Aztreonam-avibactam versus meropenem for the treatment of serious infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria (REVISIT): a descriptive, multinational, open-label, phase 3, randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: There is a need for additional therapeutic options for serious infections caused by Gram-negative pathogens. In the phase 3, descriptive REVISIT study, we investigated the safety and efficacy of aztreonam-avibactam in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections or hospital-acquired pneumonia or ventilator-associated pneumonia (HAP-VAP) caused, or suspected to be caused, by Gram-negative bacteria. METHODS: This prospective, multinational, open-label, central assessor-masked study enrolled adults who were hospitalised with a complicated intra-abdominal infection or HAP-VAP. Patients were randomly allocated via block randomisation using interactive response technology stratified by infection type in a 2:1 ratio to aztreonam-avibactam (with metronidazole for complicated intra-abdominal infection) or meropenem with or without colistin for 5-14 days for complicated intra-abdominal infection or 7-14 days for HAP-VAP. The primary endpoint was clinical cure at the test-of-cure visit (within 3 days before or after day 28) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Secondary endpoints included 28-day mortality in the ITT population and safety in patients in the ITT population who received study drug (safety analysis set). No formal hypothesis testing was planned. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03329092) and EudraCT (2017-002742-68) and is complete. FINDINGS: Between April 5, 2018, and Feb 23, 2023, we screened 461 patients. 422 patients were enrolled and randomly allocated (282 in the aztreonam-avibactam group and 140 in the meropenem group, forming the ITT analysis set), of whom ten patients (seven in the aztreonam-avibactam group and three in the meropenem group) were randomly allocated but did not receive study treatment. 271 (64%) of 422 patients had at least one Gram-negative pathogen from an adequate specimen identified at baseline. The most frequent baseline pathogens were Enterobacterales (252 [93%] of 271). Overall, 19 (24%) of 80 isolates tested for carbapenemases were carbapenemase-positive (serine, metallo-ß-lactamase, or both). 193 (68·4%) of 282 patients in the aztreonam-avibactam group and 92 (65·7%) of 140 in the meropenem group had clinical cure at the test-of-cure visit (treatment difference 2·7% [95% CI -6·6 to 12·4]). For patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection, the adjudicated clinical cure rate was 76·4% (159 of 208) for the aztreonam-avibactam group and 74·0% (77 of 104) for the meropenem group. Cure rates in patients with HAP-VAP were 45·9% (34 of 74) for aztreonam-avibactam and 41·7% (15 of 36) for meropenem. 28-day all-cause mortality rates were 4% (12 of 282) for aztreonam-avibactam and 7% (ten of 140) for meropenem; in patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection, mortality was 2% (four of 208) and 3% (three of 104) for aztreonam-avibactam and meropenem, respectively, and in patients with HAP-VAP, mortality was 11% (eight of 74) and 19% (seven of 36), respectively. Aztreonam-avibactam was generally well tolerated, and safety findings were consistent with the known safety profile of aztreonam monotherapy. There were no treatment-related serious adverse events in the aztreonam-avibactam group. INTERPRETATION: These phase 3 efficacy and safety data provide support for aztreonam-avibactam as a potential therapeutic option for complicated intra-abdominal infection or HAP-VAP caused by Gram-negative bacteria. FUNDING: Pfizer.

