Early-onset SCA17 with 43 TBP repeats: expanding the phenotype?

The SCA17 clinical phenotype includes characteristics associated with cerebellar and cortical atrophy such as ataxia, dementia, epilepsy, chorea and parkinsonian features. Here we describe the case of a 38-year-old male presenting with ataxia, cognitive impairment and seizures, who was found to carry 43 repeats on one allele of the TATA-binding protein (TBP) gene. Therefore, genetic analysis of TBP gene triplets was performed on the patient's entire family, identifying three asymptomatic carriers of the same allele. A neuroradiological phenotype appeared to segregate with this allele, suggesting that it may play at least a contributory role in the determination of SCA17.

Early predictors of peripheral neurotoxicity in cisplatin and paclitaxel combination chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the possible use of clinical signs of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN) or of nerve growth factor (NGF) circulating levels to predict the final outcome of CIPN. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-two women affected by locally advanced squamous cervical carcinoma treated with TP (paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 over a 3 h infusion plus cisplatin 75 mg/m2) or TIP (TP plus ifosphamide 5 mg/m2) were examined and scored according to the Total Neuropathy Score (TNS), before and during chemotherapy. RESULTS: A correlation with the final severity of CIPN was observed with vibration perception and deep tendon reflex evaluation, while pin sensibility, strength, and autonomic symptoms and signs were not informative. A highly significant correlation existed between the decrease in circulating levels of NGF and the severity of CIPN (r = -0.579; P < 0.001; 95% confidence limits -0.702 to -0.423). However, circulating levels of NGF were not effective as predictors of the final neurological outcome of each patient. CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that a precise clinical evaluation of the peripheral nervous system of patients treated with platinum and taxane combination polychemotherapy not only gives reliable information regarding the course of CIPN, but also can be used to predict the final neurological outcome of the treatment.

Grading of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity using the Total Neuropathy Scale.

The authors compared clinically based neurotoxicity scales with the Total Neuropathy Scale, with the aim of improving the grading of the severity of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). The severity of CIPN was evaluated in a series of 60 women treated with cisplatin- and paclitaxel-based chemotherapy. A reduced version of TNS (TNSr) was also compared. The authors concluded that the TNS and TNSr can be used to assess the severity of CIPN effectively, and the results of this evaluation can be reliably correlated with the oncologic grading of sensory peripheral neurotoxicity.

Neuro- and ototoxicity of high-dose carboplatin treatment in poor prognosis ovarian cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Hematopoietic toxicity of high-dose carboplatin (HD-CBDCA) chemotherapy can be managed effectively with autologous blood cell support, but no conclusive data are available on its neuro- and ototoxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We determined the neuro- and ototoxicity of HD-CBDCA in 10 patients affected by advanced ovarian cancer. HD-CBDCA was delivered as 24-hour continuous infusion or as 5-day schedules. Each patient underwent an extended clinical and instrumental neurological and otological evaluation before, during and after treatment. RESULTS: After HD-CBDCA only 1 patient had a clinically-evident peripheral neuropathy, while 3 additional patients had only distal paresthesias. Neurophysiological examination evidenced mild, although diffuse, sensory nerve impairment. Motor nerve impairment was also occasionally observed. All the sensory and motor pathological changes had a favorable course during the follow-up period. Ototoxicity was more severe than neurotoxicity and, in one case it was dose-limiting and audiologic impairment tended to remain constant also in the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: HD-CBDCA treatment can be tolerated by most of the patients, but careful monitoring of neuro- and, especially, ototoxicity should be planned.

Antibodies of the anti-Yo and anti-Ri type in the absence of paraneoplastic neurological syndromes: a long-term survey of ovarian cancer patients.

In recent years several authors have described a close correlation between circulating antineuronal antibodies of different types and the occurrence of paraneoplastic neurological syndromes. Because this has not been widely accepted, we screened 300 serum samples from 181 ovarian cancer patients for the presence of circulating antineuronal antibodies by immunofluorescence. The findings were confirmed by immunoblotting. In 11 patients circulating antineuronal antibodies were detected. In 4 patients they were classified as anti-Yo and in 7 as anti-Ri, titres ranging from 1:400 to 1: 204,800. All the patients underwent thorough neurological and neurophysiological investigations, with special regard to paraneoplastic syndrome. None of them had symptoms pointing to a paraneoplastic neurological syndrome, although patients were followed up to 2 years after the first examination. Thus the frequency of circulating antineuronal antibodies in ovarian cancer patients is higher than the frequency of paraneoplastic syndromes, and antibody positivity does not necessarily lead to the appearance of a neurological paraneoplastic syndrome.

