Haplo recipients, 32.2% (95% CI 26-33.1) for MUD and 17.5% (95% CI 8.4-29.3) for MSD. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) was 35.3% (95% CI 22.3-48.5) for MSD, 29.6% (95% CI 23.2-36.2) for MUD, and 19.2% (95% CI 10.7-29.6) for Haplo patients. In the multivariate model, compared to the referent group of MSD recipients, the risk of NRM was higher among patients transplanted from Haplo donors ([hazard ratio] HR 5.1, 95% CI 2.23-11.61, p < 0.001) and MUD (HR 3.21, 95% CI 1.48-0.6.94, p = 0.003). Furthermore, both Haplo and MUD were associated with inferior OS, (HR 3.6, 95% CI 1.98-0.6.56, p < 0.001, and HR 2.3, 95% CI 1.37-0.3.88, p = 0.002, respectively), and LFS (HR 2.24, 95% CI 1.31-0.3.84, p = 0.003, and HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.04-0.2.60, p = 0.034, respectively). Patients transplanted from Haplo donors were also associated with worse GFRS (HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.07-2.77, p:0.025) compared with MSD patients. Older adult AML patients with active disease transplanted from MSD experienced prolonged OS and LFS compared to 10/10 MUD and Haplo due to lower NRM. Prospective clinical trials are warranted.
Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Humanos , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/terapia , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/mortalidade , Idoso , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Transplante Homólogo/métodos , Europa (Continente) , Doadores não Relacionados , Taxa de Sobrevida , Intervalo Livre de DoençaRESUMO
ABSTRACT: Metachromatic leukodystrophy (MLD) is a rare genetic disorder caused by pathogenic variants of the ARSA gene, leading to a deficiency of the arylsulfatase A enzyme (ARSA) and consecutive accumulation of galactosylceramide-3-0-sulfate in the nervous system. The condition leads to severe neurological deficits and subsequently results in profound intellectual and motoric disability. Especially, the adult form of MLD, which occurs in individuals aged >16 years, poses significant challenges for treating physicians because of the rarity of cases, limited therapeutic options, and different allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) protocols worldwide. Here, we report the results of allo-HCT treatment in 4 patients with a confirmed adult MLD diagnosis. Bone marrow or mobilized peripheral progenitor cells were infused after a reduced intensity conditioning regime consisting of fludarabine and treosulfan. In 3 patients, allo-HCT was followed by an infusion of mesenchymal cells to further consolidate ARSA production. We observed a good tolerability and an increase in ARSA levels up to normal range values in all patients. A full donor chimerism was detected in 3 patients within the first 12 months. In a 1-year follow-up, patients with complete donor chimerism showed a neurological stable condition. Only 1 patient with an increasing autologous chimerism showed neurological deterioration and a decline in ARSA levels in the first year. In summary, allo-HCT offers a therapeutic option for reconstituting ARSA enzyme levels in adult patients with MLD, with tolerable side effects.
Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Leucodistrofia Metacromática , Adulto , Humanos , Leucodistrofia Metacromática/terapia , Cerebrosídeo Sulfatase/genéticaRESUMO
A randomized study (acronym: MC-FludT.14/L Trial II) demonstrated that fludarabine plus treosulfan (30 g/m²) was an effective and well tolerated conditioning regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). To further evaluate this regimen, all 252 study patients aged 50 to 70 years were compared with similar patients, who underwent allo-HCT after fludarabine/melphalan (140 mg/m²) (FluMel) or busulfan (12.8 mg/kg)/cyclophosphamide (120 mg/kg) (BuCy) regimens and whose data was provided by the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry. In 1:1 propensity-score matched-paired analysis (PSA) of AML patients, there was no difference in 2-year-relapse-incidence after FluTreo compared with either FluMel (n = 110, p = 0.28) or BuCy (n = 78, p = 0.98). However, 2-year-non-relapse-mortality (NRM) was lower compared with FluMel (p = 0.019) and BuCy (p < 0.001). Consequently, 2-year-overall-survival (OS) after FluTreo was higher compared with FluMel (p = 0.04) and BuCy (p < 0.001). For MDS patients, no endpoint differences between FluTreo and FluMel (n = 30) were evident, whereas 2-year-OS after FluTreo was higher compared with BuCy (n = 25, p = 0.01) due to lower 2-year-NRM. Multivariate sensitivity analysis confirmed all significant results of PSA. Consequently, FluTreo (30 g/m²) seems to retain efficacy compared with FluMel and BuCy, but is better tolerated by older patients.