Impact of discontinuing routine fluoroquinolone prophylaxis in neutropenic allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Uncertainty exists as to the role of fluoroquinolone (FQ) prophylaxis for patients undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in the era of rising antibiotic resistance. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate rates of bloodstream infections (BSI), resistance patterns and outcomes of patients after discontinuing routine FQ prophylaxis administration. METHODS: All adult recipients of first HSCT from 2017 to 2020 were retrospectively included and classified according to time of HSCT as FQ group (HSCT January 2017-December 2018) or no FQ group (January 2019-December 2020). The primary outcome was Gram-negative (GN) BSI from day -7 to 30 days post-HSCT. The independent association between the study period and BSI was assessed using survival analysis, and adjusting for confounders. RESULTS: We included 254 patients, 130 (51%) and 124 (49%) in the FQ and no FQ groups, respectively. Compared to the FQ group, no FQ had significantly more GN BSI (21% versus 33%, P = 0.027) and the median time to first GN BSI was significantly shorter [4 (IQR 1-8) days versus 6 (1-10) days, P = 0.009]. Following adjustment, FQ prophylaxis remained associated with lower hazard for GN BSI (hazard ratio 0.57, 95% CI 0.34-0.93). Eighty-two GN BSI episodes had FQ susceptibility testing. More GN BSI episodes were FQ resistant in the FQ group (68.9% versus 41.6%, P = 0.021). No significant difference was found for 30-day mortality, time to first febrile neutropenia and time to first broad-spectrum antibiotics between the groups (P was not significant). CONCLUSIONS: FQ prophylaxis is associated with fewer GN BSI in the early post-HSCT period even in high FQ resistance settings, with FQ resistance rates reaching >60% following prophylaxis.

Recurrent Clostridioides difficile infections in solid organ transplant recipients: The international CALIPSO study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in solid-organ transplant (SOT) recipients. METHODS: Retrospective multicenter study including SOT recipients with a first CDI episode in the year after transplantation (Jan 2017-June 2020). The primary outcome measure was recurrence, defined as a new CDI ≤56 days from the first episode. A competing risk analysis was performed using the sub-distribution hazard model multivariable analysis. RESULTS: 191 SOT recipients were included: 101 (52.9%) were kidney, 66 (34.6%) liver, 11 (5.8%) lung, 8 (4.2%) simultaneous pancreas-kidney, 4 (2.1%) heart and 1 (0.5%) pancreas alone recipients. Treatment for the first CDI were: vancomycin (n = 114,59.7%), vancomycin+metronidazole (n = 39,20.4%), metronidazole (n = 26,13.6%), fidaxomicin (n = 9,4.7%), 3 patients did not receive any therapy. After the first CDI, 17/191 (8.9%) patients died within 56-day mortality without having a recurrence, while 23/191 (12%) patients had a recurrence. Among patients with recurrent CDI, 56-day mortality rate was 30.4% (7/23 patients). On multivariable analysis, severe CDI (sHR4.01, 95% CI 1.77-9.08, p < .001) and metronidazole monotherapy (sHR 3.65, 95% CI 1.64-8.14, p = .001) were factors independently associated with recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Metronidazole monotherapy is associated with increased risk of recurrent CDI in SOT recipients. Therapeutic strategies aimed to reduce the risk of recurrence should be implemented in this setting.

Introducing new antibiotics for multidrug-resistant bacteria: obstacles and the way forward.

BACKGROUND: Following intense efforts to revive the dry antibiotic research and development pipeline, a few highly awaited antibiotics with activity against multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria were recently approved. OBJECTIVES: We aim to highlight gaps in the evidence generated for new antibiotics by the time of their approval and to review the consequent limitations of treatment guidelines for priority MDR bacteria. We also report on availability of the new antibiotics, reimbursement strategies allowing use of these antibiotics in hospitals and antibiotic stewardship efforts. SOURCES: We searched PubMed for phase 3 randomized controlled trials that assessed antibiotics approved for use against MDR bacteria between 2013-2023. Other sources included governmental and professional documents regarding policies for reimbursement and use of the new antibiotics. CONTENT: Several gaps in the evidence available regarding the new antibiotics are described related to the trials' target populations, comparators, management algorithm within the trial, non-inferiority hypotheses and assessment of resistance development within the studies. We highlight the risk of current guidelines to increase usage of new antibiotics and consequently accelerate resistance development. Updated mapping of antibiotic availability reveals critical inequality in access to the new antibiotics. Finally, strategies used nationally in Europe to provide access to the new antibiotics are not sufficiently balanced by antibiotic stewardship efforts to calibrate judicious use of the new antibiotics. IMPLICATIONS: Antibiotic resistance is an immediate threat. The present review highlights areas where more systematic and uniform strategies across countries and geographical regions are warranted to improve evidence, availability and use of new broad-spectrum antibiotics.

