Molecular imaging in MSK radiology: Where are we going?

Musculoskeletal (MSK) pathologies are one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. However, treatment options and understanding of pathogenetic processes are still partially unclear, mainly due to a limited ability in early disease detection and response to therapy assessment. In this scenario, thanks to a strong technological advancement, structural imaging is currently established as the gold-standard of diagnosis in many MSK disorders but each single diagnostic modality (plain films, high-resolution ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance) still suffer by a low specificity regarding the characterization of inflammatory processes, the quantification of inflammatory activity levels, and the degree of response to therapy. To overcome these limitations, molecular imaging techniques may play a promising role. Starting from the strengths and weaknesses of structural anatomical imaging, the present narrative review aims to highlight the promising role of molecular imaging in the assessment of non-neoplastic MSK diseases with a special focus on its role to monitor treatment response.

Noninvasive liver fibrosis assessment in chronic viral hepatitis C: agreement among 1D transient elastography, 2D shear wave elastography, and magnetic resonance elastography.

PURPOSE: To assess the agreement of one-dimensional transient elastography (1D-TE), two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE), and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in a consecutive cohort of patients affected by hepatitis C virus (HCV) and to understand which patient-related factors are associated with disagreement. METHODS: Ninety-one consecutive patients with current or previous chronic HCV infection were enrolled between March 2017 and September 2018. We assessed the correlation between stiffness measurements expressed in kilopascals (kPa). After converting kPa values in three groups of increasing fibrosis burden using validated cut-off values, we assessed the agreement among the different techniques. Factors influencing inter-modality disagreement were examined by employing multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients met the inclusion criteria and had reliable measurements by all stiffness imaging techniques. At the quantitative analysis, a strong correlation between stiffness measurements was found (Spearman's rho values ranging from 0.7 to 0.89 in all pairs of techniques). Complete concordance among MRE, 1D-TE, and 2D-SWE was found in 64.9% of patients, and the agreement was highest between MRE and 1D-TE, with κ value of 0.801. In only 2/77 patients (2.6%), there was complete disagreement. High body mass index (BMI) was the only factor significantly associated with inter-modality discordance. CONCLUSIONS: MRE, 1D-TE, and 2D-SWE assigned the majority of patients to the same fibrosis group. The agreement was at least good, and there was a strong correlation between kPa values in all three pairs of techniques. Highest agreement was found between MRE and 1D-TE. High BMI was associated with discordance among the techniques.