Real-World Management Strategies of Anticoagulated Atrial Fibrillation Patients After a Clinically Significant Bleeding Episode.

BACKGROUND: Systemic anticoagulation for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) carries inherent bleeding risks, and determining whether and when to resume anticoagulation after significant bleeding is a common dilemma. We aimed to describe the clinical characteristics of AF patients discharged after a bleeding event, document real-life thromboembolic prevention strategy (TPS), and analyse their associated clinical outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of anticoagulated AF patients admitted for bleeding from 2017 to 2019. RESULTS: A total of 140 patients were included, with a mean age of 78.6 years. Four discharge groups were defined: 75 patients (53.5%) had optimal anticoagulation (OA), 37 (26.4%) had a suboptimal antithrombotic regimen (SAR; low-dose direct oral anticoagulants without dose-reduction criteria or antiplatelet therapy), 10 (7.1%) were referred for left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO), and 18 (12.9%) left without any TPS. All-cause mortality at 2 years was high (28.6%) but not statistically different between groups (P = 0.71). Patients discharged with a TPS (OA/SAR/LAAO referral) were more likely to be readmitted for bleeding at 2 years (34% vs 0%; P = 0.002), and those discharged without a TPS had higher rates of stroke (16.6% vs 1.4%; P = 0.003). SAR yielded readmission rates for bleeding similar to resumption of OA (27% vs 34.7%; P = 0.41) but was associated with high rates of death or readmission at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: This real-life cohort reveals that clinicians frequently downgrade or discontinue long-term thromboembolic protection after a bleeding event despite current guideline recommendations to the contrary, and downgrading resulted in bleeding risk similar to OA.

Protein and Exercise to Reverse Frailty in Older Men and Women Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Design of the PERFORM-TAVR Trial.

Despite the high procedural success of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), 2 out of 5 older adults report poor physical performance and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in the ensuing months, particularly those with frailty. There has yet to be a trial examining the synergistic effects of exercise and protein supplementation to counteract frailty and improve patient-centred outcomes following TAVR. The PERFORM-TAVR trial is a multicentre parallel-group randomised clinical trial that is enrolling 200 frail older adults ≥ 70 years of age undergoing TAVR. Patients will be randomly allocated to 1 of 2 treatment groups: standard-of-care lifestyle education (control group) or protein-rich oral nutritional supplement for 4 weeks before TAVR with the addition of home-based supervised exercise sessions for 12 weeks after TAVR (intervention group). The primary outcome will be physical performance as measured by a blinded observer using the Short Physical Performance Battery at 3 months. Secondary outcomes at 3, 6, and 12 months will include HRQOL, as measured by the Short-Form 36 Physical and Mental Component summary scores, and a composite safety end point. The PERFORM-TAVR trial is testing a novel frailty intervention in older adults undergoing TAVR to optimise recovery and downstream HRQOL. This represents a potential paradigm shift that highlights the value of assessing and treating patients' frailty in parallel with their underlying heart valve disease. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT03522454.

Rationale and Design of the Randomized Bayesian Multicenter COME-TAVI Trial in Patients With a New Onset Left Bundle Branch Block.

Patients with new-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are at risk of developing delayed high-degree atrioventricular block. Management of new-onset LBBB post-TAVI remains controversial. In the Comparison of a Clinical Monitoring Strategy Versus Electrophysiology-Guided Algorithmic Approach in Patients With a New LBBB After TAVI (COME-TAVI) trial, consenting patients with new-onset LBBB that persists on day 2 after TAVI, meeting exclusion/inclusion criteria, are randomized to an electrophysiological study (EPS)-guided approach or 30-day electrocardiographic monitoring. In the EPS-guided approach, patients with a His to ventricle (HV) interval ≥ 65 ms undergo permanent pacemaker implantation. Patients randomized to noninvasive monitoring receive a wearable continuous electrocardiographic recording and transmitting device for 30 days. Follow-up will be performed at 3, 6, and 12 months. The primary endpoint is a composite outcome designed to capture net clinical benefit. The endpoint incorporates major consequences of both strategies in patients with new-onset LBBB after TAVI, as follows: (i) sudden cardiac death; (ii) syncope; (iii) atrioventricular conduction disorder requiring a pacemaker (for a class I or IIa indication); and (iv) complications related to the pacemaker or EPS. The trial incorporates a Bayesian design with a noninformative prior, outcome-adaptive randomization (initially 1:1), and 2 prespecified interim analyses once 25% and 50% of the anticipated number of primary endpoints are reached. The trial is event-driven, with an anticipated upper limit of 452 patients required to reach 77 primary outcome events over 12 months of follow-up. In summary, the aim of this Bayesian multicentre randomized trial is to compare 2 management strategies in patients with new-onset LBBB post-TAVI-an EPS-guided approach vs noninvasive 30-day monitoring. Trial registration number: NCT03303612.

