From cortisol-producing adrenal adenoma to atrial myxoma, through nivolumab-induced hypophysitis: a complicated case report of Carney Complex.

PURPOSE: Carney complex (CNC) is a rare, autosomal dominant syndrome, most commonly caused by PRKAR1A gene mutations and characterized by pigmented skin and mucosal changes with multiple endocrine and non-endocrine tumours. This case report highlights the diagnostic challenges associated with CNC in a patient with multiple neoplasms and a complex medical history, including cortisol-producing adrenal adenoma, breast cancer, melanoma, and atrial myxoma. METHODS: We report the case of a 41-year-old woman with a medical history of left adrenalectomy for cortisol producing adenoma (2005) with no sign of adrenal insufficiency at follow-up, right mastectomy for BRCA1/2 negative carcinoma (2013) and left parotid BRAF-V600E wild-type melanoma (2019), treated with nivolumab adjuvant therapy. In August 2019, following the fifth nivolumab administration, the patient developed central hypocortisolism due to iatrogenic hypophysitis, confirmed by brain MRI and properly treated with oral hydrocortisone. Nivolumab was discontinued due to the patient's decision. In October 2020 and April 2021, the patient had ischaemic strokes, requiring systemic thrombolysis. Echocardiographic examination then revealed a left atrial mass, with histological finding of myxoma. RESULTS: Given the rarity of this neoplasm and the suspicion of a syndromic disorder, a genetic evaluation was conducted, which confirmed a PRKAR1A gene mutation and the diagnosis of Carney complex. CONCLUSION: This case illustrates the diagnostic challenges in CNC, especially in patients with multiple tumourous manifestations and a wide spectrum of life-threatening clinical presentations. It underscores the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to diagnose and manage rare diseases, improving patient outcomes through timely genetic testing and coordinated care.

Unsuccessful rechallenge with nivolumab in a patient with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who had a 6-year complete response and treatment-free period: Case report.

Several predictive factors of immune checkpoint inhibitor response have been reported, but there has not been sufficient exploration of which patients benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge. We report the case of a patient with non-small cell lung cancer who had 6 years of complete response with initial nivolumab treatment. After relapse, however, rechallenge with nivolumab did not result in tumour shrinkage or long-term response. Even in patients who had an exceptional response to the initial immune checkpoint inhibitor, long-term efficacy may not be achieved by immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge. Thorough investigation of biomarkers that predict efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge is warranted.

Multimodal Treatment With Nivolumab Contributes to Long-Term Survival in a Case of Unresectable Esophagogastric Junction Neuroendocrine Carcinoma.

Advanced neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) has an extremely poor prognosis, partly explained by the rarity and diagnostic difficulty, for which the most appropriate treatment strategy has not been established. In this report, we discuss a case of unresectable advanced esophagogastric junction NEC, which was difficult to diagnose, that has achieved relatively long-term survival with multidisciplinary treatment centered on nivolumab. A man in his 60s was initially diagnosed with an advanced esophagogastric junction squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The lymph node metastasis was detected in the regional lymph nodes and para-aortic region. We diagnosed the patient with T3, N3, M1 (Lym), stage IVB, and administered systemic chemotherapy. Due to the failure of first-line, fluorouracil, and cisplatin therapy, we administered nivolumab as the second-line therapy. This therapy demonstrated partial response, so we performed conversion surgery, however the postoperative diagnosis was NEC. Three years after treatment initiation, a single lymph node metastasis has recurred, which is under control with nivolumab and radiation therapy. However, 4.5 years after the start of treatment, with the advent of immune-related adverse events (irAE), nivolumab was discontinued and the patient was placed on surveillance. Six months after that, metastasis to the hilar lymph node and adrenal gland was observed. Both times that recurrence/metastasis appeared, they occurred while nivolumab was being discontinued, suggesting its significant systemic anti-cancer effect. Therefore, nivolumab in particular may be an effective treatment for advanced esophageal NEC, and this case suggests that it may contribute to prolonged progression-free survival.

Real-world safety of nivolumab in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma in Japan: post-marketing surveillance study.