European society of clinical microbiology and infectious diseases guidelines for antimicrobial stewardship in emergency departments (endorsed by European association of hospital pharmacists).

SCOPE: This European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases guideline provides evidence-based recommendations to support a selection of appropriate antibiotic use practices for patients seen in the emergency department (ED) and guidance for their implementation. The topics addressed in this guideline are (a) Do biomarkers or rapid pathogen tests improve antibiotic prescribing and/or clinical outcomes? (b) Does taking blood cultures in common infectious syndromes improve antibiotic prescribing and/or clinical outcomes? (c) Does watchful waiting without antibacterial therapy or with delayed antibiotic prescribing reduce antibiotic prescribing without worsening clinical outcomes in patients with specific infectious syndromes? (d) Do structured culture follow-up programs in patients discharged from the ED with cultures pending improve antibiotic prescribing? METHODS: An expert panel was convened by European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases and the guideline chair. The panel selected in consensus the four most relevant antimicrobial stewardship topics according to pre-defined relevance criteria. For each main question for the four topics, a systematic review was performed, including randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Both clinical outcomes and stewardship process outcomes related to antibiotic use were deemed relevant. The literature searches were conducted between May 2021 and March 2022. In April 2022, the panel members were formally asked to suggest additional studies that were not identified in the initial searches. Data were summarized in a meta-analysis if possible or otherwise summarized narratively. The certainty of the evidence was classified according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria. The guideline panel reviewed the evidence per topic critically appraising the evidence and formulated recommendations through a consensus-based process. The strength of the recommendations was classified as strong or weak. To substantiate the implementation process, implementation trials or observational studies describing facilitators/barriers for implementation were identified from the same searches and were summarized narratively. RECOMMENDATIONS: The recommendations on the use of biomarkers and rapid pathogen diagnostic tests focus on the initiation of antibiotics in patients admitted through the ED. Their effect on the discontinuation or de-escalation of antibiotics during hospital stay was not reported, neither was their effect on hospital infection prevention and control practices. The recommendations on watchful waiting (i.e. withholding antibiotics with some form of follow-up) focus on specific infectious syndromes for which the primary care literature was also included. The recommendations on blood cultures focus on the indication in three common infectious syndromes in the ED explicitly excluding patients with sepsis or septic shock. Most recommendations are based on very low and low certainty of evidence, leading to weak recommendations or, when no evidence was available, to best practice statements. Implementation of these recommendations needs to be adapted to the specific settings and circumstances of the ED. The scarcity of high-quality studies in the area of antimicrobial stewardship in the ED highlights the need for future research in this field.

Integration of individual preclinical and clinical anti-infective PKPD data to predict clinical study outcomes.

The AIDA randomized clinical trial found no significant difference in clinical failure or survival between colistin monotherapy and colistin-meropenem combination therapy in carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative infections. The aim of this reverse translational study was to integrate all individual preclinical and clinical pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) data from the AIDA trial in a pharmacometric framework to explore whether individualized predictions of bacterial burden were associated with the trial outcomes. The compiled dataset included for each of the 207 patients was (i) information on the infecting Acinetobacter baumannii isolate (minimum inhibitory concentration, checkerboard assay data, and fitness in a murine model), (ii) colistin plasma concentrations and colistin and meropenem dosing history, and (iii) disease scores and demographics. The individual information was integrated into PKPD models, and the predicted change in bacterial count at 24 h for each patient, as well as patient characteristics, was correlated with clinical outcomes using logistic regression. The in vivo fitness was the most important factor for change in bacterial count. A model-predicted growth at 24 h of ≥2-log10 (164/207) correlated positively with clinical failure (adjusted odds ratio, aOR = 2.01). The aOR for one unit increase of other significant predictors were 1.24 for SOFA score, 1.19 for Charlson comorbidity index, and 1.01 for age. This study exemplifies how preclinical and clinical anti-infective PKPD data can be integrated through pharmacodynamic modeling and identify patient- and pathogen-specific factors related to clinical outcomes - an approach that may improve understanding of study outcomes.

