RESUMO
Statement of the Problem: By development of adhesive dentistry and noble mechanical strength of ceramics, reconstruction of posterior teeth with partial coverage restorations such as ceramic endocrowns is possible. Different ceramics may show different mechanical properties which should be investigated. Purpose: The aim of this experimental in vitro study was to compare the tensile bond strength of endocrowns made by CAD-CAM using 3 types of ceramics. Materials and Method: In this in vitro study, 30 fresh extracted human molars were prepared to evaluate the tensile bond strength of endocrowns made by IPS e.max CAD, Vita Suprinity, and Vita Enamic blocks (n=10). The specimens were mounted and endodontically treated. Standard preparations were done with 4.5±0.5 mm intracoronal extensions into the pulp chamber and the restorations were designed and milled by CAD-CAM technique. All specimens were cemented with a dual polymerizing resin cement according to the manufacturer's instructions. The specimens were incubated for 24 hours and then thermocycled for 5000 cycles at 5-55°C and underwent the tensile strength test by universal testing machine (UTM). Shapiro-Wilk and one-way ANOVA test were used to statistically analyzed (α= 0.05). Results: The highest tensile bond strength values were achieved in IPS e.max CAD (216.39 ±22.67N) and Vita Enamic (216.22±17.72N) followed by Vita Suprinity (211.54±20.01N). There was no significant statistical difference between retention of endocrowns made by CAD-CAM technique among ceramic blocks (p= 0.832). Conclusion: Within the limitation of this study, there was no significant difference between retention of endocrowns made by IPS e.max CAD, Vita Enamic, and Vita Suprinity as ceramic blocks.
RESUMO
Statement of the Problem: Marginal bone loss (MBL) is an important factor in dental implant failure. The number of implants may affect MBL. Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare MBL in patients who received two or three implants for replacement of three missing teeth in the posterior mandible. Materials and Method: This prospective cohort study evaluated patients who required replacement of three missing teeth in the posterior mandible with dental implants. The patients were assigned to two groups. In the group 1, the edentulous area was restored with two implants and a pontic while three implants were placed for this purpose in the group 2. The MBL was compared between the two groups at 12 and 24 months after loading. Results: Forty-two implants were studied in group 1 and 36 implants in the group 2. The mean MBL was 0.90±0.12mm in the group 1 and 0.89±0.12mm in the group 2 at 12 months after loading. The mean MBL was 1.00±0.10mm in the group 1 and 0.98±0.10mm in the group 2 at 24 months after implant loading. The mean of MBL was not statistically different between the two groups at 12 months and 24 months (p> 0.05). Conclusion: It seems that the use of two or three implants for replacement of three missing teeth in the posterior mandible is not associated with an increase in MBL.
RESUMO
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: Different materials can be used to reconstruct the core foundation in all-ceramic restorations. Bond strength of the core material to zirconia is an important factor in long-term restoration success. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess shear bond strength (SBS) of zirconia to four different core materials. MATERIALS AND METHOD: In this experimental in vitro study, 40 zirconia ceramic disks (10×3 mm) were prepared and divided to four groups based on core material. Cylinder shaped core specimens (3×4 mm) of non-precious gold alloy (NPG), zirconia ceramic, natural dentin, and composite resin were prepared and bonded perpendicularly to the zirconia disks using Gillmore Needle Apparatus and dual cure resin cement. All samples were thermocycled for 2000 cycles. To evaluate SBS, the specimens were tested by universal testing machine. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn's test with Bonferroni correction. Statistical significance was set at p< 0.05. RESULTS: The highest values for SBS were achieved in composite resin group (11.58±1.74 MPa) followed by NPG (10.32±0.94 MPa), zirconia (7.3±1.11 MPa) and dentin group (6.53±0.56 MPa). SBS in composite resin and NPG core materials were significantly higher than other core materials (p< 0.05). CONCLUSION: Composite resin and NPG cores showed significant higher bond strength to zirconia in comparison to dentine and zirconia core materials.
RESUMO
Objectives: Implant-supported restorations are generally used for the replacement of the lost teeth. Stability against masticatory forces and proper retention are critical for optimal durability of restorations. The aim of this experimental study was to compare the retention of cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) copings made by different techniques. Materials and Methods: Twenty-four solid abutment analogs were mounted and scanned with a desktop scanner. They were divided into two groups (n=12) and received metal copings fabricated by either soft or hard Co-Cr alloy. Soft Ceramill Sintron Co-Cr patterns were milled and sintered. Hard Co-Cr blocks were milled in a milling machine. The copings were sandblasted, polished, adjusted, and placed on the respective abutments. The frequency of adjustments was recorded for each abutment. The copings were cemented with zinc phosphate cement and underwent tensile test by a universal testing machine. The Mann-Whitney test and t-test were used to compare the two groups (α=0.05). Results: There was no significant difference in retention of copings between the experimental groups. The mean retentive force was 559.58±115.66 N and 557.13 ±130.48 N for the soft and hard metal groups, respectively (P=0.96). Considering the non-normal distribution of adjustment frequency data, the Mann-Whitney test showed that the frequency of adjustments was significantly higher in the hard metal group than the soft metal group (9.5 versus 0.1667; P<0.001). Conclusion: Although hard metal copings required more adjustments, retention of soft and hard Co-Cr copings was not significantly different.