OBJECTIVE: This post-marketing surveillance (PMS) was conducted to evaluate the incidence of adverse events with nivolumab in patients with unresectable, advanced or recurrent malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) that had progressed after first-line chemotherapy and to identify factors that potentially affected its safety in real-world clinical practice. METHODS: Patients who had not received nivolumab previously were registered between November 2018 and February 2021. Nivolumab was given intravenously 240 mg every 2 weeks or 480 mg every 4 weeks. Patients were followed up for 6 months after treatment initiation. Information on patient characteristics, treatment status, and adverse events was collected. RESULTS: This PMS enrolled 124 patients, involving 48 sites across Japan. At 6 months, nivolumab therapy was ongoing in 35.5% of patients (44/124) and had been discontinued in 64.5% (80/124). The overall incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) was 40.3%; the incidence of Grade 3 or higher TRAEs was 12.9%. The pattern of TRAEs based on System Organ Class categories was generally consistent with those seen in the Japanese phase II MERIT study. The most common Grade 3 or higher TRAEs were interstitial lung disease (2.4%), lung disorder, and diarrhea (each 1.6%). The incidence of TRAEs was significantly higher in inpatients or patients who had good PS, high bodyweight, high body mass index, or autoimmune diseases than in those without these characteristics. CONCLUSION: The post-marketing incidence of TRAEs with nivolumab in patients with MPM has been evaluated, and no new safety signals were identified compared to the phase II clinical trial in Japan.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors-associated cranial nerves involvement: a systematic literature review on 136 patients.

OBJECTIVE: Describe the demographic data and clinical phenotype of cranial palsy induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors (CNP-ICI). METHODS: A systematic literature review of the literature was performed in Pubmed, Web of Science, and Embase, including 68 articles and 136 patients (PROSPERO no. CRD42024517262). RESULTS: Out of the 1205 articles screened, 68 articles were included after fulfilling the inclusion criteria, for a total of 136 patients. All articles were case reports and case series. In the cohort studied, 52% of patients were treated with anti PD-1/PDL-1 therapies, 14% with anti CTLA-4 therapies, and 34% with a combination of anti CTLA-4 and anti PD-1/PDL-1 therapies. The facial nerve was the most affected cranial nerve, involved in 38% of cases, followed by the optic nerve (35%), the cochleovestibular nerve (12%), and the abducens nerve (10%). The median time from the initial immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) injection to the onset CNP-ICI was 10 weeks (IQR 4-20). Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated contrast enhancement or abnormal signal of the affected nerve in 43% of cases. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis indicated lymphocytic pleocytosis in 59% of cases. At the onset of immune-related adverse events, 89% of patients discontinued immunotherapy, and 92% received treatment for CNP-ICI. Treatment regimens included corticosteroids in 86% of cases, intravenous immunoglobulin in 21%, and plasma exchange in 5.1%. Among the whole population, 33% achieved recovery, 52% showed clinical improvement, 16% remained stable, and 3% experienced worsening of their condition. Rechallenge with immunotherapy was significantly associated with the emergence of new immune-related Adverse Events (irAEs). CONCLUSION: ICI therapy may lead to cranial nerve involvement, particularly affecting the facial nerve, typically presenting around 10 weeks after treatment initiation. While corticosteroid therapy often resulted in patient improvement, rechallenging with ICIs were associated with new irAEs.