Multi-year analysis of the global preclinical antibacterial pipeline: trends and gaps.

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major global health threat estimated to have caused the deaths of 1.27 million people in 2019, which is more than HIV/AIDS and malaria deaths combined. AMR also has significant consequences on the global economy. If not properly addressed, AMR could immensely impact the world's economy, further increasing the poverty burden in low- and middle-income countries. To mitigate the risk of a post-antibiotic society, where the ability to effectively treat common bacterial infections is being severely threatened, it is necessary to establish a continuous supply of new and novel antibacterial medicines. However, there are gaps in the current pipeline that will prove difficult to address, given the time required to develop new agents. To understand the status of upstream antibiotic development and the challenges faced by drug developers in the early development stage, the World Health Organization has regularly assessed the preclinical and clinical antibacterial development pipeline. The review identifies potential new classes of antibiotics or novel mechanisms of action that can better address resistant bacterial strains. This proactive approach is necessary to stay ahead of evolving resistance patterns and to support the availability of effective treatment options. This review examines the trends in preclinical development and attempts to identify gaps and potential opportunities to overcome the numerous hurdles in the early stages of the antibacterial research and development space.

Cross-Sectional Study of Q Fever Seroprevalence among Blood Donors, Israel, 2021.

We evaluated Q fever prevalence in blood donors and assessed the epidemiologic features of the disease in Israel in 2021. We tested serum samples for Coxeilla burnetii phase I and II IgG using immunofluorescent assay, defining a result of >200 as seropositive. We compared geographic and demographic data. We included 1,473 participants; 188 (12.7%) were seropositive. The calculated sex- and age-adjusted national seroprevalence was 13.9% (95% CI 12.2%-15.7%). Male sex and age were independently associated with seropositivity (odds ratio [OR] 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.2; p = 0.005 for male sex; OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.01-1.03; p<0.001 for age). Residence in the coastal plain was independently associated with seropositivity for Q fever (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2-2.3; p<0.001); residence in rural and farming regions was not. Q fever is highly prevalent in Israel. The unexpected spatial distribution in the nonrural coastal plain suggests an unrecognized mode of transmission.

Universal Risk Factors for Mortality in Bloodstream Infections (UNIFORM): a systematic review and Delphi survey.

BACKGROUND: Significant variations in the variables collected in clinical studies focusing on bacteraemia lead to inconsistency in the evaluation of risk factors for mortality. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to define a minimum set of risk factors that should be assessed and reported in all studies assessing survival in bacteraemia. STUDY ELIGIBILITY: We conducted a systematic review including observational prospective and retrospective cohort studies that assessed all-cause mortality among patients with bacteraemia. We included only studies computing an adjusted analysis for mortality, with >500 participants. EXPOSURES: Independently significant risk factors for all-cause, preferably 30-day, mortality. DATA SOURCES: PubMed was used to identify eligible studies published between 2000 and 2020. A Delphi survey among experts was used to evaluate and prioritize the factors identified by the systematic review. RISK OF BIAS: SIGN checklist complemented by risk of bias assessment of the adjusted analysis. DATA SYNTHESIS: Definite universal risk factors were defined as those assessed in >50% of all included studies and significant in >50% of those. Potential universal risk factors were defined as those significant in >50% of studies evaluating the factor and a subgroup analysis was performed for studies of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia. RESULTS: We included in the systematic review 62 studies, comprising more than 300,000 patients, from which a list of 17 risk factors was derived, whose association with all-cause mortality was statistically significant in most studies. The factors address baseline patient variables, the setting of infection acquisition, factors associated with the specific infection, the inflammatory response at onset of sepsis and management parameters where relevant. There were 14 risk factors for S. aureus bacteraemia. CONCLUSION: We identified a minimum set of universal factors to be collected, reported, and assessed, in all future studies evaluating factors associated with mortality in bacteraemia to improve study quality and harmonization.