Neurotoxicity and ototoxicity of cisplatin plus paclitaxel in comparison to cisplatin plus cyclophosphamide in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.

PURPOSE: To compare the neurotoxicity and ototoxicity of combination cisplatin plus paclitaxel versus cisplatin plus cyclophosphamide using extensive clinical and instrumental evaluation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-six of 51 consecutive patients affected by-epithelial ovarian cancer seen in our institution between October 1994 and August 1995 entered the study. After randomization, they were assigned to receive cisplatin 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks associated with cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 (CC group, n = 22) or paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 over a 3-hour infusion (CP group, n = 24). Treatment was repeated six times in 43 patients and nine times in 25. Before treatment and after three, six, and nine courses of chemotherapy, patients underwent clinical and instrumental neurologic and otologic examinations. RESULTS: Mild sensory impairment was evident even after only three courses of both treatments and signs and symptoms were more severe at the end of treatment. On clinical grounds only, it was possible to demonstrate after six and nine courses a difference between CC and CP treatment, due to the involvement in some CP patients of pain and thermal sensory modalities. However, the overall severity of the neuropathy was similar. Audiometric parameters demonstrated a more negative outcome after treatment in CC compared with CP patients. However, the different severity of the involvement was closely correlated to this initial difference in audiologic performance. CONCLUSION: Up to nine courses of chemotherapy, the CC and CP schedules are similar in terms of severity of neurotoxicity and ototoxicity when patients are evaluated during and immediately after treatment. With the doses used in our study, these toxicities are not dose-limiting. Our results suggest that most of the toxic effects observed during the treatment were due to cisplatin.

Risk factors for the development of severe cisplatin neurotoxicity.

Cisplatin sensory neuropathy is not equally severe in all patients and may progress even after drug withdrawal. A major goal in cisplatin chemotherapy would be the identification of early predictors of an unfavorable neurological outcome in order to adjust the schedules of administration. The final neurological outcome of 63 women treated with the same schedule of cisplatin (CDDP) was compared with the general demographic and oncological parameters and with the baseline neurological results. No definite association could be drawn between any of the parameters evaluated and peripheral neuropathy. Further studies are needed to investigate the individual factors which are at the basis of the remarkable variability of this severe side effect of CDDP.

Peripheral neurotoxicity of taxol in patients previously treated with cisplatin.

BACKGROUND: Taxol is a new anticancer drug that acts as a tubulin polymeration enhancer. Its major toxicities are myelosuppression, hypersensitivity, and mucositis, but it also induces peripheral nerve damage. The use of taxol has recently been proposed for platinum-resistant cancers, but in these cases there is a possibility of cumulative toxicity in the peripheral nervous system. METHODS: Twenty-two patients affected by a relapse of cisplatin-treated ovarian cancer were examined clinically and neurophysiologically to determine the evolution of taxol-induced peripheral somatic and autonomic neurotoxicity and the possible cumulative effect of a combination of taxol and cisplatin. Each patient was examined before, during, and after taxol treatment (using a dose of 135 or 175 mg/m2 in 3 hours every 3 weeks). RESULTS: No patients were excluded from the study because of unacceptable toxicities of any kind. The serial examinations demonstrated that taxol induced onset of (or worsening of preexisting) neuropathic symptoms and signs in almost all the patients. The features were those of a distal, symmetrical, sensory polyneuropathy due to an axonopathy. Motor nerves and the autonomic nervous system were unaffected. Taxol neurotoxicity appeared early in the course of the treatment (i.e., after three courses) and was not severely disabling. In most cases after the early onset of peripheral neuropathy, stabilization of this side effect occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the low doses of taxol used in this study, the sensory nerve damage was unexpectedly severe. It appears that a cumulative, but not dose-limiting, neurotoxic effect occurs using taxol in patients previously treated with cisplatin.

