Unveiling a new era with liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry to enhance parathyroid hormone measurement in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Precise determination of circulating parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentration is crucial to diagnose and manage various disease conditions, including the chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder. However, the lack of standardization in PTH assays is challenging for clinicians, potentially leading to medical errors because the different assays do not provide equivalent results and use different reference ranges. Here, we aimed to evaluate the impact of recalibrating PTH immunoassays by means of a recently developed LC-MS/MS method as the reference. Utilizing a large panel of pooled plasma samples with PTH concentrations determined by the LC-MS/MS method calibrated with the World Health Organization (WHO) 95/646 International Standard, five PTH immunoassays were recalibrated. The robustness of this standardization was evaluated over time using different sets of samples. The recalibration successfully reduced inter-assay variability with harmonization of PTH measurements across different assays. By recalibrating the assays based on the WHO 95/646 International Standard, we demonstrated the feasibility for standardizing PTH measurement results and adopting common reference ranges for PTH assays, facilitating a more consistent interpretation of PTH values. The recalibration process aligns PTH results obtained from various immunoassays with the LC-MS/MS method, providing more consistent and reliable measurements. Thus, establishing true standardization across all PTH assays is crucial to ensure consistent interpretation and clinical decision-making.

Concise review on the combined use of immunocapture, mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography for clinical applications.

Immunocapture is now a well-established method for sample preparation prior to quantitation of peptides and proteins in complex matrices. This short review will give an overview of some clinical applications of immunocapture methods, as well as protocols with and without enzymatic digestion in a clinical context. The advantages and limitations of both approaches are discussed in detail. Challenges related to the choice of mass spectrometer are also discussed. Top-down, middle-down, and bottom-up approaches are discussed. Even though immunocapture has its limitations, its main advantage is that it provides an additional dimension of separation and/or isolation when working with peptides and proteins. Overall, this short review demonstrates the potential of such techniques in the field of proteomics-based clinical medicine and paves the way for better personalized medicine.

Validation of an LC-MS/MS Method Using Solid-Phase Extraction for the Quantification of 1-84 Parathyroid Hormone: Toward a Candidate Reference Measurement Procedure.

BACKGROUND: Parathyroid hormone (PTH) measurement is important for patients with disorders of calcium metabolism, including those needing bone-turnover monitoring due to chronic kidney disease-mineral bone disorder. There are currently 2 generations of PTH immunoassays on the market, both having cross-reactivity issues and lacking standardization. Therefore, we developed an LC-MS/MS higher-order method for PTH analysis. METHODS: The method was calibrated against the international standard for 1-84 PTH (WHO 95/646). Antibody-free sample preparation with the addition of an isotope-labeled internal standard was performed by solid-phase extraction. Extracts were analyzed by LC-MS/MS. EDTA-K2 plasma was used throughout the development and validation. Bias and uncertainty sources were tested according to ISO 15193. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines and reference measurement procedures were consulted for the design of the validation. Patient samples and external quality controls were compared between LC-MS/MS and 2 third-generation immunoassays. RESULTS: The method was validated for 1-84 PTH from 5.7 to 872.6 pg/mL. The interassay imprecision was between 1.2% and 3.9%, and the accuracy ranged from 96.2% to 103.2%. The measurement uncertainty was <5.6%. The comparison between LC-MS/MS and the immunoassays showed a proportional bias but moderate to substantial correlation between methods. CONCLUSIONS: This LC-MS/MS method, which is independent of antibodies, is suitable for a wide range of PTH concentrations. The obtained analytical performance specifications demonstrate that development of a reference measurement procedure will be possible once a higher order reference standard is available.

Development and validation of a fast and reliable method for the quantification of glucagon by liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry.

INTRODUCTION: The quantitation of glucagon remains a challenging immunoassay, mainly due to cross-reactivity. A sensitive, rapid and specific intact glucagon method is therefore necessary for quality routine analysis. A tandem mass spectrometry method to fulfill this objective is described in this work. METHODS: Glucagon was extracted from plasma employing a mixed-mode anion exchange solid-phase extraction. Sample stability was assessed in K2-EDTA and P800 tubes at different temperatures. We compared our method to two different immunoassays. FDA and EMA guidelines were followed for validation. An external quality control program served for comparison with other laboratories. RESULTS: Assay imprecision was below 4%. Recoveries were within 95-103%. LoQ was 8.75 pg/mL. Total analytical CV was 2.91%. Samples were found stable at 4 °C for less than 4 h. Diasource® RIA disagreed with our method. Mercodia® ELISA provided a closer agreement, also proven by external quality control samples. CONCLUSIONS: A rapid and specific LC-MS/MS method for glucagon quantitation has been developed, validated and is suitable to routine care. The simplicity and the good performances in terms of time and specificity, could open the possibility to establish a standardized method for glucagon.