The effect of antibiotic therapy for Clostridioides difficile infection on mortality and other patient-relevant outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Current practice guidelines favour fidaxomicin over vancomycin and exclude metronidazole from the recommended standard regimen for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), based on lower recurrence rates with fidaxomicin, giving little weight to mortality or the clinical implications of recurrences. OBJECTIVES: To compile the effects of metronidazole, glycopeptides (vancomycin or teicoplanin), and fidaxomicin for CDI on mortality and other patient-relevant outcomes. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, conference proceedings, and Google Scholar, until August 2023. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs). PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients experiencing primary or recurrent CDI. INTERVENTIONS: Glycopeptides versus fidaxomicin or metronidazole (comparators). ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS: We used the Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool for randomized trials, focusing on the outcome of all-cause mortality. METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS: Random effects meta-analyses were performed for dichotomous outcomes. Outcomes were summarized preferentially for all randomly assigned patients. RESULTS: Thirteen trials were included. There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR] < 1 favouring the comparator) between vancomycin and fidaxomicin (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.64-1.14, 8 RCTs, 1951 patients) or metronidazole (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.46-1.32, 4 RCTs, 808 patients), with low and very low certainty of evidence, respectively. No significant difference in initial treatment failure between fidaxomicin and vancomycin was found, however, initial treatment failure was higher with metronidazole (RR 1.58, 95% CI 1.10-2.27, 5 RCTs, 843 patients). No study reported on symptomatic recurrence necessitating re-treatment among all randomly assigned patients. Among initially cured patients, symptomatic recurrence necessitating re-treatment was lower with fidaxomicin than with vancomycin (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.42-0.71, 6 RCTs, 1617 patients). None of the studies reported on other CDI complications or the burden of infection on daily activities. CONCLUSIONS: Setting patient-relevant outcomes for CDI independently of the RCT definitions and results might lead to less confidence in the guidance for CDI management.

Clinical significance and burden of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) colonization acquisition in hospitalized patients.

BACKGROUND: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) infections have a significant morbidity and mortality toll. The clinical significance and associated burden of CRE colonization rather than infection state are not frequently investigated. We aimed to assess the outcomes of CRE colonized patients compared to matched controls. METHODS: A secondary analysis of a 1:2 matched case-control study at a tertiary hospital in northern Israel (January-2014 to June-2017). Cases were adults who newly acquired CRE colonization during hospitalization. Controls were inpatients negatively screened for CRE, matched by age, hospitalization division and total days of hospitalization 90 days prior to screening. Our primary outcome was 1-year all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality, diagnosis of any clinical infection, overall days of hospital stay and bloodstream infections all in 1-year follow-up. We estimated crude and propensity score weighted estimates for study outcomes. RESULTS: We included a total of 1019 patients: 340 CRE colonized and 679 non-colonized controls. After adjustment, CRE colonization was not associated with increased 1-year mortality (weighted OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.64-1.50, p = 0.936). CRE colonized patients had 1.7 times the odds of clinical infection of any cause (weighted odds ratio (OR) 1.65, 95% CI 1.06-2.56, p = 0.025). CRE colonized patients had increased length of hospital stay compared to controls (weighted OR 1.52, 95%CI 1.10-2.10, p < 0.001) among 1-year survivors. CONCLUSIONS: CRE colonization may not be independently associated with mortality but with higher risk of clinical infections and longer hospital stays. Infection prevention and antimicrobial stewardship are of utmost importance to prevent acquisition and infections in colonized patients.

