Transcatheter Closure of Postinfarct VSD With the Amplatzer PIVSD Occluder: Results of a US Study.

Background: A postinfarct ventricular septal defect (PIVSD) is associated with high mortality and morbidity, particularly in patients with hemodynamic instability who are not suitable candidates for surgical repair. The Amplatzer PIVSD Occluder (Abbott) is indicated for transcatheter PIVSD closure in patients who are not satisfactory candidates for surgical repair. The objective of this study was to evaluate associated clinical outcomes. Methods: A total of 131 patients underwent transcatheter PIVSD closure using the Amplatzer PIVSD Occluder between 2011 and 2021 as part of a postapproval, multicenter, retrospective, observational study. The patients were analyzed in 2 cohorts. Cohort 1 included 99 patients (age 68.6 ± 11.9 years) implanted from 2011 to 2016 and evaluated technical success, procedure survival, and 6-month survival. Cohort 2 included 32 patients (age 66.4 ± 10.9 years) implanted from 2012 to 2021 with postprocedure echocardiograms and evaluated 24-hour closure, 6-month closure, and 6-month survival. Results: Technical success was achieved in 76.8% (76/99), procedure survival in 84.3% (75/89), and 6-month survival was observed in 37.2% of cohort 1 patients. Twenty-four-hour closure and 6-month closure were achieved in 53.1% (17/32) and 66.7% (4/6) of cohort 2 patients, respectively. Six-month survival was 46.4% of cohort 2 patients. Of the 16 deaths in cohort 2, 11 were cardiac-related, 4 were noncardiac-related, and 1 was of unknown etiology. Conclusions: This study demonstrates high morbidity of patients undergoing PIVSD closure using the Amplatzer PIVSD Occluder and that the device continues to be a safe alternative to medical therapy in patients who are not satisfactory candidates for surgical repair of a PIVSD.

Stroke volume index (SVI) predicts all-cause mortality following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) may result in low transvalvular gradients and underestimation of AS severity. A low-flow state may occur with reduced LVEF. Little is known about the implications of low compared to normal flow in patients with reduced LVEF undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). OBJECTIVES: We compared survival rates with degree of flow across stenosed aortic valves and left ventricular dysfunction. We hypothesized that the stroke volume index (SVI) offers essential information regarding survival following TAVR. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with LVEF <50 % undergoing TAVR at the Gates Vascular Institute in Buffalo, New York, from 2012 to 2017. We performed Receiver Operator Characteristics to examine the value of SVI in predicting the postoperative outcome of patients. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to investigate the effect of a low-flow state on five-year survival in patients with systolic dysfunction undergoing TAVR. RESULTS: Five-year survival following TAVR was decreased in patients with low-flow AS (SVI <35 mL/m2) compared to patients with normal flow. Seventy-four percent (n = 50) of patients with low-flow compared to 43 % (n = 22) of patients with normal flow were deceased five years post-TAVR (p ≤0.001). ROC curve indicated SVI to be a clinical predictor of five year survival (AUC 0.732, 95 % CI: 0.641-0.823, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with systolic dysfunction and low transvalvular flow AS had increased mortality five years following TAVR. These findings highlight a better prognosis in patients with normal flow and LV systolic dysfunction. CONDENSED ABSTRACT: Low-flow aortic stenosis can occur with reduced left ventricular function. We compared survival rates of patients with known reduced left ventricular function in low-flow and normal flow aortic stenosis. This retrospective single-center study examined mortality rates following transcatheter aortic valve replacement. The mean gradient was not a predictor of mortality. This study shows patients with low-flow aortic stenosis have decreased five-year survival following valve replacement.

Electrosurgery in Structural Heart Interventions.

Electrosurgery has emerged as a groundbreaking tool in the field of structural cardiac interventions, revolutionizing the approach to complex cardiac conditions. This review delves into the core principles, procedural techniques, outcomes, and potential challenges associated with various electrosurgical procedures within the realm of structural cardiology. Five key electrosurgical procedures performed in complex structural interventions are highlighted in this review. They are the Transcaval Access, BASILICA, LAMPOON, ELASTIC/ELASTA-Clip, and SESAME procedures. While these electrosurgery procedures hold promise and have demonstrated positive outcomes, their technical intricacies, patient selection criteria, and the need for further research remain important considerations. As technology continues to evolve and more data becomes available, electrosurgery is poised to continue shaping the landscape of cardiac care, offering minimally invasive alternatives, and improving patient outcomes in complex structural cardiac interventions.

A Simple Technique for Deploying the SENTINEL Cerebral Protection System in Bovine Aortic Arch Anatomy.