Les patients chez qui un bloc de branche gauche (BBG) est récemment apparu à la suite de l'implantation valvulaire aortique par cathéter (IVAC) présentent un risque de bloc auriculoventriculaire de haut degré tardif. La prise en charge d'un BBG récemment apparu après une IVAC demeure controversée. Dans le cadre de l'essai COME-TAVI (Comparison of a ClinicalMonitoring Strategy VersusElectrophysiology-Guided Algorithmic Approach in Patients With a New LBBB AfterTAVI, ou comparaison d'une stratégie de surveillance clinique, par rapport à une approche guidée par étude électrophysiologique et fondée sur un algorithme, chez des patients présentant un BBG d'apparition récente à la suite d'une IVAC), des patients qui présentent un BBG d'apparition récente persistant le 2e jour après une IVAC, qui répondent aux critères d'admissibilité et qui ont donné leur consentement sont répartis aléatoirement pour être suivis à l'aide d'une approche guidée par une étude électrophysiologique (EEP) ou faire l'objet d'une surveillance électrocardiographique d'une durée de 30 jours. Un stimulateur cardiaque est implanté chez les patients du groupe de l'EEP dont l'intervalle HV (temps de conduction dans le tronc du faisceau de His jusqu'aux ventricules) est ≥ 65 ms. Les patients du groupe de surveillance non invasive reçoivent un dispositif portable d'enregistrement et de transmission continue de données électrocardiographiques pour une période de 30 jours. Le suivi sera réalisé aux 3e, 6e et 12e mois. Le critère d'évaluation principal est un paramètre composite conçu afin de saisir le bienfait clinique net. Il comprend les conséquences majeures des deux stratégies chez les patients présentant un BBG d'apparition récente après une IVAC, comme suit : (i) mort subite d'origine cardiaque; (ii) syncope; (iii) trouble de la conduction auriculoventriculaire nécessitant la pose d'un stimulateur cardiaque (pour une indication de classe I ou IIa); et (iv) complications relatives au stimulateur cardiaque ou à l'EEP. L'essai intègre une conception bayésienne avec une répartition aléatoire (dans un rapport initial de 1:1) antérieure non informative adaptée aux résultats et deux analyses intermédiaires définies au préalable lorsque 25 % et 50 % du nombre anticipé des critères d'évaluation principaux seront atteints. L'essai est axé sur les événements, et la limite supérieure anticipée pour atteindre 77 événements relatifs aux critères d'évaluation principaux sur 12 mois de suivi est de 452 patients. En résumé, l'objectif de cet essai bayésien multicentrique à répartition aléatoire est de comparer deux stratégies de prise en charge de patients présentant un BBG d'apparition récente après une IVAC, soit une approche guidée par une EEP, par rapport à une surveillance non invasive de 30 jours. Trial registration number: NCT03303612.

Automated and semi-automated 3D echocardiographic software for aortic annulus sizing in transcatheter aortic valve implantation helps bridge the gap between expert and novice operators.

3D-transesophageal echocardiography (3D-TEE) is an alternative to multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) for aortic annulus (AoA) sizing in preparation for Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We aim to evaluate how the fully automated (auto) and semi-automated (SA) TEE methods perform compared to conventional manual TEE method and the gold standard MDCT for annulus sizing both in expert and novice operators. In this prospective cohort study, eighty-nine patients with severe aortic stenosis underwent multimodality imaging with 3D-TEE and MDCT. Annular measurements were collected by expert echocardiographers using 3D auto, SA and manual methods and compared to MDCT. A novice in the field of echocardiography retrospectively measured the AoA for all patients using the same methods. TEE measurements, independently of the method used, had good to very good agreement to MDCT. They significantly underestimated aortic annular area and circumference vs. MDCT with the auto method underestimating it the most and the manual method the least (6.5% and 1.3% respectively for area and circumference). For experts, the manual TEE method offered the least systematic bias while the SA method had narrower limits of agreement (LOA). For the novice operator, SA method provided the least bias and narrower LOA vs. MDCT. There is good agreement between novice and experts for all 3 TEE methods but better agreement with auto and SA methods as opposed to manual one. Our study supports the use of 3D-TEE as a complementary method to MDCT for aortic annular sizing. The newer auto and SA software, that requires minimal operator intervention, is an easy to use, reliable and reproducible tool for aortic annulus sizing for experienced operators, and especially less experienced ones.