Colistin Monotherapy versus Combination Therapy for Carbapenem-Resistant Organisms.

BACKGROUND: Pneumonia and bloodstream infections (BSI) due to extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Acinetobacter baumannii, XDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are associated with high mortality rates, and therapeutic options remain limited. This trial assessed whether combination therapy with colistin and meropenem was superior to colistin monotherapy for the treatment of these infections. METHODS: The OVERCOME (Colistin Monotherapy versus Combination Therapy) trial was an international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. We randomly assigned participants to receive colistin (5 mg/kg once followed by 1.67 mg/kg every 8 hours) in combination with either meropenem (1000 mg every 8 hours) or matching placebo for the treatment of pneumonia and/or BSI caused by XDR A. baumannii, XDR P. aeruginosa, or CRE. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality, and secondary outcomes included clinical failure and microbiologic cure. RESULTS: Between 2012 and 2020, a total of 464 participants were randomly assigned to treatment, and 423 eligible patients comprised the modified intention-to-treat population. A. baumannii was the predominant trial pathogen (78%) and pneumonia the most common index infection (70%). Most patients were in the intensive care unit at the time of enrollment (69%). There was no difference in mortality (43 vs. 37%; P=0.17), clinical failure (65 vs. 58%; difference, 6.8 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -3.1 to 16.6), microbiologic cure (65 vs. 60%; difference, 4.8 percentage points; 95% CI, -5.6 to 15.2), or adverse events (acute kidney injury, 52 vs. 49% [P=0.55]; hypersensitivity reaction, 1 vs. 3% [P=0.22]; and neurotoxicity, 5 vs. 2% [P=0.29]) between patients receiving monotherapy and combination therapy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with colistin and meropenem was not superior to colistin monotherapy for the treatment of pneumonia or BSI caused by these pathogens. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases protocol 10-0065; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01597973.).

Refractory Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections treated with phage PASA16: A compassionate use case series.

BACKGROUND: A growing number of compassionate phage therapy cases were reported in the last decade, with a limited number of clinical trials conducted and few unsuccessful clinical trials reported. There is only a little evidence on the role of phages in refractory infections. Our objective here was to present the largest compassionate-use single-organism/phage case series in 16 patients with non-resolving Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. METHODS: We summarized clinical phage microbiology susceptibility data, administration protocol, clinical data, and outcomes of all cases treated with PASA16 phage. In all intravenous phage administrations, PASA16 phage was manufactured and provided pro bono by Adaptive Phage Therapeutics. PASA16 was administered intravenously, locally to infection site, or by topical use to 16 patients, with data available for 15 patients, mainly with osteoarticular and foreign-device-associated infections. FINDINGS: A few minor side effects were noted, including elevated liver function enzymes and a transient reduction in white blood cell count. Good clinical outcome was documented in 13 out of 15 patients (86.6%). Two clinical failures were reported. The minimum therapy duration was 8 days with a once- to twice-daily regimen. CONCLUSIONS: PASA16 with antibiotics was found to be relatively successful in patients for whom traditional treatment approaches have failed previously. Such pre-phase-1 cohorts can outline potential clinical protocols and facilitate the design of future trials. FUNDING: The study was funded in part by The Israeli Science Foundation IPMP (ISF_1349/20), Rosetrees Trust (A2232), United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation (2017123), and the Milgrom Family Support Program.