Assuntos
Bussulfano , Bussulfano/análogos & derivados , Ciclofosfamida , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Melfalan , Síndromes Mielodisplásicas , Sistema de Registros , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante , Vidarabina , Vidarabina/análogos & derivados , Humanos , Bussulfano/uso terapêutico , Bussulfano/administração & dosagem , Bussulfano/farmacologia , Vidarabina/uso terapêutico , Vidarabina/farmacologia , Vidarabina/administração & dosagem , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/terapia , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/mortalidade , Síndromes Mielodisplásicas/terapia , Síndromes Mielodisplásicas/mortalidade , Síndromes Mielodisplásicas/tratamento farmacológico , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapêutico , Ciclofosfamida/administração & dosagem , Ciclofosfamida/farmacologia , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante/métodos , Feminino , Masculino , Melfalan/uso terapêutico , Melfalan/administração & dosagem , Melfalan/farmacologia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacologia , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Chimeric antigen receptor positive T cell (CAR-T cell) treatment became standard therapy for relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies, such as non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and multiple myeloma. Owing to the rapidly progressing field of CAR-T cell therapy and the lack of generally accepted treatment guidelines, we hypothesized significant differences between centers in the prevention, diagnosis, and management of short- and long-term complications. METHODS: To capture the current CAR-T cell management among German centers to determine the medical need and specific areas for future clinical research, the DAG-HSZT (Deutsche Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Hämatopoetische Stammzelltransplantation und Zelluläre Therapie; German Working Group for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy) performed a survey among 26 German CAR-T cell centers. RESULTS: We received answers from 17 centers (65%). The survey documents the relevance of evidence in the CAR-T cell field with a homogeneity of practice in areas with existing clinical evidence. In contrast, in areas with no - or low quality - clinical evidence, we identified significant variety in management in between the centers: management of cytokine release syndrome, immune effector cell-related neurotoxicity syndrome, IgG substitution, autologous stem cell backups, anti-infective prophylaxis, and vaccinations. CONCLUSION: The results indicate the urgent need for better harmonization of supportive care in CAR-T cell therapies including clinical research to improve clinical outcome.
Assuntos
Receptores de Antígenos Quiméricos , Humanos , Imunoterapia Adotiva , Alemanha , Pacientes , Terapia Baseada em Transplante de Células e TecidosRESUMO
ABSTRACT: Cytopenias represent the most common side effect of CAR T-cell therapy (CAR-T) and can predispose for severe infectious complications. Current grading systems, such as the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), neither reflect the unique quality of post-CAR-T neutrophil recovery, nor do they reflect the inherent risk of infections due to protracted neutropenia. For this reason, a novel EHA/EBMT consensus grading was recently developed for Immune Effector Cell-Associated HematoToxicity (ICAHT). In this multicenter, observational study, we applied the grading system to a large real-world cohort of 549 patients treated with BCMA- or CD19-directed CAR-T for refractory B-cell malignancies (112 multiple myeloma [MM], 334 large B-cell lymphoma [LBCL], 103 mantle cell lymphoma [MCL]) and examined the clinical sequelae of severe (≥3°) ICAHT. The ICAHT grading was strongly associated with the cumulative duration of severe neutropenia (r = 0.92, P < .0001), the presence of multilineage cytopenias, and the use of platelet and red blood cell transfusions. We noted an increased rate of severe ICAHT in patients with MCL vs those with LBCL and MM (28% vs 23% vs 15%). Severe ICAHT was associated with a higher rate of severe infections (49% vs 13%, P < .0001), increased nonrelapse mortality (14% vs 4%, P < .0001), and inferior survival outcomes (1-year progression-free survival: 35% vs 51%, 1-year overall survival: 52% vs 73%, both P < .0001). Importantly, the ICAHT grading demonstrated superior capacity to predict severe infections compared with the CTCAE grading (c-index 0.73 vs 0.55, P < .0001 vs nonsignificant). Taken together, these data highlight the clinical relevance of the novel grading system and support the reporting of ICAHT severity in clinical trials evaluating CAR-T therapies.
Assuntos
Citopenia , Linfoma de Célula do Manto , Mieloma Múltiplo , Neutropenia , Receptores de Antígenos Quiméricos , Humanos , Adulto , Incidência , Proteínas Adaptadoras de Transdução de Sinal , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapiaRESUMO
Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) are CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapies approved for relapsed/refractory aggressive large B cell lymphoma (LBCL). Significant costs and complex manufacturing underscore the importance of evidence-based counseling regarding the outcomes of these treatments. With the aim of examining the efficacy and safety of axi-cel versus tisa-cel in patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive LBCL, we performed a systematic literature search of comparative studies evaluating outcomes in relapsed/refractory aggressive LBCL after treatment with axi-cel or tisa-cel. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and hematotoxicity. Meta-analysis and meta-regression were used to generate summary statistics. A total of 2372 participants were included in the 8 studies in our analysis. The dropout rate between apheresis and infusion was 13% for axi-cel versus 18% for tisa-cel, and the median time from apheresis to infusion was 32 days versus 45 days. Axi-cel showed higher odds for a complete response (OR, 1.65; P < .001) and was associated with higher odds for PFS at 1 year after infusion (OR, .60; P < .001). OS appeared to be improved with axi-cel (OR, .84; 95% CI, .68 to 1.02; P = .08), whereas the cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was 11.5% for axi-cel versus 3.7% for tisa-cel (P = .002). The main predictors for survival were lactate dehydrogenase level, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, and response to bridging, and axi-cel maintained superior efficacy even in elderly patients. In terms of safety, axi-cel was associated with significantly higher odds of any-grade CRS (OR, 3.23; P < .001), but not of grade ≥3 CRS (P = .92). Axi-cel was associated with significantly higher odds of severe ICANS grade ≥3 (OR, 4.03; P < .001). In terms of hematotoxicity, axi-cel was significantly associated with higher odds of severe neutropenia at 1 month after infusion (OR, 2.06; P = .003). As a result, axi-cel was associated with significantly greater resource utilization, including prolonged hospital stay, more frequent intensive care admission, and use of agents such as tocilizumab for toxicity management. We provide strong evidence of the greater efficacy of axi-cel versus tisa-cel in relapsed/refractory aggressive LBCL. The higher toxicity and NRM seen with axi-cel might not counterbalance the overall results, highlighting the need for timely intervention and careful selection of patients, balancing resource utilization and clinical benefit.