Conversion Surgery After Chemotherapy Plus Nivolumab as the First-Line Treatment for Unresectable Advanced or Recurrent Gastric Cancer and a Biomarker Study Using the Gustave Roussy Immune Score: A Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: There are few reports on conversion surgery (CS) after chemotherapy plus nivolumab as a first-line treatment in patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer (GC). This multicenter study was conducted to analyze real-world data on CS after chemotherapy plus nivolumab as a first-line treatment and to identify predictive biomarkers. METHODS: This multicenter study included 104 patients who received chemotherapy plus nivolumab as primary treatment for unresectable advanced recurrent GC from 12 institutes. We investigated and analyzed patient characteristics and blood test data in the presence or absence of CS, the relationship between the Gustave Roussy Immune Score (GRIm-s) and CS, and the characteristics of CS cases. RESULTS: CS was performed in 12 patients (11.5%). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) was significantly better in patients who underwent CS (p < 0.0001). There were no CS cases with high-risk GRIm-s (0%), however there were 22 non-CS cases (23.9%). No high-risk GRIm-s cases were converted to CS. Minimally invasive surgery was performed in 50.0% of the cases, with R0 resection in all cases and only one case of urinary retention (Grade II) as a postoperative complication, indicating a good postoperative short-term outcome. There were two cases of postoperative recurrence (16.7%), both of which were grade 1b. CONCLUSIONS: The short-term postoperative results of CS after chemotherapy plus nivolumab as the first-line treatment for GC were acceptable in this study. There were no high-risk GRIm-s cases among those who underwent CS, suggesting that the GRIm-s may be a predictor of CS.

Evaluation of emergency department visits and immune-related adverse effects (irAEs) in patients treated with nivolumab.

INTRODUCTION: The development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represents one of the most significant advancements in cancer treatment over the past decade. Nivolumab, a widely used ICI, has been incorporated into the therapeutic regimens for various cancers. As with any drug, this drug also has side effects, including class-specific immune-related adverse effects (irAEs). Although irAEs are not rare, their diagnosis can be challenging. This study examines the emergency department (ED) visits of patients undergoing nivolumab therapy, focusing on diagnostic challenges, evaluating the management, and outcomes of irAEs in the ED setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on adult patients who received nivolumab therapy for any cancer between April 1, 2018, and March 31, 2023, at a large, urban tertiary care center. In this study, we evaluated the ED visits of patients receiving nivolumab. In addition to previous studies, we evaluated irAEs in detail (percentage, recognizability, risk factors, reasons for late recognition, and outcome). Patient data were collected from electronic medical records and patient's medical files. The anamnesis, laboratory, and imaging results, ED management, and consultation notes were examined separately for each ED visit. Logistic regression models were employed to identify significant univariable predictors of ED visits and irAEs. RESULTS: A total of 199 patients were included in the study, all of whom had metastatic cancer. Of these, 154 patients (77.4%) received nivolumab therapy for non-small cell lung cancer. Most patients (71.9%, n = 143) had at least one additional comorbidity. One hundred and eleven patients (55.8%) presented to the ED. Hypertension (OR: 2.425, 95% CI: 1.226-4.795, p = 0.011) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR: 2.489, 95% CI: 1.133-5.468, p = 0.023) were identified as risk factors for ED visits. A total of 21 irAEs were diagnosed (14 in ED, 6 in the oncology clinic, and 1 in the inpatient ward). Univariate analysis found no significant association between irAE diagnosis and any specific factors. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of the patients treated with nivolumab for advanced cancer present to ED for ICI-related adverse events, although most cases were not attributable to irAEs. Due to the vague symptomatology of irAEs, their recognition and diagnosis in the ED can be challenging. Close collaboration between ED physicians and oncologists is paramount to the management of patients with cancer in the ED.

Occult checkpoint inhibitor myocarditis during adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab: a smoldering but severe toxicity.

Checkpoint inhibitor myocarditis is a rare but life-threatening toxicity of immunotherapy, occasionally manifesting as persistent troponin elevation. Dual checkpoint blockade with ipilimumab and nivolumab has been found to induce immune-related myocarditis in patients with metastatic melanoma. We herein report a case of smoldering immune-related myocarditis in a 54-year-old male after a single infusion of nivolumab plus ipilimumab as adjuvant treatment for completely resected stage IV melanoma. High-dose steroid treatment resulted in decrease in the levels of cardiac enzymes, without any major complications.

[Box: see text].