The SENTINEL Cerebral Protection System is one of the most commonly used devices for embolic protection during transcatheter aortic valve replacement. However, successful deployment of the SENTINEL device is often challenging in patients with a bovine aortic arch anatomy using the standard technique and requires extensive manipulation in the aortic arch increasing the risk of stroke. We describe a novel and simple technique of 2-filter deployment of SENTINEL device in patients with bovine arch anatomy. In this technique, after the deployment of the proximal filter, the device is hyperflexed on itself facing the lateral aspect of the ascending aorta instead of facing the descending aorta, with its tip pointing toward the common origin of the left common carotid artery (LCCA) and brachiocephalic trunk. The guidewire is then advanced to the LCCA. Since the guidewire can pass either anterior or posterior to the device shaft, the device needs to be untwisted either by clockwise or counterclockwise motion, before pulling the device shaft back to engage the LCCA, after which the distal filter can be deployed. Computed tomography scans obtained for planning transcatheter aortic valve replacement should be reviewed for the presence of bovine aortic arch anatomy so that this technique can be deployed directly, thereby reducing manipulations in the aortic arch, saving time, and not requiring additional equipment.

Real-World Outcomes for the Fifth-Generation Balloon Expandable Transcatheter Heart Valve in the United States.

BACKGROUND: The fifth-generation SAPIEN 3 Ultra Resilia valve (S3UR) incorporates several design changes as compared with its predecessors, the SAPIEN 3 (S3) and SAPIEN 3 Ultra (S3U) valves, including bovine leaflets treated with a novel process intended to reduce structural valve deterioration via calcification, as well as a taller external skirt on the 29-mm valve size to reduce paravalvular leak (PVL). The clinical performance of S3UR compared with S3 and S3U in a large patient population has not been previously reported. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare S3UR to S3/S3U for procedural, in-hospital, and 30-day clinical and echocardiographic outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). METHODS: Patients enrolled in the STS/ACC TVT (Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy) Registry between January 1, 2021, and June 30, 2023, who underwent TAVR with S3UR or S3U/S3 valve platforms were propensity-matched and evaluated for procedural, in-hospital, and 30-day clinical and echocardiographic outcomes. RESULTS: 10,314 S3UR patients were propensity matched with 10,314 patients among 150,539 S3U/S3 patients. At 30 days, there were no statistically significant differences in death, stroke, or bleeding, but a numerically higher hospital readmission rate in the S3UR cohort (8.5% vs 7.7%; P = 0.04). At discharge, S3UR patients exhibited significantly lower mean gradients (9.2 ± 4.6 mm Hg vs 12.0 ± 5.7 mm Hg; P < 0.0001) and larger aortic valve area (2.1 ± 0.7 cm2 vs 1.9 ± 0.6 cm2; P < 0.0001) than patients treated with S3/S3U. The 29-mm valve size exhibited significant reduction in mild PVL (5.3% vs 9.4%; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: S3UR TAVR is associated with lower mean gradients and lower rates of PVL than earlier generations of balloon expandable transcatheter heart valve platforms.

Understanding Treatment Preferences for Patients with Tricuspid Regurgitation.

Background. Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a high-prevalence disease associated with poor quality of life and mortality. This quantitative patient preference study aims to identify TR patients' perspectives on risk-benefit tradeoffs. Methods. A discrete-choice experiment was developed to explore TR treatment risk-benefit tradeoffs. Attributes (levels) tested were treatment (procedure, medical management), reintervention risk (0%, 1%, 5%, 10%), medications over 2 y (none, reduce, same, increase), shortness of breath (none/mild, moderate, severe), and swelling (never, 3× per week, daily). A mixed logit regression model estimated preferences and calculated predicted probabilities. Relative attribute importance was calculated. Subgroup analyses were performed. Results. An online survey was completed by 150 TR patients. Shortness of breath was the most important attribute and accounted for 65.8% of treatment decision making. The average patients' predicted probability of preferring a "procedure-like" profile over a "medical management-like" profile was 99.7%. This decreased to 78.9% for a level change from severe to moderate in shortness of breath in the "medical management-like" profile. Subgroup analysis confirmed that patients older than 64 y had a stronger preference to avoid severe shortness of breath compared with younger patients (P < 0.02), as did severe or worse TR patients relative to moderate. New York Heart Association class I/II patients more strongly preferred to avoid procedural reintervention risk relative to class III/IV patients (P < 0.03). Conclusion. TR patients are willing to accept higher procedural reintervention risk if shortness of breath is alleviated. This risk tolerance is higher for older and more symptomatic patients. These results emphasize the appropriateness of developing TR therapies and the importance of addressing symptom burden. Highlights: This study provides quantitative patient preference data from clinically confirmed tricuspid regurgitation (TR) patients to understand their treatment preferences.Using a targeted literature search and patient, physician, and Food and Drug Administration feedback, a cross-sectional survey with a discrete-choice experiment that focused on 5 of the most important attributes to TR patients was developed and administered online.TR patients are willing to accept higher procedural reintervention risk if shortness of breath is alleviated, and this risk tolerance is higher for older and more symptomatic patients.