Predictors of infectious foci on FDG PET/CT in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

We looked for predicting factors for the detection of infectious foci on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography in combination with computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) among patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) who participated in an interventional study that was conducted at Rambam Health Care Campus, between July 1, 2015 and February 1, 2019. The primary outcome was an infectious focus detected by FDG PET/CT. Independent predictors for detection of focal infection were identified using univariate followed by a logistic regression multivariate analysis. We included 149 patients with 151 separate episodes of SAB who underwent FDG-PET/CT. Focal infections were detected in 107 patients (70.8%). Independent predictors for focal infection detection were community acquisition of bacteremia with odds ratio (OR) 3.03 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-8.77], p-0.042 and C reactive protein (CRP) with OR 1.09 [95% CI 1.04-1.14], p < 0.001. Primary bacteremia was inversely associated with focal infection detection with OR 0.27 [0.10-0.69], p = 0.007, as were the pre-scan blood glucose levels OR 0.9 [0.98-0.99], p-0.004. The latter stayed significant in the subgroup of patients with diabetes mellitus. To conclude, patients with community-acquired bacteremia or high CRP levels should be carefully investigated for focal infection. Patients who present with primary bacteremia seem to be at low risk for focal infection.

Longer-term Mortality and Kidney Outcomes of Participants in the Combination Antibiotics for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CAMERA2) Trial: A Post Hoc Analysis.

Background: The Combination Antibiotic Therapy for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CAMERA2) trial ceased recruitment in July 2018, noting that a higher proportion of patients in the intervention arm (combination therapy) developed acute kidney injury (AKI) compared to the standard therapy (monotherapy) arm. We analyzed the long-term outcomes of participants in CAMERA2 to understand the impact of combination antibiotic therapy and AKI. Methods: Trial sites obtained additional follow-up data. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, censored at death or the date of last known follow-up. Secondary outcomes included kidney failure or a reduction in kidney function (a 40% reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate to <60 mL/minute/1.73 m2). To determine independent predictors of mortality in this cohort, adjusted hazard ratios were calculated using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. Results: This post hoc analysis included extended follow-up data for 260 patients. Overall, 123 of 260 (47%) of participants died, with a median population survival estimate of 3.4 years (235 deaths per 1000 person-years). Fifty-five patients died within 90 days after CAMERA2 trial randomization; another 68 deaths occurred after day 90. Using univariable Cox proportional hazards regression, mortality was not associated with either the assigned treatment arm in CAMERA2 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.84 [95% confidence interval [CI], .59-1.19]; P = .33) or experiencing an AKI (HR at 1 year, 1.04 [95% CI, .64-1.68]; P = .88). Conclusions: In this cohort of patients hospitalized with methicillin-resistant S aureus bacteremia, we found no association between either treatment arm of the CAMERA2 trial or AKI (using CAMERA2 trial definition) and longer-term mortality.

Host test based on tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand, interferon gamma-induced protein-10 and C-reactive protein for differentiating bacterial and viral respiratory tract infections in adults: diagnostic accuracy study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the performance of a test (called BV), integrating the blood levels of three immune proteins into a score, to differentiate bacterial from viral infection among adults with suspected lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI). METHODS: Prospective diagnostic accuracy study, enrolling febrile adults >18 years with LRTI signs or symptoms for less than 7 days presenting to several hospitals' emergency departments in Israel. The main exclusion criterion was immunodeficiency. Reference standard diagnosis (bacterial/viral/indeterminate) was based on three experts independently reviewing comprehensive patient data including follow-up data. BV generated three results: viral infection or other nonbacterial condition (0 ≤ score < 35), equivocal (35 ≤ score ≤ 65) and bacterial infection including co-infection (65 < score ≤ 100). BV performance was assessed against the reference standard with indeterminate reference standard and equivocal BV cases removed. RESULTS: Of 490 enrolled patients, 415 met eligibility criteria (median age 56 years, interquartile range 35). The reference standard classified 104 patients as bacterial, 210 as viral and 101 as indeterminate. BV was equivocal in 9.6% (30/314). Excluding indeterminate reference standard diagnoses and equivocal BV results, BV's sensitivity for bacterial infection was 98.1% (101/103; 95% confidence interval 95.4-100), specificity 88.4% (160/181; 83.7-93.1) and negative predictive value 98.8% (160/162; 97.1-100). DISCUSSION: BV exhibited high diagnostic performance for febrile adults with suspected LRTI among patients with reference standard diagnoses of bacterial or viral LRTI.