Updates and emerging trends in the management of immune-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

The rapidly expanding class of therapies targeting immune checkpoints for the treatment of various cancers now includes 8 clinically approved agents: a lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3) inhibitor (relatlimab), a cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitor (ipilimumab), three programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors (nivolumab, pembrolizumab and cemiplimab), and three programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitors (atezolizumab, durvalumab, and avelumab). Previously, we reviewed the mechanisms of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), strategies for management of irAEs, and highlighted similarities as well as differences amongst clinical guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC), and European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO). Herein, we provide an update that includes discussion of changes to these clinical guidelines since our last review, the new LAG-3 targeted agents, emerging patterns of irAEs, and new directions for improved monitoring and treatment of irAEs that could incorporate interdisciplinary pharmacist-led teams, artificial intelligence, and pharmacogenomics.

Therapeutical Usefulness of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors in Aggressive or Metastatic Pituitary Tumours.

Therapeutic options for pituitary neuroendocrine tumours (PitNETs) refractory to temozolomide are scarce. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), particularly inhibitors of the programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) pathway and its ligand (PD-L1), have been experimentally used in aggressive or metastatic PitNETs. We aimed to study the therapeutic usefulness of anti-PD-1 drugs in patients with aggressive or metastatic PitNETs. Published cases and case series involving patients with PitNETs treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors were reviewed. Demographic data, clinical-pathological features, previous therapies, drug dosage and posology, and the best radiological and biochemical responses, as well as survival data, were evaluated. We identified 29 cases of aggressive (n = 13) or metastatic (n = 16) PitNETs treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. The hypersecretion of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) was documented in eighteen cases (62.1%), seven were prolactinomas (24.1%), and four were non-functioning PitNETs. All patients underwent various therapies prior to using ICIs. Overall, a positive radiological response (i.e., partial/complete radiological response and stable disease) was observed in eighteen of twenty-nine cases (62.1%), of which ten and four were ACTH- and prolactin-secreting PitNETs, respectively. Hormonal levels reduced or stabilised after using ICIs in 11 of the 17 functioning PitNET cases with available data (64.7%). The median survival of patients treated with ICIs was 13 months, with a maximum of 42 months in two ACTH-secreting tumours. Among 29 patients with PitNETs treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, the positive radiological and biochemical response rates were 62.1% and 64.7%, respectively. Altogether, these data suggest a promising role of ICIs in patients with aggressive or metastatic PitNETs refractory to other treatment modalities.

Real-Life Outcomes of Adjuvant Targeted Therapy and Anti-PD1 Agents in Stage III/IV Resected Melanoma.

This study was carried out at the Dermatologic Clinic of the University of Turin, Italy, to assess the effectiveness and safety of adjuvant therapy in patients who received either targeted therapy (TT: dabrafenib + trametinib) or immunotherapy (IT: nivolumab or pembrolizumab) for up to 12 months. A total of 163 patients participated, including 147 with stage III and 19 with stage IV with no evidence of disease. The primary outcomes were relapse-free survival (RFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS). At 48 months, both TT and IT approaches yielded comparable outcomes in terms of RFS (55.6-55.4%, p = 0.532), DMFS (58.2-59.8%, p = 0.761), and OS (62.4-69.5%, p = 0.889). Whilst temporary therapy suspension was more common among TT-treated patients compared to IT-treated individuals, therapy discontinuation due to adverse events occurred at comparable rates in both groups. Predictors of relapse included mitoses, lymphovascular invasion, ulceration, and positive sentinel lymph nodes. Overall, the proportion of BRAF-mutated patients receiving IT stood at 7.4%, lower than what was observed in clinical trials.

Adding-on nivolumab to chemotherapy-stabilized patients is associated with improved survival in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are rarely used to treat advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) due to marginal efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 92 consecutive patients diagnosed with advanced or recurrent PDAC who received nivolumab-based treatment. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify prognostic factors. A control group of 301 patients with PDAC who achieved disease control with palliative chemotherapy but without ICIs was selected for comparison using propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: The median overall survival (OS) since nivolumab treatment was 15.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.5-19.0), 2.4 (95% CI 1.2-3.6), and 1.1 (95% CI 1.0-1.2) months in patients who received add-on nivolumab after achieving disease control with chemotherapy, in those who received concomitant nivolumab and chemotherapy without prerequisite confirmation of disease control, and in those who received nivolumab without concomitant chemotherapy, respectively (P < 0.001). After PSM, the median overall survival (OS) since initiation of the concomitant chemotherapy that achieved disease control was significantly longer (P = 0.026) in patients who received add-on nivolumab (19.8 months; 95% CI 14.5-25.1) than in those who received chemotherapy alone (13.8 months; 95% CI 10.8-16.9). The immune profiling of the tumors in resected patients revealed higher scores of CD8+ T cells to Tregs in patients with add-on nivolumab comparing to those who received chemotherapy alone. CONCLUSION: Adding-on nivolumab was associated with improved OS in patients with advanced PDAC who achieved disease control following chemotherapy.