Inaccuracy of brachial blood pressure and its potential impact on treatment and aortic blood pressure estimation.

OBJECTIVE: Although brachial cuff SBP is universally used to guide hypertension management, it can differ significantly from intraarterial SBP. We examine the potential impacts of cuff-to-intraarterial brachial SBP (bSBP) mismatch on hypertension treatment and accuracy towards central SBP. METHODS: In 303 individuals, cuff bSBP (CUFF-bSBP) and central SBP were measured using a Mobil-o-Graph simultaneously to intraarterial bSBP (IA-bSBP) and aortic SBP. According to the difference between CUFF-bSBP and IA-bSBP, we identified three phenotypes: Underestimation (CUFF-bSBP < IA-bSBP by >10 mmHg); No Mismatch (CUFF-bSBP within 10 mmHg of IA-bSBP); Overestimation (CUFF-bSBP > IA-bSBP by >10 mmHg) phenotypes. Risk of overtreatment and undertreatment, and accuracy (ARTERY society criteria: mean difference ≤5 ±â€Š8 mmHg) were determined. A multiple linear regression model was used to assess variables associated with the bSBP difference. RESULTS: Underestimation (n = 142), No Mismatch (n = 136) and Overestimation (n = 25) phenotypes had relatively similar characteristics and CUFF-bSBP (124 ±â€Š17, 122 ±â€Š14, 127 ±â€Š19 mmHg, P = 0.19) but different aortic SBP (133 ±â€Š21, 120 ±â€Š16, 112 ±â€Š18 mmHg, P < 0.001). In the underestimation phenotype, 59% were at risk of undertreatment (14% in No Mismatch), whereas 50% in the Overestimation phenotype were at risk of overtreatment (17% in No Mismatch). CUFF-bSBP accurately estimated aortic SBP only in the No Mismatch Group (mean difference 1.6 ±â€Š8.2 mmHg) whereas central BP never met the accuracy criteria. Male sex, higher height and active smoking were associated with lesser underestimation of bSBP difference. CONCLUSION: The brachial cuff lacks accuracy towards intraarterial BP in a significant proportion of patients, potentially leading to increased risks of BP mismanagement and inaccurate determination of central BP. This illustrates the need to improve the accuracy of cuff-based BP monitors.

Mortality risk after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: analysis of the predictive accuracy of the Transcatheter Valve Therapy registry risk assessment model.

AIMS: The risk assessment tools currently used to predict mortality in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) were designed for patients undergoing cardiac surgery. We aimed to assess the accuracy of the TAVI dedicated risk score in predicting mortality outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients (n=1,038) undergoing TAVI at a single institution from 2014 to 2016 were included. The ACC/TVT registry mortality risk score, the STS-PROM score and the EuroSCORE II were calculated for all patients. In-hospital and 30-day all-cause mortality rates were 1.3% and 2.9%, respectively. The ACC/TVT risk stratification tool scored higher for patients who died in-hospital than for those who survived the index hospitalisation (6.4±4.6 vs. 3.5±1.6, p=0.03, respectively). The ACC/TVT score showed a high level of discrimination, C-index for in-hospital mortality 0.74, 95% CI: (0.59-0.88). There were no significant differences between the performance of the ACC/TVT registry risk score, the EuroSCORE II and the STS-PROM score for in-hospital and 30-day mortality rates. CONCLUSIONS: The ACC/TVT registry risk model is a dedicated tool to aid in the prediction of in-hospital mortality risk after TAVI.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement by a Novel Suprasternal Approach.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) provides therapy for patients with severe aortic stenosis at extreme, high, or intermediate surgical risk. Transfemoral access has been the preferred access route; however, this approach is not suitable for many TAVR candidates. A suprasternal approach may allow for earlier ambulation and shorter hospital stay as compared with other, nontransfemoral approaches. METHODS: A total of 11 patients with unsuitable transfemoral access underwent suprasternal TAVR. Propensity matching was used to compare suprasternal patients to patients undergoing transaortic, transapical, and trans-subclavian TAVR. RESULTS: Groups were well matched for baseline characteristics. A self-expanding valve device was used in 6 (54.5%) and a balloon-expandable valve in 5 (45.5%) of the 11 patients treated by the suprasternal route. Suprasternal and trans-subclavian patients were able to ambulate earlier than patients treated by the transaortic route, a median 1.6 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.9 to 1.8), 1.6 days (IQR: 0.9 to 2.7), and 3.9 days (IQR: 1.9 to 4.5) after the procedure for suprasternal, trans-subclavian, and transaortic patients, respectively (p = 0.001). Length of hospitalization was shorter for patients treated by suprasternal or trans-subclavian access in comparison with patients treated by the transaortic or transapical approach: median 4 days (IQR: 3 to 8) and 4 days (IQR: 4 to 8) versus 8 days (IQR: 6 to 14) and 6 days (IQR: 7 to 11) for suprasternal and trans-subclavian versus transaortic and transapical, respectively (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Suprasternal and trans-subclavian access are associated with earlier ambulation and shorter hospitalization than other nontransfemoral TAVR routes, without an increase in complications. Further study is required to determine if suprasternal is the alternative access of choice for TAVR patients with poor transfemoral vasculature.

Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Closure Using Intracardiac Echocardiographic Guidance From the Left Atrium.

BACKGROUND: Most commonly, left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion procedures are performed using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) guidance and general anaesthesia. Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) offers potential advantages over TEE, however, ICE-guided LAA occlusion experience is limited and has been typically performed from a right-sided location where LAA visualization might be suboptimal. We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous LAA occlusion using ICE guidance performed from the left atrium. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with atrial fibrillation, significant risk for stroke, and long-term contraindication to anticoagulation underwent LAA closure with the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (St Jude Medical, Inc, St Paul, MN) with mild sedation and ICE guidance. The ICE catheter was introduced in the left atrium through a second transseptal puncture. Patients underwent preprocedural TEE to rule out thrombus and 3-month follow-up TEE to assess occlusion grade. Patient characteristics, procedural data, effectiveness of ICE imaging, quality of occlusion, and complications were prospectively recorded. RESULTS: Procedural success was achieved in 36 of 37 patients (97%). Closure was complete or near complete (grade ≥3 according to ICE and angiography) in all cases where the device was released. In all cases, ICE imaging yielded good LAA and surrounding structure visualization and adequate procedural guidance. Three major procedural or in-hospital complications occurred. Median length of stay was 1 day. Follow-up TEE documented the absence of any residual peri-device leak in all but 1 (29 of 30) case. CONCLUSION: Initial experience suggests LAA occlusion with the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug using ICE guidance from the left atrium is feasible, reproducible, and safe.

Effectiveness and safety of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients with myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of observational studies.

INTRODUCTION: Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCT) showed that glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) are associated with reduced adverse events following primary percutaneous coronary revascularization (PCI). However, the external validity of RCTs is generally limited due to their restricted inclusion of patients. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of GPI, as adjuvant therapy for primary PCI in real-life patients with myocardial infarction with ST segment elevation (STEMI) from the general population. METHODS: We identified all published peer-reviewed observational studies enrolling STEMI patients who underwent primary PCI. We performed random-effect meta-analyses to determine the association of GPI with major adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 11 studies, enrolling 12,253 patients, were retained for this meta-analysis. GPI was associated with approximately 53% reduction in short-term mortality (odds ratio (OR): 0.47, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.32-0.68). There was a 62% reduction in long-term mortality associated with GPI (OR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.30-0.50). GPI was associated with a 62% reduction in 30-day re-infarction (OR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.24-0.60) and 42% reduction in 30-day repeat PCI (OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.36-0.94). A non-significant increase in major bleeding with GPI was observed with an OR of 1.55 (95% CI: 0.92-2.62). CONCLUSIONS: GPI is associated with significant reductions in short-term mortality, re-infarction and repeat PCI, long-term mortality and an inconclusive increase in major bleeding. These results provide evidence for the safety and effectiveness of GPI as adjuvant therapy for primary PCI in real-life STEMI patients.

Safety and effectiveness of enoxaparin following fibrinolytic therapy: Results of the Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI)-QUEBEC registry.

BACKGROUND: Previous randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses demonstrated the superior efficacy of enoxaparin (ENOX) over unfractionated heparin (UFH) in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The external validity of randomized controlled trials may be limited by selective inclusion of patients who are younger and healthier than the 'real-life' population. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of ENOX compared with UFH in unselected STEMI patients. METHODS: The safety and effectiveness of ENOX and UFH were compared in STEMI patients who received fibrinolytic therapy at 17 Quebec hospitals in 2003. RESULTS: A total of 498 STEMI patients received systemic anticoagulation, with ENOX and UFH administered in 114 and 384 patients, respectively. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the two patient groups. The rates of in-hospital major adverse cardiac or cerebral events were 11.4% in the ENOX group compared with 14.0% in the UFH group (P=0.51). In-hospital death or nonfatal reinfarction occurred in 7.9% of patients who received ENOX compared with 9.9% of patients who received UFH (P=0.52). Major bleeding occurred in 4.4% of patients who received ENOX versus 6.0% in patients who received UFH (P=0.51). INTERPRETATION: There was no significant difference in the rates of in-hospital adverse events in the ENOX group compared with the UFH group, when used in the real-life context. Larger observational studies may further confirm the safety, effectiveness and optimal duration of the administration of ENOX in unselected STEMI patients treated with fibrinolysis.