Weekly cisplatin +/- glutathione in relapsed ovarian carcinoma.

On the basis of experimental data showing the efficacy of glutathione (GSH) as a protective agent on cisplatin-induced neurotoxicity and the clinical evidence of the low incidence of neurotoxicity in high-dose cisplatin + GSH treated patients we evaluated the neuroprotective effect of GSH in a randomized phase II study. Thirty-three patients with relapsed ovarian cancer after a disease-free interval of at least 1 year and a cumulative dose of prior cisplatin ranging 450-650 mg m-2 were randomized to receive cisplatin 50 mg m-2 weekly +/- 2.5 g GSH for 9 consecutive weeks. Clinical and instrumental neurologic and otologic evaluations were made at the baseline and at the end of the study. Overall response rate in 31 evaluable patients was: 9/15 in group A and 12/16 in group B, including 4/15 vs 7/16 complete responses. The administered dose intensity of cisplatin was higher in the GSH treated patients (100% dose intensity was received by 56% vs 27%). A trend in terms of neuroprotection was detected in the GSH treated group, and no major difference was observed in the other toxicities between the two groups. It is concluded that possible benefit can be expected from the concomitant administration of GSH and cisplatin in patients at high risk of developing neurotoxicity, without decreasing the anti-tumor activity.

Long-term peripheral neurotoxicity of cisplatin in patients with successfully treated epithelial ovarian cancer.

We evaluated clinically and neurophysiologically the immediate and long-term involvement of the peripheral nervous system in 22 selected patients with epithelial ovarian cancer successfully treated with DDP alone or in combination with non-neurotoxic drugs. While the motor nerves were unaffected, generally the involvement of sensory nerves was more severe at the examination performed several months after DDP discontinuation than at the evaluation performed after the "induction phase". We conclude that up to now the importance of long-term DDP-induced peripheral nerve damage has probably been underestimated. DDP-induced long-term damage is at least as severe as the immediate toxicity and, moreover, it is likely that complete recovery can occur, if ever, only years after DDP discontinuation.

Antiepileptic drugs and peripheral nerve function: a multicenter screening investigation of 141 patients with chronic treatment. Collaborative Group for the Study of Epilepsy.

One hundred forty-one adult patients treated for no less than 6 months with standard daily doses of the commonest antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were recruited in five Italian centers and submitted to intensive clinical and electrophysiologic investigation to assess the effects of AEDs on peripheral nerves. Eighty percent of the patients were receiving monotherapy. Carbamazepine (CBZ) was the most common AED (51 cases), followed by phenytoin (PHT) (46), phenobarbital (PB) (42), and valproate (VPA) (25). Fifty-three percent of the patients had one or more symptoms of polyneuropathy (paresthesias being the most common complaint). The neurologic examination was abnormal in 32%. Electrophysiologic findings in two or more separate nerves were abnormal in 77 patients (54.6%); of these, 27 (19.1%) had abnormal neurologic findings and 21 (14.9%) also had symptoms of polyneuropathy. Sensory functions were most frequently impaired. Sural nerve biopsy was performed in 4 patients receiving monotherapy with CBZ, PHT, PB, and VPA. Except in patients receiving VPA (in whom no morphologic abnormalities were detected), mild predominantly axonal damage with secondary myelin changes was noted. A correlation was noted between polyneuropathy, age of the patient and, to a lesser extent, receipt of two or more AEDs.

Clinical and neurophysiologic evaluation of the effect of Cisplatin administration on the motor nerves.

Cisplatin is known to induce a disabling sensory peripheral neuropathy. However, some authors have suggested that cisplatin may also cause motor impairment, raising doubts as to the pathogenetic hypothesis of primary damage to the dorsal root ganglia neurons induced by the drug. In order to clarify the real extent of motor nerve damage induced by cisplatin we performed a prospective neurophysiologic study on 33 patients affected by ovarian cancer in which cisplatin was administered as single anticancer agent. No motor nerve impairment ensued after cisplatin treatment and, therefore, we conclude that the occurrence of motor neuropathy during or immediately after, cisplatin treatment is probably coincidental and indicates the need for a careful search for concomitant causes of peripheral nerve damage.