The pathway through LC-MS method development: in-house or ready-to-use kit-based methods?

Historically, the determination of low concentration analytes was initially made possible by the development of rapid and easy-to-perform immunoassays (IAs). Unfortunately, typical problems inherent to IA technologies rapidly appeared (e.g. elevated cost, cross-reactivity, lot-to-lot variability, etc.). In turn, liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methods are sensitive and specific enough for such analyses. Therefore, they would seem to be the most promising candidates to replace IAs. There are two main choices when implementing a new LC-MS/MS method in a clinical laboratory: (1) Developing an in-house method or (2) purchasing ready-to-use kits. In this paper, we discuss some of the respective advantages, disadvantages and mandatory requirements of each choice. Additionally, we also share our experiences when developing an in-house method for cortisol determination and the implementation of an "ready-to-use" (RTU) kit for steroids analysis.

Evolution of the slopes of ST2 and galectin-3 during marathon and ultratrail running compared to a control group.

Background Previous studies have suggested that exercising may induce cardiac damage. Galectin-3 (Gal-3) and soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (ST2) are very interesting biomarkers for heart failure and myocardial fibrosis. We aimed to compare the kinetics of emerging fibrosis cardiac biomarkers as Gal-3 and ST-2 in endurance runners, and recreational runners before and after a running event represented by a marathon and an ultratrail event. Methods Blood samples were taken from 19 healthy non-elite marathon runners (42 km), 27 ultratour runners (67 km), and 14 recreational runners who represented the control group (10 km) just before the run (T0), just after (T1) and 3 h after (T2), in order to analyze Gal-3, ST2, hsTnT, NT-proBNP, CKMB and hsCRP. We compared the percentage of evolution and the slopes obtained from T0 to T1 (pT0T1) and from T1 to T2 (pT1T2), between the different groups of runners participating in three different races. Results Plasma cardiac biomarker concentrations increased significantly from baseline to immediately post-exercise and most of the time decreased over the subsequent 3-h period. For pT0T1 and pT1T2, the markers Gal-3 and ST2 showed a significant difference between types of run (p < 0.05 and p < 0.0001, respectively). During the recovery time, Gal-3 returned to the baseline values but not ST2 which continued to increase. Conclusions Gal-3 and ST2 are considered as a reflection of cardiac fibrosis and remodeling. The evolution of both was different, particularly after the recovery time. ST2 values exceeding cutoff values at any time.

A fast and simple method for simultaneous measurements of 25(OH)D, 24,25(OH)2D and the Vitamin D Metabolite Ratio (VMR) in serum samples by LC-MS/MS.

BACKGROUND: Rapid, easy and reliable measurement of the major vitamin D metabolites is required in order to fulfill the needs of a clinical routine laboratory. To overcome these challenges, we have developed and validated a LC-MS/MS method for the quantification of 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 and D3, epi-25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. METHODS: Sample preparation was based on precipitation and centrifugation of 100µL of patient serum, followed by injection into the LC-MS/MS system. Samples from Vitamin D Standardization Program (n=80) and patient samples (n=281) have been compared with a reference LC-MS/MS method. For the analytical validation NIST and Labquality quality control materials were used. RESULTS: Mean intra-assay and inter-assay imprecision were <6.0 and 6.4% and mean recoveries were within 95-104%. LOQ's were 0.5µg/L for 24,25(OH)2D3, 1.1µg/L for 25(OH)D3 and epi-25(OH)D3 and 1.7µg/L for 25(OH)D2. A 3% bias obtained between the proposed and the reference method satisfies Vitamin D Standardization Program recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: We present a rapid, easy, reliable and cost-effective method completely adequate for routine testing, which permits the measurement of the ratio of 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D to 25-hydroxyvitamin D, Vitamin D Metabolite Ratio (VMR), in serum samples.