[Multicenter Follow-up Survey on Radiation Dose Levels in Cardiovascular X-ray Apparatus under Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Conditions].

It is important to optimize the exposure dose when conducting interventional radiology, but optimization is difficult for medical centers to achieve independently. In 2005, we administered a questionnaire on the measurement of dose rates and awareness of exposure reduction when performing percutaneous coronary intervention. Ten years later, we conducted a follow-up survey of the same 31 centers to determine the current situation and identify trends. The results of the survey showed that the mean fluoroscopy dose rate decreased to 55% of the 2005 value, from 28.2 to 15.6 mGy/min, and the mean radiography dose rate decreased to 71% of the 2005 value, from 4.2 to 3.0 mGy/s. Dose rates for both fluoroscopy and radiography decreased by 84% of facilities. The results also indicated greater cooperation by physicians compared to 10 years ago. In particular, there was a considerable increase in the exchange of ideas with physicians regarding exposure, suggesting a stronger level of interest in exposure. The overall score for questionnaire items was 33% higher than that in the previous survey. These results show that in the past 10 years, awareness of exposure reduction has improved, and dose optimization has been a major factor in the downward trend in dose rates in radiography and fluoroscopy.

[Multicenter Survey of the Display Air Kerma and Actual Measured Values in IVR X-ray Apparatus].

PURPOSE: We conducted a multicenter study to investigate the current status of difference between the actual values at the patient entrance reference point (PERP) and display air kerma. METHODS: We exposure dose and fluoroscopy dose were measured by 32 apparatuses at 32 member institutions of the Japanese Society of Circulation Imaging Technology (CITEC) under unified conditions, and the actual measured values and display air kerma were compared. We entrance doses during fluoroscopy and imaging were measured at the PERP, with focus detector distance (FDD) 110 cm, a copper plate of 3.5 mm in thickness adhered to the front face of flat panel detector (FPD) as absorber, field-of-view (FOV) 18 cm, and the frame rate of 15 f/s, excluding the bed. Display air kerma were recorded at the same time. JIS (Z 4751-2-43: 2012) specify "The reference air kerma rate and the cumulative reference air kerma shall not deviate from their respective display air kerma by more than ±35% over the range of 6 mGy/min and 100 mGy to the maximum value." The number of apparatuses display air kerma deviated from this condition and its percentage were obtained. RESULTS: The mean difference percentage between actual measured values and display air kerma in 32 apparatuses was approximately 15.6%, with some apparatuses showing substantially different display air kerma. CONCLUSION: In order to estimate patients' skin exposure dose from display air kerma more accurately, it is necessary to perform calibration of the apparatus by regular dose measurement or convert values.