HISTORIQUE : Des essais aléatoires et contrôlés et des méta-analyses passés ont démontré l'efficacité supérieure de l'enoxaparine (ENOX) par rapport à l'héparine non fractionnée (HNF) chez les patients ayant un infarctus du myocarde avec élévation du segment ST (IMÉST). La validité externe des essais aléatoires et contrôlés peut être limitée par l'inclusion sélective de patients qui sont plus jeunes et en meilleure santé qu'au sein de la « véritable ¼ population. OBJECTIF : Évaluer l'innocuité et l'efficacité de l'ENOX par rapport à l'HNF chez des patients non sélectionnés ayant eu un IMÉST. MÉTHODOLOGIE : Les chercheurs ont comparé l'innocuité et l'efficacité de l'ENOX et de l'HNF chez des patients qui ont subi un IMÉST et ont reçu des fibrinolytiques dans 17 hôpitaux québécois en 2003. RÉSULTATS : Au total, 498 patients ayant subi un IMÉST ont reçu des anticoagulants systémiques, l'ENOX et l'HNF ayant été administrés chez 114 et 384 patients, respectivement. On ne constatait aucune différence à l'égard des caractéristiques de base des deux groupes de patients. Le taux d'événements cardiaques ou cérébraux négatifs majeurs en milieu hospitalier s'élevait à 11,4 % au sein du groupe prenant de l'ENOX, par rapport à 14,0 % dans celui prenant de l'HNF (P=0,51). Un décès en milieu hospitalier ou un infarctus non fatal s'est produit chez 7,9 % des patients qui avaient reçu de l'ENOX par rapport à 9,9 % de ceux qui avaient reçu de l'HNF (P=0,52). Des saignements majeurs se sont produits chez 4,4 % des patients qui avaient reçu de l'ENOX et 6,0 % de ceux qui avaient reçu de l'HNF (P=0,51). INTERPRÉTATION : En milieu réel, on ne remarquait aucune différence significative dans les taux de réactions néfastes en milieu hospitalier au sein du groupe prenant de l'ENOX par rapport à celui prenant de l'HNF. De plus vastes études d'observation pourraient mieux confirmer l'innocuité, l'efficacité et la durée optimale de l'administration d'ENOX chez des patients non sélectionnés ayant eu un IMÉST et étant traités par fibrinolyse.

Kinin B2 receptor is not involved in enalapril-induced apoptosis and regression of hypertrophy in spontaneously hypertensive rat aorta: possible role of B1 receptor.

1. Treatment with enalapril induces smooth muscle cell apoptosis and regression of aortic hypertrophy in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs), whereas combined blockade of angiotensin II AT(1) and AT(2) receptors does not. We postulated that vascular apoptosis with enalapril involves enhanced half-life of bradykinin (BK) and kinin B(2) receptor stimulation. 2. SHR, 11-weeks old, were treated for 4 weeks with enalapril (30 mg kg(-1) day(-1)), Hoe 140 (500 microg kg(-1) day(-1); B(2) receptor antagonist), alone or in combination. Controls received vehicle. 3. The half-life of hypotensive responses to intra-arterial bolus injections of BK were significantly increased in SHR anesthetized after 4 weeks of enalapril, an effect prevented by Hoe 140. The magnitude of BK-induced hypotension was significantly attenuated in all rats treated with Hoe 140. 4. As compared to placebo, enalapril treatment significantly reduced blood pressure (-34+/-2%), aortic hypertrophy (-20+/-3%), hyperplasia (-37+/-5%) and DNA synthesis (-61+/-8%), while it increased aortic DNA fragmentation by two-fold. Hoe 140 given alone or in combination with enalapril affected none of these parameters. 5. As a possible alternative mechanism, aortae isolated during the second week of enalapril treatment showed a transient upregulation of contractile responses to des-Arg(9)BK (EC(50)<1 nM), which were significantly reduced by [Leu(8)]des-Arg(9)BK (10 microM). Moreover, in vitro receptor autoradiography revealed an increase in expression of B(1) and B(2) receptor binding sites by 8-11 days of enalapril treatment. 6. Aortic apoptosis induction and hypertrophy regression with enalapril do not involve kinin B(2) receptors in SHR. Kinins acting via B(1) receptors remains a candidate mechanism.