Measurement of changes in serum-based inflammatory indicators to monitor response to nivolumab monotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Nonresectable gastric cancer develops rapidly; thus, monitoring disease progression especially in patients receiving nivolumab as late-line therapy is important. Biomarkers may facilitate the evaluation of nivolumab treatment response. Herein, we assessed the utility of serum-based inflammatory indicators for evaluating tumor response to nivolumab. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 111 patients treated with nivolumab monotherapy for nonresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer from October 2017 to October 2021. We measured changes in the C-reactive protein (CRP)-to-albumin ratio (CAR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in serum from baseline to after the fourth administration of nivolumab. Furthermore, we calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC ROCs) for CAR, PLR, and NLR to identify the optimal cutoff values for treatment response. We also investigated the relationship between clinicopathologic factors and disease control (complete response, partial response, and stable disease) using the chi-squared test. RESULTS: The overall response rate (complete and partial response) was 11.7%, and the disease control rate was 44.1%. The median overall survival (OS) was 14.0 (95% CI 10.7‒19.2) months, and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.1 (95% CI 3.0‒5.9) months. The AUC ROCs for CAR, PLR, and NLR before nivolumab monotherapy for patients with progressive disease (PD) were 0.574 (95% CI, 0.461‒0.687), 0.528 (95% CI, 0.418‒0.637), and 0.511 (95% CI, 0.401‒0.620), respectively. The values for changes in CAR, PLR, and NLR were 0.766 (95% CI, 0.666‒0.865), 0.707 (95% CI, 0.607‒0.807), and 0.660 (95% CI 0.556‒0.765), respectively. The cutoff values for the treatment response were 3.0, 1.3, and 1.4 for CAR, PLR, and NLR, respectively. The PFS and OS were significantly longer when the treatment response values for changes in CAR, PLR, and NLR were below these cutoff values (CAR: OS, p < 0.0001 and PFS, p < 0.0001; PLR: OS, p = 0.0289 and PFS, p = 0.0302; and NLR: OS, p = 0.0077 and PFS, p = 0.0044). CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of the changes in CAR, PLR, and NLR could provide a simple, prompt, noninvasive method to evaluate response to nivolumab monotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered with number K2023006.

External validation of hemoglobin and neutrophil levels as predictors of the effectiveness of ipilimumab plus nivolumab for treating renal cell carcinoma.

Introduction: Pretreatment hemoglobin and neutrophil levels were previously reported to be important indicators for predicting the effectiveness of ipilimumab plus nivolumab (IPI + NIVO) therapy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Therefore, we aimed to validate this in a large external cohort. Methods: In total, 172 patients with RCC who underwent IPI + NIVO treatment at a multicenter setting were divided into three groups according to their pretreatment hemoglobin and neutrophil levels (group 1: non-anemia; group 2: anemia and low-neutrophil; and group 3: anemia and high-neutrophil). Results: Group 1 showed better survival than groups 2 and 3 (overall survival: 52.3 vs. 21.4 vs. 9.4 months, respectively; progression-free survival: 12.1 vs. 7.0 vs. 3.4 months, respectively). Discussion: In this large cohort, we validated our earlier observation that hemoglobin and neutrophil levels can be reliable predictors of the effectiveness of IPI + NIVO in advanced RCC. Thus, our approach may aid in selecting the optimal first-line therapy for RCC.

Adverse reactions associated with nivolumab and small molecule antiangiogenic drugs: A pharmacovigilance analysis.

AIMS: Immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as nivolumab, combined with small molecule antiangiogenic receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), present a promising strategy for future immunotherapy. However, combination therapy can lead to specific adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in various clinical settings. Current research on the ADRs associated with combination therapy is limited. Our study aims to assess the safety of combination therapy. METHODS: We extracted ADR reports on combination therapy from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System database, covering the period from the first quarter of 2012 to the third quarter of 2023, and conducted a large-scale retrospective study. We evaluated ADR risk signals using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and calculated the Ro/e ratio to compare the differences in the risk of fatal ADRs among various tumour types. RESULTS: We comprehensively reported the occurrence of ADRs in pan-cancer patients undergoing combination therapy. The combination therapy significantly increased the risk of sensitive skin (ROR: 231.43, 95% CI: 55.01-973.72, P < .05), metastatic renal cell carcinoma (ROR: 220.71, 95% CI: 28.99-1695.41, P < .05) and renal cell carcinoma (ROR: 188.22, 95% CI: 44.24-800.85, P < .05). We also compared the differences in ADRs resulting from different small molecule drug combinations, as well as the differences in ADRs among patients with different types of tumours under combination therapy. Furthermore, we analysed the characteristics of patients prone to experiencing fatal ADRs. CONCLUSION: These results can help enhance understanding of the ADRs commonly associated with combination therapy and assist oncologists in formulating screening protocols.

Subcutaneous versus intravenous nivolumab for renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The evolving oncology treatment paradigm has created an unmet need for administration options that improve patient experiences and healthcare efficiencies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: CheckMate 67T (NCT04810078) was a phase 3, open-label, multicenter, noninferiority trial in which patients with advanced/metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma were randomized to subcutaneous nivolumab (1200 mg every 4 weeks; coformulated with recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 20,000 units) or intravenous nivolumab (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks). Primary objective was to assess the noninferiority of subcutaneous versus intravenous nivolumab by coprimary endpoints determined from a population pharmacokinetics analysis (time-averaged serum concentration over the first 28 days [Cavgd28], and minimum steady-state serum concentration [Cminss]; noninferiority threshold: lower boundary of 90% confidence interval (CI) of the geometric mean ratios [GMR] ≥0.8). Objective response rate (ORR) was a key secondary endpoint powered for noninferiority (noninferiority threshold: lower boundary of 95% CI of relative risk of ORR [subcutaneous versus intravenous nivolumab] ≥0.60). RESULTS: Overall, 495 patients were randomized. Relative exposure in the subcutaneous versus intravenous arm reported by the GMR of Cavgd28 and Cminss was 2.098 (90% CI, 2.001-2.200) and 1.774 (90% CI, 1.633-1.927), respectively. After 8 months minimum follow-up, ORR was 24.2% with subcutaneous nivolumab (95% CI, 19.0-30.0) versus 18.2% with intravenous nivolumab (95% CI, 13.6-23.6; relative risk: 1.33 [95% CI, 0.94-1.87]). Coprimary endpoints and ORR met noninferiority thresholds. Additional efficacy and safety measures were similar. CONCLUSION: Subcutaneous nivolumab was noninferior to intravenous nivolumab based on pharmacokinetics and ORR. No new safety signals were observed.

[Classical chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or adjuvant radiotherapy-how to improve the oncologic outcome of radical cystectomy?] / Klassische Chemotherapie, Immuntherapie oder adjuvante Strahlentherapie ­ Wie können wir die onkologischen Ergebnisse der radikalen Zystektomie verbessern?

According to current guidelines, patients with muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (pT2-pt4a pN0) should be offered neoadjuvant cisplatin-containing chemotherapy before radical cystectomy. If not used neoadjuvantly, chemotherapy can be administered in the adjuvant setting (for > pT3 or pN+ disease). Both neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy lead to improved overall survival. In the adjuvant setting, the checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab has also been approved for treatment of PD-L1-positive tumors (tumor proportion score [TPS] ≥ 1%). On the one hand, real-world evidence shows that cisplatin-fit patients often do not receive chemotherapy and, on the other hand, that a relevant proportion of patients are also not suitable for cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Further multimodal therapeutic strategies are hence urgently needed to improve the prognosis of affected patients. In particular, the use of antibody-drug conjugates and combination strategies involving checkpoint inhibitors are currently being intensively researched.

Multiorgan transplant for therapy-associated lung and liver failure in a patient with stage III lung cancer.

Immunotherapy can significantly improve efficacy of cancer treatments. For locally advanced stage III lung cancers, chemoimmunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting can achieve complete pathological response in about 40% of cases. However, optimal cancer response in patients receiving immunotherapy is sometimes associated with potentially fatal bystander injury to lung and liver. We report a successful combined double lung and liver transplantation for immunotherapy-associated respiratory failure and cirrhosis in a patient with advanced lung cancer. A 68-year-old male with stage IIIA squamous cell lung cancer, encountered severe interstitial pneumonitis and nodular regenerative hyperplasia of the liver following systemic anti-cancer therapy that included immunotherapy and platinum-based chemotherapy. These adverse events culminated in fulminant end-stage pulmonary fibrosis and cirrhosis, that was treated with simultaneous lung and liver transplantation, complete resection of lung cancer and mediastinal lymphadenectomy. The patient demonstrated promising early outcomes without recurrence of cancer at 12 months. Given that oncologic treatments can induce irreversible solid organ failure despite cancer control, our report suggests that in carefully selected patients without systemic metastasis and in whom complete resection of residual cancer can be performed, organ transplantation can be life-saving.

Clinical features, treatment, and outcome of nivolumab-induced cholangitis.

BACKGROUND: Cholangitis is an uncommon and severe adverse reaction of nivolumab with unclear clinical features. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinicopathological features, imaging, and treatment of nivolumab-induced cholangitis. METHODS: Case reports, case series, and clinical studies of nivolumab-induced cholangitis were retrospectively analyzed by searching Chinese and English databases from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2023. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients entered the study. The median number of cycles of cholangitis onset was seven cycles after administration (range 1, 28) and the median time was 11 days (range 78, 390). Abdominal pain (42.1%) and fever (18.4%) were the most important initial symptoms. Some patients (15.8%) showed elevated liver enzymes without any clinical symptoms. The median alkaline phosphatase level was 1721 IU/L (range 126, 9118), and the median γ-glutamyltranspeptidase level was 829 IU/L (range 104, 3442). Anti-nuclear antibodies, anti-mitochondrial antibodies, and IgG4 typically show negative results. Imaging shows extrahepatic bile duct and intrahepatic bile duct dilation, hypertrophy, and stenosis. Liver biopsy and biliary tract biopsy mainly found CD8 inflammatory cell infiltration. Systemic steroids (84.2%) and ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) (34.2%) were administered, and 24 patients (63.2%) had poor to moderate response to steroids. Thirty-one patients (81.6%) improved and seven patients (18.4%) did not improve. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians must remain vigilant for patients experiencing cholestasis while on nivolumab and should assess for cholangitis and carry out appropriate imaging tests. Considering the excellent efficacy of UCDA in cholangitis, steroids combined with UDCA may be a viable treatment option in cases where steroids are ineffective for cholangitis.

The rapidly changing treatment landscape of first-line advanced urothelial cancer (aUC) or metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC).

The landscape of treatment for first-line therapy in advanced urothelial cancer (aUC) and metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) has rapidly changed in the last year alone. Maintenance avelumab remains a viable treatment option for many patients across the globe for those who have responded or have achieved stable disease after platinum-based chemotherapy. However, the recent FDA approvals based on EV-302 for enfortumab vedotin (EV) and pembrolizumab, as well as CheckMate-904 with gemcitabine and cisplatin with nivolumab (GC+N) followed by maintenance nivolumab have left clinicians with the complicated decision of determining which regimen is most appropriate for their individual patients with untreated aUC. This commentary highlights the key trials that have set the standard-of-care for front-line aUC treatment and suggestions for choosing different regimens for the appropriate patient.